The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.

Less Ads, More Data, More Tools Register for FREE

Pin to quick picksROSN.L Regulatory News (ROSN)

  • There is currently no data for ROSN

Watchlists are a member only feature

Login to your account

Alerts are a premium feature

Login to your account

Annual Financial Report

30 Apr 2013 18:00

RNS Number : 5967D
OJSC OC Rosneft
30 April 2013
 



 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Financial Statements

As of December 31, 2012

 

Independent auditor's report

 

To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors

of Rosneft Oil Company

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Open Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company and its subsidiaries which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2012, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year 2012, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.

 

Audited entity's responsibility for the consolidated financial statements

 

Management of the audited entity is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

 

Auditor's responsibility

 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the fairness of these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the Federal Standards on Auditing effective in the Russian Federation and International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.

 

An audit involves performing audit procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The audit procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management of the audited entity, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.

 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

 

Opinion

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Open Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company and its subsidiaries as at December 31, 2012, and their financial performance and cash flows for the year of 2012 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

Roman Romanenko

Partner

Ernst & Young LLC

 

February 1, 2013

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Balance Sheet

 

(in billions of Russian rubles)

 

 

As of December 31,

Notes

2012

2011

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

19

296

166

Restricted cash

19

4

4

Other financial assets

20

86

150

Accounts receivable

21

227

217

Inventories

22

132

126

Prepayments and other current assets

23

175

152

Total current assets

920

815

Non-current assets:

Property, plant and equipment

24

2,461

2,231

Intangible assets

25

19

22

Other financial assets

26

24

34

Investments in associates and joint ventures

27

269

114

Bank loans granted

13

13

Deferred tax assets

16

15

13

Goodwill

25

134

132

Other non-current non-financial assets

28

3

3

Total non-current assets

2,938

2,562

Total assets

3,858

3,377

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

29

208

181

Loans and borrowings

30

126

152

Finance lease liabilities

30

3

1

Liabilities related to derivative instruments

31

-

4

Income tax liabilities

16

7

3

Other tax liabilities

32

77

66

Provisions

33

5

6

Other current liabilities

1

1

Total current liabilities

427

414

Non-current liabilities:

Loans and borrowings

30

837

596

Finance lease liabilities

30

8

5

Deferred tax liabilities

16

252

234

Provisions

33

67

57

Other non-current liabilities

1

2

Total non-current liabilities

1,165

894

Equity:

Share capital

35

1

1

Treasury shares

35

(299)

(224)

Additional paid-in capital

35

385

386

Other reserves

(4)

(5)

Retained earnings

2,147

1,877

Total shareholders' equity

2,230

2,035

Non-controlling interests

17

36

34

Total equity

2,266

2,069

Total liabilities and equity

3,858

3,377

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

 

(in billions of Russian rubles, except earnings per share data, and share amounts) 

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2012

2011

(reclassified)

2010

(reclassified)1

Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

Oil and gas sales

8

1,526

1,392

1,056

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

8

1,479

1,265

810

Support services and other revenues

42

45

49

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

27

31

16

4

Total revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates

3,078

2,718

1,919

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

220

189

144

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

371

298

72

General and administrative expenses

68

52

51

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

241

216

212

Exploration expenses

23

13

14

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

24, 25

227

213

202

Taxes other than income tax

9

645

498

331

Export customs duty

10

901

790

509

Total costs and expenses

2,696

2,269

1,535

Operating income

382

449

384

Finance income

11

24

20

20

Finance expenses

12

(15)

(19)

(21)

Other income

13, 27

85

25

27

Other expenses

13

(50)

(48)

(49)

Foreign exchange differences

11

(22)

(2)

Income before income tax

437

405

359

Income tax expense

16

(95)

(86)

(58)

Net income

342

319

301

Other comprehensive income

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

4

(1)

(3)

(Loss)/gain from changes in fair value of financial assets available-for-sale, net of tax

(3)

1

-

Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

1

-

(3)

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

343

319

298

Net income

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

341

316

293

attributable to non-controlling interests

1

3

8

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

attributable to Rosneft shareholders

342

316

290

attributable to non-controlling interests

1

3

8

Net income attributable to Rosneft per common share (in RUB) - basic and diluted

18

36.21

32.95

30.53

Weighted average number of shares outstanding (millions)

9,416

9,591

9,598

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity

 

(in billions of Russian rubles, except share amounts)

 

 

Numberof shares

(millions)

Share

capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Other reserves

Retained earnings

Total shareholders' equity

Non-controlling interests

Total

equity

Balance at December 31, 2010

9,599

1

396

(221)

(5)

1,588

1,759

32

1,791

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

316

316

3

319

Total comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

-

316

316

3

319

Purchase of treasury shares (Note 35)

(11)

-

-

(3)

-

-

(3)

-

(3)

Dividends declaredon common stock (Note 35)

-

-

-

-

-

(27)

(27)

-

(27)

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries (Note 35)

-

-

(10)

-

-

-

(10)

(1)

(11)

Balance at December 31, 2011

9,588

1

386

(224)

(5)

1,877

2,035

34

2,069

Net income for the year

-

-

-

-

-

341

341

1

342

Other comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

1

-

1

-

1

Total comprehensive income

-

-

-

-

1

341

342

1

343

Purchase of treasury shares (Note 35)

(350)

-

-

(75)

-

-

(75)

-

(75)

Dividends declaredon common stock (Note 35)

-

-

-

-

-

(71)

(71)

-

(71)

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries (Note 35)

-

-

(1)

-

-

-

(1)

1

-

Balance at December 31, 2012

9,238

1

385

(299)

(4)

2,147

2,230

36

2,266

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

 

(in billions of Russian rubles)

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2012

2011

2010

Operating activities

Net income

342

319

301

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

24

227

213

202

Loss on disposal of non-current assets

9

19

15

Gain on disposal of subsidiaries

27

(82)

Loss/(gain) from assets and liabilities write-off, net

10

(10)

Loss from impairment of unproved properties

10

Gain on extinguishment of promissory notes

(5)

Dry hole costs

3

4

4

Foreign exchange (gain)/loss

(30)

31

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

27

(31)

(16)

(4)

Finance expenses

12

15

19

21

Finance income

11

(24)

(20)

(20)

Income tax expense

16

95

86

58

Loss on bad debt allowance

3

2

1

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Increase in accounts receivable, gross

(6)

(88)

(22)

Increase in restricted cash

(3)

Increase in inventories

(6)

(61)

(9)

Increase in prepayments and other current assets

(23)

(15)

Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

61

82

13

Increase in other tax liabilities

11

20

11

(Decrease)/increase in current provisions

(1)

1

(Decrease)/increase in other current liabilities

(6)

(4)

1

Decrease in other non-current liabilities

(10)

(9)

Long-term bank loans granted

(33)

(53)

(105)

Repayment of long-term bank loans granted

33

48

106

Acquisition of trading securities

(53)

(64)

(34)

Proceeds from sale of trading securities

57

68

27

Net cash provided by operating activities before income tax and interest

581

568

552

Income tax payments

(76)

(102)

(86)

Interest received

10

13

5

Dividends received

1

8

7

Net cash provided by operating activities

516

487

478

 

Rosneft Oil Company

 

Consolidated Statement of Cash flows (continued)

 

(in billions of Russian rubles)

 

For the years ended December 31,

Notes

2012

2011

2010

Investing activities

Capital expenditures

(466)

(391)

(264)

Acquisition of licenses

(4)

(7)

(4)

Acquisition of rights to use trademarks "Sochi 2014"

(1)

(1)

(1)

Acquisition of short-term financial assets

(118)

(134)

(160)

Proceeds from sale of short-term financial assets

162

197

64

Acquisition of long-term financial assets

(3)

(5)

(9)

Proceeds from sale of long-term financial assets

6

5

Acquisition of associates and joint ventures

27

(43)

(47)

Acquisition of a subsidiary, net of cash acquired

7

(4)

Sale of property, plant and equipment

4

2

1

Placements under reverse REPO agreements

(15)

(31)

(12)

Receipts under reverse REPO agreements

37

23

1

Net cash used in investing activities

(445)

(394)

(379)

Financing activities

Proceeds from short-term loans and borrowings

50

25

5

Repayment of short-term loans and borrowings

(39)

(17)

(20)

Proceeds from long-term loans and borrowings

30

371

124

187

Repayment of long-term loans and borrowings

(137)

(123)

(163)

Cash paid for acquisition of treasury shares

(75)

(3)

Acquisition of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries

(2)

(11)

Dividends paid to shareholders

(71)

(27)

(22)

Interest paid

(29)

(24)

(19)

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

68

(56)

(32)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

139

37

67

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

19

166

127

60

Effect of foreign exchange on cash and cash equivalents

(9)

2

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

19

296

166

127

1. General

 

Open Joint Stock Company ("OJSC") Rosneft Oil Company ("Rosneft") and its subsidiaries (collectively, "The Company") are principally engaged in exploration, development, production and sale of crude oil and gas and refining, transportation and sale of petroleum products in the Russian Federation and in certain international markets.

 

Rosneft State Enterprise was incorporated as an open joint stock company on December 7, 1995. All assets and liabilities previously managed by Rosneft State Enterprise were transferred to the Company at their book value effective on that date together with the Government of the Russian Federation ("State") ownership in other privatized oil and gas companies. The transfer of assets and liabilities was made in accordance with Russian Government Resolution No. 971 dated September 29, 1995, On the Transformation of Rosneft State Enterprise into an Open Joint Stock Company "Oil Company Rosneft". Such transfers represented a reorganization of assets under the common control of the State and, accordingly, were accounted for at their book value. In 2005, the State contributed the shares of Rosneft to the share capital of OJSC Rosneftegaz. As of December 31, 2005, 100% of the shares of Rosneft less one share were owned by OJSC Rosneftegaz and one share was owned by the Russian Federation Federal Agency for the Management of Federal Property. Subsequently, OJSC Rosneftegaz's ownership interest decreased through additional issuance of shares during Rosneft's Initial Public Offering ("IPO") in Russia, issuance of Global Depository Receipts ("GDR") for the shares on London Stock Exchange and the share swap realized during the merger of Rosneft and certain subsidiaries during 2006. As of December 31, 2012 OJSC Rosneftegaz's ownership interest in Rosneft was 75.16%.

 

Under Russian legislation, natural resources, including oil, gas, precious metals and minerals and other commercial minerals situated in the territory of the Russian Federation are the property of the State until they are extracted. Law of the Russian Federation No. 2395-1, On Subsurface Resources, regulates relations arising in connection with the geological study, and the use and protection of subsurface resources in the territory of the Russian Federation. Pursuant to the law, subsurface resources may be developed only on the basis of a license. A license is issued by the regional governmental body and contains information on the site to be developed, the period of activity, as well as financial and other conditions. The Company holds licenses issued by competent authorities for geological studies, exploration and development of oil and gas blocks and fields in areas where its subsidiaries are located.

 

The Company is subject to export quotas set by the Russian Federation State Pipeline Commission to allow equal access to the limited capacity of oil pipeline system owned and operated by OJSC AK Transneft. The Company exports certain quantities of crude oil bypassing OJSC AK Transneft system thus achieving higher export capacity. In 2012, 2011 and 2010, the Company's export sales were approximately 60%, 58% and 57% of produced crude oil, respectively. The remaining production was processed at the Company's refineries for further sale on domestic and international markets.

 

2. Basis of preparation

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, including all International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") and Interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board ("IASB") and effective in the reporting period, and are fully compliant therewith.

 

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except certain financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value (Note 36).

 

Rosneft and its subsidiaries maintain their books and records in accordance with statutory accounting and taxation principles and practices applicable in respective jurisdictions. These consolidated financial statements were derived from the Company's statutory books and records.

 

The Company's consolidated financial statements are presented in billions of Russian rubles ("RUB"), unless otherwise indicated.

 

The consolidated financial statements were approved and authorized for issue by the President of the Company on February 1, 2013.

 

Subsequent events have been evaluated through February 1, 2013, the date these consolidated financial statements were issued.

 

3. Significant accounting policies

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements differ from the financial statements issued for statutory purposes in that they reflect certain adjustments, not recorded in the Company's statutory books, which are appropriate to present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows in accordance with IFRS. The principal adjustments relate to: (1) recognition of certain expenses; (2) valuation and depreciation of property, plant and equipment; (3) deferred income taxes; (4) valuation allowances for unrecoverable assets; (5) accounting for the time value of money; (6) accounting for investments in oil and gas property and conveyances; (7) consolidation principles; (8) recognition and disclosure of guarantees, contingencies, commitments and certain assets and liabilities; (9) accounting for asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations; (10) business combinations and goodwill; (11) accounting for derivative instruments.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of majority-owned, controlled subsidiaries and special-purpose entities where the Company holds a beneficial interest. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The equity method is used to account for investments in associates in which the Company has the ability to exert significant influence over the associates' operating and financial policies. The investments in entities where the Company holds the majority of shares, but does not exercise control, are also accounted for using the equity method. Investments in other companies are accounted for at fair value or cost adjusted for impairment, if any.

 

Business combinations, goodwill and other intangible assets

 

Acquisitions by the Company of controlling interests in third parties (or interest in their charter capital) are accounted for using the acquisition method.

 

Acquisition date is the date when effective control over the acquiree passes to the Company.

 

The cost of an acquisition is measured as the aggregate of the consideration transferred, measured at acquisition date fair value and the amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree. For each business combination, the Company elects whether it measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree's identifiable net assets. Acquisition costs incurred are expensed and included in administrative expenses. 

 

Any contingent consideration to be transferred by the acquirer will be recognised at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration which is deemed to be an asset or liability, will be recognised in accordance with IAS 39 either in profit or loss or as a change to other comprehensive income. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it will not be remeasured.

 

Goodwill is initially measured at cost being the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognised for non-controlling interest over the net identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If this consideration is lower than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the difference is recognised in profit or loss.

 

Associates 

 

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method unless they are classified as non-current assets held for sale. Under this method, the carrying value of investments in associates is initially recognized at the acquisition cost.

 

The carrying value of investments in associates is increased or decreased by the Company's reported share in profit and loss and other comprehensive income of the investee after the acquisition date. The Company's share in profit and loss and other comprehensive income of an associate is recognized in the Company's consolidated statement of comprehensive income as profit and loss and other comprehensive income, respectively. Dividends paid by the associate are accounted for as a reduction of the carrying value of investments.

 

The Company's net investment in associates includes the carrying value of the investment in these associates as well as other long-term investments that are, in substance, investments in associates, such as loans. If the share in losses exceeds the carrying value of the investment in associates and the value of other long-term investments related to investments in these associates, the Company ceases to recognize its share in losses when the carrying value reaches zero. Any additional losses are provided for and liabilities are recognized only to the extent that the Company has legal or constructive obligations or has made payments on behalf of the associate.

 

If the associate subsequently makes profits, the Company resumes recognizing its share in these profits only after its share of the profits equals the share of losses not recognized.

 

The carrying value of investments in associates is tested for impairment by reconciling its recoverable amount (the higher of its value in use and fair value less costs to sell) to its carrying value, whenever impairment indicators are identified.

 

Joint ventures

 

The Company participates in joint ventures either in the form of jointly controlled entities or jointly controlled operations.

 

Jointly controlled entities imply establishing a legal entity where the Company and other participants have respective equity interests. Equity interests in jointly controlled entities are accounted for under the equity method.

 

The Company's share in net profit or loss of jointly controlled entities is recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as profit or loss from the date that joint control commences until the date that joint control ceases.

 

A jointly controlled operation involves the use of assets and other resources of venturers rather than the establishment of a legal entity independent of its venturers. Each venturer uses its own property, plant and equipment and inventories. It is also responsible for its expenses and liabilities and raising funds for which it becomes liable. The Company accounts for the assets it controls, the expenses and liabilities it incurs, and the share of income from the sale of goods or services by the joint venture.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash represents cash on hand, in the Company's bank accounts, in transit and interest bearing deposits which can be effectively withdrawn at any time without prior notice or penalties reducing the principal amount of the deposit. Cash equivalents are highly liquid, short-term investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and have original maturities of three months or less from their date of purchase. They are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value. Restricted cash is presented separately in the consolidated balance sheet if its amount is significant.

 

Financial assets

 

The Company recognizes financial assets on its balance sheet when, and only when, it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. When financial assets are recognized initially, they are measured at fair value, which is usually the price of the transaction, i.e. the fair value of consideration paid or received.

 

When financial assets are recognized initially, they are classified as following: (1) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, (2) loans issued and accounts receivable, (3) financial assets held to maturity, (4) financial assets available for sale, as appropriate.

 

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss include financial assets held for trading and financial assets designated as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss at initial recognition. Financial assets held for trading are those which are acquired principally for the purpose of sale or repurchase in the near future or are part of a portfolio of identifiable financial instruments that have been commonly managed and for which there is evidence of a recent pattern of actual short term profit taking, or which are derivative instruments (unless the derivative instrument is defined as an effective hedging instrument). Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are classified in the consolidated balance sheet as current assets and changes in the fair value are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as Finance income or Finance expenses.

 

All derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in either current financial assets, non-current financial assets, current liabilities related to derivative instruments, non-current liabilities related to derivative instruments. Recognition and classification of a gain or loss that results from recognition of an adjustment of a derivative instrument at fair value depends on the purpose for issuing or holding the derivative instrument. Gains and losses from derivatives that are not accounted for as hedges under International Accounting Standard ("IAS") 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, are recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Fair value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's length transaction.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, the fair value of financial assets at fair value that are quoted in an active market is defined as bid prices for assets and ask prices for issued liabilities as of the measurement date.

 

If no active market exists for financial assets, the Company measures the fair value using the following methods:

analysis of recent transactions with peer instruments between independent parties;

current fair value of similar financial instruments;

discounting future cash flows.

 

The discount rate reflects a minimum return on investment an investor is willing to accept before starting an alternative project, given its risk and the opportunity cost of forgoing other projects.

 

Loans issued and accounts receivable include non-derivative financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market, not classified as financial assets held for trading and have not been designated as at fair value through profit or loss or available for sale. If the Company cannot recover all of its initial investment in the financial asset due to reasons other than deterioration of its quality, the financial asset is not included in this category. After initial recognition, loans issued and accounts receivable are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method ("EIR"), less impairment losses. The EIR amortization is included in Finance income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The losses arising from impairment are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in Finance expenses.

 

The Company does not classify financial assets as held to maturity if, during either the current financial year or the two preceding financial years, the Company has sold, transferred or exercised a put option on more than an insignificant (in relation to the total) amount of such investments before maturity unless: (1) such financial asset was close enough to maturity or call date so that changes in the market rate of interest did not have a significant effect on the financial asset's fair value; (2) after substantially all of the financial asset's original principal had been collected through scheduled payments or prepayments; or (3) due to an isolated non-recurring event that is beyond the Company's control and could not have been reasonably anticipated by the Company.

 

Dividends and interest income are recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on an accrual basis. The amount of accrued interest income is calculated using effective interest rate.

 

All other financial assets not included in the other categories are designated as financial assets available for sale. Specifically, shares of other companies not included in the first category are designated as available for sale. In addition, the Company may include any financial asset in this category at the initial recognition.

 

Financial liabilities

 

The Company recognizes financial liabilities on its balance sheet when, and only when, it becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the financial instrument. When financial liabilities are recognized initially, they are measured at fair value, which is usually the price of the transaction, i.e. the fair value of consideration paid or received.

 

When financial liabilities are recognized initially, they are classified as following:

financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss;

other financial liabilities.

 

Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are financial liabilities held for trading unless such liabilities are linked to delivery of unquoted equity instruments.

 

At the initial recognition, the Company may include in this category any financial liability, except equity instruments that are not quoted in an active market and whose fair value cannot be reliably measured. However, subsequent to initial recognition, the liability cannot be reclassified.

 

Financial liabilities not classified as financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are designated as other financial liabilities. Other financial liabilities include, inter alia, trade and other accounts payable, loans and borrowings payable.

 

Subsequent to initial recognition, financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in profit or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Other financial liabilities are carried at amortized cost.

 

The Company writes off a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) from its balance sheet when, and only when, it is extinguished - i.e. when the obligation specified in the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires. The difference between the carrying value of a financial liability (or a part of a financial liability) extinguished or transferred to another party and the redemption value, including any transferred non-monetary assets and assumed liabilities, is recognized in profit or loss. Any previously recognized components of other comprehensive income pertaining to this financial liability are also included in the financial result and are recognized as gains and losses for the period.

 

Earnings per share

 

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net earnings attributable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the corresponding period. In the absence of any securities-to-shares conversion transactions, the amount of basic earnings per share stated in these consolidated financial statements is equal to the amount of diluted earnings per share.

 

Inventories

 

Inventories consisting primarily of crude oil, petroleum products, petrochemicals and materials and supplies are accounted for at the weighted average cost unless net realisable value is less than cost. Materials that are used in the production are not written down below cost if the finished products in which they will be incorporated are expected to be sold above cost.

 

Repurchase and resale agreements

 

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase ("REPO") and securities purchased under agreements to resell ("reverse REPO") generally do not constitute a sale for accounting purposes of the underlying securities, and so are treated as collateralized financing transactions. Interest paid or received on all REPO and reverse REPO transactions is recorded in Finance expense or Finance income, respectively, at the contractually specified rate using the effective interest method.

 

Exploration and Production assets

 

Exploration and Production assets include exploration and evaluation assets, mineral rights and oil and gas properties (development assets and production assets).

 

Exploration and evaluation costs

 

The Company recognizes exploration and evaluation costs using the successful efforts method as permitted by IFRS 6, Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources. Under this method, all costs related to exploration and evaluation (license acquisition costs, exploration and appraisal drilling) are temporarily capitalized in cost centers by field (well) until the drilling program results in discovering economically feasible oil and gas reserves.

 

The length of time necessary for this determination depends on the specific technical or economic difficulties in assessing the recoverability of the reserves. If a determination is made that the well did not encounter oil and gas in economically viable quantities, the well costs are expensed to Exploration expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Exploration and evaluation costs, except for costs associated with seismic, topographical, geological, geophysical surveys, are initially capitalized as exploration and evaluation. Exploration and evaluation assets are recognized at cost less impairment, if any, as property, plant and equipment until the existence (or absence) of commercial reserves has been established. Exploration and evaluation assets are subject to technical, commercial and management review as well as review for indicators of impairment at least once a year. This is to confirm the continued intent to develop or otherwise extract value from the discovery. When indicators of impairment are present, impairment test is performed.

 

If subsequently commercial reserves are discovered, the carrying value, less losses from impairment of respective exploration and evaluation assets, is classified as oil and gas properties (development assets). However, if no commercial reserves are discovered, such costs are expensed after exploration and evaluation activities have been completed.

 

Development and production

 

Oil and gas properties (development assets) are accounted for on a field-by-field basis and represent (1) capitalized costs to develop discovered commercial reserves and to put fields into production, and (2) exploration and evaluation costs incurred to discover commercial reserves reclassified from exploration and evaluation assets to oil and gas properties (development assets) following discovery of commercial reserves.

 

Oil and gas properties (development assets) costs include the expenditures to acquire such assets, directly identifiable overhead expenses, capitalized financing costs and related asset retirement (decommissioning) obligation costs. Oil and gas properties (development assets) are generally recognized as construction in progress.

 

Following commencement of commercial production, oil and gas properties (development assets) are reclassified as oil and gas properties (production assets).

 

Other property, plant and equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost as of the acquisition date, except for property, plant and equipment acquired prior to January 1, 2009, which is stated at deemed cost, net of accumulated depreciation and impairment. The cost of maintenance, repairs, and replacement of minor items of property is charged to operating expenses. Renewals and betterments of assets are capitalized.

 

Upon sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts. Any resulting gains or losses are included in profit or loss.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

Oil and gas properties are depleted using unit-of-production method on field-by-field basis starting from the commencement of commercial production.

 

In applying the unit-of-production method to mineral licenses, the depletion rate is based on total proved reserves. In applying the unit-of-production method to other oil and gas properties (including construction in progress), the depletion rate is based on proved developed reserves.

 

Other property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight line method over their estimated useful lives from the time they are ready for use, except for catalysts which are amortized using the unit-of-production method.

 

Components of other property, plant and equipment and respective estimated useful life are as follows:

 

Buildings and structures

30-45 years

Plant and machinery

5-25 years

Vehicles and other property, plant and equipment

6-10 years

Service vessels

20 years

Offshore drilling assets

20 years

 

Land generally has an indefinite useful life and, thus, is not depreciated.

 

Land leasehold rights are amortized on a straight line basis over their expected useful life, which averages 20 years.

 

Impairment of non-current assets

 

The Company assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is any indication that an asset or cash-generating unit may be impaired. If any such indication exists, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the asset or cash-generating unit.

 

In assessing whether there is any indication that an asset may be impaired, the Company considers internal and external sources of information. It considers at least the following:

External sources of information:

·; during the period, an asset's market value has declined significantly more than would be expected as a result of the passage of time or normal use;

·; significant changes with an adverse effect on the Company have taken place during the period, or will take place in the near future, in the technological, market, economic or legal environment in which the Company or in the market to which an asset is dedicated;

·; market interest rates or other market rates of return on investments have increased during the period, and those increases are likely to affect the discount rate used in calculating an asset's value in use and decrease the asset's recoverable amount materially;

·; the carrying amount of the net assets of the Company is more than its market capitalization.

Internal sources of information:

·; evidence is available of obsolescence or physical damage of an asset;

·; significant changes with an adverse effect on the Company have taken place during the period, or are expected to take place in the near future, in the extent to which, or manner in which, an asset is used or is expected to be used (e.g., the asset becoming idle and reassessing the useful life of an asset as finite rather than indefinite);

·; information on dividends from a subsidiary, joint venture or associate;

·; evidence is available from internal reporting that indicates that the economic performance of an asset is, or will be, worse than expected. Such evidence includes the existence of:

cash flows for acquiring the asset, or subsequent cash needs for operating or maintaining it, that are significantly higher than those originally budgeted;

actual net cash flows or operating profit or loss flowing from the asset that are significantly worse than those budgeted;

a significant decline in budgeted net cash flows or operating profit, or a significant increase in budgeted loss, flowing from the asset;

operating losses or net cash outflows for the asset, when current period amounts are aggregated with budgeted amounts for the future.

 

The following factors indicate that exploration and evaluation assets may be impaired:

the period for which the Company has the right to explore in the specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;

substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned;

exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the Company has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area;

sufficient data exist to indicate that, although a development in the specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

 

The recoverable amount of an asset or a cash-generating unit is the higher of:

value in use of an asset (cash-generating unit) and

fair value of an asset (cash-generating unit) less costs to sell.

 

If the asset does not generate cash inflows that are largely independent of those from other assets, its recoverable amount is determined for the asset's cash-generating unit.

 

The Company initially measures the value in use of a cash-generating unit. When the carrying amount of a cash-generating unit is greater than its value in use, the Company measures the unit's fair value for the purpose of measuring the recoverable amount. When the fair value is less than the carrying value impairment loss is recognized.

 

Value in use is determined by discounting the estimated value of the future cash inflows expected to be derived from the asset or cash-generating unit, including cash inflows from its sale. The value of the future cash inflows from a cash-generating unit is determined based on the forecast approved by management of the business unit to which the unit in question pertains.

 

Impairment of financial assets

 

At each balance sheet date the Company analyzes whether there is objective evidence of impairment for all categories of financial assets, except those recorded at fair value through profit or loss. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that has occurred since the initial recognition of the asset (an incurred 'loss event') and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated. Evidence of impairment may include (but not limited to) indications that the debtors or a group of debtors is experiencing financial difficulty, default or delinquency in interest or principal payments, the probability that they will enter bankruptcy or other financial reorganization and observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows, such as changes in arrears or economic conditions that correlate with defaults.

 

Capitalized interest

 

Interest expense related to the use of borrowed funds used for capital construction projects and acquisition of property, plant and equipment is capitalized provided that such interest expense could have been avoided if the Company had not made capital investments. Interest is capitalized only during the period when construction activities are actually in progress and until the resulting properties are put into operation.

 

Leasing agreements

 

Leases, which transfer to the Company substantially all the risks and benefits incidental to ownership of the asset, are classified as financial lease and are capitalized at the commencement of the lease at the fair value of the leased property or, if it is lower than the cost, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Lease payments are apportioned between the finance expenses and reduction of the lease liability so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liabilities. Finance expenses are charged directly to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Leased property, plant and equipment are accounted for using the same policies as applied to the Company's own assets. In determining the useful life of a leased item of property, plant and equipment, consideration is given to the probability of transfer of title to the lessee at the end of the lease term.

 

If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the asset shall be fully depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and its useful life. Where such certainty exists, the asset is depreciated over its useful life.

 

Leases where the lessor retains substantially all the risks and benefits of ownership of the assets are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

 

The Company has asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations associated with its core business activities. The nature of the assets and potential obligations are as follows:

 

The Company's exploration, development and production activities involve the use of wells, related equipment and operating sites, oil gathering and treatment facilities, tank farms and in-field pipelines. Generally, licenses and other regulatory acts require that such assets be decommissioned upon the completion of production. According to these requirements, the Company is obliged to decommission wells, dismantle equipment, restore the sites and perform other related activities. The Company's estimates of these obligations are based on current regulatory or license requirements, as well as actual dismantling and other related costs. These liabilities are measured by the Company using the present value of the estimated future costs of decommissioning of these assets. The discount rate is reviewed at each reporting date and reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability.

 

In accordance with IFRS Interpretations Committee ("IFRIC") 1 Changes in Existing Decommissioning, Restoration and Similar Liabilities, the provision is reviewed at each balance sheet date as follows:

upon changes in the estimates of future cash flows (e.g., the costs of and timeframe for abandoning one well) or a discounting rate, changes in the amount of the liability are included in the cost of the item of plant, property and equipment, whereby such cost may not be negative and may not exceed the recoverable value of the item of plant, property and equipment;

any changes in the liability due to its nearing maturity (change in the discount) are recognized in Finance expenses.

