Register
Login:
Share:
Email Facebook Twitter




BLNX Share Chat - RSS Feed

Blinkx Share Chat (BLNX)



Share Price: 22.50Bid: 22.50Ask: 23.00Change: -1.25 (-5.26%)Faller - Blinkx
Spread: 0.50Spread as %: 2.22%Open: 22.75High: 24.00Low: 21.50Yesterday’s Close: 23.75


Share Discussion for Blinkx (BLNX)


Thread ViewThread View
Please Login or Register to post messages
Posts per page:


CAGNEY
Posts: 115
Off Topic
Opinion:Hold
Price:22.50
see saw.
Today 16:35
last Friday,nearly at the stock market close,i almost bought back into Blinx.thought this must be the bottom,but i resisted,good job,i bought back into Boom,both companies are a gamble,but better news coming from Boom.Blinx and Blur are in a continuous scramble,how will it end?
 
morose
Posts: 451
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:22.50
Hellooooooo
Today 16:35
Anyone here??
Lundon79
Posts: 1,894
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
Executive Voices
Sat 12:55
http://www.blnx.com/executive-voices/edward-reginelli

I like these presumably quarterly exec updates.. Ties in with what has been promised re better communication.. Bit gobsmacked by Ed's outlook however..

"Strong financial discipline has led blinkx to profits, and the ability to maintain a strong, debt-free balance sheet. As we grow, we need to constantly manage our cost structure and be able to take swift and decisive actions to align with industry changes so we will be in a position to capitalize on future opportunities – this is our plan for future growth and we are already executing against it.

We believe the digital advertising industry will continue to consolidate and unprofitable entities will most likely exit the space. Our focus is on building a sustainable model with the optionality to take advantage of the future consolidation trend."

Are we not one of those "unprofitable entities"....?? if the management forecasted 2H profit doesnt materialise then we may well be on last legs
Mediapro
Posts: 24
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
View Thread (4)
RE: 2oco
Sat 12:46
Not sure how you are defining exceptionally well but the EMEA office closing within months of rebrand is hardly what I would call successful....
pensioner167
Posts: 233
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
View Thread (4)
RE: 2oco
Sat 11:51
I just read my post. BM took charge in July 2012 not 2013. This is a typo as I knew it was a year and a half after he took charge that Edelman published. If BM had tried to change things too quickly the company would have collapsed. Not only does Blinkx now have a plan but, in my opinion, the rebranding was handled exceptionally well.
Mediapro
Posts: 24
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
Appnexus
Sat 11:47
Quite right, their tech is not that awesome however with WPP being an owner it is a huge amount of ad dollars passing through their platform!
2oco
Posts: 116
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
Pensioner167
Sat 11:02
many thanks for the detailed information.
pensioner167
Posts: 233
Observation
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
View Thread (4)
RE: 2oco
Sat 10:07
I think 2oco might be trying to make the point that a lot of money is wasted by our competition and not even WPP know what they are doing.

Appnexus decided they were not very good at video display and so concentrated on non-video. They are now trying again with video and have a product in beta.

Turn have a reasonable DSP product but are weak on SSP. They boast about their computing power - 170 teraflops. This is less than a tenth of the power of a supercomputer like the one Dwight built !! The computing power of supercomputers is measured in petaflops. So even if they had the equivalent prevalidation software that Rhythm now has, they would not have the computing power to run it. Turn has used its capital to expand globally rather than channel their funds into areas with the most profit potential.

It is unhelpful to post vague references to the competition without putting them in context. It confuses the less intelligent like the boy wot done good, bought his-self an orse.

When BM came to Blinkx it was a video search company which had been trying to sell itself as such. They had been talking to News International but when these efforts came to nothing they turned to advertising. The problem is that they were staffed up with people with expertise in search engines and did not have advertising expertise. So they bought into things like Zango. BM has changed all this and developed a plan which he is executing. First he needed a good base from which to start and he identified Rhythm which he bought. He needed a war chest and so bought Rhythm with shares as far as possible and raised capital on the market in November 2003 when the share price was high. The Edelman affair related to things which had taken place before BM took charge (July 2013).

The plan is simply to define what a second generation ad exchange will look like and do what is necessary to produce it. The cost of development (shown in the accounts) that is being done has been huge since BM took charge. This is the way forward rather than through acquisitions.

Finally I would like to mention that one of the advantages of Ad blocking is that some sites are also totally blocked. This includes iii so I cannot read the rubbish comments on their board. If the BBC blocks its site I will remove Ad blocking.
2oco
Posts: 116
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
Sargee
Sat 09:52
yes it is out of date but it shows.

Our competitors.

What they do.

What their valuation was at the time.

Information on their turnover.

Who is invested in them.

And also who migh be interested in us.
Brotherhumble
Posts: 4,261
Off Topic
Opinion:No Opinion
Price:23.75
View Thread (4)
RE: why would someone buy Blinkx
Sat 09:03
Would have could have should have .....might happen. Long suffering investors here have heard it all before.





Sign up for Live Prices


Home  |  Contact Us  |  About Us  |  Careers  |  Advertise with Us  |  Sitemap  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Cookies  |  Privacy


Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look. While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.