 

The Company's refining and distribution activities involve refining operations, marine and other distribution terminals, and retail sales. The Company's refining operations consist of major petrochemical operations and industrial complexes. Legal or contractual asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations related to petrochemical, oil refining and distribution activities are not recognized due to the limited history of such activities in these segments, the lack of clear legal requirements as to the recognition of obligations, as well as the fact that decommissioning period for such assets are not determinable.

 

Because of the reasons described above the fair value of an asset retirement (decommissioning) obligation of the refining and distribution segment cannot be reasonably estimated.

 

Due to continuous changes in the Russian regulatory and legal environment, there could be future changes to the requirements and contingencies associated with the retirement of long-lived assets.

 

Income tax

 

From 2012 Russian tax legislation permits to calculate income taxes on a consolidated basis. Therefore the main subsidiaries of the Company which do not have non-controlling interest were combined into the Consolidated group of taxpayers (Note 39). For subsidiaries which are not included to the Consolidated group of taxpayers income taxes were calculated on an individual subsidiary basis. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in the amount determined by the Company in accordance with IAS 12, Income Taxes.

 

Deferred tax is provided using the liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes.

 

A deferred tax liability is recognized for all taxable temporary differences, except to the extent that the deferred tax liability arises from:

the initial recognition of goodwill;

the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which:

is not a business combination; and

affects neither accounting profit, nor taxable profit;

the investments in subsidiaries when the Company is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

 

A prior period tax loss used to reduce the current amount of income tax is recognized as a deferred tax asset.

 

A deferred tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences can be utilized, unless the deferred tax asset arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that:

is not a business combination; and

at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit (tax loss).

 

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets for all deductible temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries and associates, and interests in joint ventures, to the extent that the following two conditions are met:

the temporary difference will reverse in the foreseeable future; and

taxable profit will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities shall be measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

 

The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis.

 

The carrying amount of a deferred tax asset is reviewed at each balance sheet date.

 

The Company reduces the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow the benefit of part or all of that deferred tax asset to be utilized. 

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as Non-current Deferred tax assets and Non-current Deferred tax liabilities, respectively.

 

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.

 

Recognition of revenues

 

Revenues are recognized when risks and rewards pass to the customer which usually occurs when the title passes to the customer, providing that the contract price is fixed or determinable and collectability of the receivable is reasonably assured. Specifically, domestic sales of crude oil and gas, as well as petroleum products and materials are usually recognized when title passes. For export sales, title generally passes at the border of the Russian Federation and the Company covers transportation expenses (except freight), duties and taxes on those sales (Note 9). Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable taking into account the amount of any trade discounts, volume rebates and reimbursable taxes.

 

Sales of support services are recognized as services are performed provided that the service price can be determined and no significant uncertainties regarding the receipt of revenues exist.

 

Transportation expenses

 

Transportation expenses recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income represent all expenses incurred by the Company to transport crude oil for refining and to end customers, and to deliver petroleum products from refineries to end customers (these may include pipeline tariffs and any additional railroad transportation costs, handling costs, port fees, sea freight and other costs).

 

Refinery maintenance costs

 

The Company recognizes the costs of overhauls and preventive maintenance performed with respect to oil refining assets as expenses when incurred.

 

Environmental liabilities

 

Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and do not have a future economic benefit, are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded when environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.

 

Accounting for contingencies

 

Certain conditions may exist as of the date of these consolidated financial statements which may further result in a loss to the Company, but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company's management makes an assessment of such contingent liabilities which is based on assumptions and is a matter of opinion. In assessing loss contingencies relating to legal or tax proceedings that involve the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company, after consultation with legal or tax advisors, evaluates the perceived merits of any legal or tax proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

 

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a loss will be incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability is accrued in the Company's consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable, but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, together with an estimate of the range of possible loss if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

 

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the nature of the guarantee would be disclosed. However, in some instances in which disclosure is not otherwise required, the Company may disclose contingent liabilities or other uncertainties of an unusual nature which, in the judgment of management after consultation with its legal or tax counsel, may be of interest to shareholders or others.

 

Taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities

 

Refundable excise is deducted from revenues. Non-refundable excise and customs duties are not deducted from revenues and are recognized as expenses in Taxes other than income tax in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Value-added tax ("VAT") receivable and payable is recognized, respectively, as Prepayments and other current assets and Other tax liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Functional and presentation currency

 

The financial statements are presented in Russian Rubles, which is the functional currency of Rosneft Oil Company and all of its subsidiaries operating in the Russian Federation.

 

Transactions and balances

 

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the profit or loss.

 

Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates as at the dates of the initial transactions. Non-monetary items measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the date when the fair value is determined.

 

The Company's subsidiaries

 

The results and financial position of all of the Company's subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

assets and liabilities for each balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate at that reporting date;

income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive income are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate on the dates of the transactions); and

all resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component of other comprehensive income.

 

Changes in accounting policies and disclosures

 

The accounting policies adopted are consistent with those of the previous financial year. New and amended standards did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.

 

During 2012 the Company acquired a number of significant investments in joint ventures and associates (Note 27). Starting from 2012 the Company retrospectively changed presentation of Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates in consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates amounted to RUB 31 billion, RUB 16 billion and RUB 4 billion in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, was reclassified to Revenues and equity share in profits of joint ventures and associates and was included in Operating income.

 

 

Significant accounting judgments, estimates and assumptions

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management to make a number of accounting estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results, however, could differ from those estimates.

 

The most significant accounting estimates and assumptions used by the Company's management in preparing the consolidated financial statements include:

estimation of oil and gas reserves;

estimation of rights to, recoverability and useful lives of non-current assets;

impairment of goodwill (Note 25 "Intangible assets and goodwill");

allowances for doubtful accounts receivable and obsolete and slow-moving inventories (Note 21 "Accounts receivable" and Note 22 "Inventories");

assessment of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations (Note 3 "Significant accounting policies", Topic "Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations" and Note 33 "Provisions");

assessment of legal and tax contingencies, recognition and disclosure of contingent liabilities (Note 39 "Contingencies");

assessment of deferred income tax assets and liabilities (Note 3 "Significant accounting policies", Topic "Income tax" and Note 16 "Income tax");

assessment of environmental remediation obligations (Note 33 "Provisions" and Note 39 "Contingencies");

fair value measurements (Note 36 "Fair value of financial instruments");

assessment of ability to renew operating leases and to enter into new lease agreements.

 

Significant estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts are those used in determining the economic recoverability of reserves.

 

The estimated amounts of oil and gas reserves are used in calculating the depletion charges under the unit-of-production method and are made in accordance with the requirements adopted by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Estimates are reassessed on an annual basis.

 

Such estimates and assumptions may change over time when new information becomes available, e.g.:

obtaining more detailed information on reserves (either as a result of more detailed engineering calculations or additional exploration drilling activities);

conducting supplemental activities to enhance oil recovery;

changes in economic estimates and assumptions (e.g. a change in pricing factors).

 

In accordance with IAS 8, Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, the Company recognizes the effect of a change in accounting estimates prospectively by including it in profit or loss in the period of the change, if such change affects that period only, or the period of the change and future periods, if the change affects both.

 

A change in an accounting estimate is recognized by adjusting the carrying amount of the related asset, liability or equity item.

 

 

New standards and interpretations issued but not yet effective

 

In May 2011, the IASB issued a package of standards on consolidation: IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12, Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities, revised IAS 27, Separate Financial Statements, and revised IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures. The package of new and revised standards introduces the new model of control and treatment of joint arrangements and also new disclosure requirements. The package is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company will adopt the package from January 1, 2013. As a result of the application of the package the Company expects a change from the equity method of accounting to accounting for the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses relating to the Company's interest in certain joint arrangements in accordance with the IFRSs applicable to the particular assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. The Company does not expect this change of the accounting method to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.

 

In May 2011, the IASB issued IFRS 13, Fair Value Measurement. The new IFRS 13 sets new fair value measurement and disclosure requirements. IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company will adopt IFRS 13 from January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect IFRS 13 to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.

 

In December 2011, the IASB amended IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosure, and IAS 32, Financial Instrument: Presentation. Amendments clarify assets and liabilities offsetting rules and introduce new related disclosure requirements. The amendments to IAS 32 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The new disclosure requirements in IFRS 7 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company adopted revised IFRS 7 from January 1, 2013 and will adopt revised IAS 32 from January 1, 2014. The Company does not expect the amendments to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.

 

IFRS 9, Classification and Measurement, as issued reflects the first phase of the IASBs work on the replacement of IAS 39 and applies to classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities as defined in IAS 39. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2015. In subsequent phases, the IASB will address hedge accounting and impairment of financial assets. The Group will quantify the effect in conjunction with the other phases, when issued, to present a comprehensive picture.

 

In May 2012, as a result of Annual Improvements 2009-2011 cycle the IASB issued a number of amendments to various standards. The following standards were primarily affected by the amendments: IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements; IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment; IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation; IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting. The amendments introduced a relatively minor changes to clarify guidance in existing standards. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Company will adopt the amended standards from January 1, 2013. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.

 

 

Capital and financial risk management

 

Capital management

 

The Company's capital management objectives are to secure the ability to continue as a going concern and to optimize the cost of capital in order to enhance value to shareholders.

 

The Company's management performs regular assessment of the net debt to capital employed ratio to ensure it meets the Company's current rating requirements.

 

The Company's capital consists of debt obligations, which include long and short-term loans, borrowings, equity attributable to equity holders of Rosneft that includes share capital, reserves and retained earnings, as well as non-controlling interest. Net debt is a non-IFRS measure and is calculated as a sum of loans and borrowings less cash and cash equivalents and certain temporary investments in short-term financial assets. Net debt to capital employed ratio enables the users to see how significant net debt is relative to capital employed.

 

The Company's net debt to capital employed ratio was as follows:

 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Total debt

963

748

716

Cash and cash equivalents

(296)

(166)

(127)

Other short-term financial assets

(86)

(150)

(211)

Net debt

581

432

378

Total equity

2,266

2,069

1,791 

Total capital employed

2,847

2,501

2,169

Net debt to capital employed ratio, %

20.4%

17.3%

17.4%

 

Financial risk management

 

In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to the following financial risks: market risk (including foreign currency risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Company has introduced a risk management system and developed a number of procedures to measure, assess and monitor risks and select the relevant risk management techniques.

 

The Company has developed, documented and approved the relevant policies pertaining to market, credit and liquidity risks and the use of derivative financial instruments.

 

Foreign currency risk 

 

The Group undertakes transactions denominated in foreign currencies and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures primarily with respect to the US$ and the Euro. Foreign exchange risk arises from assets, liabilities, commercial transactions and financing denominated in foreign currencies.

 

The carrying values of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are presented in the table below:

Assets

Liabilities

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2012

2011

2010

2012

2011

2010

US$

451

291

278

(711)

(675)

(637)

Euro

54

41

1

(97)

(32)

(14)

Total

505

332

279

(808)

(707)

(651)

 

The level of currency risk is assessed on a monthly basis using a sensitivity analysis and is maintained within the limits adopted in line with the Company's policy. The table below summarizes the impact on the Company's income before income tax as a result of appreciation/(depreciation) of RUB against the US$ and Euro.

 

US$ - effect

Euro - effect

2012

2011

2010

2012

2011

2010

Currency rate change in %

10.72%

12.50%

8.90%

9.49%

11.77%

11.05%

Gain/(loss)

28/(28)

48/(48)

32/(32)

4/(4)

(1)/1

1/(1)

 

The financial exposure to foreign currency risk of forecasted operating expense is managed as an integral part of the Company's risk management program, which seeks to reduce the potentially adverse effect that the volatility of the exchange rate markets may have on operating results. The Company enters into contracts to economically hedge certain of its risks associated with RUB appreciation (Note 20, Note 26). These instruments are not accounted for as accounting hedges pursuant to IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

 

Interest rate risk

 

Loans and borrowings raised at variable interest rates expose the Company to interest rate risk arising on the possible movement of variable element of the overall interest rate. Such risks are hedged by the Company.

 

As of December 31, 2012, the Company's variable rate liability (based on LIBOR, EURIBOR or MOSPRIME), net of interest payable, totaled RUB 632 billion. In 2012 and 2011, variable rate funds raised by the Company were primarily denominated in US$ and Euros.

 

The Company analyses its interest rate exposure, including performing scenario analysis to measure an impact on annual income before income tax of an interest rate shift.

 

The table below summarizes the impact of a potential increase or decrease in LIBOR on the Company's profit before tax, as applied to the variable element of interest rates on loans and borrowings. The increase/decrease is based on management estimates of potential interest rate movements.

 

Increase/decrease in interest rate

Effect on income before income tax

basis points

bln RUB

2012

+5

-

-5

-

2011

+15

(1)

-15

1

2010

+100

(6)

-30*

2

*Down to 0.0% on the variable element.

 

Potential change in EURIBOR and MOSPRIME is insignificant.

 

The sensitivity analysis is limited only to variable rate loans and borrowings and is conducted with all other variables held constant. The analysis is prepared assuming the amount of variable rate liability outstanding at the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year. Interest rate on variable rate loans and borrowings will effectively change throughout the year in response to fluctuations in market interest rates.

 

The impact measured through the sensitivity analysis does not take into account other potential changes in economic conditions, which may accompany the relevant changes in market interest rates.

 

The Company enters into contracts to economically hedge risks associated with an increasing interest expense (Note 20, Note 31).

 

Credit risk

 

The Company controls own exposure to credit risk. All external customers and their financial guarantors, other than related parties, undergo a creditworthiness check (including sellers, which act on prepayment basis). The Company performs an ongoing assessment and monitoring of financial position and the risk of default. In the event of default by the parties on their respective obligations under the financial guarantee contracts, the Company's exposure to credit risk will be limited to the corresponding contract amounts. As of December 31, 2012, management assessed such risk as remote.

 

In addition, as part of its cash management and credit risk function, the Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of financial and banking institutions where it deposits cash and performs trade finance operations. Banking relationships are primarily with Russian subsidiaries of large international banking institutions and certain large Russian banks.

 

The Company had one major customer in 2012, 2011 and 2010 being an international oil trader and accounting for at least 10% of total sales. Revenues generated from sales to this oil trader totaled RUB 384 billion, RUB 547 billion and RUB 293 billion, or 13%, 20% and 15% of total revenues, respectively. These revenues are recognized mainly under the Refining and distribution segment (Note 8). The Company is not dependent on any of its major customers or any one particular customer as there is a liquid market for crude oil and petroleum products. As of December 31, 2012, the amount of current receivable from the Company's major customer totaled RUB 23 billion, or around 10% of the Company's total receivables.

 

The Company's exposure to credit risk is limited to the carrying amount of financial assets recognized in the consolidated balance sheet.

 

Liquidity risk

 

The Company has mature liquidity risk management processes covering short-term, mid-term and long-term funding. Liquidity risk is controlled through maintaining sufficient reserves and the adequate amount of committed credit facilities and loan funds. Management conducts regular monitoring of projected and actual cash flow information, analyses the repayment schedules of the existing financial assets and liabilities and performs annual detailed budgeting procedures.

 

Contractual maturities of the Company's financial liabilities are presented below:

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

On demand

12 months

1 to 5 years

> 5 years

Total

Loans and borrowings

-

123

272

501

896

Finance lease liabilities

-

1

3

4

8

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

-

97

-

-

97

Banking customer accounts

40

-

-

-

40

Derivative financial liabilities

4

-

-

-

4

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

On demand

12 months

1 to 5 years

> 5 years

Total

Loans and borrowings

-

111

533

505

1,149

Finance lease liabilities

-

4

6

4

14

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

-

117

-

-

117

Banking customer accounts

41

-

-

-

41

Derivative financial liabilities

-

-

-

-

-

 

Loans and borrowings above exclude certain Yukos related borrowings and promissory notes payable that were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The borrowings and promissory notes payable are being disputed by the Company (Note 30, Note 39).

 

Acquisitions

 

In February 2012, the Company acquired for RUB 4 billion 100% interest in Research and Development Center LLC which is engaged in developing advanced technologies for refining and for petrochemical industry.

 

The following table summarizes the Company's purchase price allocation of Research and Development Center LLC to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed:

 

Property, plant and equipment

1

Intangible assets

2

Total non-current assets

3

Deferred tax liabilities

1

Total non-current liabilities

1

Total identifiable net assets at fair value

2

Goodwill

2

Purchase consideration transferred

4

 

The goodwill of RUB 2 billion relates to the expected synergies arising from the implementation of acquired innovative technologies in refining and petrochemicals. Accordingly, this goodwill was allocated to the Refining and distribution segment.

 

In June 2012, the Company acquired for RUB 1 billion 100% interest in Polar Terminal LLC. Polar Terminal LLC is engaged in an investment project for construction of crude oil and petroleum products transshipment terminal. Allocation of purchase price to assets, liabilities and result of operations of Polar Terminal LLC are not significant to these consolidated financial statements.

 

Segment information

 

The Company determines its operating segments based on the nature of their operations. The performance of these operating segments is assessed by management on a regular basis. Exploration and production segment is engaged in field exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas. Refining and distribution segment is engaged in processing crude oil and other hydrocarbons into petroleum products, as well as the purchase, sale and transportation of crude oil and petroleum products. Corporate and other unallocated activities do not represent operating segment and comprise corporate activity, activities involved in field development, maintenance of infrastructure and functioning of the first two segments, as well as banking and finance services, and other activities. Substantially all of the Company's operations and assets are located in the Russian Federation.

 

Segment performance is evaluated based on both revenues and operating income which are measured on the same basis as in the consolidated financial statements, and of revaluation of intersegment transactions at market prices.

 

Operating segments in 2012:

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Revenues from external customers

45

2,976

26

-

3,047

Intersegment revenues

1,169

-

-

(1,169)

-

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

31

-

-

-

31

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

1,245

2,976

26

(1,169)

3,078

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

662

2,900

76

(1,169)

2,469

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

192

29

6

-

227

Total costs and expenses

854

2,929

82

(1,169)

2,696

Operating income

391

47

(56)

-

382

Finance income

24

Finance expenses

(15)

Total finance income

9

Other income

85

Other expenses

(50)

Foreign exchange differences

11

Income before income tax

437

Income tax

(95)

Net income

342

 

Operating segments in 2011:

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Revenues from external customers

50

2,621

31

-

2,702

Intersegment revenues

1,030

-

-

(1,030)

-

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

16

-

-

-

16

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

1,096

2,621

31

(1,030)

2,718

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

534

2,503

49

(1,030)

2,056

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

184

24

5

-

213

Total costs and expenses

718

2,527

54

(1,030)

2,269

Operating income

378

94

(23)

-

449

Finance income

20

Finance expenses

(19)

Total finance income

1

Other income

25

Other expenses

(48)

Foreign exchange differences

(22)

Income before income tax

405

Income tax

(86)

Net income

319

 

Operating segments in 2010:

Exploration and production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Adjustments

Consolidated

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Revenues from external customers

35

1,846

34

-

1,915

Intersegment revenues

817

-

-

(817)

-

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

4

-

-

-

4

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

856

1,846

34

(817)

1,919

Costs and expenses

Costs and expenses other than depreciation, depletion and amortization

383

1,706

61

(817)

1,333

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

176

23

3

-

202

Total costs and expenses

559

1,729

64

(817)

1,535

Operating income

297

117

(30)

-

384

Finance income

20

Finance expenses

(21)

Total finance expenses

(1)

Other income

27

Other expenses

(49)

Foreign exchange differences

(2)

Income before income tax

359

Income tax

(58)

Net income

301

 

Oil and gas and petroleum products sales comprise the following (based on the country indicated in the bill of lading):

2012

2011

2010

Oil and gas sales

International Sales of crude oil - Europe

1,033

955

694

International Sales of crude oil - Asia

388

366

299

International Sales of crude oil - CIS, other than Russia

78

54

42

Domestic sales of crude oil

5

3

8

Domestic sales of gas

22

14

13

Total oil and gas sales

1,526

1,392

1,056

Petroleum products and petrochemical sales

International Sales of petroleum products - Europe

636

500

254

International Sales of petroleum products - Asia

228

224

182

International Sales of petroleum products - CIS, other than Russia

11

8

5

Domestic sales of petroleum products

520

473

356

Domestic sales of petrochemical products

11

10

9

International sales of petrochemical products - Europe

73

50

4

Total petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

1,479

1,265

810

 

Taxes other than income tax

 

Taxes other than income tax for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Mineral extraction tax

527

414

274

Excise tax

79

55

34

Property tax

12

11

9

Other

27

18

14

Total taxes

645

498

331

 

Export customs duty

 

Export customs duty for the years ended December 31 comprises the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Export customs duty on oil and gas sales

689

612

396

Export customs duty on petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

212

178

113

Total export customs duty

901

790

509

 

 

Finance income

 

Finance income for the years ended December 31 comprises the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Interest income on:

Deposits and deposit certificates

5

11

11

Loans issued

6

5

6

Notes receivable

3

2

-

Bonds

3

2

-

Gains from changes in fair value of financial assets at fair value recognized in profit or loss

5

-

2

Gain from disposal of financial assets

1

-

1

Other finance income

1

-

-

Total finance income

24

20

20

 

Finance expenses

 

Finance expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Interest expense on loans and borrowings

8

7

11

Restructured tax liabilities

-

3

2

Loss from changes in fair value of financial assets at fair value recognized in profit or loss

-

3

4

Loss from disposal of financial assets

1

-

-

Increase in provision due to the unwinding of discount

4

5

2

Other finance expenses

2

1

2

Total finance expenses

15

19

21

 

The weighted average rate used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization is 4.05%, 3.70% and 3.84% p.a. in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Other income/expenses

 

Other income for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Gain on remeasurement to fair value of investment in Kynsko-Chaselskoye neftegaz LLC (Note 27)

82

-

-

Accounts payable write-off

-

22

11

Other

3

3

16

Total other income

85

25

27

 

Other expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

9

19

15

Disposal of companies and non-core assets

11

10

6

Impairment

10

4

-

Social payments, charity, sponsorship, financial aid

9

12

5

Other

11

3

23

Total other expenses

50

48

49

 

Personnel expenses

 

Personnel expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Salary

94

75

73

Statutory insurance contributions

20

16

12

Expenses for non-statutory defined contribution plan

3

3

3

Other employee benefits

6

3

2

Total personnel expenses

123

97

 90

 

Personnel expenses are included in Production and operating expenses, General and administrative expenses and Other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.

 

Operating leases

 

Operating leases have various terms and conditions and primarily are agreements to lease oil and gas facilities for an indefinite tenancy, land plots (sand pits) for 3 to 5 years, railroad wagons and cisterns for periods less than 12 months and industrial estate of Company's oil refining plants (land plots). The agreements provide for an annual revision of the rental rates and contractual terms and conditions.

 

Total operating lease expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to RUB 8 billion, RUB 10 billion and RUB 8 billion, respectively. The expenses were recognized within production and operating expenses, general and administrative expenses and other expenses in the statement of comprehensive income.

 

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31 are as follows:

 

2012

2011

2010

Less than 1 year

8

9

7

From 1 to 5 years

18

18

10

Over 5 years

41

14

8

Total future minimum lease payments

67

41

25

 

Income tax

 

Income tax expenses for the years ended December 31 comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Current income tax

84

99

90

Prior period adjustments

(5)

(3)

(5)

Current income tax expense

79

96

85

Deferred tax relating to origination and reversal of temporary differences

16

(10)

(27)

Total deferred income tax expense/(benefit)

16

(10)

(27)

Total income tax expense

95

86

58

 

The Russian income tax rate of 20% applied for companies domiciled in Russian Federation in 2012, 2011 and 2010. Income tax rate may vary from 20% for subsidiaries incorporated in other jurisdictions. It is calculated according to local fiscal regulations.

 

Temporary differences between these consolidated financial statements and tax records gave rise to the following deferred income tax assets and liabilities:

 

As of December 31, 2012

Recognized in profitand loss

As of December 31, 2011

Recognized in profitand loss

As of December 31, 2010

Recognized deferred tax assets relateto the following:

Short-term financial assets

3

2

1

1

Short-term accounts receivable, net of allowance

1

1

1

Inventories

1

1

Long-term financial assets

1

1

1

Long-term accounts receivable, net of allowance

(1)

1

Property, plant and equipment

1

(1)

2

2

Other non-current assets

(2)

2

2

Short-term accounts payable and accrued liabilities

3

(1)

4

1

3

Other current liabilities

(1)

1

1

Long-term accounts payable and accrued liabilities

2

1

1

1

Long- term accrued reserves

2

1

1

1

Tax loss carry forward

3

2

1

1

Valuation allowance for deferred income tax asset

(2)

(2)

(1)

(1)

Deferred tax assets

15

2

13

4

9

Recognized deferred tax liabilities relateto the following:

Mineral rights

(62)

1

(63)

2

(65)

Property, plant and equipment and other

(190)

(19)

(171)

4

(175)

Deferred tax liabilities

(252)

(18)

(234)

6

(240)

Net deferred tax liabilities

(237)

(16)

(221)

10

(231)

 

A reconciliation between tax expense and the product of accounting profit multiplied by 20% tax rate for the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010 is as follows:

 

2012

2011

2010

Income before income tax

437

405

359

Income tax at statutory rate of 20%

87

81

72

Increase/(decrease) resulting from:

Effect of income tax rates in other jurisdictions

2

3

2

Effect of income tax relieves

(12)

(6)

(10)

Tax effect of non-taxable income and non-deductible expenses

18

8

(6)

Income tax

95

86

58

 

Unrecognized deferred tax assets in the consolidation balance sheet for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to RUB 7 billion, RUB 5 billion and RUB 5 billion, respectively, related to unused tax losses. Tax loss carry forwards available for utilization to the Company expire in 2013-2022.

 

Non-controlling interests

 

Non-controlling interests include:

 

As of December 31, 2012

2012

As of December 31, 2011

2011

As of December 31, 2010

2010

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

Non-control-ling interest (%)

Non-control-ling interest in net assets

Non-control-ling interest in net income

CJSC Vankorneft

6.04

23

1

6.04

22

5

6.04

18

6

OJSC Grozneftegaz

49.00

6

-

49.00

6

-

49.00

6

-

OJSC Far Eastern Bank

15.91

-

-

17.94

-

-

90.08

3

-

OJSC Rosneft Sakhalin

45.00

2

-

45.00

2

-

45.00

2

-

OJSC Russian Regional Development Bank (VBRR)

15.33

1

-

15.33

1

-

15.33

1

-

PHC CSKA LLC

20.00

2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-controlling interests in other entities

various

2

-

various

3

(2)

various

2

2

Non-controlling interests as of the end of the reporting period

36

1

34

3

32

8

 

Earnings per share

 

For the years ended December 31, basic earnings per share comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

2010

Continued operations

Net income attributable to shareholders of Rosneft

341

316

293

Weighted average number of issued common shares outstanding (millions)

9,416

9,591

9,598

Total basic earnings per share (RUB)

36.21

32.95

30.53

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

Cash and cash equivalents consist of the following:

 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Cash on hand and in bank accounts in RUB

19

22

Cash on hand and in bank accounts in foreign currencies

206

62

Deposits

69

80

Other

2

2

Total cash and cash equivalents

296

166

 

Cash accounts denominated in foreign currencies represent primarily cash in US$.

 

Deposits are interest bearing and denominated primarily in RUB.

 

Restricted cash comprises the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Obligatory reserve with the CBR

1

1

Offsetting account under joint venture agreement with BP Group in Euro (Note 27)

3

3

Total restricted cash

4

4

 

Other short-term financial assets

 

Other short-term financial assets comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Financial assets available-for-sale:

Bonds

14

13

Stocks and shares

6

2

Loans and accounts receivable:

Loans granted (Note 30)

14

2

Loans issued to associates

1

4

Notes receivable, net of allowance

27

36

Loans granted under reverse repurchase agreements

-

22

Deposits and deposit certificates

-

21

Structured deposits

-

31

Held-for-trading financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

Corporate bonds

10

16

State bonds

5

3

Stocks and shares

6

-

Derivative financial instruments

3

-

Total other short-term financial assets

86

150

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 available-for-sale bonds comprise the following:

 

Type of security

2012

2011

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

State bonds(federal loan bonds issued by the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation)

3

6.9%-8.1%

November 2014 - July 2015

4

6.1% - 11.3%

July 2012 - January 2016

Municipal bonds

1

8.75%-9.25%

June 2013 - November 2018

1

8.0% - 17.9%

March 2012 - October 2021

Corporate bonds

10

4.25%-10.0%

February 2013 - November 2023

8

6.25% - 13.0%

February 2013 - October 2021

Total

14

13

 

Structured deposits are denominated in US$ and amount to RUB 0 billion and RUB 31 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest rates of structured deposits range from 5.1% to 7.0% p.a. as of December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2012 all structured deposits were repaid.

 

Bank deposits amount to RUB 0 billion and RUB 21 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, bank deposits are primarily denominated in US$ and bear interest rates ranging from 3.0% to 7.25% p.a. As of December 31, 2012 the bank deposits were repaid.

 

As of December 31, 2012, notes receivable include corporate notes receivable that are primarily denominated in RUB with nominal interest rates ranging from 4.25% to 8.50% p.a. with maturities to November 2014 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 5.94% p.a. with maturities to June 2013.

 

As of December 31, 2011, notes receivable include corporate notes receivable with nominal interest rates ranging from 3.84% to 7.10% p.a. with maturities ranging from January 2012 to December 2014 and nominally interest-free corporate notes receivable with weighted average effective interest rate of 6.39% p.a. with maturities ranging from January 2012 to February 2014. Long-term portion of notes receivable is included in Long-term financial assets (Note 26).

 

Reverse repurchase agreements are collateralized by trading securities with a fair value of RUB 0 billion and RUB 22 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 trading securities comprise the following:

 

Type of security

2012

2011

Balance

Interest rate p.a.

Date of maturity

Balance

Interest rate

p.a.

Date ofmaturity

State and municipal bonds

-

-

-

3

6.7% - 15.0%

December 2012 - February 2036

Corporate bonds

10

2.85% - 13.5%

March 2013 - October 2023

16

6.47% - 19.0%

February 2012 - October 2021

Bonds issued by CBR

5

6.7% - 12.0%

January 2013 - February 2036

-

-

-

Trading stocks with state participation

6

-

Total

21

19

 

In 2012 the Company entered into a series of deliverable conversion transactions with an option (collar) for the sale of US$ for a term until December 2013. Monthly at the predetermined date RUB/US$ exchange spot rate is fixed. In the event that the RUB/US$ exchange spot rate breaks out of the upper or lower bands of the collar, the parties of the contract execute currency purchase-sale transaction for nominal amount of US$ 20.5 million (RUB 0.6 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) at the conversion rates, stipulated in the contract. Fair value measurements are performed using a model, based on source data from Bloomberg. Fair value of the series of deliverable conversion transactions with an option (collar) is presented in Other short-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 1 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.

 

In 2012 the Company entered into currency - interest rate swap contracts with five banks for a term until 2015. In accordance with the schedule the parties of the contract are obliged to exchange payments in one currency for payments in another currency in the amount equivalent to the nominal amount, multiplied by a corresponding interest rate, and exchange the nominal amounts at the end of the contract term. Nominal amount for the Company is US$ 1,982 million (RUB 60 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) at the fixed interest rate ranging from ranging from 1.65% to 2.155% p.a. Nominal amount for the other party is RUB 62 billion at the fixed interest rate 7.2% p.a.

 

In 2012 the Company entered into currency - interest rate swap contracts with two banks for a term until 2017. In accordance with the schedule the parties of the contract are obliged to exchange payments in one currency for payments in another currency in the amount equivalent to the nominal amount, multiplied by a corresponding interest rate, and exchange the nominal amounts at the end of the contract term. Nominal amount for the Company is US$ 641 million (RUB 19 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) at the floating interest rate USD LIBOR 3M plus 252 and 268 basis points. Nominal amount for the other party is RUB 20 billion at the fixed interest rate 8.6% p.a.

 

Currency - interest rate swaps are measured, based on the yield curve, at the present value of future estimated cash flows, using market interest rates. Fair value of the currency - interest rate swap contracts is presented in Other short-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 2 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.

 

Accounts receivable

 

Accounts receivable include the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Trade receivables

194

183

Banking loans to customers

19

24

Other accounts receivable

22

15

Total

235

222

Allowance for doubtful accounts

(8)

(5)

Total accounts receivable, net of allowance

227

217

 

The allowance for doubtful accounts is recognized at each balance sheet date based on estimates of the Company's management regarding the expected cash inflows to repay accounts receivable.

 

The Company recognized allowance for doubtful accounts for all significant past due accounts receivable as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 accounts receivable were not pledged as collateral for loans and borrowings provided to the Company.

 

 

Inventories

 

Inventories comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Crude oil and associated gas

45

46

Petroleum products and petrochemicals

56

46

Materials and supplies

20

23

Work in progress

11

11

Total

132

126

 

Materials and supplies mostly include spare parts. Petroleum products and petrochemicals include those designated both for sale and for own use.

2012

2011

2010

The cost of inventories recognised as an expense during the period

379

297

151

 

Cost of inventories recognized as an expense during the period is included in Production and operating expenses, Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs and General and administrative expenses.

 

Prepayments and other current assets

 

Prepayments comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Value added tax and excise receivable

81

62

Prepayments to suppliers

24

25

Prepaid customs duties

54

51

Other taxes

11

11

Other

5

3

Total prepayments and other current assets

175

152

 

Prepaid customs duties primarily represent export duties related to the export of crude oil and petroleum products (Note 10). 

 

Property, plant and equipment and construction in progress

 

Explorationand production

Refining and distribution

Corporate and other unallocated activities

Total

Cost

As of January 1, 2011

1,937

378

82

2,397

Additions

275

103

21

399

Disposals

(20)

(9)

(5)

(34)

Exchange differences

5

5

Cost of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

7

7

As of December 31, 2011

2,204

472

98

2,774

Depreciation, depletion and impairment losses

As of January 1, 2011

(294)

(60)

(16)

(370)

Depreciation and depletion charge

(177)

(24)

(12)

(213)

Disposals and other movements

1

1

Impairment of assets

(4)

(4)

Exchange differences

(4)

(4)

As of December 31, 2011

(474)

(84)

(32)

(590)

Net book value as of January 1, 2011

1,643

318

66

2,027

Net book value as of December 31, 2011

1,730

388

66

2,184

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of January 1, 2011

13

9

2

24

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2011

11

29

7

47

Total as of January 1, 2011

1,656

327

68

2,051

Total as of December 31, 2011

1,741

417

73

2,231

Cost

Additions

298

154

22

474

Disposals

(15)

(7)

(10)

(32)

Exchange differences

(6)

(6)

Cost of asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

5

5

As of December 31, 2012

2,486

619

110

3,215

Depreciation, depletion and impairment losses

Depreciation and depletion charge

(185)

(33)

(11)

(229)

Disposals and other movements

1

1

1

3

Impairment of assets

(10)

(10)

Exchange differences

4

4

As of December 31, 2012

(664)

(116)

(42)

(822)

Net book value as of December 31, 2012

1,822

503

68

2,393

Prepayments for property, plant and equipment as of December 31, 2012

5

53

10

68

Total as of December 31, 2012

1,827

556

78

2,461

 

The cost of construction in progress included in Property, Plant and Equipment was RUB 654 billion, RUB 441 billion and RUB 302 billion as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively.

 

In 2011, the Company identified an impairment indicator (a decrease of freight rates and tariffs on the global transportion services market) with respect to the three twin-hull shuttle oil tankers, included in Corporate and other unallocated activities category of Property, plant and equipment. The Company compared carrying and recoverable amounts of these oil tankers as prescribed by IAS 36, Impairment of Assets. The Company used market information on similar oil tankers to measure their fair value. Resulting impairment loss of RUB 4 billion was recognized in Other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in 2011.

 

In 2012, the Company identified an impairment indicator (exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the entity has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area) with respect to the three exploration licenses, included in Exploration and production segment of Property, plant and equipment. As a result the Company recognized an impairment loss of RUB 10 billion in Other expenses in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income in 2012.

 

Depreciation charge for the period includes RUB 4 billion of depreciation which was capitalized as part of the construction cost of property, plant and equipment and cost of inventory.

 

The Company capitalized RUB 24 billion, RUB 14 billion and RUB 11 billion of interest expenses on loans and borrowings in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Exploration and evaluation assets

 

Exploration and evaluation assets included in segment "Exploration and production" comprise the following:

 

2012

2011

As of January 1

11

10

Capitalized expenditures

4

7

Reclassified to development assets

(4)

(1)

Expensed

-

(5)

As of December 31

11

11

 

Mineral rights

 

Mineral rights included in exploration and production assets comprise the following:

 

Mineral rights to proved properties

Mineral rights to unproved properties

Total

As of January 1, 2011

Cost

266

99

365

Accumulated depletion

(30)

(30)

Net book value as of January 1, 2011

236

99

335

Depletion charge

(15)

(15)

Additions

8

8

Reclassification from unproved properties to proved properties

3

(3)

As of December 31, 2011

Cost

269

104

373

Accumulated depletion

(45)

(45)

Net book value as of December 31, 2011

224

104

328

Depletion charge

(15)

(15)

Additions

6

6

Impairment of unproved properties

(10)

(10)

Reclassification from unproved properties to proved properties

2

(2)

As of December 31, 2012

Cost

271

98

369

Accumulated depletion

(60)

(60)

Net book value as of December 31, 2012

211

98

309

 

Provision for asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations

 

The provision for asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations was RUB 38 billion, RUB 36 billion and RUB 32 billion as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, and included in Property, plant and equipment.

 

Intangible assets and goodwill

 

Intangible assets and goodwill comprise the following:

 

Rights for land lease

Other intangible assets

Total intangible assets

Goodwill

Cost

As of January 1, 2011

21

8

29

132

Additions

3

3

Disposals

(2)

(2)

(4)

As of December 31, 2011

19

9

28

132

Amortization

As of January 1, 2011

(4)

(2)

(6)

Amortization charge

(1)

(1)

(2)

Other disposals

1

1

2

As of December 31, 2011

(4)

(2)

(6)

Net book value as of January 1, 2011

17

6

23

132

Net book value as of December 31, 2011

15

7

22

132

Cost

Additions

2

2

2

Disposals

(1)

(2)

(3)

As of December 31, 2012

18

9

27

134

Amortization

Amortization charge

(1)

(1)

(2)

As of December 31, 2012

(5)

(3)

(8)

Net book value as of December 31, 2012

13

6

19

134

 

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test as of October 1 of each year. The impairment test was carried out at the beginning of the fourth quarter of each year using data that was appropriate at that time. As a result of the annual test, no impairment of goodwill was identified in 2012 or 2011.

 

Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated to related groups of cash generating units being its operating segments - Exploration and production segment and Refining and distribution segment. In assessing whether goodwill has been impaired, the current values of the operating segments (including goodwill) were compared with their estimated value in use.

 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Goodwill

Exploration and production

21

21

Refining and distribution

113

111

Total

134

132

 

The Company has estimated value in use of the operating segments using a discounted cash flow model. Future cash flows have been adjusted for risks specific to the segment and discounted using a rate, which reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the segment for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted.

 

The Company's business plan, approved by the Company's Board of Directors, is the primary source of information for the determination of the operating segments' value in use. The business plan contains internal forecasts of oil and gas production, refinery throughputs, sales volumes of various types of refined products, revenues, operating and capital expenditures. As an initial step in the preparation of these plans, various assumptions, such as oil prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, petroleum product margins and cost inflation rates, are set. These assumptions take into account existing prices, US$ and RUB inflation rates, other macroeconomic factors and historical trends, as well as markets volatility.

 

In determining the value in use for each of the operating segments, cash flows have been discounted and aggregated with the segments' terminal value. In determining the terminal value of the Company's segments in the post-forecast period the Gordon model has been used. The model has used average rates of operation decline equal to natural rates of production decline for the existing assets provided that there is no production drilling. These rates were 8.0% of annual decline for Exploration and production segment and 0.0% for Refining and distribution segment.

 

The most important assumptions among the factors listed above are the following:

discount rate;

oil price;

production volumes.

 

The sensitivity of the discounted cash flows to their changes is the most significant.

 

The discount rate calculation is based on the Company's weighted average cost of capital adjusted to reflect pre-tax discount rate and amounts to 6.9% p.a. in 2012 (7.3% p.a.. in 2011). For the purposes of impairment testing, the Company's Urals oil price assumptions were based on the forecasted market prices. Management believes that no reasonably possible changes in the assumptions may lead to the goodwill impairment.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 the Company did not have any intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, except for goodwill. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011 no intangible assets have been pledged as collateral.

 

Other long-term financial assets

 

Other long-term financial assets comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Bonds

1

1

Financial assets available for sale

Promissory notes

-

7

Shares of OJSC INTER RAO UES

3

5

Shares of JSC IDGC Holding

3

-

Long-term loans issued to associates

11

13

Loans to employees

1

1

Derivative financial instruments

2

-

Other

3

7

Total other long-term financial assets

24

34

 

Pursuant to contracts, long-term loans issued to associates have a maturity period from 3 through 9 years.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no overdue long-term financial assets for which no impairment provision was created.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, shares of OJSC INTER RAO UES were impaired in the amount of RUB 2 billion and RUB 0 billion, respectively, loans issued to associates were impaired in the amount of RUB 0.2 billion and RUB 0.3 billion, respectively, and promissory notes were impaired in the amount of RUB 0 billion and RUB 3 billion, respectively.

 

No long-term financial assets were pledged as collateral as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, no long-term financial assets were received by the Company as collateral.

 

Shares of OJSC INTER RAO UES

 

In December 2010, the Company entered into a letter of intent to exchange its interest in a number of equity investees and one subsidiary for noncontrolling interest in INTER RAO UES. In May 2011, the exchange in respect of the Company's interest in equity investees was completed, and the Company acquired 0.4% share in INTER RAO UES. In July 2011, the Company exchanged its 100% interest in the subsidiary for additional shares in INTER RAO UES. Immediately after the transaction Rosneft's share in INTER RAO UES's equity increased to 1.36%. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's investment in INTER RAO UES was accounted for as Long-term financial asset available for sale.

 

Shares of JSC IDGC Holding

 

In April 2012, the Company acquired 1,588,994,637 ordinary shares of JSC IDGC Holding issued additionally. Payment for the shares was made from proceeds received from the sale of investments in associates JSC Kubanenergo and JSC Tomsk Distribution Company. As a result of this acquisition, the Company's ownership interest in JSC IDGC Holding became 3.15%. As of December 31, 2012, the Company's investment in IDGC Holding was accounted for as Long-term financial asset available for sale.

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

In 2012 the Company entered into a series of deliverable forward transactions for the sale of US$ for a term until 2015 for the nominal amount of US$ 1,259 million (RUB 38 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012). The Company sells US$ in accordance with the schedule at the conversion rates, stipulated in the contract. The value of forward transactions is determined using the market quotes of forward exchange rates. Fair value measurements are performed using a model, based on source data from Bloomberg. Fair value of the series of deliverable forward transactions is presented in Other long-term financial assets - Derivative financial instruments in the amount of RUB 2 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates

 

Investments in joint ventures and associates comprise the following:

 

Name of an investee

Country

The Company's share as of December 31, 2012, %

As of December31,

2012

2011

Joint ventures

Polar Lights Company LLC

Russia

50.00%

1

2

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

Russia

50.00%

38

34

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

Russia

25.94%

30

16

Rosneft Shell Caspian Vent.

Russia

51.00%

1

1

Ruhr Oel GmbH

Germany

50.00%

47

46

Taihu Ltd

Cyprus

51.00%

13

2

Lanard Holdings LTD (Fuelling complex Vnukovo)

Cyprus

50.00%

17

-

NGK ITERA LLC

Russia

51.00%

95

-

Arktikshelfneftegaz JSC

Russia

50.00%

3

-

Associates

SC Kubanenergo

Russia

27.97%

-

2

Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC

Russia

35.33%

13

-

Other associates

11

11

Total joint ventures and associates

269

114

 

Financial information on significant associates and joint ventures as of December 31, 2012 is presented below:

The Company's share in net assets

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

OJSC Verkhne-chonsk-neftegaz

Taihu Ltd

Ruhr Oel GmbH

NGK ITERA LLC

Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazo-dobycha LLC

Shares of fueling service complex of Vnukovo

Current assets

11

7

10

11

14

1

-

Non-current assets

43

20

46

14

54

8

1

Total assets

54

27

56

25

68

9

1

Current liabilities

(22)

(8)

(6)

(19)

(10)

(8)

-

Non-current liabilities

(9)

(1)

(37)

-

(14)

(1)

-

Total liabilities

(31)

(9)

(43)

(19)

(24)

(9)

-

Total Company's share in net assets

23

18

13

6

44

-

1

 

The Company's share in net profit

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

OJSC Verkhne-chonsk-neftegaz

Taihu Ltd

Ruhr Oel GmbH

 

NGK ITERA LLC

Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazo-dobycha LLC

Shares of fueling service complex of Vnukovo

Sales revenue

55

20

55

24

15

-

2

Cost of sales

(19)

(3)

(41)

(24)

(12)

-

(2)

Gross profit

36

17

14

-

3

-

-

Other expenses

(28)

(1)

(3)

-

(1)

-

-

Profit before tax

8

16

11

-

2

-

-

Income tax

(2)

(2)

(3)

-

-

-

-

Total Company's share in net profit

6

14

8

-

2

-

-

 

Financial information on significant associates and joint ventures as of December 31, 2011 is presented below:

The Company's share in net assets

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

OJSC Verkhne-chonsknefte-gaz

Taihu Ltd

Ruhr Oel GmbH

Current assets

11

2

11

8

Non-current assets

52

17

42

16

Total assets

63

19

53

24

Current liabilities

(24)

(3)

(7)

-

Non-current liabilities

(13)

(7)

(44)

(17)

Total liabilities

(37)

(10)

(51)

(17)

Total Company's share in net assets

26

9

2

7

 

The Company's share in net profit

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

OJSC Verkhne-chonsknefte-gaz

Taihu Ltd

Ruhr Oel GmbH

Sales revenue

52

11

50

13

Cost of sales

(49)

(1)

(38)

(13)

Gross profit

3

10

12

-

Other expenses

(3)

(1)

(3)

-

Profit before tax

-

9

9

-

Income tax

-

(1)

(2)

-

Total Company's share in net profit

-

8

7

-

 

The OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz and NGK ITERA LLC investments include RUB 7 billion and RUB 2 billion of goodwill, respectively.

 

The difference amounting to RUB 39 billion between the cost of investments and the Сompany's share in the net assets of the Ruhr Oel GmbH is an adjustment to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the joint venture acquisition, and goodwill. This difference is included in the carrying amount of investments in the Ruhr Oel GmbH.

 

The difference amounting to RUB 13 billion between the cost of investments and the Сompany's share in the net assets of Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC is an adjustment to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the associate acquisition. This difference is included in the carrying amount of investments in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC.

 

Investments in fueling service complex of Vnukovo include adjustments to the fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities at the date of the associate acquisition, and goodwill. The difference amounting to RUB 16 billion is included in the carrying amount of investments in fueling service complex of Vnukovo.

 

The fair value of investments in associates with published market quotations comprise:

 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

OJSC Kubanenergo

-

2

 

Equity share in profits/(losses) of associates and jointly controlled entities:

 

Participation

interest (percentage)as of December 31, 2012

Share in income/(loss)of equity investees

2012

2011

2010

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

50.00

8

-

1

Polar Lights Company LLC

50.00

1

1

-

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

25.94

14

8

1

Taihu Ltd

51.00

8

7

3

NGK ITERA LLC

51.00

2

-

-

Other

various

(2)

-

(1)

Total equity share in profits

31

16

4

 

The Company's investments in joint operations as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 include Sakhalin-1 production sharing agreement ("PSA") which is operated by ExxonMobil. PSA Sakhalin-1 was accounted for using method of proportional consolidation.

 

OJSC Tomskneft VNK

 

OJSC Tomskneft VNK is a joint venture with OJSC Gazprom Neft engaged in oil exploration and production in Western Siberia. The shareholder agreement provides that key decisions regarding the activities of OJSC Tomskneft VNK shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right. The investment in OJSC Tomskneft VNK includes goodwill in the amount of RUB 10.8 billion.

 

Polar Lights Company LLC ("PLC")

 

PLC is a limited liability company equally owned by Conoco Phillips Timan-Pechora Inc. and the Company. PLC is primarily engaged in the development of the Ardalin and satellite fields in the Timan-Pechora Basin located 125 kilometers south of the Barents Sea above the Arctic Circle.

 

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz

 

OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz is a joint venture with TNK-BP International Limited which holds a license for the development of the Verkhnechonskoye oil and gas condensate deposit, the largest oil deposit in the Irkutsk region.

 

In 2008, commercial production began at the Verkhnechonskoye oil field. OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz is financed by the Company and other participant pro rata to their interest in share capital of the OJSC Verkhnechonskneftegaz.

 

Taihu Ltd./OJSC Udmurtneft

 

In November 2006, the Company acquired a 51% equity share in Taihu Ltd., a joint venture with China Petrochemical Corporation ("Sinopec"), incorporated for holding interest in and strategic management of OJSC Udmurtneft. The Shareholder Agreement in respect of this joint venture stipulates that key decisions regarding its business shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right.

 

In December 2006, Taihu Ltd, through its wholly owned subsidiary, acquired a 96.86% equity interest in OJSC Udmurtneft. OJSC Udmurtneft is located in the Volga-Ural region of the Russian Federation and holds licenses for the development of 24 producing oil and gas condensate deposits.

 

As of December 31, 2012, as a result of treasury share transactions the share of Taihu Ltd. in OJSC Udmurtneft increased to 97.14%.

 

NGK ITERA LLC

 

In August 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of 51% of NGK ITERA LLC, one of the largest independent producers and traders of natural gas in Russia. Purchase consideration comprised cash in the amount of RUB 7 billion, including performance-based consideration of RUB 2 billion, and fair value of 100% interest in the Company's subsidiary Kynsko-Chaselskoye neftegaz LLC ("KCN LLC") in the amount of RUB 86 billion.

 

As a result of fair value remeasurement of the disposed 100% share in KCN LLC, which owns an oil and gas exploration and production license, the Company recognized gain in the amount of RUB 82 billion in Other income in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. The acquisition of share in NGK ITERA LLC was accounted for as an investment in jointly controlled entity using the equity method because key business decisions are subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right.

 

Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Limited

 

JV Rosneft-Shell Caspian Ventures Limited ("JV") is a joint venture in which the Company holds a 51% interest. The Articles of Incorporation of the joint venture stipulate that key decisions regarding its business shall be subject to unanimous approval by both participants and none of the participants has a preferential voting right.

 

On December 6, 1996, the Company and the JV entered into an agreement with eight oil and gas companies and government agencies of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan for the establishment of Caspian Pipeline Consortium ("CPC"). The purpose of the consortium is to design, finance, build and operate a pipeline from the oil fields located in Western Kazakhstan through Russia to the port of Novorossiysk. The interest of the JV in the CPC is 7.5%. In October 2001, the CPC pipeline commenced operation.

 

Ruhr Oel GmbH ("ROG")

 

In May 2011 the Company acquired 50% ownership interest in ROG. ROG is a joint venture with BP Group engaged in processing of crude oil in Western Europe.

 

CJSC Arcticshelfneftegaz

 

In February 2012, the Company acquired 50% interest in CJSC Arcticshelfneftegaz ("ASNG") through acquisition of 100% interest in ArcticProminvest LLC for RUB 3 billion. ASNG was established for the purpose of raising private investments for the exploration and development of oil and gas resources of the Arctic shelf in the Barents Sea area. ASNG holds a license for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons at the Medyn-Varandei license area. The license is valid until 2025. Two oil fields (Varandei-sea and Medyn-sea) were discovered within the license area. This acquisition was accounted for as investment in jointly controlled entity using the equity method.

 

Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC

 

In March 2012, the Company acquired 35.3% interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC from Sberbank Capital LLC for RUB 13 billion. Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha LLC holds licenses for oil production at the Srednebotuobinskoye oil, gas and condensate field located 160 km north of the Eastern Siberia - Pacific Ocean ("ESPO") oil pipeline. This acquisition was accounted for as an investment in associate using the equity method.

 

Fueling service complex of international airport Vnukovo

 

In April 2012, the Company acquired 50% interest in fueling service complex of international airport Vnukovo through acquisition of share in Lanard Holdings Ltd (Cyprus) for RUB 16 billion. International airport Vnukovo is located in the Moscow Region and is one of the largest air transportation hubs in Russia. The acquisition was accounted for as an investment in jointly controlled entity using the equity method.

 

Other associates

 

Other associates are mainly represented by investments in shares of electric power generation, transmission, distribution and maintenance companies located in the Tomsk region and in the south of Russia.

 

 

Other non-current non-financial assets

 

Other non-current non-financial assets comprise the following:

 

As of December, 31

2012

2011

Prepaid insurance

1

2

Other

2

1

Total other non-current non-financial assets

3

3

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities comprise the following:

 

As of December, 31

2012

2011

Accounts payable to suppliers and contractors

117

97

Advances received

18

18

Banking customer accounts

41

40

Salary and other benefits payable

22

17

Other accounts payable

10

9

Total accounts payable and accrued liabilities

208

181

 

Current accounts payable are normally settled within 31 days on average (2011: 32 days). Interest rates on banking customer accounts amount to 0.01%-3.0% p.a. Trade and other payables are non-interest bearing.

 

Loans, borrowings and finance lease liabilities

 

Loans and borrowings comprise the following:

As of December 31,

Currency

2012

2011

Long-term

Bank loans

RUB

101

3

Bank loans

US$, Euro

648

658

Bonds

RUB

20

-

Eurobonds

US$

91

-

Customer deposits

RUB

8

5

Customer deposits

US$, Euro

3

2

Other debt

RUB

1

1

Less: Current portion of long-term loans and borrowings

(35)

(73)

Long-term loans and borrowings

837

596

Short-term

Bank loans

RUB

8

5

Bank loans (Note 20)

US$

12

-

Customer deposits

RUB

12

15

Customer deposits

US$, Euro

3

3

Borrowings

RUB

5

7

Borrowings - Yukos related

RUB

8

8

Promissory notes payable

RUB

1

1

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related

RUB

40

40

Obligations under a repurchase agreement

RUB

2

-

Current portion of long-term loans

35

73

Short-term loans and borrowings and current portion of long-term loans

126

152

Total loans and borrowings

963

748

 

Long-term loans and borrowings

 

Long-term bank loans comprise the following:

Purpose of the loan

Currency

Interest rate p.a.

Maturity date

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Loans raised for replenishment of working capital

US$/Euro

LIBOR+0.58% - LIBOR+2.40%; 4.35%;EURIBOR+2.40%

2013-2017

167

148

Loans raised to finance special-purpose business activities

US$

LIBOR+0.60% -LIBOR+3.25%

2029

456

483

Loans raised to finance special-purpose business activities

RUB

7.20% -8.49%

2015

101

3

Loans raised for property, plant and equipment construction/purchase

US$/Euro

LIBOR+1.00% - LIBOR+1.35%; 3.23%;EURIBOR+0.35%

2016-2021

27

29

Total

751

663

Debt issue costs

(2)

(2)

Total long-term bank loans

749

661

 

Generally, long-term bank loans are denominated in US$ and secured by oil export contracts. If the Company fails to make timely debt repayments, the terms of such contracts are normally provided the lender with an express right of claim for contractual revenue in the amount of failing loan repayments which must be remitted directly through transit currency (US$ denominated) accounts in lender banks. Under the terms of such contracts, the lender is normally provided with an express right of claim for contractual revenue which must be remitted directly through transit currency (US$ denominated) accounts in lender banks Accounts receivable outstanding balance arising out of such contracts amounts to RUB 32 billion and RUB 43 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and is indicated as part of receivables of customers and clients.

 

In December 2011, Rosneft received funds under a syndicated long-term floating rate debt agreement with foreign banks in the amount of US$ 1.4 billion and Euro 0.47 billion (RUB 42.5 billion and RUB 18.9 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012). The debt is repayable within 5 years.

 

In April 2012, the Company received cash under two long-term unsecured loan agreements. One loan in the amount of US$ 1.05 billion (RUB 31.9 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) and Euro 0.85 billion (RUB 34.0 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) was received from a syndicate of foreign banks for 5 years at floating rates. Loans were raised for general corporate purposes. The second loan was received from a Russian bank at a fixed rate in the amount of US$ 1.0 billion (RUB 30.4 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) repayable in 2015, but early repaid in November 2012. These loans were raised to finance business activities.

 

During the third quarter of 2012, the Company received cash under two long-term unsecured loan agreements. One loan in the amount of Euro 0.53 billion (RUB 21.3 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) was received from a syndicate of foreign banks for 5 years at floating rates and RUB 100 billion from a Russian bank at a fixed rate repayable in 2015. These loans were raised for general corporate purposes. As of December 31, 2012 the loans are fully drawn down.

 

In December 2012, the Company signed two long-term loan agreements with a group of international banks for the total amount of US$ 16.8 billion to finance the acquisition of 50% stake in TNK-BP from BP (Note 39). One loan agreement in the amount of US$ 4.1 billion (RUB 124.5 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) is signed with the syndicate of foreign banks for 5 years under floating rates. The other one is signed with the syndicate of foreign banks under floating rates in the amount of US$ 12.7 billion (RUB 385.7 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) for 2 years. As of December 31, 2012 loans are not drawn down.

 

In October 2012, the Company issued two tranches of documentary non-convertible interest-bearing bonds with the nominal amount of RUB 20 billion and maturity in 2017. Coupon payments will be done on semi-annual basis of fixed rate of 8.6% p.a.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company raised the funds through Eurobonds placement in amount of US$ 3.0 billion. Eurobonds were placed by two tranches at a nominal value: one in the amount of US$ 1.0 billion (RUB 30.4 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) with the coupon of 3.149% p.a. to be matured in March 2017, and the other one in the amount of US$ 2.0 billion (RUB 60.7 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2012) with the coupon of 4.199% p.a. to be matured in March 2022. The funds received will be used for general corporate purposes.

 

Customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks, denominated in RUB and foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2012, RUB denominated deposits bear interest rates ranging from 4.00% to 15.12% p.a. and deposits denominated in foreign currencies bear interest rates ranging from 0.75% to 9.00% p.a.

 

The Company is obliged to comply with a number of restrictive financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements. Such covenants include maintaining certain financial ratios.

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive financial and other covenants contained in its loan agreements.

 

Short-term loans and borrowings 

 

In May and July 2012 the Company issued a US$ 400 million loan to a third party (RUB 13 billion at the CBR official exchange rates as of the issue dates) at the interest rate of 5.5% p.a. and the maturity of 12 months. In October 2012 the Company sold the loan to a foreign bank for the carrying value of the asset at the date of transfer. Simultaneously the foreign bank and the Company entered into put and call option agreements in respect of rights and obligations under the loan agreement. Put option grants the foreign bank an option to require the Company repurchase the loan for its nominal value with interest accrued but not yet paid to the date of the request in the event of a failure by the other party of the loan agreement to pay any amount due. Call option grants the Company an option to repurchase the loan at any time for nominal value with interest accrued but not yet paid to the date of the request. Loan issued to the third party has been included in Other short-term financial assets - Loans granted (Note 20) in the amount of RUB 12 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012. Liabilities to the foreign bank were included in Short-term loans and borrowings in the amount of RUB 12 billion in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012.

 

Customer deposits represent fixed-term deposits placed by customers with the Company's subsidiary banks, denominated in RUB and foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2012 the RUB denominated deposits bear interest rates ranging from 0.01% to 11.00% p.a. and deposits denominated in foreign currencies bear interest rates ranging from 0.01% to 7.20% p.a.

 

RUB denominated borrowings represent loans received from an equity investee.

 

RUB denominated borrowings - Yukos related primarily include borrowings provided by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., at 9% p.a. interest that matured in 2007. The borrowings were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The borrowings are being disputed by the Company. The Company partially settled the above mentioned liabilities in compliance with the court decision in 2010 (Note 39).

 

Promissory notes payable - Yukos related comprise amounts that were carried in the books of the former Yukos subsidiaries the Company acquired through the auctions for the sale of the assets of Yukos. The promissory notes are being disputed by the Company. The promissory notes are claimed to be primarily payable on demand and bear interest rates ranging from 0% to 18% p.a. (Note 39).

 

In 2012 and 2011 the Company received cash under repurchase agreements and recognized these transactions as a collateralized loan. As of December 31, 2012, the liabilities of the Company under repurchase agreements amounted to RUB 2 billion with the fair value amounted to RUB 2.5 billion.

 

In 2012 the Company had neither delays in payments under loan agreements nor overdue interest payments.

 

Finance lease

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Long-term finance lease liabilities

11

6

Including short-term financial lease liabilities

3

1

 

Repayments of finance lease obligations comprise the following:

 

As of December 31, 2012

Minimum

lease payments

Finance expense

Present value of minimum lease payments

Less than 1 year

4

(1)

3

From 1 to 5 years

6

(1)

5

Over 5 years

4

(1)

3

Total

14

(3)

11

 

As of December 31, 2011

Minimum

lease payments

Finance expense

Present value of minimum lease payments

Less than 1 year

1

1

From 1 to 5 years

3

3

Over 5 years

4

(2)

2

Total

8

(2)

6

 

Finance leases entered into by the Company do not contain covenants and are entered into for a long term, with certain leases having purchase options at the end of lease term. Finance leases are denominated in RUB and US$.

 

The following is the analysis of the property, plant and equipment under capital leases recognized in Property, plant and equipment (Note 24):

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Plant and machinery

8

1

Vehicles

6

8

Total cost

14

9

Less: accumulated depreciation

(3)

(2)

Total net book value of leased property

11

7

 

Current liabilities related to derivative instruments

 

In December 2008, the Company entered into a 5-year interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of US$ 500 million (RUB 15 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2008). Under the terms of the contract, a floating LIBOR rate may be converted into a certain fixed rate. The other party has a call option to terminate the deal commencing two years after the contract date. Weighted average fixed interest rate for the contract is 1.71% p.a.

 

In December 2007, the Company entered into a 5-year interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of US$ 3 billion (RUB 74 billion at the CBR official exchange rate as of December 31, 2007). The contract expired in December 2012. Under the terms of the contract, a floating LIBOR rate could be converted into a certain fixed rate. The other party had a call option to terminate the deal. Weighted average fixed interest rate for the contract was 3.41% p.a.

 

Current liabilities related to derivative instruments comprise:

 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Interest rate swap

4

Total current liabilities related to derivative financial instruments

4

 

Interest rate swaps are measured, based on the yield curve, at the present value of future estimated cash flows, using market interest rates. Fair value measurements are based on source data from Bloomberg.

 

The resulting change in the fair value of liabilities related to the existing interest rate swap contracts was recorded as finance income in the amount of RUB 4 billion and as a reduction of finance expenses in the amount of RUB 2 billion in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Other short-term tax liabilities

 

Other short-term tax liabilities comprise the following:

As of December 31,

2012

2011

Mineral extraction tax

44

41

VAT

19

13

Excise duties

10

7

Personal income tax

1

Property tax

3

3

Other

2

Total other tax liabilities

77

66

 

Provisions

 

Asset retirement obligations

Environmental remediation provision

Legal, tax and other claims

Total

As of December 31, 2010, including

44

3

5

52

Non-current

44

3

-

47

Current

-

-

5

5

Provisions charged during the year

13

-

-

13

Increase/(decrease) in the liability resulting from

Changes in estimates

(3)

1

-

(2)

Change in the discount rate

(4)

-

-

(4)

Unwinding of discount

4

-

-

4

Utilised

-

-

-

-

As of December 31, 2011, including

54

4

5

63

Non-current

54

3

-

57

Current

-

1

5

6

Provisions charged during the year

5

1

1

7

Increase/(decrease) in the liability resulting from

Changes in estimates

(3)

-

(1)

(4)

Change in the discount rate

7

-

-

7

Unwinding of discount

4

-

-

4

Utilised

(3)

-

(2)

(5)

As of December 31, 2012, including

64

5

3

72

Non-current

64

3

-

67

Current

-

2

3

5

 

Asset retirement (decommissioning) obligations represent an estimate of costs of wells liquidation, recultivation of sand pits, slurry ponds, disturbed lands and dismantling pipelines and power transmission lines. The budget for payments under asset retirement obligations is prepared on an annual basis. Depending on the current economic environment the entity's actual expenditures may vary from the budgeted amounts.

 

Pension benefit obligations

 

Defined contribution plans

 

The Company makes payments to the State Pension Fund of the Russian Federation. These payments are calculated by the employer as percentage from the salary expense and are expensed as accrued.

 

The Company also maintains a defined contribution corporate pension plan to finance non-state pensions of its employees.

 

Pension contributions recognized in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income was as follows:

 

2012

2011

2010

State Pension Fund

16

14

10

NPF Neftegarant

3

3

3

Total pension contributions

19

17

13

 

Shareholders' equity

 

Common shares 

 

As of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

Authorized common shares:

quantity, millions

10,598

amount, billions of RUB

0.6

Issued and fully paid shares:

quantity, millions

10,598

amount, billions of RUB

0.6

Nominal value of 1 common share, RUB:

0.01

 

Amounts available for distribution to shareholders are based on statutory accounts of Rosneft prepared in accordance with Russian accounting standards, which differ significantly from IFRS (Note 3). Russian legislation identifies the basis of distribution as the current period net profit calculated in accordance with statutory accounting standards. According to Russian legislation, dividends cannot exceed the accounting income for the reporting year.

 

On June 10, 2011, the annual general shareholders' meeting approved dividends on the Company's common shares for 2010 in the amount of RUB 29 billion or RUB 2.76 per share. RUB 27 billion of the above related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares.

 

On June 20, 2012, the annual general shareholders' meeting approved dividends on the Company's common shares for 2011 in the amount of RUB 37 billion or RUB 3.45 per share. RUB 33 billion of the above are related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares. In August 2012, the approved dividends were fully paid.

 

On November 30, 2012, the extraordinary general shareholders' meeting approved additional dividends on the Company's common shares for 2011 in the amount of RUB 42 billion or 4.08 per share. RUB 38 billion of the above are related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares. In December 2012, the approved dividends were fully paid. Thus the dividends for 2011 amounted to 25% of the Company's IFRS net income attributable to Rosneft's shareholders.

 

Treasury shares 

As of December 31,

2012

2011

number, millions

1,360

1,010

amount, billions of RUB

299

224

 

In April 2011, the Company purchased 11,296,701 of its own shares for RUB 2.9 billion or RUB 258 per share.

 

In June 2012, the Company purchased 321,963,949 of its own shares for RUB 68 billion or RUB 212 per share.

 

In August 2012, the Company transferred 185,794 of treasury shares to compensate independent members of the Company's Board of Directors for 2011 and 2012 (Note 37). Both fair and carrying value of the above shares approximated RUB 0.04 billion.

 

In November 2012, the Company purchased 28,513,639 of its own shares for RUB 7 billion or RUB 249 per share.

 

Additional paid-in capital

2012

2011

Additional paid-in capital as of January 1

386

396

Change in ownership interests in subsidiaries

(1)

(10)

Additional paid-in capital as of December 31

385

386

 

In 2012 and 2011 the Company acquired additional shares in its two subsidiaries. The effect of these transactions in the total amount of RUB 1 billion and RUB 10 billion, respectively, was accounted for as a reduction of Additional paid-in capital.

 

 

Fair value of financial instruments

 

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities is determined as follows:

fair value of financial assets and liabilities quoted on active liquid markets is determined in accordance with the market quotes;

fair value of other financial assets and liabilities is determined in accordance with generally accepted models and is based on discounted cash flow analysis that relies on prices used for existing transactions in the current market;

fair value of derivative financial instruments is based on market quotes. If such quotes are unavailable, fair value is determined on the basis of valuation models that rely on assumptions confirmed by observable market prices or rates as of the reporting date.

 

Assets and liabilities of the Company that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with the fair value hierarchy are presented in the table below.

Fair value measurement

as of December 31, 2012

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Held-for-trading

13

8

-

21

Available-for-sale

5

15

-

20

Derivative financial instruments

-

3

-

3

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale

6

-

-

6

Derivative financial instruments

-

2

-

2

Total assets measured at fair value

24

28

-

52

 

Fair value measurement

as of December 31, 2011

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets:

Current assets

Held-for-trading

9

10

-

19

Available-for-sale

8

7

-

15

Non-current assets

Available-for-sale

5

7

-

12

Total assets measured at fair value

22

24

-

46

Current liabilities:

Derivative financial instruments

-

(4)

-

(4)

Total liabilities measured at fair value

-

(4)

-

(4)

 

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable recognized in these consolidated financial statements approximates their fair value.

 

The following table summarizes carrying amounts and fair values of all the Company's financial instruments recorded in the consolidated financial statements:

 

Carrying value

Fair value

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

Financial assets

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss:

Derivative financial instruments

5

-

5

-

Corporate and state bonds

15

19

15

19

Loans issued:

Bank deposits

-

52

-

52

Loans issued to associates

12

17

12

17

Other

1

1

1

1

 

Carrying value

Fair value

As of December 31,

As of December 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

Financial liabilities

Financial liabilities at amortized cost:

Accounts payable

(208)

(181)

(208)

(181)

Loans and borrowings with variable interest rate

(632)

(642)

(605)

(624)

Loans and borrowings with fixed interest rate

(331)

(106)

(321)

(108)

Financial liabilities at fair value, through profit or loss:

Derivative financial instruments

-

(4)

-

(4)

Financial lease liabilities

(11)

(6)

(11)

(6)

 

 

Related party transactions

 

For the purposes of these consolidated financial statements, parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial or operational decisions. In 2010, 2011 and 2012 the Company entered into transactions with the following related parties: joint ventures and associates, joint operations, enterprises directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government, key management, pension funds (Note 34).

 

Related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties might not, and transactions between related parties may not be effected on the same terms as transactions between unrelated parties.

 

Disclosure of related party transactions is presented on an aggregate basis for the companies directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government, associates and other companies. In addition, there may be an additional disclosure of certain significant transactions (balances and turnovers) with certain related parties.

 

In the course of its ordinary business, the Company enters into transactions with other companies controlled by the Russian Government. In the Russian Federation, electricity and transport tariffs are regulated by the Federal Tariff Service, an authorized governmental agency of the Russian Federation. Bank loans are recorded based on the market interest rates. Taxes are accrued and paid in accordance with the applicable tax law. The Company sells crude oil and petroleum products to related parties in the ordinary course of business at the prices close to average market prices. Gas sales prices in Russian market are regulated by the Federal Tariff Service.

 

Transactions with companies directly or indirectly controlled by the Russian Government

 

Revenues and income

2012

2011

2010

Oil and gas sales

94

28

8

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

30

25

20

Support services and other revenues

2

2

2

Finance income

18

7

7

144

62

37

 

Costs and expenses

2012

2011

2010

Production and operating expenses

8

10

5

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

187

181

126

Other expenses

17

7

-

Financial expenses

4

-

-

216

198

131

 

Other operations

2012

2011

2010

Purchase of financial assets and investments

(6)

(9)

(1)

Sale of financial assets and investments

-

1

-

Loans received

100

-

-

Loans repaid

(2)

(3)

(43)

Loans and borrowings issued

-

(1)

-

Deposits placed

(10)

(30)

(105)

Deposits repaid

24

165

24

Repurchase of shares

(1)

-

-

 

Settlement balances

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

Assets

Cash and cash equivalents

188

55

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

13

11

Prepayments and other current assets

15

16

Financial assets

7

11

223

93

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

15

2

Loans and borrowings

100

-

115

2

Transactions with joint ventures

 

Revenues and income

2012

2011

2010

Support services and other revenues

-

3

2

Finance income

1

1

2

1

4

4

 

Costs and expenses

2012

2011

2010

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products

89

68

37

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

6

5

3

Other expenses

1

5

-

96

78

40

 

Other operations

2012

2011

2010

Loans repaid

(2)

-

(3)

Repayment of loans and borrowings issued

5

3

-

 

Settlement balances

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

Assets

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

-

1

Prepayments and other current assets

-

-

Financial assets

-

6

-

7

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

7

1

Loans and borrowings

5

7

12

8

Transactions with associates

 

Crude oil is purchased from associates at Russian domestic market prices.

 

Pursuant to contracts, long-term loans issued to associates have maturity from 3 through 9 years (Note 26), and bear interest rates from 5.0% to 10.3% p.a.

 

Revenues and income

2012

2011

2010

Oil and gas sales

1

2

1

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

2

5

4

Support services and other revenues

4

6

4

Finance income

1

1

-

8

14

9

 

Costs and expenses

2012

2011

2010

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products

19

12

8

Production and operating expenses

2

4

7

Other expenses

7

3

1

28

19

16

 

Other operations

2012

2011

2010

Purchase of financial assets

-

(5)

-

Sale of financial assets and investments in associates

-

-

-

Loans and borrowings issued

(1)

-

(5)

Repayment of loans and borrowings issued

-

3

-

 

Settlement balances

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

Assets

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

6

8

Financial assets

12

10

18

18

Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

11

8

11

8

 

Transactions with non-state pension fund NPF Neftegarant

 

Costs and expenses

2012

2011

2010

Other expenses

3

3

3

 

Other operations

2012

2011

2010

Loans repaid

-

(1)

(1)

 

Compensation to key management personnel

 

For the purpose of these consolidated financial statements key management personnel includes: President of Rosneft, Vice-Presidents, members of the Board of Directors, members of the Management Board, members of the Audit Committee, directors of departments and heads of independent units, as well as others charged with governance. 

 

Short-term benefits of the key management personnel, including payroll, bonuses, personal income tax and social taxes, severance payments and contributions to insurance programs of the key management personnel amounted to RUB 9.1 billion, RUB 4.4 billion and RUB 2.5 billion in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. 

 

On June 18, 2010, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer 26,099 shares of Rosneft to each of the independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft (Mr. Andrey L. Kostin, Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov and Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff) as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors.

 

On June 10, 2011, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer to each of the following independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft (Mr. Andrey L. Kostin, Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov and Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff) 25,238 shares of Rosneft, 20,821 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Andrey G. Reus and Mr. Nikolay P. Tokarev, each, 18,928 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Vladimir L. Bogdanov, and 14,021 shares of Rosneft to Sergey M. Bogdanchikov as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors.

 

On June 20, 2012, annual General Meeting of Shareholders decided to transfer to each of the following independent members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft as a compensation for their services in the capacity of the Company's directors for the periods June 10, 2011 -September 13, 2011 and September 13, 2011 - June 20, 2012: 28,944 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Alexander D. Nekipelov, 26,925 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Andrey L. Kostin and Mr. Hans-Joerg Rudloff, each, 24,906 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Sergey V. Shishigin, 22,213 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Nikolay P. Tokarev and Mr. Dmitry E. Shugaev, each, 17,408 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Vladimir L. Bogdanov and 16,260 shares of Rosneft to Mr. Matthias Warnig as a compensation for his services in the capacity of the Company's director for the period September 13, 2011 -June 20, 2012.

Key subsidiaries

 

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

2012

2011

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Exploration and production

%

%

%

%

RN-Yuganskneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Purneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Sakhalinmorneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Krasnodarneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Stavropolneftegaz LLC

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Severnaya Neft LLC (Northern Oil)

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC RN-Astra

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Sakhalinmorneftegaz Shelf

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Dagneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

81.22

81.22

81.22

94.96

OJSC Rosneft-Dagneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

68.70

68.70

68.70

91.60

CJSC Vankorneft

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

93.96

93.96

93.96

93.96

OJSC Grozneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas production operator services

51.00

51.00

51.00

51.00

СJSC RN-Exploration

Russia

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Kaiganneftegaz LLC

Russia

Field survey and exploration

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC East-Siberian Oil and Gas Company

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

99.52

99.52

Val Shatskogo LLC

Russia

Oil and gas development

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Samaraneftegaz

Russia

Oil and gas development and production

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

 

 

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

2012

2011

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Refining, marketing and distribution

%

%

%

%

RN-Tuapse Refinery LLC

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Komsomolsky Refinery LLC

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-MZ Nefteproduct

Russia

Petroleum refining

65.42

65.42

65.42

87.23

OJSC Angarsk Petrochemical Company

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Achinsk Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Angarsk Polymer Plant

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Kuybyshev Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Novokuybyshev Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Syzran Refinery

Russia

Petroleum refining

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Neftegorsk Gas-Processing Plant

Russia

Gas processing

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Otradny Gas-Processing Plant

Russia

Gas processing

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-ARTAG

Russia

Marketing and distribution

38.00

50.67

38.00

50.67

OJSC Rosneft-Altainefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

64.18

78.59

64.18

78.59

RN-Arkhangelsknefteproduct LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Kabardino-Balkarskaya Toplivnaya Company

Russia

Marketing and distribution

99.81

99.89

99.81

99.89

OJSC Rosneft-Kubannefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

89.50

96.61

89.50

96.61

OJSC Rosneft-Karachaevo-Cherkessknefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

85.99

85.99

85.99

87.46

OJSC Rosneft-Kurgannefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

83.32

90.33

83.32

90.33

RN-Nakhodkanefteproduct LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Smolensknefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

66.67

86.97

66.67

86.97

RN-Tuapsenefteproduct LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Vostoknefteproduct LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft-Stavropolye

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Trade LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Irkutsknefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Samaranefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Samara Terminal LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Buryatnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

97.48

98.88

97.48

98.88

CJSC Khakasnefteprodukt VNK

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Tomsknefteprodukt VNK

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Belgorodnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Bryansknefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Voronezhnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Lipetsknefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Orelnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Penzanefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Tambovnefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Ulyanovsknefteprodukt

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Ulyanovsk Terminal LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

 

Name

Country of incorporation

Core activity

2012

2011

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Preferred and common shares

Voting shares

Refining, marketing and distribution (continued)

%

%

%

%

OJSC RN-Moskva

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC NBA Service

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Germes Moskva

Russia

Marketing and distribution

85.61

85.61

85.61

85.61

CJSC Contract Oil

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Mytischi Fuel Company

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Stavropolnefteproduct

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

U-Kuban LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Ingushnefteproduct LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Rosneft Trading S.A.

Switzerland

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Trumpet limited

Ireland

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Polar Terminal LLC

Russia

Marketing and distribution

100.00

100.00

-

-

 

Other

Rosneft International Ltd

Ireland

Holding company

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

Yukostransservice CJSC

Russia

Transportation services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC Rosnefteflot

Russia

Transportation services

51.00

51.00

51.00

51.00

OJSC Russian Regional Development Bank (VBRR)

Russia

Banking

84.67

84.67

84.67

84.67

OJSC Far Eastern Bank

Russia

Banking

84.09

84.67

82.06

82.62

CJSC RN-Shelf-Dalniy Vostok

Russia

Management company

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

CJSC RN-Energoneft

Russia

Electric-power transmission services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

RN-Burenie LLC

Russia

Drilling services

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

NK Rosneft NTC LLC

Russia

Research & development activities

100.00

100.00

100.00

100.00

OJSC Rosneft Sakhalin

Russia

Research & development activities

55.00

55.00

55.00

55.00

PHC CSKA LLC

Russia

Sport activity

80.00

80.00

100.00

100.00

Research and Development Center LLC

Russia

Research & development activities

100.00

100.00

-

-

 

Contingencies

 

Russian business environment

 

Russia continues economic reforms and development of its legal, tax and regulatory frameworks as required by a market economy. The future stability of the Russian economy is largely dependent upon these reforms and developments and the effectiveness of economic, financial and monetary measures undertaken by the government.

 

The Russian economy is vulnerable to market downturns and economic slowdowns elsewhere in the world. The global financial crisis has resulted in uncertainty regarding further economic growth, availability of financing and cost of capital, which could negatively affect the Company's future financial position, results of operations and business prospects.

 

Management believes it is taking appropriate measures to support the sustainability of the Company's business in the current circumstances.

 

Legal claims

 

In 2006, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., a former subsidiary of Yukos Oil Company, initiated arbitral proceedings against OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, which was subsequently merged into the Company, and OJSC Samaraneftegaz, the Company's subsidiary, in various arbitration courts alleging default under six RUB-denominated loans. The International Commercial Arbitration Court (the "ICAC") at the Russian Federation Chamber of Commerce and Industry issued four arbitration awards in favor of Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. against OJSC Yuganskneftegaz concerning four of the loans in the aggregate amount of approximately RUB 12.9 billion. Arbitration panel formed pursuant to the International Chamber of Commerce ("ICC") rules issued an award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz in the amount of RUB 3.1 billion in loan principal and interest plus post award interest of 9% p.a. on the above amount of loan principal and interest concerning the two other loans.

 

In 2007, the Company successfully challenged the ICAC awards and the ICAC awards were set aside by the Russian courts, including the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l., nevertheless, sought to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. Although the district court in Amsterdam refused to enforce the ICAC awards on the ground that they were properly set aside by a competent court on April 28, 2009 the Amsterdam Court Appeal reversed the district court's judgment and allowed Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. to enforce the ICAC awards in the Netherlands. On June 25, 2010, the Supreme Court of the Netherlands declared inadmissible the Company's appeal of the decision of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. Although the Company does not agree with the decisions of the Dutch courts above, on August 11, 2010 it complied with such decisions and arranged for relevant payments to be made with respect to the claim against the Company.

 

While the Dutch case was pending, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed an additional lawsuit against the Company in the High Court of Justice in London, seeking enforcement of the ICAC awards in England and Wales, as well as interest on those awards.

 

Following the payments arranged by the Company noted above, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. continues to seek statutory interest in the High Court of Justice in London in the amount of approximately RUB 4.6 billion as of the date of its Particulars of Claim. On June 14, 2011, the High Court issued an interim decision on two preliminary issues it had agreed to consider prior to reaching a decision on the merits of the claim. Although Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. prevailed on both issues, the court granted the Company leave to appeal, which it did. On June 27, 2012 the Court of Appeal of England handed down its judgment whereby the Company prevailed on one of these preliminary issues. No further appeals were requested by any party. The case will now return to the High Court of Justice to schedule the timetable for the next steps. The Company's application for the court to consider a further preliminary issue is scheduled to be heard in March 2013. The Company intends to defend its position vigorously in the remaining proceedings in England.

 

In 2007, lawsuits were filed in Russian arbitrazh courts in Moscow and Samara to nullify the loan agreements with Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. Court hearings in both cases were suspended for some time. However, February 1, 2012 the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region declared invalid the loan agreements between Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. and OJSC Samaraneftegaz. On July 17, 2012, the 11th Arbitrazh Appellate Court dismissed Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s appeal of that judgment. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed a cassation appeal against both court decisions with the Federal Arbitrazh Court for Povolzhsky District, whose hearings are set for February 28, 2013.

 

On July 11, 2012, the Moscow Arbitrazh Court declared invalid the loan agreements between Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. and OJSC Yuganskneftegaz. On October 9, 2012, the 9th Arbitrazh Appellate Court dismissed Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s appeal of that judgment. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed a cassation appeal against these judicial acts with the Federal Arbitrazh Court of Moscow District, which is to take place on February 25, 2013.

 

On July 2, 2010, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. filed a petition with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the "U.S. S.D.N.Y.") seeking confirmation of the ICC award against OJSC Samaraneftegaz noted above. In August 2010, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. also commenced proceedings in the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region seeking enforcement of the same award in the Russian Federation.

 

On February 15, 2011, the Arbitrazh Court of the Samara Region denied Yukos Capital S.a.r.l.'s enforcement application. The time for cassation appeal from the ruling has lapsed without Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. having filed such an appeal. On January 20, 2012, OJSC Samaraneftegaz filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of personal jurisdiction in the U.S. S.D.N.Y. On July 24, 2012, the U.S. S.D.N.Y. granted summary judgment to Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. on the issue of personal jurisdiction over OJSC Samaraneftegaz in New York. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. and OJSC Samaraneftegaz thereafter filed cross-motions for summary judgment concerning whether the U.S. S.D.N.Y. should enforce the award. The motions are pending.

 

Yukos International (UK) B.V. has initiated proceedings in the Amsterdam District Court claiming damages of up to U.S.$333 million (RUB 10 billion at the CBR official exchange rate at December 31, 2012), plus statutory interest with effect from February 7, 2011, plus costs, against Rosneft and other co-respondents unrelated to Rosneft relating to alleged injury supposedly caused by the entry of a freezing order that Yukos International (UK) B.V. claims restricted its ability to invest certain funds as it chose. The first court date in this case was June 27, 2012. Rosneft filed its Statement of Defence on October 3, 2012. That statement asserts various defences including that the court properly granted the freezing order and that Yukos International (UK) B.V. suffered no damages as a result of having its funds deposited in an interest bearing account of its choice. Yukos International (UK) B.V.'s Statement of Reply is due on February 20, 2013.

 

The Company and its subsidiary participate in arbitral proceedings related to bankruptcy of OJSC Sakhaneftegaz and OJSC Lenaneftegaz for the recovery of certain loans and guarantees of indemnity in the amount of RUB 1.3 billion, stated above account receivable was reserved in full.

 

During 2009-2012, the Federal Antimonopoly Service ("FAS Russia") and its regional bodies claimed that the Company and some of its subsidiaries (associates) violated certain antimonopoly regulations in relation to petroleum products trading and passed respective decisions on administrative liability. As of December 31, 2012, the total amount of administrative fines levied by FAS Russia and its regional bodies against Rosneft and its subsidiaries amounts to RUB 0.3 billion.

 

Rosneft and its subsidiaries are involved in other litigations which arise from time to time in the course of their business activities. Management believes that the ultimate result of those litigations will not materially affect the performance or financial position of the Company.

 

Taxation

 

Legislation and regulations regarding taxation in Russia continue to evolve. Various legislative acts and regulations are not always clearly written and their interpretation is subject to the opinions of the local, regional and national tax authorities. Instances of inconsistent opinions are not unusual.

 

The current regime of penalties and interest related to reported and discovered violations of Russia's laws, decrees and related regulations is severe. Interest and penalties are levied when an understatement of a tax liability is discovered. As a result, the amounts of penalties and interest can be significant in relation to the amounts of unreported taxes.

 

In Russia tax returns remain open and subject to inspection for a period of up to three years. The fact that a year has been reviewed does not close that year, or any tax return applicable to that year, from further review during the three-year period.

 

Effective January 1, 2012, the market price defining rules were changed and the list of entities that could be recognized as interdependent entities and list of managed deals were expanded. Due to the absence of law enforcement precedents based on the new rules and certain contradictions in the provisions of the new law, such rules cannot be considered clear and precise. To eliminate influence of the significant risks associated with transfer pricing to the consolidated financial statements, the Company developed methods of pricing for all types of controlled transactions, a standard on preparation of reporting documentation, also the Company systematically researches databases to determine the market price level (ROI) of the controlled transactions.

 

In November 2012, the Company and Federal Tax Agency signed the Pricing Agreement for the purpose of taxation of oil sales transactions at the Russian market. Six Company subsidiaries also acted as the Parties to the Agreement. The document establishes the principles and methods of pricing in the aforementioned transactions. The Agreement was signed as part of the new order of fiscal control over the pricing of related party transactions to match the market parameters.

 

According to additions to part one of the Tax code of the Russian Federation, brought by the Federal law of the Russian Federation from November 16, 2011 No. 321-FZ, the Company created the Consolidated group of taxpayers which included 22 of subsidiaries of the Company, including Rosneft. Rosneft became a responsible taxpayer of the group. From 2013 under the terms of the agreement, the number of members of the consolidated group of taxpayers is increased to 44. The Company management believes that creation of the consolidated group of taxpayers does not lead to significant changes of tax burden of the Company for the purpose of these consolidated financial statements.

 

During the reporting period, the tax authorities continued examinations of Rosneft and its certain subsidiaries for 2008-2011 fiscal years. Rosneft and its subsidiaries dispute a number of claims in pre-trial and trial appeal in federal tax service. The Company management does not expect results of the examinations to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

 

As of December 31, 2012, the amount of VAT receivable, that is potentially unrecoverable from the tax authorities is immaterial. The Company currently reimburses the current VAT in full in a declarative manner.

 

Management believes that the above tax risks will not have any significant impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.

 

Overall, management believes that the Company has paid or accrued all taxes that are applicable. For taxes other than income tax, where uncertainty exists, the Company has accrued tax liabilities based on management's best estimate of the probable outflow of resources, which will be required to settle these liabilities. Potential liabilities which were identified by management at the reporting date as those that can be subject to different interpretations of tax laws and regulations are not accrued in the consolidated financial statements.

Capital commitments

 

The Company and its subsidiaries are engaged in ongoing capital projects for exploration and development of production facilities and modernization of refineries and the distribution network. The budgets for these projects are generally set on an annual basis.

 

The total amount contracted but not yet performed deliveries related to the construction and acquisition of property, plant and equipment amounted to RUB 340 billion and RUB 195 billion as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Environmental issues

 

The Company periodically evaluates its environmental liabilities pursuant to environmental regulations. Such liabilities are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as identified. Potential liabilities, which might arise as a result of changes in existing regulations or regulation of civil litigation or changes in environmental standards cannot be reliably estimated but may be material. With the existing system of control, management believes that there are no material liabilities for environmental damage, other than those recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

 

Long-term contracts

 

In February 2009, Rosneft entered into a long-term crude oil sale contract for the term from January 2011 through December 2030 with China National Petroleum Corporation ("CNPC") for the total volume of 180 million tonnes of crude oil to be delivered via pipeline to China. The contract is based on customary commercial terms with an agreed formula linked to market prices. Subsequently, CNPC assigned all its rights, title and interest in this contract to China National United Oil Corporation.

 

In April 2009, Rosneft entered into a long-term crude oil sale contract for the term from January 2011 through December 2030 with OJSC AK Transneft for the total volume of 120 million tonnes of crude oil to be delivered via pipeline to China. The contract is based on customary commercial terms with an agreed formula linked to market prices.

 

As at the end of the reporting period, the Company had long-term oil supply contracts for 270 million tonnes based on a standard commercial price formula for crude oil and was bound to supply crude within the following periods:

2012

Up to 1 year

15

1 to 2 years

15

2 to 3 years

15

3 to 4 years

15

4 to 5 years

15

Over 5 years

195

Total

270

 

In July 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with a state-controlled energy company for the acquisition of 265.5 billion kWh of electric power under the "take-or-pay" arrangement on standard commercial terms through June 30, 2026.

 

In November 2012, the Company and a state-controlled energy company have concluded a contract on the supply of up to 875 bcm of gas. The contract provides for annual supplies of up to 35 bcm of gas produced by the Company to the power plants beginning on January 1, 2016 and running through December 31, 2040 on a "take-or-pay" basis. Gas prices are regulated by the State.

 

In December 2012, Rosneft and two of the world's leading oil traders agreed separate provisions for long-term crude supply contracts on standard commercial terms. Under the provisions, Rosneft plans to sign contracts with a prepayment for 5 years to supply up to 67 million tonnes of crude oil in total. The supplies are expected to commence in 2013. The parties agreed the possibility of replacing crude supplies with respective petroleum product supplies for various supply routes.

 

TNK-BP Аcquisition

 

In October 2012, the Company reached two separate agreements in principle to acquire an aggregate 100% equity interest in TNK-BP, Russia's third largest hydrocarbon producer, from TNK-BP's existing shareholders: 50% from BP and 50% from the AAR consortium. The Company subsequently signed definitive purchase agreements for these acquisitions (i) with BP on November 22, 2012 (the "BP Acquisition") and (ii) with the AAR consortium on December 12, 2012 (the "AAR Acquisition", together with the BP Acquisition, the "TNK-BP Acquisition"). The BP Acquisition and AAR Acquisition are independent of each other.

 

Under the terms of the BP Acquisition, BP will sell its 50% interest in TNK-BP Limited to Rosneft for US$17.1 billion in cash (plus interest thereon in the amount of U.S. $ 1.6 million per day from and including October 18, 2012 to and excluding the closing date) and а 12.84% stake in Rosneft, currently held in treasury. BP will have the benefit of any Rosneft dividends on such shares having a record date after October 18, 2012. The completion of the BP Acquisition is subject to regulatory approvals, and is expected to occur in the first half of 2013.

 

In addition, BP has entered into an agreement to purchase from Rosneft's parent, OJSC "ROSNEFTEGAZ", a further 600 million Rosneft shares, representing a 5.66% stake in Rosneft, at a price of US$8.00 per share (plus interest thereon at a rate of 3.5% per annum from and including October 18, 2012 to and excluding the closing date). Again, BP will have the benefit of any dividends on such shares having a record date after October 18, 2012. On completion of these transactions, BP will hold 19.75% of Rosneft shares, inclusive of its existing 1.25% holding in Rosneft, which would entitle BP to two seats on Rosneft's Board of Directors.

 

Under the terms of the AAR Acquisition agreement, Rosneft will acquire AAR's 50% equity interest in TNK-BP for a cash consideration of US$28.0 billion (plus interest thereon at a rate of 3.75% p.a. from and including October 16, 2012 to but excluding the closing date) subject to the regulatory approvals and certain other conditions. Closing is expected to occur in the first half of 2013.

 

The Company plans to account for TNK-BP Acquisition as a business combination.

 

In December 2012, Rosneft received a permission from the FAS Russia to acquire TNK-BP, along with prescription for Rosneft regarding various measures that are aimed at maintaining the competitive environment in Russia.

 

The management of Rosneft believes that the TNK-BP Acquisition is strategically important to the Company and, if and when completed, should place it in a leading position globally among public companies operating in the oil and gas sector, reinforce its position as a regional downstream leader in Russia and Europe, as well as create significant synergies with TNK-BP, including in joint development areas, optimization of oil and oil product supply logistics, production and sales of natural gas, as well as with respect to cost and asset optimization.

 

 

Events after the reporting period

 

In January 2013, Company acquired additional 20% ownership share in National Oil Consortium LLC ("NOC") for RUB 6 billion. As a result of this acquisition, the Company's ownership interest in NOC will become 40%. National Oil Consortium LLC is involved in geological exploration of the Junin-6 block in Venezuela jointly with a subsidiary of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., Venezuela's state oil company. This acquisition will continue to be accounted for as investment in associate entity using the equity method.

 

IFRS do not require that information on oil and gas reserves be disclosed. While this information was developed with reasonable care and disclosed in good faith, it is emphasized that the data represents management's best estimates. Accordingly, this information may not necessarily represent the current financial condition of the Company and its future financial results.

 

Company's activities are conducted primarily in Russia, which is considered as one geographic area.

 

Presented below are capitalized costs relating to oil and gas production

 

December 31,

2012

2011

2010

Oil and gas properties related to proved reserves

2,388

2,100

1,838

Oil and gas properties related to non-proved reserves

98

104

99

Total capitalized costs

2,486

2,204

1,937

Accumulated depreciation and depletion

(664)

(474)

(294)

Net capitalized costs

1,822

1,730

1,643

 

Net book value of production rights was RUB 309 billion, RUB 328 billion and RUB 335 billion as at December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Presented below are costs incurred in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas reserves

 

For the years ended December 31:

2012

2011

2010

Acquisition of non-proved oil and gas reserves

6

7

4

Exploration costs

23

13

14

Development costs

276

260

188

Total costs incurred

305

280

206

 

Presented below are the results of operations relating to oil and gas production 

 

For the years ended December 31:

2012

2011

2010

Revenue

1,214

1,149

947

Production costs (excluding production taxes)

74

70

69

Selling, general and administrative expenses

15

27

36

Costs of oil and gas exploration

23

13

14

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

192

184

176

Unwinding of discount

4

5

2

Taxes other than income tax

550

430

286

Income tax

85

61

57

Results of operations relating to oil and gas production

271

359

307

 

Reserve quantity information

 

For the purposes of evaluation of reserves as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 the Company used the oil and gas reserve information prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, independent reservoir engineers, prepared in accordance with United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) definitions. Proved reserves are those estimated quantities of crude oil and gas which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in the future from existing reservoirs under the existing economic and operating conditions. In certain cases, recovery of such reserves may require considerable investments in wells and related equipment. Proved reserves also include additional oil and gas reserves that will be extracted after the expiry date of license agreements or may be discovered as a result of secondary and tertiary extraction which have been successfully tested and checked for commercial benefit. Proved developed reserves are the quantities of crude oil and gas expected to be recovered from existing wells using existing equipment and operating methods.

 

Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion. Reserves on undrilled acreage are limited to those drilling units offsetting productive units that are reasonably certain of production when drilled. Proved reserves for other undrilled units can be claimed only where it can be demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity of production from the existing productive formation. Under no circumstances are estimates of proved undeveloped reserves attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless those techniques have been proved effective by actual tests in the area and in the same reservoir. Due to inherent industry uncertainties and the limited nature of deposit data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information becomes available.

 

The Company management included in proved reserves those reserves which the Company intends to extract after the expiry of the current licenses. The licenses for the development and production of hydrocarbons currently held by the Company generally expire between 2013 and 2051, and the licenses for the most important deposits expire between 2013 and 2051. In accordance with the effective version of the law of the Russian Federation, On Subsurface Resources (the "Law"), licenses are currently granted for a production period determined on the basis of technological and economic criteria applied to the development of a mineral deposit which guarantee rational use of subsurface resources and necessary environmental protection. In accordance with the Law and upon gradual expiration of old licenses issued under the previous version of the Law, the Company extends its hydrocarbon production licenses for the whole productive life of the fields. Extension of the licenses depends on compliance with the terms set forth in existing license agreements. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company is generally in compliance with all the terms of the license agreements and intends to continue complying with such terms in the future.

 

The Company's estimates of net proved oil and gas reserves and changes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are shown in the table below and expressed in million barrels of oil equivalent (oil production data was recalculated from tonnes to barrels using a field specific in the range from 7.07 to 8.04 barrels per tonne, gas production data was recalculated from cubic meters to barrels of oil equivalent ("boe") using a ratio of 35.3/6 cubic meters per barrel).

 

2012

2011

2010

mln boe

mln boe

mln boe

Beginning of year

16,352

13,970

13,951

Revisions of previous estimates

1,375

2,201

319

Increase and discovery of new reserves

736

1,044

541

Purchase of new reserves

1

-

-

Sale of reserves (Note 27)

(806)

-

-

Production

(885)

(863)

(841)

End of year

16,773

16,352

13,970

of which:

Proved reserves under PSA Sakhalin 1

87

95

80

Proved developed reserves

10,902

10,514

9,769

Minority interest in total proved reserves

118

109

122

Minority interest in proved developed reserves

86

71

44

 

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves

 

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to the above oil and gas reserves is calculated in accordance with the provisions set by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Estimated future cash inflows from oil, condensate and gas production are computed by applying the 12 month average prices (reference prices) calculated as unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12 month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, to year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Adjustment in this calculation for future price changes is limited to those required by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting period. Future development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop and produce estimated proved reserves as of year-end based on current expenses and costs and forecasts. In certain cases, future values, either higher or lower than current values, were used because of anticipated changes in operating conditions, but no general escalation that might result from inflation was applied. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and tax credits and are applied to estimated future net pre-tax cash flows, net of the tax bases of related assets.

 

Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using a 10% p.a. discount factor. Discounting requires a year-by-year estimates of future expenditures to be incurred in the periods when the reserves will be extracted.

 

The information provided in the table below does not represent management's estimates of the Company's expected future cash flows or of the value of its proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserves change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover, probable and possible reserves which may become proved in the future are excluded from the calculations. The arbitrary valuation prescribed under provisions set by SEC requires assumptions as to the timing and the amount of future development and production costs. The calculations should not be relied upon as an indication of the Company's future cash flows or of the value of its oil and gas reserves.

 

2012

2011

2010

Future cash inflows

21,113

18,611

13,677

Future development costs

(1,098)

(947)

(1,043)

Future production costs

(10,830)

(9,769)

(6,568)

Future income tax expenses

(1,496)

(1,280)

(945)

Future net cash flows

7,689

6,615

5,121

Discount for estimated timing of cash flows

(4,601)

(3,899)

(2,846)

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the end of year

3,088

2,716

2,275

 

2012

2011

2010

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the beginning of year

2,716

2,275

2,205

Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs and taxes other than income taxes

(575)

(622)

(556)

Changes in price estimates, net

260

341

370

Changes in future development costs

(118)

73

(271)

Development costs incurred during the period

276

260

188

Revisions of previous reserves estimates

151

223

52

Increase in reserves due to discoveries, less respective expenses

144

221

106

Net change in income taxes

30

(142)

(51)

Accretion of discount

272

228

221

Net changes due to purchases and sales oil and gas fields

(68)

-

-

Other

-

(141)

11

Discounted value of future cash flows as of the end of year

3,088

2,716

2,275

 

Company's share in costs, inventories and future cash flows of the equity investees

 

UOM

2012

2011

2010

Share in capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities (total)

RUB bln

121

77

77

Share in results of operations for oil and gas producing activities (total)

RUB bln

31

17

7

Share in estimated proven oil and gas reserves

mln boe

2,253

1,265

1,228

Share in estimated proven developed oil and gas reserves

mln boe

1,274

777

760

Share in discounted value of future cash flows

RUB bln

330

271

196

 

Share of other (minority) shareholders in discounted value of future cash flows

 

UOM

2012

2011

2010

Share of other (minority) shareholders in discounted value of future cash flows

RUB bln

29

32

21

 

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION ANDRESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTERS ENDED DECEMBER 31 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2012 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010

 

The following discussion of Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations is based on, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company's financial statements and the notes thereto for the periods ended December 312012, 2011 and 2010 (the "Consolidated Financial Statements"). Such terms as "Rosneft", "Company" and "Group" in their different forms in this report mean Rosneft Oil Company and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies. This report presents Rosneft's financial condition and results of operations on a consolidated basis. This report contains forward‑looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Rosneft's actual results may materially differ from those discussed in such forward‑looking statements as a result of various factors.

Except as otherwise indicated, oil and gas reserves and production are presented pro-rata for companies accounted for on an equity basis or under the proportionate consolidation method and 100% for fully consolidated companies.

Except as otherwise indicated, all amounts are provided in billions of RUB. All figures are rounded; however, figures per unit of productionare provided based on the actual data.

To convert tonnes to barrels a 7.315 ratio is used. To convert thousands of cubic meters of gas to barrels of oil equivalent a 5.883 ratio is used.

Overview

Rosneft is a vertically integrated oil and gas company with core activities and assets located principally in Russia. The Company is primarily engaged in exploration and production of hydrocarbons, oil refining and product marketing.

OJSC Rosneft was established in accordance with the Russian Government Decree №971, issued on September 29, 1995. From its foundation, the Company has expanded significantly through organic growth, consolidation of interests, acquisition of new companies and development of new businesses. Rosneft is now the leader of Russia's petroleum industry in terms of crude oil reserves and production operating in all key regions of the country.

Rosneft is one of the world's largest publicly traded companies in terms of proved hydrocarbon reserves. According to oil and gas reserve information prepared by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, independent reservoir engineers, as of December 31, 2012 proved hydrocarbon reserves amounted to 24.16 billion barrels of oil equivalent, including 18.33 billion barrels of oil and 992 billion cubic meters of gas, on the basis of the standards set forth by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Petroleum Reserves Management System ("PRMS").

Rosneft's crude oil production amounts to 2.5 million barrels per day (average for the fourth quarter of 2012) and output of natural and associated gas is 5.37 billion cubic meters per quarter (for the fourth quarter of 2012).

Rosneft processes part of the crude oil produced at its seven domestic refineries with total primary refining capacity of 1.1 million barrels per day, including mini refineries. Rosneft's domestic refinery throughput is 1.0 million barrels per day (average for the fourth quarter of 2012) which equals around 46% of the Company's crude oil output. Current utilization of the refining capacities is close to maximum. The remaining volumes of crude oil are mostly exported to Europe, Asia and CIS countries. Rosneft also holds a 50% stake in Ruhr Oel GmbH which owns stakes in four German refineries, where Rosneft processes both own and procured crude oil.

Part of the petroleum products produced by the Company at the domestic refineries is sold in Russia, both wholesale and through Rosneft's own retail network which comprises approximately 1,650 service stations in44 regions of Russia. The remaining volumes (mainly fuel oil, diesel and naphtha) are exported to Europe, Asia and CIS. Products from the German refineries are sold in Western Europe.

Financial and Operating Highlights

For 3 months ended

% change between

 4th  and 3d quarters

For 12 months ended December 31

% change for 12 months ended December 31

December 31,

2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

`2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

Financial results, RUB billion

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

790

809

(2.3)%

3,078

2,718

1,919

13.2%

41.6%

EBITDA

144

198

(27.3)%

609

662

586

(8.0)%

13.0%

Net income

57

181

(68.5)%

342

319

301

7.2%

6.0%

Capital expenditures

122

105

16.2%

466

391

264

19.2%

48.1%

Free cash flow

13

53

(75.5)%

45

99

203

(54.5)%

(51.2)%

Net Debt

581

542

7.2%

581

432

378

34.5%

14.3%

Operational results

Hydrocarbon production (th. boe per day)

2,823

2,729

3.4%

2,702

2,586

2,521

4.5%

2.6%

Crude oil production (th. barrels per day)

2,479

2,454

1.0%

2,439

2,380

2,322

2.5%

2.5%

Gas production (th.boe per day)

344

275

25.1%

263

206

199

27.7%

3.5%

Production of petroleum products

in Russia (mln tonnes)

12.56

12.77

(1.6)%

48.80

48.61

48.36

0.4%

0.5%

Production of petroleum products in Germany (mln tonnes)

2.77

2.78

(0.4)%

10.79

7.30

-

47.8%

-

Business segments and intersegment sales

Substantially all of Rosneft's operations and assets are located in the Russian Federation. As geographical regions of the Russian Federation have similar economic and legal characteristics, Rosneft does not present geographical segments separately. Rosneft also carries out projects outside Russia, including exploration projects in Algeria, the Gudautsky area in the Black Sea territorial waters of Abkhazia, United Arab Emirates and Venezuela and stakes in refineries in Germany.

Business Segments

The activities of Rosneft are divided into two main business segments, based on the nature of their operations:

● Exploration and production (upstream). Geological exploration and development of fields and crude oil and gas production; and

● Refining and distribution (downstream). Refining of crude oil, as well as the purchase, transportation, sale and transshipment of crude oil and petroleum products.

Rosneft does not separate its distribution and transportation divisions into a "midstream" segment. These activities are reflected in the downstream segment. Other types of activities are incorporated in the "Corporate and other unallocated activities" segment and include field development, maintenance of infrastructure and functioning of the first two segments, as well as banking and finance services, and other activities.

Intersegment Sales and Segment Presentation

Rosneft's two main business segments are interconnected: the majority of the revenues of one main segment is included in the expenses of the other main segment. In particular, the Company, as the holding company, buys crude oil from its producing subsidiaries, part of which it sells to third parties in and outside Russia and the remainder of which it delivers to its proprietary or third party refineries for processing. Refined petroleum products are then either sold by the Company through wholesale sales in international or domestic markets or sold to the Company's marketing and transshipment Business Units and subsidiaries for subsequent wholesale and retail sale in Russia.

Significant events in the fourth quarter of 2012

On 22 October 2012, Rosneft announced two separate agreements in principle to acquire an aggregate 100% equity interest in TNK-BP Limited, the ultimate holding company of TNK-BP, and its subsidiary TNK Industrial Holdings Limited. TNK-BP is Russia's third largest hydrocarbon producer. The two proposed transactions involve (i) an acquisition of a 50% equity interest in TNK-BP from BP, in respect of which definitive documentation was signed on 22 November 2012 and (ii) an acquisition of a 50% equity interest in TNK-BP from the AAR consortium, as to which definitive documentation was signed on 12 December 2012.

Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations

Main factors affecting Rosneft's results of operations are:

·; Changes in crude oil, petroleum product and gas prices;

·; RUB/US$ exchange rate and inflation;

·; Taxation including changes in mineral extraction tax, export customs duty and excises;

·; Changes in tariffs of natural monopolies (for pipeline and railway transport);

·; Changes in electricity prices.

Changes in prices, export customs duty and transport tariffs can have a significant impact on the mix of products and distribution channels the Company selects seeking to maximise netback prices of the produced crude oil.

Changes in Crude Oil, Petroleum Product and Gas Prices

World crude oil prices are highly volatile and fluctuate depending on the global balance of supply and demand and on numerous speculative factors. Crude oil exported by Rosneft via Transneft's (Russian pipeline monopoly) pipeline system is blended with crude oil of other producers that is of a different quality. The resulting Urals blend is traded at a discount to Brent. Crude oil exported via ESPO pipeline is sold at a price which is linked to the price of "Dubai" grade.

Petroleum product prices in international and Russian markets are primarily determined by the level of world prices for crude oil, supply and demand for petroleum products and competition on different markets. Price dynamics are different for different types of petroleum products.

The table below sets forth the average crude oil and petroleum product prices worldwide and in Russia in US$ and RUB. The prices nominated in US$ are translated into RUB at average US$/RUB exchange rate for the respective period.

For 3 months ended

% change between 3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months ended December 31

% change for 12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

World market

(US$ per barrel)

%

(US$ per barrel)

%

Brent (dated)

110.0

109.6

0.4%

111.6

111.3

79.5

0.3%

40.0%

Urals (average CIF Med and NWE)

108.7

109.0

(0.3)%

110.3

109.1

78.2

1.1%

39.5%

Urals (FOB Primorsk)

107.8

107.8

-

109.0

108.2

76.7

0.7%

41.1%

Urals (FOB Novorossysk)

108.2

108.3

(0.1)%

109.5

108.3

76.8

1.1%

41.0%

Dubai

107.5

106.3

1.1%

109.1

106.2

78.0

2.7%

36.2%

(US$ per tonne)

(US$ per tonne)

Naphtha (av. FOB/CIF Med)

921

893

3.0%

918

915

698

0.4%

31.0%

Naphtha (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

939

907

3.6%

934

929

711

0.5%

30.7%

Naphtha (CFR Japan)

944

915

3.2%

943

938

724

0.5%

29.6%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

590

624

(5.4)%

631

609

442

3.7%

37.7%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

587

620

(5.4)%

629

607

441

3.5%

37.7%

High sulphur fuel oil 180 cst(FOB Singapore)

625

660

(5.2)%

672

649

470

3.5%

37.9%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

945

945

-

953

932

672

2.3%

38.6%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB

Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

952

946

0.6%

954

934

672

2.2%

39.0%

Gasoil 0.5% (FOB Singapore)

929

933

(0.5)%

938

925

665

1.4%

39.1%

(th. RUB per barrel)

(th. RUB per barrel)

Brent (dated)

3.42

3.51

(2.6)%

3.47

3.27

2.41

6.1%

35.7%

Urals (average CIF Med and NWE)

3.38

3.49

(3.2)%

3.43

3.21

2.38

6.9%

34.9%

Urals (FOB Primorsk)

3.35

3.45

(2.9)%

3.39

3.18

2.33

6.6%

36.5%

Urals (FOB Novorossysk)

3.36

3.47

(3.2)%

3.40

3.18

2.33

6.9%

36.5%

Dubai

3.34

3.40

(1.8)%

3.39

3.12

2.37

8.7%

31.6%

(th. RUB per tonne)

(th. RUB per tonne)

Naphtha (av. FOB/CIF Med)

28.6

28.6

-

28.5

26.9

21.2

5.9%

26.9%

Naphtha (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

29.2

29.0

0.7%

29.0

27.3

21.6

6.2%

26.4%

Naphtha (CFR Japan)

29.3

29.3

-

29.3

27.6

22.0

6.2%

25.5%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

18.3

20.0

(8.5)%

19.6

17.9

13.4

9.5%

33.6%

Fuel oil 3.5% (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

18.2

19.8

(8.1)%

19.5

17.8

13.4

9.6%

32.8%

High sulphur fuel oil 180 cst (FOB Singapore)

19.4

21.1

(8.1)%

20.9

19.1

14.3

9.4%

33.6%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB/CIF Med)

29.4

30.3

(3.0)%

29.6

27.4

20.4

8.0%

34.3%

Gasoil 0.1% (av. FOB Rotterdam/CIF NWE)

29.6

30.3

(2.3)%

29.7

27.4

20.4

8.4%

34.3%

Gasoil 0.5% (FOB Singapore)

28.9

29.9

(3.3)%

29.2

27.2

20.2

7.4%

34.7%

Russian market(net of VAT, including excise tax)

(th. RUB per tonne)

(th. RUB per tonne)

Crude oil

10.3

10.3

-

10.2

8.9

6.7

14.6%

32.8%

Fuel oil

9.1

9.7

(6.2)%

9.2

8.8

7.7

4.5%

14.3%

Summer diesel

24.6

23.8

3.4%

23.2

19.7

14.3

17.8%

37.8%

Winter diesel

27.9

25.2

10.7%

25.3

21.9

16.5

15.5%

32.7%

Jet fuel

24.5

22.4

9.4%

23.3

20.7

14.9

12.6%

38.9%

High octane gasoline

27.4

26.3

4.2%

25.5

24.1

20.8

5.8%

15.9%

Low octane gasoline

24.6

23.5

4.7%

23.4

22.1

17.3

5.9%

27.7%

Sources: Platts (world market), Kortes/Argus (Russian market).

Difference between movement of prices denominated in US$ and those denominated in RUB is explained by nominal RUB appreciation against US$ by 2.9% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the third quarter of 2012, nominal RUR depreciation against US$ by 5.8% in the twelve months of 2012 compared to the twelve months of 2011 and by nominal RUR appreciation against US$ by 3.2% in the twelve months of 2011 compared to the twelve months of 2010, respectively.

The Russian Government regulates the prices of the gas sold in Russia by Gazprom. While the regulated price has been rising in Russia and is expected to continue to rise to a level closer to parity with export netbacks, it is currently still significantly below this level.

The regulated price has affected, and is likely to continue to affect, the pricing of Rosneft gas sales. Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 2.05 thousand per thousand cubic meters and RUB 2.14 thousand per thousand cubic meters in the fourth quarter of 2012 and third quarter of 2012 (without VAT), respectively.

In 2012 and 2011, Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 1.97 thousand per thousand cubic meters and RUB 1.47 thousand per thousand cubic meters (without VAT), respectively. In 2010 Rosneft's average gas sale price was RUB 1.29 thousand (without VAT).

US$/RUB and EUR/RUB Exchange Rate and Inflation 

The US$/RUB and EUR/RUB exchange rate and inflation in the Russian Federation affect Rosneft's results as most of the Company's revenues from sales of crude oil and petroleum products are denominated in US$, while most of the Company's expenses are denominated in RUB. Thus, the depreciation of the rouble positively affects Rosneft's operating income, while rouble appreciation has a negative effect.

The table below provides information on exchange rate movements and inflation during the periods analyzed:

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended December 31

December 31,

2012

September 30,

2012

2012

2011

2010

Rouble inflation (CPI) for the period

1.4%

2.0%

6.6%

6.1%

8.8%

Average RUB/US$ exchange rate for the period

31.08

32.01

31.09

29.39

30.37

RUB/US$ exchange rate at the end of the period

30.37

30.92

30.37

32.20

30.48

Average RUB/EUR exchange rate for the period

40.31

40.01

39.95

40.88

40.30

RUB/EUR exchange rate at the end of the period

40.23

39.98

40.23

41.67

40.33

Source: CBR.

 Taxation

The table below provides information on the average enacted tax rates specific to the Russian oil industry:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months endedDecember 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

Mineral extraction tax

Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

5,007

5,147

(2.7)%

5,066

4,455

3,074

13.7%

44.9%

Natural gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)

251

251

-

251

237

147

5.9%

61.2%

Associated gas (RUB per th. cubic meters)

0

0

-

0

0

0

-

-

Export customs duty for crude oil

Crude oil (US$ per tonne)

406.6

366.6

10.9%

404.3

408.9

273.6

(1.1)%

49.5%

Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

12,637

11,733

7.7%

12,570

12,017

8,309

4.6%

44.6%

Crude oil (RUB per barrel)

1,728

1,604

7.7%

1,718

1,643

1,136

4.6%

44.6%

East Siberian Crude oil (RUB per tonne)

12,637

11,733

7.7%

12,570

9,920*

1,764

26.7%

-

East Siberian Crude oil (RUB per barrel)

1,728

1,604

7.7%

1,718

1,356*

241

26.7%

-

Export customs duty for petroleum products

Gasoline** (RUB per tonne)

11,373

10,559

7.7%

11,312

10,030

5,972

12.8%

68.0%

Naphtha*** (RUB per tonne)

11,373

10,559

7.7%

11,312

10,030

5,972

12.8%

68.0%

Light and middle distillates (RUB per tonne)

8,340

7,743

7.7%

8,295

8,054

5,972

3.0%

34.9%

Liquid fuels (fuel oil) (RUB per tonne)

8,340

7,743

7.7%

8,295

6,119

3,217

35.6%

90.2%

* A special export customs duty for crude oil produced at Verkhnechonsk and Vankor fields was in effect till May, 2011.

** Starting from 1 May 2011, the Russian Government introduced a special export duty on gasoline equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil.

***Starting from 1 June 2011, the Russian Government introduced a special export duty on naphtha to 90% of the export duty for crude oil.

According to the legislation the excise tax rates on the petroleum products are linked to the environmental characteristics of the products.

Excise on petroleum products

2011

until

 June 30, 2012

until December 31, 2012

until

 June 30, 2013

until December 31, 2013

2014

2015

High octane gasoline (RUB per tonne)

High octane gasoline non-compliant with euro-3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

5,995

7,725

8,225

10,100

10,100

11,110

13,332

High octane gasoline euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

5,672

7,382

7,882

9,750

9,750

10,725

12,879

High octane gasoline euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

6,822

8,560

8,960

9,416

10,358

High octane gasoline euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

5,143

6,822

5,143

5,143

5,750

5,750

6,223

Naphtha (RUB per tonne)

6,089

7,824

7,824

10,229

10,229

11,252

13,502

Diesel (RUB per tonne)

Diesel below euro-3,4,5 (RUB per tonne)

2,753

4,098

4,300

5,860

5,860

6,446

7,735

Diesel euro-3 (RUB per tonne)

2,485

3,814

4,300

5,860

5,860

6,446

7,735

Diesel euro-4 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

3,562

4,934

5,100

5,427

5,970

Diesel euro-5 (RUB per tonne)

2,247

3,562

2,962

4,334

4,500

4,767

5,244

Lubricants (RUB per tonne)

4,681

6,072

6,072

7,509

7,509

8,260

9,086

Rosneft pays a significant portion of its revenues in taxes, as set out in the following table:

 

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

RUB billion

Total revenues

790

809

3,078

2,718

1,919

Total taxes*

415

427

1,641

1,374

898

Effective tax burden, %

52.5%

52.8%

53.3%

50.6%

46.8%

* Including export customs duty, mineral extraction tax, excise tax, income tax and other taxes.

The mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 46.7% and 42.6% of Rosneft's total revenues in the fourth and third quarters of 2012, respectively. In 2012, 2011 and 2010 the mineral extraction tax and the export customs duty accounted for approximately 46.4%, 44.3% and 40.9%, respectively, of Rosneft's total revenues.

 Mineral Extraction Tax

The rate of mineral extraction tax for crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and changes every month. It is calculated in US$ per tonne of crude oil produced and enacted in RUB per tonne using average exchange rate for the respective month.

The mineral extraction tax rate is calculated by multiplying the base rate of RUB 446(from January 1, 2012 base rate was increased from RUR 419 to RUB 446) by the adjustment ratio of ((Price ‑ 15) / 261) × Exchange rate, where "Price" is the average Urals price per barrel and "Exchange rate" is the average RUB/US$ exchange rate established by the Central Bank of Russia in the respective month.

According to changes in tax legislation introduced in the end of 2010 the base rate for crude oilwas increased to RUB 470 starting from January 1, 2013.

The Russian Tax Code provides for reduced or zero mineral extraction tax rate for crude oil produced at certain fields:

·; the reduced rate is applicable to crude oil produced at the fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%; for calculation of the reduced rate a special adjustment ratio (3.8 - 3.5 × reserve depletion rate) is applied; the reduced rate varies therefore from 0.3 to 1.0 of the standard rate;

·; the zero tax rate is applicable to high-viscosity crude oil;

·; the zero tax rate is applicable to crude oil produced in PSA projects;

·; the zero tax rate is applicable during specific time period or for specific volumes of production (depending on what is achieved earlier) at fields in Yakutia, Irkutsk Region, Krasnoyarsk Territory, Nenets Autonomous District, Yamal Peninsula, Azov, Caspian and Black seas, sea of Okhotsk, offshore fields located to the north of the Arctic Circle (the exact time period and volume vary by regions where the field is located);

·; the reduced tax rate is applicable to crude oil produced at the fields with the value of initial recoverable reserves being less than 5 mln tonne and depletion level of reserves less or equal 0.05. For the calculation of reduced tax rate special coefficient should be used characterising the value of reserves for a specific field (0.125 × value of initial oil recoverable reserves + 0.375).

Rosneft benefits from the reduced mineral extraction tax rate as it has several fields with reserve depletion rate of over 80%.

Moreover its fields in Irkutsk Region and Krasnoyarsk Territory are subject to the zero mineral extraction tax rate which is applicable for the first 25 million tonnes of production and not more than 10 years period for a production licence and not more than 15 years period for an exploration and production license.

On August 6, 2011 accumulated production at the Vankor oil field exceeded 25 million tons and zero MET rate was replaced by the standard one. In May 2012 the Company started developing Severo-Vankorsky area of Vankorskoye oil field and this area is subject to the zero MET rate (applicable for the first 25 million tonnes of production).

Rosneft has exploration projects in the Azov, Okhotsk, Caspian, Barents, Kara and Black seas and participates in the Sakhalin-1 PSA which is subject to a special tax regime exempting the Company from paying mineral extraction tax.

Currently Ministry of Finance of Russian Federation, Ministry of Energy of Russian Federation and Ministry of economic development and trade of the Russian Federationare working out the project of changes to special tax regime for certain offshore projects. The project categorizes offshore projects into one of four groups depending on complexity and specifies special MET rate for each project group ranging from 5% to 30% of international oil price.

The Ministries of Russian Federation mentioned above are projecting the law on the lowered MET rate in respect of hard to recover reserves.

Export Customs Duty on Crude Oil

The rate of export customs duty on crude oil is linked to the Urals price in the international market and is denominated in US$ per tonne.

The table below sets forth the calculation of the ordinary export customs duty for crude oil:

Urals price (US$ per tonne)

Export customs duty(US$ per tonne)

Below and including 109.5 (15 US$ per barrel).........................................................

Export customs duty is not levied

Above 109.5 to and including 146(15 to 20 US$ per barrel)............................

35% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonne and US$ 109.5

Above 146 to and including 182.5(20 to 25 US$ per barrel)............................

US$ 12.78 plus 45% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 146

Above 182.5 (25 US$ per barrel)................

US$ 29.2 plus 60% of the difference between the average Urals price in US$ per tonneand US$ 182.5

The export customs duty is changed every month and the duty for the next month is based on the average Urals price for the period from the 15th day of the previous month to the 14th day (inclusive) of the current month.

The draft law on the introduction of a special tax regime in respect of projects on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation provides for full exemption of hydrocarbons from the export customs duties.

Starting from October 2011 the marginal export duty rate was reduced from 65% to 60% and is valid up to date.

In April 12, 2012 the Russian Government decided to devise a special tax regime for exploration projects at the continental shelf of the Russian Federation (Order №443P). As part of this work the decision was taken to exempt companies working at the Russian continental shelf from export customs duty.

In accordance with the amendments to the RF Law «On customs tariff» starting from April 1, 2013 the Government of the Russian Federation will establish formulas for calculation of the export customs duties on crude oil basing on the world oil prices. The rates of the export customs duties will be based on the established formulas and will be calculate by the authorized Federal Executive Body.

The Government of the Russian Federation will establish special formula in respect of extra-viscous oil and oil with special physical and chemical characteristics and the calculated rate (according to the formula) should not exceed the statutory maximum limits.

Export customs duty on Eastern Siberian crude oil (Vankor and Verkhnechonsk)

Starting from December 01, 2009, crude oil produced at a number of fields in Eastern Siberia was subject to a specific export customs duty regime (for production of oil with specific physicochemical characteristics zero export duty rate is applied). In particular, zero export duty rate was applicable to the Verkhnechonsk field starting from December 1, 2009. The zero export duty rate was applicable to the Vankor field starting from January 19, 2010.

Starting from July 01, 2010 the zero rate was replaced by a special rate calculated as (Price-50) × 0.45, where "Price" is average Urals price in US$ per barrel used for the calculation of ordinary export duty.

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Vankor and Verkhnechonsk fields were excluded from the list of fields subject to the special export duty rate.

Export customs duty on crude oil export to CIS

Export duties are not payable on crude oil exports to CIS countries that are members of the Customs Union. In accordance with the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of Belarus dated 27 January, 2010, crude oil exports to Belarus within specific limits established by the Russian Ministry of Energy are exempted from export duty until January 1, 2012. Starting from January 1, 2012 zero export duty rate is applicable to the crude oil exports to Belarus. No new amendments were introduced in January 2013 in respect of regime of export customs duty on crude oil export to CIS.

Export Customs Duty on Petroleum Products

Export customs duty on petroleum products is set every month by the Government simultaneously with the export customs duty on crude oil and is denominated in US$ per tonne. The rate of the export customs duty on petroleum products is linked to crude oil price.

In January, 2011 export customs duties on light and dark petroleum products were calculated using special formula, and amounted to 71% (for light petroleum products) and 38% (for dark petroleum products) of the export duty for crude oil.

Starting from February 2011 the export duties for petroleum products were directly linked to export duty for crude oil and were set at 67% of the export duty for crude oil for light products and at 46.7% for dark products.

Starting from May 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for gasoline equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil. Starting from June 1, 2011 the Russian Government introduced a special export duty for naphtha equivalent to 90% of the export duty for crude oil.

Starting from October 2011 the export duty for light petroleum products (excluding gasoline and nafta) was lowered from 67% to 66% of export duty for crude oil, the export duty for dark petroleum products was raised from 46.7% to 66% of export duty for crude oil. Export duty for naphtha and gasoline remained at 90% of crude oil export duty. These rates are effective as at the reporting date.

Changes in Transport Tariffs of Pipeline and Railway Monopolies

Rosneft transports most of its crude oil and petroleum products via pipeline network owned and operated by Transneft, which is a natural state-owned pipeline monopoly. Rosneft also transports crude oil and petroleum products via railway network owned and operated by RZD, another natural state-owned monopoly.

The Federal Tariff Service (the FTS), a governmental body regulating natural monopolies, sets Transneft's base tariffs for transportation of crude oil and petroleum products, which include a dispatch tariff, a pumping tariff, loading, charge-discharge, transshipment and other tariffs. Tariffs for railroad transportation are also regulated by the FTS. The tariffs are set in roubles and are not linked to the exchange rate.

The FTS sets tariffs for each separate route of the pipeline networks depending on the length of the relevant routes, transportation direction and other factors, alternatively tariffs may be set for the entire route of the pipeline network. Tariffs for railroad transportation, where these costs are not already incorporated in pipeline tariffs, often depend on the type of cargo and the transportation route.

 

Recent changes of Transneft transportation tariffs

Petroleum products

Starting from January 1, 2011 Transneft increased tariffs by 5.9% on average for domestic transportation of petroleum products and by 9.5% on average for export transportation. As a result, annual average tariffs in 2011 compared with 2010 for the Company increased by 13.1% for export transportation and by 6.1% for domestic transportation.

In January 2012 Transneft increased tariffs by 8.6% on average for export transportation and by 6.1% on average for domestic transportation of petroleum products. Starting from August 1, 2012 tariffs for pipeline transportation of petroleum products for Rosneft increased by 5.4% for domestic transportation and by 3% for export transportation. As a result, annual average tariffs in 2012 compared with 2011 the tariffs for export transportation of petroleum products increased by 10.0% and tariffs for domestic transportation of petroleum products increased by 8.6%.

Crude oil

Starting from September 2011 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 2.85% on average. Starting from November 2011 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 5% on average. Starting from November 2012 Transneft increased tariffs for crude oil transportation by 5.5% on average while the the network tariff for ESPO (Kozmino and China) increased by 10.2%. Transneft revised and increased the tariff for Rosneft's major transportation route "Yugansk - Primorsk" and route "Yugansk - Novorossysk", by 3.5% and 6.8%, respectively. On year-on-year average basis for the routs represented in the table below, tariffs for pipeline transportation of crude oil for export and domestic supplies increased by 4.9% in 2012 compared with 2011 while the tariff for Rosneft's major transportation route "Yugansk - Primorsk" on year-on-year average basis increased by 14.8% in 2012 compared with 2011.

Recent changes of railroad transportation tariffs

In January 2011 and January 2012 tariffs for railroad transportation were increased by 8.0% and 6.0% on average, respectively.

Rosneft average transportation tariffs applied for major transportation routes denominated in RUB for the respective periods:

For 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31

change for12 months ended

December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

(th. RUB/tonne)

(%)

CRUDE OIL

Domestic

Pipeline

Yugansk - Samara refineries

0.78

0.75

4.0%

0.75

0.73

0.65

2.7%

12.3%

Samara - Samara refineries

0.05

0.05

-

0.05

0.05

0.04

-

25.0%

Yugansk - Angarsk refinery

1.30

1.25

4.0%

1.26

1.21

1.08

4.1%

12.0%

Purpe - Tuapse refinery

1.62

1.56

3.8%

1.57

1.50

1.34

4.7%

11.9%

Tomsk - Achinsk refinery

0.35

0.34

2.9%

0.34

0.33

0.30

3.0%

10.0%

Pipeline and railroad

Yugansk - Komsomolsk refinery

4.17

4.14

0.7%

4.14

3.93

3.61

5.3%

8.9%

Exports

Pipeline

Yugansk - Primorsk

1.58

1.54

2.6%

1.55

1.35

1.16

14.8%

16.4%

Yugansk - Novorossysk

1.55

1.49

4.0%

1.50

1.46

1.31

2.7%

11.5%

Vankor (Purpe)-Kozmino

2.02

1.89

6.9%

1.92

1.84

1.63

4.3%

12.9%

Railroad

Stavropolneftegaz - CPC

0.68

0.68

-

0.68

0.66

0.61

3.0%

8.2%

PETROLEUM PRODUCT EXPORTS

Diesel

Samara refineries - Ventspils

1.90

1.91

(0.5)%

1.89

1.73

1.60

9.2%

8.1%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

4.16

4.16

-

4.16

3.89

3.62

6.9%

7.5%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.63

1.63

-

1.63

1.53

1.42

6.5%

7.7%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

4.69

4.69

-

4.69

4.38

4.07

7.1%

7.6%

Fuel oil

Samara refineries - Odessa

2.90

2.93

(1.0)%

2.90

2.71

2.58

7.0%

5.0%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

4.14

4.14

-

4.14

3.96

3.67

4.5%

7.9%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.56

1.56

-

1.56

1.48

1.37

5.4%

8.0%

Achinsk refinery - Nakhodka

5.30

5.30

-

5.30

4.89

4.53

8.4%

7.9%

Naphtha

Samara refineries - Tuapse

1.93

1.93

-

1.93

1.87

1.74

3.2%

7.5%

Achinsk refinery - Tuapse

4.58

4.58

-

4.58

4.30

4.00

6.5%

7.5%

Angarsk refinery - Nakhodka

3.92

3.92

-

3.92

3.78

3.51

3.7%

7.7%

Komsomolsk refinery - Nakhodka

1.60

1.60

-

1.60

1.50

1.39

6.7%

7.9%

Source: Transneft, RZD, Rosneft. Mixed export tariffs include transshipment at non-Rosneft terminals. The data is provided for major routes at each direction

 

Rosneft operates proprietary transportation and transhipment facilities. This allows optimisation of Company's logistics (netbacks). These facilities include: the Arkhangelsk, De-Kastri, Tuapse and Nakhodka export terminals, the Okha - Komsomolsk-on-Amur pipeline, Vankor-Purpe pipeline and the Caspian Pipeline Consortium ("CPC"). In Caspian Pipeline Consortium Rosneft has a 7.5% stake through a joint venture "Rosneft Shell Caspian Ventures Ltd" (Cyprus) (Rosneft owns 51%).

Operating Results

Production of Crude Oil

Rosneft has twelve fully consolidated production and development enterprises, which produce crude oil in Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, Timan Pechora, Central Russia, southern part of European Russia and the Russian Far East. The Company also has a 20% stake in the Sakhalin-1 project accounted for using proportionate consolidation method. In addition, Rosneft participates in four production joint ventures accounted for using the equity method: Tomskneft - 50.0%, Udmurtneft - 49.54%, Polar Lights - 50.0% and Verknechonskneftegaz - 25.94%.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil production:

For 3 months ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31

change for 12 monthsended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

2011 -

2010

(million of barrels)

(%)

(million of barrels)

(%)

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

122.9

122.9

-

488.8

488.1

483.2

0.1%

1.0%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

19.9

19.9

-

78.8

77.6

75.8

1.5%

2.4%

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

12.5

12.9

(3.1)%

50.7

51.3

52.7

(1.2)%

(2.7)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

37.7

35.1

7.4%

133.9

109.7

92.9

22.1%

18.1%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

6.2

6.4

(3.1)%

25.7

26.6

29.9

(3.4)%

(11.0)%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)(net of royalty and government share)

2.2

2.2

-

8.7

10.0

9.2

(13.0)%

8.7%

Other

7.5

7.1

5.6%

29.9

32.5

35.4

(8.0)%

(8.2)%

Crude oil production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

208.9

206.5

1.2%

816.5

795.8

779.1

2.6%

2.1%

Tomskneft (Western Siberia)

9.3

9.5

(2.1)%

37.4

37.9

37.7

(1.3)%

0.5%

Udmurtneft (Central Russia)

6.0

5.9

1.7%

23.5

23.2

23.2

1.3%

-

Polar Lights (Timan Pechora)

0.5

0.4

25.0%

1.9

2.2

2.6

(13.6)%

(15.4)%

Verkhnechonskneftegaz (Eastern Siberia)

3.4

3.5

(2.9)%

13.3

9.5

4.8

40.0%

97.9%

Total share in production of joint ventures

19.2

19.3

(0.5)%

76.1

72.8

68.3

4.5%

6.6%

Total crude oil production

228.1

225.8

1.0%

892.6

868.6

847.4

2.8%

2.5%

Daily crude oil production

(th. barrels per day)

2,479

2,454

1.0%

2,439

2,380

2,322

2.5%

2.5%

In the fourth quarter of 2012 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2,479 th. barrels per day, which is an increase of 1.0% compared with the third quarter of 2012. The production level increased due to crude oil production growth mainly at Vankor, as well as at fields in Sakhalinmоrneftegaz and Stavropolneftegaz (which is included in "Other" fully consolidated subsidiaries) owing to the launch of new wells. Overall daily production growth was partially offset by the natural decline in production at Western Siberia and Timan Pechora fields.

In 2012 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2.5% higher than in 2011. The growth was driven primarily by production increase at Vankor, Verkhnechonskneftegaz, Samaraneftegaz, Udmurtneft and Yuganskneftegaz fields, which was partially offset by production decrease at Sakhalin-1 and Timan Pechora.

In 2011 Rosneft's average daily crude oil production was 2,380 th. barrels per day, which was 2.5% higher than in 2010. The growth was driven primarily by commercial production growth at the Vankor and Verkhnechonskneftegaz after the launch of new wells and due to the launch of production at Odoptu field in September 2010 at Sakhalin. Overall production growth was partially offset by the natural decline in production at the fields of Severnaya Neft.

Production of Gas

The table below sets forth Rosneft's commercial gas production*:

 

For 3 months ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31

change for 12 monthsended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

(bcm)

(%)

(bcm)

(%)

Purneftegaz (Western Siberia)

1.07

0.98

9.2%

4.07

3.71

3.60

9.7%

3.1%

Yuganskneftegaz (Western Siberia)

0.89

0.81

9.9%

3.16

2.86

2.65

10.5%

7.9%

Krasnodarneftegaz (Southern Russia)

0.82

0.66

24.2%

2.90

2.73

2.71

6.2%

0.7%

Samaraneftegaz (Central Russia)

0.13

0.14

(7.1)%

0.53

0.50

0.47

6.0%

6.4%

Severnaya Neft (Timan Pechora)

0.07

0.07

-

0.29

0.26

0.28

11.5%

(7.1)%

Vankorneft (Eastern Siberia)

0.14

0.11

27.3%

0.47

0.37

0.28

27.0%

32.1%

Sakhalin-1 (Far East)(net of royalty and government share)

0.11

0.06

83.3%

0.34

0.31

0.29

9.7%

6.9%

Other

0.29

0.25

16.0%

1.13

1.25

1.35

(9.6)%

(7.4)%

Gas production by fully and proportionately consolidated enterprises

3.52

3.08

14.3%

12.89

11.99

11.63

7.5%

3.1%

Tomskneft (Western Siberia)

0.25

0.19

31.6%

0.84

0.73

0.65

15.1%

12.3%

ITERA LLC

1.60

1.02

56.9%

2.62

-

-

-

-

Other

-

0.01

(100.0)%

0.04

0.07

0.06

(42.9)%

16.7%

Total share in production of joint ventures

1.85

1.22

51.6%

3.50

0.80

0.71

>100%

12.7%

Total gas production

5.37

4.30

24.9%

16.39

12.79

12.34

28.1%

3.6%

Natural gas

2.89

2.07

39.6%

7.28

4.68

4.66

55.6%

0.4%

Associated gas

2.48

2.23

11.2%

9.11

8.11

7.68

12.3%

5.6%

* Production volume equals extracted volume minus flared volume.

In the fourthquarter of 2012 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was 5.37 bcm, which was significantly higher than in the third quarter of 2012. The increase in gas production mainly resulted from the acquisition of ITERA.

Excluding the effect of ITERA acquisition, the gas production increased by 14.9%. The increase in the fourth quarter was due to seasonal increase in demand at Krasnodarneftegaz, Tomskneft and Sakhalin-1, as well as with the production growth at Vankorneft due to its higher oil production.

In 2012 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was significantly higher than in 2011, mainly due to ITERA acquisition which lead to the overall increase in gas production by 2.62 bcm. Excluding the effect of ITERA acquisition, gas production growth by 0.98 bcm year-on-year was due to the number of factors: stable operations at the Luguinetskaya compressor station of Tomskneft in 2012, higher crude oil production at the Vankor field and at the Priobskoe field of Yuganskneftegaz, the launch of compressor stations at the Komsomolskoe field of Purneftegaz in September 2011 and the construction of gas pipeline to the fields of Severnaya Neft.

In 2011 Rosneft's natural and associated gas production was 3.6% higher than in 2010, primarily, as a result of increased production of associated gas at Samaraneftegaz, Vankor and Yuganskneftegaz. Launch of new booster compression stations and gas preparations facilities allowed to increase associated gas utilization rates.

Rosneft is implementing a programme aimed at increasing associated gas utilisation rate. The programme envisages construction of gas gathering facilities, booster compression stations and underground storage facilities as well as gas power stations.

In 2012, the following assets were put into exploitation within the gas utilisation programme: compression stations in Priobskoe and Kharampurskoe fields, gas pipeline at Ombinskoe field.

Petroleum Product Output

Rosneft processes produced and procured crude oil at its refineries: the Tuapse refinery on the Black Sea in the South of Russia, the Komsomolsk refinery in the Russian Far East, the Achinsk and Angarsk refineries in Eastern Siberia and the Kuibyshev, Novokuibyshevsk and Syzran refineries in the Samara region (European part of Russia). The capacity of these refineries as of December 31, 2012 stands at 51.8 million tonnes per year.

Rosneft also owns six mini-refineries (in Western Siberia, Eastern Siberia, Timan-Pechora and the southern part of European Russia), as well as OJSC Angarsk polymer plant (petrochemical block of the Angarsk refinery), LLC Novokuibyshevsk lubricants and additives plant (lubricants block of the Novokuibyshevsk refinery) and OJSC Rosneft-MZ Nefteprodukt (lubricants plant in Moscow).

In May, 2011 Rosneft acquired a 50% stake in Ruhr Oel GmbH which owns stakes in four refineries in Germany. Rosneft's share in primary capacity of these refineries amounts to 11.6 million tonnes per year. The Gelsenkirchen refinery, which is fully owned by Ruhr Oel GmbH, has a petrochemical block with annual capacity of 1 million tonnes of ethylene.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's crude oil processing and petroleum product output volumes.

For 3 months ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 monthsended December 31

change for 12 monthsended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

(million of tonnes)

(%)

(million of tonnes)

(%)

Crude oil processing at Rosneft's own refineries in Russia

13.10

13.27

(1.3)%

50.85

50.65

50.49

0,4%

0.3%

Crude oil processing at Ruhr Oel GmbH

2.81

2.81

-

10.73

7.21

-

48,8%

-

Total group crude oil processing

15.91

16.08

(1.1)%

61.58

57.86

50.49

6,4%

14.6%

Product output:

High octane gasoline

1.38

1.45

(4.8)%

5.34

5.33

4.92

0,2%

8.3%

Low octane gasoline

0.07

0.09

(22.2)%

0.35

0.35

1.53

-

(77.1)%

Naphtha

0.94

0.94

-

3.67

3.83

3.13

(4,2)%

22.4%

Diesel

4.49

4.49

-

17.22

17.25

16.84

(0,2)%

2.4%

Fuel oil

4.33

4.13

4.8%

16.39

16.91

17.39

(3,1)%

(2.8)%

Jet

0.34

0.43

(20.9)%

1.50

1.20

1.10

25,0%

9.1%

Petrochemicals

0.17

0.08

112.5%

0.53

0.54

0.52

(1,9)%

3.8%

Other*

0.84

1.16

(27.6)%

3.80

3.20

2.93

18,8%

9.2%

Product output at Rosneft's own refineries

12.56

12.77

(1.6)%

48.80

48.61

48.36

0,4%

0.5%

Product output at Ruhr Oel GmbH

2.77

2.78

(0.4)%

10.79

7.30

-

47,8%

100.0%

Total group product output

15.33

15.55

(1.4)%

59.59

55.91

48.36

6,6%

15.6%

*including production of petroleum products at gas refineries

In the fourth quarter of 2012, Rosneft's total refinery throughput was 1.1% lower than in the third quarter of 2012. Rosneft's refinery throughput in Russia decreased by 1.3% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with the third quarter of 2012.

The decrease in the refinery throughput at refineries in Russia was due to the turnarounds at Angarsk refinery and Syzran refinery. Turnarounds at refineries mentioned above were the key factor of change in output structure in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the third quarter of 2012. In addition, the increase in total petrochemical products output in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the third quarter of 2012 resulted from the rebound of production levels at Angarsk polymer refinery due to the completion of planned turnarounds.

Rosneft's share in processing of non-crude feedstock at Ruhr Oel GmbH refineries was 0.30 and 0.35 million of tonnes in the fourth and in the third quarters of 2012 respectively.

In 2012 Rosneft's refinery throughput was 6.4% higher than in 2011 mainly due to the acquisition of a 50% stake in Ruhr Oel GmbH in May 2011. Throughput at Russian refineries increased by 0.4%. Increase in jet fuel production resulted from change in output structure of the Syzran refinery following the demand growth.

In 2011 Rosneft's refinery throughput was 14.6% higher in comparison to 2010 due to the acquisition of share in Ruhr Oel GmbH in May 2011 and crude oil processing growth at Rosneft's own refineries by 0.3%. The decrease in low octane gasoline output and increase in naphtha output was experienced after the introduction of new requirements for Technical regulations to quality of motor fuel introduced since January 2011.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth the statement of income information both in absolute values and respective changes over the analyzed periods:

For 3 months ended

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

Change

% of total revenue

% of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Oil and gas sales

385

48.7%

393

48.6%

(2.0)%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

383

48.5%

398

49.2%

(3.8)%

Support services and other revenues

11

1.4%

11

1.4%

-

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

11

1.4%

7

0.8%

57.1%

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

790

100.0%

809

100.0%

(2.3)%

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

62

7.9%

52

6.4%

19.2%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

96

12.2%

100

12.4%

(4.0)%

General and administrative expenses

20

2.5%

15

1.9%

33.3%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

62

7.9%

61

7.5%

1.6%

Exploration expenses

8

1.0%

6

0.7%

33.3%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

61

7.7%

59

7.3%

3.4%

Taxes other than income tax

161

20.4%

165

20.4%

(2.4)%

Export customs duty

237

30.0%

212

26.2%

11.8%

Total cost and expenses

707

89.5%

670

82.8%

5.5%

Operating income

83

10.5%

139

17.2%

(40.3)%

Finance income

9

1.1%

6

0.7%

50.0%

Finance expenses

(3)

(0.4)%

(5)

(0.6)%

(40.0)%

Other income

-

-

84

10.4%

-

Other expenses

(23)

(2.9)%

(9)

(1.1)%

>100.0%

Result of operations with foreign currency, foreign exchange differences

8

1.0%

16

2.0%

(50.0)%

Income before income tax

74

9.4%

231

28.6%

(68.0)%

Income tax expense

(17)

(2.2)%

(50)

(6.2)%

(66.0)%

Net income

57

7.2%

181

22.4%

(68.5)%

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

-

-

5

0.6%

(100.0)%

Gain/(loss) from changes in fair value of financial assets available for-sale

(1)

(0.1)%

1

0.1%

-

Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

(1)

(0.1)%

6

0.7%

-

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

56

7.1%

187

23.1%

(70.1)%

 

The table below provides information on the Results of Operations for the period 2012, 2011 and 2010:

 

For 12 months ended December 31

% change

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

2011 -2010

(RUB billion)

(%)

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

Oil and gas sales

1,526

1,392

1,056

9.6%

31.8%

Petroleum products and petrochemicals sales

1,479

1,265

810

16.9%

56.2%

Support services and other revenues

42

45

49

(6.7)%

(8.2)%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

31

16

4

93.8%

>100.0%

Total revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

3,078

2,718

1,919

13.2%

41.6%

Costs and expenses

Production and operating expenses

220

189

144

16.4%

31.3%

Cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs

371

298

72

24.5%

>100.0%

General and administrative expenses

68

52

51

30.8%

2.0%

Pipeline tariffs and transportation costs

241

216

212

11.6%

1.9%

Exploration expenses

23

13

14

76.9%

(7.1)%

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

227

213

202

6.6%

5.4%

Taxes other than income tax

645

498

331

29.5%

50.5%

Export customs duty

901

790

509

14.1%

55.2%

Total cost and expenses

2,696

2,269

1,535

18.8%

47.8%

Operating income

382

449

384

(14.9)%

16.9%

Finance income

24

20

20

20.0%

-

Finance expenses

(15)

(19)

(21)

(21.1)%

(9.5)%

Other income

85

25

27

>100.0%

(7.4)%

Other expenses

(50)

(48)

(49)

4.2%

(2.0)%

Result of operations with foreign currency, foreign exchange differences

11

(22)

(2)

-

>100.0%

Income/(loss) before income tax

437

405

359

7.9%

12.8%

Income tax expense

(95)

(86)

(58)

10.5%

48.3%

Net income/(loss)

342

319

301

7.2%

6.0%

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

Foreign exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

4

(1)

(3)

-

(66.7)%

Gain/(loss) from changes in fair value of financial assets available for-sale

(3)

1

-

-

-

Total other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

1

-

(3)

-

(100.0)%

Total comprehensive income(loss), net of tax

343

319

298

7.5%

7.0%

 

For 3 months ended

For 12 months ended

December 31,

2012

September 30,

2012

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

December 31,

2010

EBITDA

144

198

609

662

586

Operating income margin

10.5%

17.2%

12.4%

16.5%

20.0%

Share of pipeline and transportation costs in revenue

7.8%

7.5%

7.8%

7.9%

11.0%

Net income margin

7.2%

22.4%

11.1%

11.7%

15.7%

* The difference between percents presented here and in the sections is a result of rounding

Revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

In the fourth quarter of 2012 revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures were 2.3% down compared to those of the third quarter of 2012 and amounted to RUB 790 billion. The decrease was mainly driven by decrease in crude oil and petroleum product prices and decrease in sales volumes of petroleum products, partially offset by growth of equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures.

In 2012 revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures were 13.2% higher compared to 2011, that was driven by increase in sales volumes and price. Urals price increased by 1.1% and the world market prices for diesel and fuel oil denominated in RUB rose by 8.4% and 9.6% respectively.

In the year ended December 31, 2011, revenues and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures were RUB 2,718 billion, an increase of 41.6% compared revenues of RUB 1,919 billion in 2010. This was mainly driven by substantial increases in price, growth of production volumes and equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures.

The table below presents revenues from sales of crude oil, gas, petroleum, petrochemical products and other revenues in billions of RUB*:

For 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for12 months

ended

December 31

December

 31, 2012

September

 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

 2012 -

2011

 2011 -

2010

%

of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Crude oil

International Sales to non-CIS

359

45.4%

363

44.9%

(1.1)%

1,421

46.1%

1,321

48.6%

993

51.7%

7.6%

33.0%

Europe and other directions

261

33.0%

265

32.8%

(1.5)%

1,033

33.5%

955

35.1%

694

36.1%

8.2%

37.6%

Asia

98

12.4%

98

12.1%

0.0%

388

12.6%

366

13.5%

299

15.6%

6.0%

22.4%

International sales to CIS

20

2.5%

22

2.7%

(9.1)%

78

2.5%

54

2.0%

42

2.2%

44.4%

28.6%

Domestic

0

0.0%

1

0.1%

(100.0)%

5

0.2%

3

0.1%

8

0.4%

66.7%

(62.5)%

Total crude oil

379

47.9%

386

47.7%

(1.8)%

1,504

48.8%

1,378

50.7%

1,043

54.3%

9.1%

32.1%

Gas

6

0.8%

7

0.9%

(14.3)%

22

0.7%

14

0.5%

13

0.7%

57.1%

7.7%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

216

27.4%

222

27.4%

(2.7)%

839

27.3%

712

26.2%

429

22.3%

17.8%

66.0%

Europe and other directions

162

20.6%

163

20.1%

(0.6)%

611

19.9%

488

18.0%

247

12.8%

25.2%

97.6%

Asia

54

6.8%

59

7.3%

(8.5)%

228

7.4%

224

8.2%

182

9.5%

1.8%

23.1%

International Sales to CIS

4

0.5%

3

0.4%

33.3%

11

0.4%

8

0.3%

5

0.3%

37.5%

60.0%

Domestic

128

16.2%

139

17.2%

(7.9)%

495

16.1%

448

16.4%

340

17.7%

10.5%

31.8%

Wholesale

73

9.2%

85

10.5%

(14.1)%

295

9.6%

270

9.9%

220

11.4%

9.3%

22.7%

Retail

55

7.0%

54

6.7%

1.9%

200

6.5%

178

6.5%

120

6.3%

12.4%

48.3%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

13

1.6%

16

2.0%

(18.8)%

50

1.6%

37

1.4%

23

1.2%

35.1%

60.9%

Total petroleum products

361

45.7%

380

47.0%

(5.0)%

1,395

45.4%

1,205

44.3%

797

41.5%

15.8%

51.2%

Petrochemical products

22

2.8%

18

2.2%

22.2%

84

2.7%

60

2.2%

13

0.7%

40.0%

>100.0%

International sales

19

2.4%

16

2.0%

18.8%

73

2.3%

50

1.8%

4

0.2%

46.0%

>100.0%

Domestic

3

0.4%

2

0.2%

50.0%

11

0.4%

10

0.4%

9

0.5%

10.0%

11.1%

Support services and other revenues

11

1.4%

11

1.4%

0.0%

42

1.4%

45

1.7%

49

2.6%

(6.7)%

(8.2)%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

11

1.4%

7

0.8%

57.1%

31

1.0%

16

0.6%

4

0.2%

93.8%

>100.0%

Total sales

790

100.0%

809

100.0%

(2.3)%

3,078

100.0%

2,718

100.0%

1,919

100.0%

13.2%

41.6%

*The difference between percentages presented in the above table and in this section is a result of rounding

 

Sales Volumes

The table below analyses crude oil, gas and petroleum and petrochemical product sales volumes:

For 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for12 months

ended

December 31

December

31, 2012

September

30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

2011 -2010

Crude oil

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

%

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

mln

bbls

%of total volume

%

International Sales to non-CIS

111.2

46.8%

111.3

46.1%

(0.1)%

438.2

47.2%

433.8

48.9%

420.6

51.8%

1.0%

3.1%

Europe and other directions

77.5

32.6%

77.6

32.2%

(0.1)%

306.5

33.0%

301.4

34.0%

297.0

36.6%

1.7%

1.5%

Asia

33.7

14.2%

33.7

13.9%

0.0%

131.7

14.2%

132.4

14.9%

123.6

15.2%

(0.5)%

7.1%

CIS

13.1

5.5%

11.7

4.8%

12.0%

47.5

5.1%

33.6

3.8%

24.9

3.1%

41.4%

34.9%

Domestic

0.1

0.0%

0.7

0.3%

(85.7)%

3.7

0.4%

2.2

0.2%

8.8

1.1%

68.2%

(75.0)%

Total crude oil

124.4

52.3%

123.7

51.2%

0.6%

489.4

52.7%

469.6

52.9%

454.3

56.0%

4.2%

3.4%

Crude oil

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

mln tonnes

International Sales to non-CIS

15.2

46.8%

15.2

46.1%

(0.1)%

59.9

47.2%

59.3

48.9%

57.5

51.8%

1.0%

3.1%

Europe and other directions

10.6

32.6%

10.6

32.2%

(0.1)%

41.9

33.0%

41.2

34.0%

40.6

36.6%

1.7%

1.5%

Asia

4.6

14.2%

4.6

13.9%

0.0%

18.0

14.2%

18.1

14.9%

16.9

15.2%

(0.5)%

7.1%

CIS

1.8

5.5%

1.6

4.8%

12.0%

6.5

5.1%

4.6

3.8%

3.4

3.1%

41.4%

34.9%

Domestic

0.0

0.0%

0.1

0.3%

(85.7)%

0.5

0.4%

0.3

0.2%

1.2

1.1%

68.2%

(75.0)%

Total crude oil

17.0

52.3%

16.9

51.2%

0.6%

66.9

52.7%

64.2

52.9%

62.1

56.0%

4.2%

3.4%

Petroleum products

International Sales to non-CIS

8.5

26.2%

8.4

25.5%

1.2%

32.6

25.6%

30.5

25.2%

25.5

23.0%

6.9%

19.6%

Europe and other directions

6.5

20.0%

6.2

18.8%

4.8%

24.1

18.9%

21.1

17.4%

15.4

13.9%

14.2%

37.0%

Asia

2.0

6.2%

2.2

6.7%

(9.1)%

8.5

6.7%

9.4

7.8%

10.1

9.1%

(9.6)%

(6.9)%

International Sales to CIS

0.2

0.6%

0.2

0.6%

0.0%

0.5

0.4%

0.4

0.3%

0.3

0.3%

25.0%

33.3%

Domestic

5.2

16.0%

6.1

18.5%

(14.8)%

21.4

16.8%

21.4

17.7%

20.5

18.5%

0.0%

4.4%

Wholesale

3.4

10.5%

4.2

12.7%

(19.0)%

14.6

11.4%

14.9

12.3%

15.2

13.7%

(2.0)%

(2.0)%

Retail

1.8

5.5%

1.9

5.8%

(5.3)%

6.8

5.4%

6.5

5.4%

5.3

4.8%

4.6%

22.6%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

0.8

2.5%

0.8

2.4%

0.0%

2.8

2.2%

2.5

2.1%

1.8

1.6%

12.0%

38.9%

Total petroleum products

14.7

45.3%

15.5

47.0%

(5.2)%

57.3

45.0%

54.8

45.3%

48.1

43.4%

4.6%

13.9%

Petrochemical products

0.8

2.4%

0.6

1.8%

33.3%

2.9

2.3%

2.2

1.8%

0.7

0.6%

31.8%

>100.0%

International sales

0.6

1.8%

0.4

1.2%

50.0%

2.2

1.7%

1.5

1.2%

0.1

0.1%

46.7%

>100.0%

Domestic

0.2

0.6%

0.2

0.6%

0.0%

0.7

0.6%

0.7

0.6%

0.6

0.5%

0.0%

16.7%

Total crude oil and products

32.5

100.0%

33.0

100.0%

(1.5)%

127.1

100.0%

121.2

100%

110.9

100.0%

4.9%

9.3%

Gas

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

bcm

Sales Volumes

2.90

2.76

5.1%

11.08

9.74

9.80

13.8%

(0.6)%

 

Average Crude Oil and Petroleum Product Sales Prices 

The following table sets forth Rosneft's average export and domestic prices of crude oil, gas and petroleum products (the average sales prices may differ from official market prices provided by specialized agencies due to different quality of products and sales terms):

For 3 months ended

% change between4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months ended

% change for12 months ended

December 31

December 31,

2012

September 30,

2012

December 31,

2012

December 31,

2011

December 31,

2010

Average prices on foreign markets

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

2012

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

(th.RUB/barrel)

(th.RUB/tonne)

 2012 -2011

 2011 -2010

Crude oil, excluding CIS

3.20

23.4

3.30

24.2

(3.3)%

3.24

23.7

3.04

22.3

2.40

17.3

6.3%

28.9%

Europe and other directions

3.34

24.4

3.44

25.2

(3.2)%

3.37

24.6

3.17

23.2

2.30

17.1

6.0%

35.7%

Asia

2.88

21.1

2.98

21.8

(3.2)%

2.95

21.6

2.76

20.2

2.40

17.7

6.9%

14.1%

Crude oil, CIS

1.60

11.7

1.84

13.5

(13.3)%

1.66

12.1

1.61

11.8

1.70

12.4

2.5%

(4.8)%

Petroleum products, non- CIS

25.0

26.6

(6.0)%

25.7

23.4

16.8

9.8%

39.3%

Europe and other directions

24.6

26.3

(6.5)%

25.3

23.2

16.1

9.1%

44.1%

Asia

26.5

27.4

(3.3)%

26.8

23.9

18.0

12.1%

32.8%

Petroleum products, CIS

22.2

24.1

(7.9)%

23.4

21.8

17.3

7.3%

26.0%

Average domestic prices

Crude oil

1.57

11.5

1.54

11.3

1.8%

1.40

10.3

1.39

10.2

0.90

6.8

1.0%

50.0%

Petroleum products

24.3

23.1

5.2%

23.1

20.9

16.6

10.5%

25.9%

Wholesale

21.4

20.3

5.4%

20.2

18.2

14.5

11.0%

25.5%

Retail

29.8

29.3

1.7%

29.4

27.1

22.8

8.5%

18.9%

Gas (th.rub. /th. cubic meter)

2.05

2.14

(4.2)%

1.97

1.47

1.29

34.0%

14.0%

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

17.8

18.0

(1.1)%

17.9

15.4

12.3

16.2%

25.2%

Petrochemical products

30.7

29.5

4.1%

29.8

27.0

17.1

10.4%

57.9%

International sales

35.0

33.7

3.9%

33.9

33.0

31.5

2.7%

4.8%

Domestic

18.7

15.5

20.6%

16.8

14.0

14.5

20.0%

(3.4)%

International Crude Oil Sales to non-CIS

Revenues from international crude oil sales to non-CIS countries in the fourth quarter of 2012 were RUB 359 billion which is lower by 1.1% in comparison with the third quarter of 2012. Average prices downturn of 3.3% (negative impact on revenues of RUB 4 billion) and sales volumes reduction by 0.1%. Export average price reduction was due to general decrease of world market price.

In 2012 revenues from international crude oil sales to non-CIS countries increased by 7.6% compared to 2011. A 6.3% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of RUB 87 billion) was accompanied by a slight increase in sales volumes by 1.0% (favourable impact on revenues of RUB 13 billion).

The deviation between average sales prices on the Asian markets and world market prices (Dubai) in the fourth quarter of 2012 is due to deliveries to Transneft of 6 million tonnes (43.89 million barrels)of crude oil per year under the contract signed in 2009. These volumes are sold to Transneft at export alternative price basis and are recognized as international sales in Company's sales structure. Excluding revenues from crude oil sales to Transneft (RUB 18 billion) in the fourth quarter of 2012 the average sales price on the Asian markets amounted to RUB 3.5 thousand per barrel. In 2012 the average sales price on the Asian markets was equal to RUB 3.5 thousand per barrel excluding revenues from crude oil sales to Transneft (RUB 79 billion).

In 2011 revenues from crude oil exports to non-CIS countries increased by 33.0% compared to 2010, which was driven by a 28.9% increase in average export prices in line with the increase in average global prices, and a 3.1% increase in sales volumes. Export sales volumes growth was due to increased production at Vankor.

Crude Oil Supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH Refineries

In January 2012 Rosneft resumed supplies of its own crude oil to Ruhr Oel GmbH refineries. In the twelve months of 2012 these supplies, net of resale operations, amounted to 2.2 million tonnes (15.8 million barrels). Rosneft paid RUB 27 billion of export duties on this crude oil. 2.1 million tonnes (15.7 million barrels) of this crude oil were fully processed and sold.

Besides supplies of own crude oil, in the twelve months of 2012 Rosneft acquired 8.7 million tonnes (63.5 million barrels) of crude oil on the international market for RUB 221 billion to supply to Ruhr Oel GmbH refineries. These expenses are reflected in the cost of purchased oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

International Crude Oil Sales to CIS

In the fourth quarter of 2012 revenue from sales of crude oil to CIS (Belarus and Kazakhstan) was RUB 20 billion, which is a decrease of 9.1% compared to the previous quarter. A 13.3% downturn in average prices, was partially offset by an increase in sales volumes of 12.0% had a total negative impact on revenues of RUB 2 billion. The increase in sales volumes resulted from higher quotas for crude oil deliveries to Kazakhstan.

In 2012 revenues from international crude oil sales to CIS countries (Belarus and Kazakhstan) were RUB 24 billion higher in comparison with 2011, which is attributable to sales volumes growth of 41.4% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 22 billion). Average price upturn of 2.5% led to revenue growth of RUB 2 billion.

In 2011revenues from crude oil exports to CIS countries increased by RUB 12 billion in comparison with 2010, which was attributable to a sales volumes increase of 34.9%, partly offset by a decline in the average price of crude oil by 4.8%. The increase in sales volumes was due to the cancellation of custom duties on crude oil export to Belarus.

International Petroleum Product Sales to Non-CIS

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to non-CIS countries:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

2

0.2

36.3

2

0.0

38.9

0.0%

(6.7)%

Low octane gasoline

2

0.1

28.8

2

0.1

28.9

0.0%

0.0%

(0.3)%

Naphtha

27

1.0

29.0

26

0.9

28.8

3.8%

11.1%

0.7%

Diesel (Gasoil)

59

2.1

28.7

50

1.7

29.8

18.0%

23.5%

(3.7)%

Fuel oil

57

2.9

17.8

66

3.3

20.4

(13.6)%

(12.1)%

(12.7)%

Jet fuel

1

0.0

39.1

0

0.0

38.5

1.6%

Other

1

0.0

27.6

2

0.1

26.3

(50.0)%

(100.0)%

4.9%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

149

6.3

23.4

148

6.1

24.6

0.7%

3.3%

(4.9)%

Petroleum products sold from ROG refineries

67

2.2

29.7

74

2.3

31.6

(9.5)%

(4.3)%

(6.0)%

Total

216

8.5

25.0

222

8.4

26.6

(2.7)%

1.2%

(6.0)%

Revenues from the international sales of petroleum products to non-CIS countries wereRUB 216 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is a decrease of 2.7% compared to the previous quarter.A 6.0% downturn in average prices (unfavorable impact on revenues of RUB 9 billion) was compensated by sales volume increase of 1.2% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 3 billion).

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold to non-CIS countries:

For 12 months ended December 31

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2012 and 2011

% change between12 months ended December 31,

2011 and 2010

2012

2011

2010

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th.RUB/

tonne

High octane gasoline

7

0.2

37.2

14

0.6

25.4

4

0.2

25.5

(50.0)%

(66.7)%

46.5%

250.0%

200.0%

(0.4)%

Low octane gasoline

5

0.2

30.1

6

0.3

27.7

4

0.2

21.8

(16.7)%

(33.3)%

8.7%

50.0%

50.0%

27.1%

Naphtha

104

3.6

28.8

94

3.5

26.7

66

3.1

21.3

10.6%

2.9%

7.9%

42.4%

12.9%

25.4%

Diesel (Gasoil)

203

7.0

29.1

183

6.8

27.0

164

8.2

19.8

10.9%

2.9%

7.8%

11.6%

(17.1)%

36.4%

Fuel oil

254

12.6

19.9

241

13.1

18.4

185

13.5

13.7

5.4%

(3.8)%

8.2%

30.3%

(3.0)%

34.3%

Jet fuel

1

0.0

37.6

1

31.7

21.9

0.0%

18.6%

100.0%

44.7%

Other

5

0.3

27.0

8

0.3

25.5

6

0.3

21.1

(37.5)%

0.0%

5.9%

33.3%

0.0%

20.9%

Total petroleum products exported to non-CIS

579

23.9

24.2

547

24.6

22.3

429

25.5

16.8

5.9%

(2.8)%

8.5%

27.5%

(3.5)%

32.7%

Petroleum products sold from ROG refineries

260

8.7

29.7

165

5.9

27.9

57.6%

47.5%

6.5%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

Total

839

32.6

25.7

712

30.5

23.4

429

25.5

16.8

17.8%

6.9%

9.8%

66.0%

19.6%

39.3%

 

In 2012 revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were 17.8% higher compared to 2011 which was driven by a 9.8% upturn in average prices and sales volumes growth of 6.9% (positive impact on revenues of RUB 78 billion and RUB 49 billion, respectively). The increase in sales volumes was due to acquisition of a 50% share in Ruhr Oel GmbH.

In 2011 revenues from the export of petroleum products to non-CIS countries were 66.0% higher compared to 2010 which was mainly driven by a 39.3% upturn in average prices and sales volumes growth of 19.6%.

Domestic Sales of Petroleum Products

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 3 months ended

% change between 4th and 3d quarters of 2012

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

54

1.7

31.7

51

1.7

29.3

5.9%

0.0%

8.2%

Low octane gasoline

2

0.1

24.3

2

0.1

25.1

0.0%

0.0%

(3.2)%

Naphtha

Diesel

49

1.9

26.7

62

2.6

23.9

(21.0)%

(26.9)%

11.7%

Fuel oil

6

0.5

11.3

3

0.3

10.5

100.0%

66.7%

7.6%

Jet fuel

9

0.3

26.4

11

0.5

24.5

(18.2)%

(40.0)%

7.8%

Other

8

0.7

10.3

10

0.9

11.5

(20.0)%

(22.2)%

(10.4)%

Total

128

5.2

24.3

139

6.1

23.1

(7.9)%

(14.8)%

5.2%

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were RUB 128 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is a decrease of 7.9% compared to the third quarter of 2012. Revenue reduction was attributable to 14.8% downturn in sales volumes and partially offset by slight upturn in average prices of 5.2% which had a total unfavourable impact on revenues of RUB 11 billion. Sales volumes decrease was due to a seasonal reduction in demand for summer diesel, resulting to its redirection to foreign markets, and decreased sales to agricultural enterprises. Seasonal increased demand for fuel oil on domestic market led to its redirection of respective volumes from non-CIS markets.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's revenue and average price per tonne of petroleum products sold in Russia:

For 12 months ended December 31

%change between12 months endedDecember 31, 2012 and 2011

%change between12 months ended December 31,2011 and 2010

2012

2011

2010

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/

tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/

tonne

High octane gasoline

187

6.3

30.0

174

6.3

27.4

126

5.4

23.4

7.5%

0.0%

9.5%

38.1%

16.7%

17.1%

Low octane gasoline

7

0.4

24.7

7

0.3

22.5

24

1.3

18.4

0.0%

33.3%

9.8%

(70.8)%

(76.9)%

22.3%

Naphtha

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Diesel

211

8.7

24.9

196

9.5

20.7

132

8.3

16

7.7%

(8.4)%

20.3%

48.5%

14.5%

29.4%

Fuel oil

17

1.6

10.6

19

2.1

9.2

20

2.6

7.6

(10.5)%

(23.8)%

15.2%

(5.0)%

(19.2)%

21.1%

Jet fuel

39

1.6

25.4

25

1.1

22.1

16

1.0

16.7

56.0%

45.5%

14.9%

56.3%

10.0%

32.3%

Other

34

2.8

10.9

27

2.1

12.7

22

1.9

10.9

25.9%

33.3%

(14.2)%

22.7%

10.5%

16.5%

Total

495

21.4

23.1

448

21.4

20.9

340

20.5

16.6

10.5%

0.0%

10.5%

31.8%

4.4%

25.9%

Revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market were RUB 495 billion in 2012 which is an increase of 10.5% compared with 2011. This resulted from a 10.5% upturn in average prices (positive impact on revenues of RUB 47billion).

In the year ended 31 December 2011, revenues from sales of petroleum products on the domestic market increased by 31.8% compared to 2010. This resulted from a 25.9% upturn in average prices and from a 4.4% increase in sales volumes. Volumes growth was due to the increased demand for petroleum products at domestic market.

Sales of bunker fuel to end-users

Since December 2007 the Group has been selling bunker fuel (fuel oil and diesel fuel) in the ports of the Russian Federation including seaports of Far East, North and South of European part of Russia, as well as river ports.

Revenues from sales of bunker fuel in the fourth quarter of 2012 were RUB 13 billion, а decrease of 18.8% in comparison with the previous quarter which is mainly attributable to a seasonal factor.

16.2% upturn in average prices accompanied by a 12.0% increase in sales volumes led to revenue growth of 35.1% or RUB 13 billion in 2012 compared to 2011. In 2011 and 2010 revenues were RUB 37 billion and RUB 23 billion respectively. Volumes growth was due to expansion of the Company's bunkering business.

Petrochemical Product Sales

Revenues from sales of petrochemical products in the fourth quarter of 2012 were RUB 22 billion, an increase of 22.2% compared to the third quarter of 2012. The increase in sales volumes by 33.3% resulted from increase in production of petroleum products output at Angarsk Polymer refinery followed the completion of planned turnarounds.

In the year ended 31 December 2012, revenues from sales of petrochemical products increased by 40.0% compared to 2011, due to the acquisition of a portion of Ruhr Oel GmbH in May 2011. The sales volumes of petrochemical product from Ruhr Oel GmbH were 2.05 mln tones and 1.38 mln tones in 2012 and 2011, respectively.

In the year ended 31 December 2011, revenues from sales of petrochemical products increased significantly to RUB 60 billion, compared to RUB 13 billion in 2010. This was mainly due to Rosneft's acquisition of a portion of Ruhr Oel GmbH in May 2011.

Gas Sales

Rosneft's gas sales have been limited to date, but the Company's long term strategy envisages significant expansion of its gas business. Gazprom controls the Unified Gas Supply System (UGSS) and is the dominant gas supplier in Russia and the only exporter of gas.

The table below sets forth revenues, volumes and average price of gas sales by Rosneft:

For 3 months ended

% changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for

12 months endedDecember 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

2011 -

2010

Revenue

(RUB billion)

%

(RUB billion)

%

Western Siberia

1.7

1.5

13.3%

5.7

4.1

3.4

39.0%

20.6%

South Russia

2.4

2.0

20.0%

8.0

6.8

6.0

17.6%

13.3%

Far East

0.4

0.3

33.3%

1.4

1.2

1.0

16.7%

20.0%

European part of Russia

1.6

2.7

(40.7)%

6.7

2.1

2.1

219.0%

0.0

Total

6.1

6.5

(6.2)%

21.8

14.2

12.5

53.5%

13.6%

Sales volumes

(bcm)

%

(bcm)

%

Western Siberia

1.29

1.15

12.2%

4.54

5.09

5.15

(10.8)%

(1.2)%

South Russia

0.85

0.69

23.2%

3.02

2.91

3.04

3.8%

(4.3)%

Far East

0.21

0.14

50.0%

0.72

0.71

0.66

1.4%

7.6%

European part of Russia

0.55

0.78

(29.5)%

2.80

1.03

0.95

171.8%

8.4%

Total

2.90

2.76

5.1%

11.08

9.74

9.80

13.8%

(0.6)%

Average price

(th. RUB/th. of cubic metres)

%

(th. RUB/th. of cubic metres)

%

Western Siberia

1.34

1.26

6.3%

1.25

0.80

0.66

56.3%

21.2%

South Russia

2.85

2.92

(2.4)%

2.64

2.35

1.98

12.3%

18.7%

Far East

1.99

1.89

5.3%

1.88

1.62

1.54

16.0%

5.2%

European part of Russia

2.52

2.79

(9.7)%

2.45

2.09

2.19

17.2%

(4.6)%

Total

2.05

2.14

(4.2)%

1.97

1.47

1.29

34.0%

14.0%

* average price is calculated from unrounded figures

In the fourth quarter of 2012 revenues from gas sales decreased by 6.2% and amounted to RUB 6.1 billion due to downturn in average prices.

Revenue growth from gas sales of 53.5% in 2012 in comparison with 2011 was driven by an increase in average prices of 34.0% and an increase in sales volumes which had a positive impact on revenues of RUB 6 billion and RUB 2 billion, respectively.

In 2011 revenues from gas sales increased by 13.6% and amounted to RUB 14.2 billion in comparison to 2010, which was driven by an increase in average prices of 14.0% and partially offset by sales volumes decrease of 0.6%.

 

Support Services and Other Revenues

Rosneft owns service companies which render drilling, construction, repair and other services mainly to the companies within the Group. Revenues from services rendered to third parties are reported in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's other revenues for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

changebetween

4th and 3d quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

change for 12 months endedDecember 31

December 31,

2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012-

2011

 2011-

2010

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%of total revenue

%

(RUB billion, except %)

Drilling services

0.6

5.5%

0.8

7.5%

(25.0)%

2.2

5.3%

1.2

2.7%

1.8

3.6%

83.3%

(33.3)%

Sales of materials

2.5

22.9%

2.6

24.3%

(3.8)%

10.1

24.3%

10.1

22.6%

10.6

21.5%

0.0%

(4.7)%

Repairs and maintenance services

0.9

8.3%

0.8

7.5%

12.5%

3.3

7.9%

3.2

7.2%

3.3

6.7%

3.1%

(3.0)%

Rent services

0.7

6.4%

0.7

6.5%

0.0%

2.8

6.7%

2.5

5.6%

2.1

4.3%

12.0%

19.0%

Construction services

0.5

4.6%

0.5

4.7%

0.0%

2.2

5.3%

2.8

6.3%

2.5

5.1%

(21.4)%

12.0%

Transport services

1.7

15.6%

2.0

18.7%

(15.0)%

7.2

17.3%

8.1

18.1%

10

20.2%

(11.1)%

(19.0)%

Electric power sales and transmission

1.3

11.9%

1.0

9.3%

30.0%

4.6

11.1%

8.9

19.9%

12.1

24.5%

(48.3)%

(26.4)%

Other revenues

2.7

24.8%

2.3

21.5%

17.4%

9.2

22.1%

7.9

17.6%

7

14.1%

16.5%

12.9%

Total

10.9

100.0%

10.7

100.0%

1.9%

41.6

100.0%

44.7

100%

49.4

100%

(6.9)%

(9.5)%

Equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures

The equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures amounted to RUB 11 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with RUB 7 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The increase resulted from the increase in profits incurred by Rosneft's associates, mainly Verkhnechonskneftegaz, Tomskneft, and including share in profit of ITERA Oil and Gas Company.

In 2012 and 2011 the equity share in profits of associates and joint ventures amounted to RUB 31 billion and RUB 16 billion, respectively.

Costs and Expenses

Production and Operating Expenses

Operating expenses are split over operating segments in the table below.

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

2011-

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Upstream

19.8

18.2

8.8%

73.4

70.7

66.3

3.8%

6.6%

Land restoration program

-

- 

-

0.7

-

3.4

-

(100.0)%

Downstream

33.4

26.5

26.0%

114.9

89.8

47.6

28.0%

88.7%

 Including procurement of additives and materials for Ruhr Oel GmbH

8.4

7.8

7.7%

33.7

24.1

-

39.8%

-

Other

8.5

7.4

14.9%

30.8

28.7

26.7

7.3%

7.5%

Total

61.7

52.1

18.4%

219.8

189.2

144.0

16.2%

31.4%

Upstream production costs and operating expenses

Upstream production and operating expenses include materials and supplies, equipment maintenance and repairs, wages and salaries, activities to enhance oil recovery, procurement of fuel and lubricants, electricity and other similar costs of Rosneft's consolidated exploration and production enterprises.

In 2010 the Company adopted a special five-year land restoration program aimed at restoration of lands located in the territory of upstream activities of several subsidiaries of Rosneft and damaged before the acquisition of these subsidiaries by Rosneft. In March 2012 the program was amended, which resulted in additional accrual of RUB 0.7 billion. This amount does not include expenses on land restoration spent by the Company as a part of regular production activity.

Upstream production and operating expenses increasedby 8.8% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with the previous quarter and amounted to RUB 19.8 billion. The expenses growth resulted from an increase of materials and supplies expenses, increase of equipment maintenance and repairs expenses as well as from the seasonal increase of electricity consumption and seasonal growth of expenses for field transportation.

In 2012 upstream production and operating expenses increased by 3.8% up to RUB 73.4 billion compared with 2011. The growth of expenses was kept below the inflation level due to cost saving efforts.

In 2011upstream production and operating expenses increased to RUB 70.7billion, or by 6.6% compared with 2010, when these expenses were RUB 66.3 billion. The growth was due to an oil production increase of 2.1%.

Upstream production and operating expenses per barrel are shown in the table below.

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months ended December 31

December 31, 2011

September 30, 2011

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 - 2011

2011 - 2010

(RUB per bbl and RUB per boe, except %)

Expenses per bbl of crude oil produced

94.8

88.1

7.6%

89.9

88.8

85.1

1.2%

4.3%

Expenses per boe of hydrocarbon produced

86.2

81.0

6.4%

82.3

81.6

78.2

0.9%

4.3%

Refining and distribution expenses

Rosneft's downstream operating expenses increased by 26.0% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with the third quarter of 2012. The increase was due to refineries seasonal expenses growth, increased expenses for procurement of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH, as well as due to partial sale of previously accumulated intragroup inventories (according to the accounting principles operating expenses are adjusted for all the expenses associated with the change in intragroup inventories) and other factors.

Downstream operating expenses increased by 28.0% in 2012 compared with 2011 due to increased expenses for procurement of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH. 

Excluding the effect of procurement of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH downstream operating expenses increased by 23.6% mainly due to an increase in electricity tariffs, cost of materials and additives for own refineries.

These expenses increased by 88.7% in 2011 compared with 2010. The increase resulted among other factors from procurements of additives and other materials for refining process at Ruhr Oel GmbH for the amount of RUB 24.1 billion. Excluding this amount, downstream operating expenses increased by 38.0% due to increased volumes of retail sales, increased expenses for additives for refining on own refineries and other factors.

The table below shows operating expenses at Rosneft's refineries in Russia.

For 3 months

ended

Change

For 3 months

ended

Change

 

March 31. 2013

December 31. 2012

March 31. 2013

March 31. 2012

 

Operating expenses at refineries in Russia

(RUB billion)

9.76

9.10

7.3%

9.76

8.36

16.7%

 

including TNK-BP acquisition effect

0.67

-

-

0.67

-

-

 

Operating expenses per tonne of product utput

(RUB per tonne)

783

724

8.1%

783

683

14.6%

 

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput (RUB per tonne)

753

694

8.5%

753

651

15.7%

 

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput (RUB per tonne) excluding TNK-BP acquisition effect

701

694

1.0%

701

651

7.7%

 

 

Operating expenses at refineries abroad

(RUB billion)

11.23

12.40

(9.4)%

11.23

9.17

22.5%

 

Operating expenses per tonne of product output (RUB per tonne)

 4,319

4,477

(3.5)%

4,319

3,411

26.6%

 

Operating expenses per tonne of crude oil throughput (RUB per tonne)

 4,333

4,414

(1.8)%

4,333

3,398

27.5%

 

 

Total operating expenses at refineries

(RUB billion)

20.99

21.50

(2.4)%

20.99

17.54

19.7%

 

including TNK-BP acquisition effect

0.67

-

-

0.67

-

-

Operating expenses of Rosneft's refineries were RUB 9.10 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, which is an increase of 6.6% compared with RUB 8.54 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The increase was primarily due to seasonal increase in expenses for electricity, growth of equipment maintenance and repairs expenses and other factors.

In 2012 these expenses increased by 25.7% to RUB to 34.84 billion compared with RUB 27.71 billion in 2011. The growth resulted mainly from increase in volumes of additives used to produce euro-standard products in accordance with requirements of technical regulations for motor fuel quality. The growth was also due to higher prices for additives and other materials involved in production as well as growth in electricity tariffs.

In 2011operating expenses related to refining increased by 29.1% to RUB 27.71 billion compared to RUB 21.46 billion in 2010. The increase resulted from the increase in cost and volumes of materials and additives for production of euro-class gasoline and higher average electricity tariffs.

Operating expenses per tonne at Rosneft's refineries, situated abroad, are resulting from more broad spectrum of petroleum products and petrochemistry output as well as higher Nelson index (more complicated technological process).

Operating expenses Rosneft's refineries, situated abroad decreased by 9.4% compared with the fourth quarter of 2012 due to lower volumes of crude oil processing in the first quarter of 2013.

Other operating expenses

Operating expenses related to other activities increased by 14.9% in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with the third quarter of 2012 due to the higher volumes of repairs and maintenance services rendered to the third parties, higher volumes of electric power sales and transmission to the third parties and other factors.

In 2012 these expenses increased by 7.3% to RUB 30.8 billion compared with RUB 28.7 billion in 2011. The increase was primarily due to the higher volumes of drilling and repairs and maintenance services rendered to the third parties.

In 2011these expenses increased to RUB 28.7 billion compared with RUB 26.7 billion in 2010.

 

Cost of Purchased Crude Oil, Gas and Petroleum Products and Refining Costs

The following table shows Rosneft's crude oil, gas and petroleum product procurement costs and volumes and third-party refining costs:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

2011-

2010

Crude oil

Cost of crude oil procured (RUB billion)

80

84

(4.8)%

312

225

43

38.7%

423.3%

including Domestic market

25

27

(7.4)%

91

72

43

26.4%

67.4%

International market

55

57

(3.5)%

221

153

-

44.4%

-

Volume of crude oil procured (million of barrels)

32.9

35.8

(8.1)%

127.1

104.1

51.8

22.1%

101.0%

including Domestic market

17.4

18.8

(7.4)%

64.0

59.1

51.8

8.3%

14.1%

International market

15.5

17.0

(8.8)%

63.1

45.0

-

40.2%

-

Gas

Cost of gas procured (RUB billion)

0.4

0.3

33.3%

1.2

1.0

1.0

20.0%

-

Volume of gas procured (bcm)

0.22

0.17

29.4%

0.72

0.55

0.51

30.9%

7.8%

Petroleum products

Cost of petroleum product procured (RUB billion) (1)

11

11

-

39

61

28

(36.1%)

117.9%

Volume of petroleum product procured (million of tonnes)

0.4

0.4

-

1.5

2.4

1.5

(37.5%)

60.0%

Crude oil refining services

Cost of refining of crude oil under processing agreements (RUB billion)

5

5

-

19

11

-

72.7%

-

Volumes of crude oil refined under processing agreements (million of tonnes)

2.8

2.8

-

10.7

7.2

-

48.6%

-

Total cost of procured oil, gas and petroleum products and refining costs (RUB billion)

96

100

(4.0)%

371

298

72

24.5%

313.9%

(1) Аverage procurement price of petroleum products from third parties may be higher than the average selling price of petroleum products due to differences in the mix of procured and sold petroleum products.

Crude oil purchase

Rosneft purchases crude oil primarily from its affiliates to process it at own refineries. Rosneft procures crude oil on the international market to supply it to Ruhr Oel GmbH refineries.

The structure of crude oil purchases is provided in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended 31 December

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

2011-

2010

(million bbl, except %)

International market

15.5

17.0

(8.8)%

63.1

45.0

-

40.2%

-

Tomskneft

9.4

10.3

(8.7)%

35.7

39.7

37.2

(10.1)%

6.7%

Udmurtneft

4.2

4.2

-

12.6

9.1

10.1

38.5%

(9.9)%

Others

3.8

4.3

(11.6)%

15.7

10.3

4.5

52.4%

128.9%

Total

32.9

35.8

(8.1)%

127.1

104.1

51.8

22.1%

101.0%

Rosneft performs oil swap operations in order to optimize transportation costs of deliveries to refineries. Revenues and costs related to these operations are shown on a net basis in the "Pipeline tariffs and Transportation costs" line of the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income. In the fourth quarter of 2012 these transactions were exercised with Gazpromneft, Bashneft, TNK-BP and others.

The volume of crude oil swaps amounted to 23.5 million barrels and 21.4 million barrels in the fourth quarter of 2012 and in the third quarter of 2012, respectively. Rosneft's estimated benefits from these transactions were RUB 0.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 and RUB 0.5 billion in the third quarter of 2012.

 

In the twelve months of 2012 the volume of crude oil swaps amounted to 81.6 million barrels, which resulted in benefits for Rosneft in the amounts of RUB 2.3 billion.

Petroleum products purchase

Petroleum products from third parties are purchased primarily to cover current needs of Rosneft's retail subsidiaries. Procurement of petroleum products is exposed to seasonal fluctuations of volumes and mix. Procurement prices may significantly vary depending on regional markets.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties in the fourth and third quarters of 2012:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price

th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

7

0.24

28.3

7

0.25

27.3

(4.0)%

3.7%

Low octane gasoline

0

0.00

24.0

0

0.00

26.4

-

(9.1)%

Diesel

3

0.11

24.3

2

0.11

25.6

50.0%

-

(5.1)%

Jet fuel

0

0.01

24.9

1

0.02

23.7

(100.0)%

(50.0)%

5.1%

Other

1

0.04

21.7

1

0.04

20.1

-

8.0%

Total

11

0.40

26.1

11

0.42

25.9

(4.8)%

0.8%

The decrease in volumes of petroleum product purchases in the fourth quarter of 2012 in comparison to the third quarter of 2012 resulted from the seasonal fall of the market demands.

The table below sets forth Rosneft's costs, volumes and average prices per tonne of petroleum products procured from third parties in 2012, 2011 and 2010:

For 12 months ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31,

 2012 and 2011

% change for 12 months ended December 31,

2011 and 2010

2012

2011

2010

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

RUB billion

million of tonnes

Average price th. RUB/tonne

High octane gasoline

24

0.90

26.7

50

1.85

26.6

15

0.69

21.3

(52.0)%

(51.4)%

0.4%

233.3%

168.1%

24.9%

Low octane gasoline

0

0.00

25.0

1

0.06

18.4

1

0.07

17.7

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

35.9%

0.0%

(14.3)%

4.0%

Diesel

10

0.41

25.1

8

0.42

20.5

10

0.66

15.1

25.0%

(2.4)%

22.4%

(20)%

(36.4)%

35.8%

Fuel oil

0

0.01

9.6

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

(100.0)%

Jet fuel

2

0.07

24.3

0

0.00

18.3

32.8%

Other

3

0.13

20.9

2

0.11

19.0

2

0.12

13.6

50.0%

18.2%

10.0%

0.0%

(8.3)%

39.7%

Total

39

1.51

25.5

61

2.44

24.9

28

1.55

17.8

(36.1)%

(38.1)%

2.4%

117.9%

57.4%

39.9%

The decrease in volumes of petroleum product purchases in 2012 in comparison to 2011 was due to increased supplies for retail sales from own refineries, as well as decrease in number of own filling stations.

Average petroleum product procurement prices may deviate from average sales prices depending on particular regions and product quality.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses include wages and salaries and social benefits (except for wages of technical staff of production and refining entities), banking commissions, third-party fees for professional services, insurance expenses (except for insurance of oil and gas production and refining entities), maintenance of social infrastructure, lease expenses, expenses to establish allowances for doubtful accounts and other general expenses.

General and administrative expenses in the fourth quarter of 2012 were RUB 20billion and in the third quarter of 2012 were RUR 15 billion that was due to general and administrative expenses upturn related to bad debt reserves and increase in audit, consulting fees and other factors.

In 2012 and 2011 general and administrative expenses were RUB 68 billion and RUB 52 billion, respectively, which was due to increase in consulting fees and other factors.

Pipeline Tariffs and Transportation Costs

Transportation costs are costs incurred by Rosneft to transport crude oil for refining and to end customers, and to deliver petroleum products from refineries to end customers (these may include pipeline tariffs and any additional railroad transportation costs, handling costs, port fees, sea freight and other costs).

In the fourth quarter of 2012 Rosneft's transportation costs increased to RUB 62billion, or by 1.6% compared to the third quarter of 2012 which was mainly due to increase in Transneft tariffs.

In 2012 Rosneft's transportation costs increased by 11.6% compared with the previous year. The increase resulted from transportation tariffs growth, which was partially offset by the change in structure of transportation routes.

During 2011 Rosneft's transportation costs increased by RUB 4 billion, or by 1.9% compared with 2010. The increase resulted from indexation of transportation tariffs, increased volumes of crude oil transportation from Vankor to China and start of crude oil supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH, which was partially compensated by replacement of railroad deliveries of crude oil to China for pipeline transportation.

The table below sets forth comparison on quarter-on-quarter basis for costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway:

For 3 months ended

% change

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per tonne, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per tonne, th.RUB/t

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne, th.RUB/t

CRUDE OIL

International sales

Pipeline

16.6

97.6%

27.4

1.65

16.4

97.6%

26.7

1.62

1.2%

2.6%

1.9%

Railroad and mixed

0.4

2.4%

0.3

0.84

0.4

2.4%

0.3

0.83

0.0%

0.0%

1.2%

Transportation to refineries

Pipeline (1)

11.4

6.9

0.61

11.2

6.7

0.59

1.8%

3.0%

3.4%

Railroad and mixed

1.6

6.3

3.86

1.5

5.8

3.94

6.7%

8.6%

(2.0)%

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

International sales

Pipeline

0.6

6.2%

1.3

2.42

0.4

4.3%

1.0

2.42

50.0%

30.0%

0.0%

Railroad and mixed

6.4

66.0%

10.5

1.65

6.3

67.0%

10.4

1.65

1.6%

1.0%

0.0%

Pipeline and FCA(2)

2.7

27.8%

-

-

2.7

28.7%

-

-

-

-

-

Other transportation expenses (3)

9

10

(10.0)%

Total

39.7

62

38.9

61

2.1%

1.6%

(1) Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

 

(2) Rosneft exported part of petroleum products in the fourth quarter of 2012 and in the third quarter of 2012, respectively, through its own pipeline in the town of Tuapse, and on FCA terms from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly, except for transshipment and dispatching cargo costs.

 

(3) Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to service stations. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals excluding economy in price.

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 1.9%, which was due to the Transneft tariffs growth in November 2012.

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 1.2%, which was due to the change in structure of transportation routes.

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 3.4% compared to the third quarter, which was due to pipeline tariff change.

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 2.0%, which was due to change in logistics of crude oil supply to Komsomolsk refinery.

Pipeline transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales remained unchanged and amounted to 2.42 th. rub.

Railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales remained unchanged and amounted to 1.65 th. rub.

The table below sets forth costs per tonne of crude oil and petroleum products transported by pipeline, railway and a combination of pipeline and railway for the comparable periods:

For 12 months ended December 31

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2012 and 2011

%

change between

the twelve months ended December 31,2011 and 2010

2012

2011

2010

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per tonne sold, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per tonne sold, th.RUB/t

Volume, mln. tonnes

Share in export volumes

Cost, bln. RUB

Cost per tonne sold, th.RUB/t

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne sold

Volume

Cost

Cost per tonne sold

CRUDE OIL

International sales

Pipeline

64.7

97.4%

105.6

1.63

61.5

96.3%

92.5

1.50

47.4

78.0%

61.2

1.29

5.2%

14.2%

8.7%

29.7%

51.1%

16.3%

Railroad and mixed

1.7

2.6%

1.4

0.84

2.4

3.7%

2.6

1.09

13.4

22.0%

31.7

2.37

(29.2)%

(46.2)%

(22.9)%

(82.1)%

(91.8)%

(54.0)%

Transportation to refineries

Pipeline (1)

43.4

25.8

0.59

42

24.2

0.58

37.8

22.4

0.59

3.3%

6.6%

1.7%

11.1%

8.0%

(1.7)%

Railroad and mixed

6.1

24.2

3.97

6.2

23.7

3.84

6.6

23.6

3.60

(1.6)%

2.1%

3.4%

(6.1)%

0.4%

6.7%

PETROLEUM PRODUCTS

International sales

Pipeline

1.4

3.8%

3.3

2.39

0.6

1.9%

1.4

2.22

1.1

4.2%

2.3

2.07

133.3%

135.7%

7.7%

(45.5)%

(39.1)%

7.2%

Railroad and mixed

27.0

73.4%

47.0

1.74

25.5

77.2%

49.7

1.95

18.0

68.1%

46.2

2.56

5.9%

(5.4)%

(10.8)%

41.7%

7.6%

(23.8)%

Pipeline and FCA(2)

8.4

22.8%

-

-

6.9

20.9%

-

-

7.3

27.7%

-

-

21.7%

-

-

(5.5)%

-

-

Other transportation expenses (3)

34

22

25

54.5%

(12.0)%

 

Total

152.7

241

145.1

216

131.6

212

5.2%

11.6%

10.3%

1.9%

 (1) Including crude oil purchased on international market, which was directed to Ruhr Oel GmbH.

(2) Rosneft exported part of petroleum products in 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively, through its own pipeline in the town of Tuapse and on FCA terms from Samara refineries, where Rosneft does not bear transportation expenses directly, except for transshipment and dispatching cargo costs.

(3) Other transportation expenses include cost of railroad transportation of petroleum products from refineries to tank farms and road transportation from tank farms to service stations. Other transportation expenses also include Rosneft expenses on crude oil swap deals excluding economy in price.

Construction of Skovorodino - Daquing pipeline (branch of ESPO pipeline) was completed in the end of 2010. Rosneft replaced railroad deliveries of crude oil to China by pipeline supplies, which changed the structure of the transportation routes and allowed the Company to benefit from economies on transportation expenses.

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 8.7% in 2012, which was due to an increase in tariffs by 2.7% - 14.8%.

The increase in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 16.3% in 2011, which was due to an increase in tariffs of between 11.5% - 16.4% and the change in transportation routes used (particularly, start of deliveries of Vankor and Yugansk crude oil to China via ESPO).

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 22.9% in 2012, which was due to the cease of supplies of Purneftegaz crude oil to CPC.

The decrease in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of international sales was 54.0% in 2011, which was primarily due to ceasing the supply of crude oil to China by mixed transport.

Crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries increased by 1.7% in 2012 as a result of tariffs growth and was partially offset by increased supplies to Ruhr Oel Gmbh of crude oil procured on the international market.

The decrease in crude oil pipeline transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 1.7% in 2011, which was primarily due to the start of crude oil supplies to Ruhr Oel GmbH, where transportation costs are low due to short transportation distances in Europe.

The increase in crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of supplies to refineries was 3.4% in 2012, which was due to an increase in tariffs.

Crude oil railroad and mixed transportation cost per tonne of domestic supplies increased by 6.7% in the year ended 31 December 2011, primarily due to an increase in transportation tariffs by 8.2%, which was partially offset by the change in structure of transportation routes.

The increase in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 7.7% in 2012, which was due to increase in tariffs.

In 2011 the increase in pipeline cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 7.2%, which was due to increase in tariffs by 5.0% - 8.1%.

The decrease in railroad and mixed cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales was 10.8% in 2012 due to petroleum products sales volumes growth on the local market of Germany, where transportation costs are low due to short transportation distances. For the same reason in 2011 the decrease in cost per tonne of petroleum product international sales via railroad and mixed transportation was equal to 23.8%.

Exploration Expenses

Exploration expenses mainly relate to exploratory drilling, seismic and other geological and geophysical works. Exploratory drilling costs are generally capitalised if commercial reserves of crude oil and gas are discovered or expensed in the current period in the event of unsuccessful exploration results.

In the fourth quarter of 2012 exploration expenses increased to RUB 8 billion compared withRUB 6 billion in the third quarter of 2012 due to seismic exploration works a at the Norway off-shore.

In 2012 exploration expenses were RUB 23 billion and increased by 76.9% compared with 2011 due to increased volumes of seismic exploration works at the blocks in the Black sea and Arctic off-shore.

In 2011 exploration expenses decreased by 7.1% compared with 2010.

 

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortisation

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation include depreciation of crude oil and gas producing assets, and other production and corporate assets.

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation were RUB 61billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to RUB 59 billion in the third quarter of 2012 due to higher volumes of production and increased book value of fixed assets.

In 2012 depreciation, depletion and amortisation were RUB 227billion and increased by 6.6% compared with RUB 213 billion in 2011.

Taxes Other than Income Tax

Taxes other than income tax include the mineral extraction tax, the excise tax, the property tax and other taxes. The basis for calculation of mineral extraction tax is described under "-Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax" above.

The following table sets forth Rosneft's taxes other than income tax (excluding export duties) for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

%changebetween

3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

 2011-2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Mineral extraction tax

132

133

(0.8)%

527

414

274

27.3%

51.1%

Excise tax

20

23

(13.0)%

79

55

34

43.6%

61.8%

Social security tax

5

6

(16.7)%

22

15

12

46.7%

25.0%

Property tax

3

3

-

12

11

9

9.1%

22.2%

Interest, penalties and other payments to budget

1

-

100.0%

5

3

2

66.7%

50.0%

Total taxes other than income tax

161

165

(2.4)%

645

498

331

29.5%

50.5%

Taxes other than income tax were RUB 161 billion and decreased by 2.4% in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with RUB 165 billion in the third quarter of 2012 mainly due to the excise tax and the mineral extraction tax decrease. In the fourth quarter of 2012 the excise tax decreased significantly due to decrease in share of petroleum products subject to excises taxes in total volume of petroleum product sales. In the fourth quarter of 2012 the mineral extraction tax decreased due to reduction of mineral extraction tax rates.

In 2012 taxes other than income tax increased by 29.5% compared with 2011 mainly due to the beginning of the mineral extraction tax accruals for crude oil produced at the Vankor field and the increase in base rate of the mineral extraction tax, as well as the excise tax increase from January 1, and July 1, 2012.

Taxes other than income tax increased by 50.5% to RUB 498 billion in 2011 compared to 2010. The increase in taxes resulted mainly from an increase in mineral extraction tax rate by 44.9% due to increase in crude oil price.

The following table sets the actual mineral extraction tax rates per tonne and per tonne of oil equivalent produced for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

  3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

%

change for 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

 2011-

2010

(thousand RUB per ton, except %)

Average enacted mineral extraction tax rate

5.01

5.15

(2.7)%

5.07

4.46

3.07

13.7%

44.9%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per tonne of crude oil produced

4.62

4.71

(1.9)%

4.73

3.81

2.52

24.1%

51.2%

Actual mineral extraction tax expense per tonne of oil equivalent produced

4.21

4.33

(2.8)%

4.33

3.50

2.31

23.7%

51.5%

The actual mineral extraction tax rate is lower than enacted tax rate for the analysed period primarily due to the reduced rates for crude oil produced at fields with reserve depletion of over 80%. The difference between enacted rate and actual rate is also affected by the normal delay in the inventory turnover. In 2011 the actual average mineral extraction tax rate and expense duty on application of the zero rate for crude oil produced at the Vankor fields was applicable till August 2011. Since May 2012, the reduced mineral extraction tax is applicable to the Severo-Vankorsky oil producing field.

Export Customs Duty

Export customs duties include crude oil and petroleum product export customs duties. The export customs duties are also discussed above under "Macroeconomic Factors Affecting Results of Operations-Taxation-Mineral Extraction Tax and Export Customs Duty".

The following table sets forth Rosneft's export customs duties for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween

  3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012-

2011

 2011-2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Export customs duty for crude oil

180

162

11.1%

689

612

396

12.6%

54.5%

Export customs duty for petroleum products

57

50

14.0%

212

178

113

19.1%

57.5%

Total export customs duties

237

212

11.8%

901

790

509

14.1%

55.2%

The following table sets forth certain information about the export customs duty:

For 3 months

ended

% changebetween 3d and 4th quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -2011

2011 -2010

(thousand RUB, except %)

Average Urals price

24.72

25.52

(3.1)%

25.08

23.45

17.38

7.0%

34.9%

Average enacted export customs duty

12.64

11.73

7.8%

12.57

12.02

8.31

4.6%

44.6%

Hypothetical export customs duty*

12.33

12.74

(3.2)%

12.55

12.61

8.58

(0.5)%

47.0%

Average customs duty on crude oil exports to non-CIS countries subject to regular rate (th. RUB/tonne)

12.60

11.82

6.6%

12.57

12.04

8.33

4.4%

44.5%

*Hypothetical customs duty is calculated using the average Urals price for the period (i.e. without time lag).

The actual average customs duty on exports subject to regular duty deviates from the enacted export customs duty due to different monthly export volumes. Furthermore, crude oil produced at the Vankor field was subject to reduced export duty until May 2011.

Operating Income

As a result of the factors discussed above, operating income decreased by 40.3% to RUB 83 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with RUB 139 billion in the third quarter of 2012. Reduction in operating income is primarily driven by the decrease in revenues due to decrease in market prices in RUB terms and decrease in petroleum products sales volume, and due to negative effect from export duty lag. As a percentage of total revenue, operating income was 10.5% and 17.2% in the fourth quarter of 2012 and in the third quarter of 2012, respectively.

Operating income decreased by 14.9% in 2012 to RUB 382 billion compared to RUB 449 billion in 2011. As a percentage of total revenues, operating income was 12.4% and 16.5% in 2012 and 2011, respectively. Reduction in operating income margin is primarily driven by termination of zero Mineral Extraction Tax rate and special export customs duty rate for crude oil produced at the Vankor field, by revision MET rate basis and by increase in tariffs of state-owned monopolies.

Finance Income and Expenses

Finance income and expenses include interest received on deposits and deposit certificates, loans issued, interest paid on loans and borrowings received, results from changes in fair value of financial assets, increase in provision due to the unwinding of discount, results from disposal of financial assets and other finance income and expenses.

Net finance income in the fourth quarter of 2012 increased by RUB 5 billion up to RUB 6 billion compared with RUB 1 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The increase is mainly attributable to changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments, particularly, interest rate and currency - interest rate swap contracts, forward contracts and the collar contract.

Net finance income in the year ended 31 December 2012 increased by RUB 8 billion up to RUB 9 billion. The increase is mainly attributable to changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments and the extinguishment of restructured tax liabilities in 2011 and 2012.

Net finance expense decreased from RUB 1 billion in the year ended 31 December 2010 to net finance income of RUB 1 billion in the year ended 31 December 2011, due to partial disposal of financial assets.

Other income and other expenses

In the fourth quarter of 2012 other income decreased to less than one billion RUB, compared to RUB 84 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In 2012 and 2011 other income amounted to RUB 85 billion and RUB 25 billion, respectively. The increase in other income is mostly attributable to the non-cash income from acquisition of 51% of ITERA Oil and Gas Company in the amount of RUB 82 billion.

In the fourth quarter of 2012 other expenses amounted to RUB 23 billion, compared to RUB 9 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The increase in other expenses in the fourth quarter was mostly due to recognition of impairment in the value of unproved reserves and impairment of certain assets resulting from annual inventory revision, and the write-off of non-production costs. In 2012 and 2011 other expenses amounted to RUB 50 billion and RUB 48 billion, respectively.

Foreign Exchange Income / (Loss)

Foreign exchange effect is mostly attributed to monthly revaluation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency at the exchange rate at the end of the period.

Foreign exchange income was RUB 8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with foreign exchange income of RUB 16 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The reduction in foreign exchange income is attributed to considerable appreciation of rouble against US dollar during the fourth quarter.

Foreign exchange income was RUB 11 billion in 2012 compared to foreign exchange loss of RUB 22 billion in 2011. Opposite dynamics of gain and loss from the foreign exchange in 2012 compared to 2011 is attributed to fluctuation of the exchange rate of rouble against US dollar during 2012 compared to 2011.

 

Income Tax

The following table sets forth the Company's effective income tax rate under IFRS for the periods analysed:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December 31,

2012

September 30,

2012

2012

2011

2010

Effective income tax rate for Rosneft under IFRS

23.0%

21.6%

21.7%

21.2%

16.2%

The Company applies the provision of IAS 12 "Income taxes" to determine effective tax rate. The effective tax rate is calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to income before tax.

The income tax is amounted to RUB 17 billion of loss in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the loss of RUB 50 billion accrued in the third quarter of 2012 due to the decrease in taxable income which was significantly affected by losses recognition from the revaluation of obligations denominated in foreign currency in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Income tax expense amounted to RUB 95 billion in 2012 compared to the expenses of RUB 86 billion in 2011.

 Net Income/(Loss)

As a result of the factors discussed above, net income amounted to RUB 57 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to the net income of RUB 181 billion in the third quarter of 2012. 

Net income increased from RUB 319 billion in 2011 to RUB 342 billion in 2012. The increase in the net income in 2012 is mainly attributable to non-cash income from ITERA acquisition and income from foreign exchange gain which was partially offset by operating income decrease.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

The principal items of the statement of cash flows for the periods analysed are as follows:

For 3 months

ended

Changebetween

 4 and 3 quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

Change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31,2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

 2011-2010

(RUB billion)

times

(RUB billion)

times

Net cash provided by operating activities

137

160

0.86

516

487

478

1.06

1.02

Net cash used in investing activities

(114)

(105)

1.09

(445)

(394)

(379)

1.13

1.04

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

37

55

0.67

68

(56)

(32)

1.75

Operating Cash Flow

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to RUB 137 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to RUB 160 billion in the third quarter of 2012. Operating cash flow includes operations with trading securities as part of the Company's efforts to manage cash resources (net inflow of RUB 2 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 and net inflow of RUB 2 billion in the third quarter of 2012). For the management analysis the operating cash flow was adjusted for the effects mentioned above. The adjusted net cash provided by operating activity amounted to RUB 135 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 and RUB 158 billion in the third quarter of 2012.

Net cash provided by operating activity through the presented periods is given in the table below:

For 3 months

ended

Changebetween

4 and 3 quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

Change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31,

2012

September 30,

2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

 2011-2010

(RUB billion)

times

(RUB billion)

times

Net cash provided by operating activity

137

160

0.86

516

487

478

1.06

1.02

Effect from operation with trading securities

(2)

(2)

1.00

(5)

3

(11)

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activity

135

158

0.85

511

490

467

1.04

1.05

Change in working capital before FX

19

(25)

11

(76)

(17)

4.47

Adjusted net cash provided by operating activity before change in working capital

116

183

0.63

500

414

450

1.21

0.92

The decrease in the adjusted operating cash flow quarter-on-quarter primarily resulted from the decrease in the net income due to decrease in revenues which caused by decrease in market prices in RUB terms and decrease in petroleum products sales volume, and due to negative effect from export duty lag.

Changes mentioned above were compensated by decrease in working capital by RUB 19 billion before foreign exchange effect in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared with the increase in working capital by RUB 25 billion before foreign exchange effect in the third quarter of 2012. The working capital with the foreign exchange effect decreased by RUB 24 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 due to the following factors:

·; decrease in accounts receivables by RUB 20 billion due to early payments collection from buyers and due to decrease in sales volumes;

·; decrease in the inventories by RUB 8 billion;

·; increase in accounts payables by RUB 13 billion, that was compensated by increase in prepayments by RUB 11 billion.

In 2012 net cash provided by the operating activity (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of RUB 5 billion) amounted to RUB 511 billion. In 2011 net cash provided by the operating activity (adjusted for the result of the operations with trading securities of RUB 3 billion) amounted to RUB 490 billion. The increase in adjusted net cash provided by operating activity in 2012 compared to 2011 resulted from the increased net income by 7.21% and change in working capital.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was RUB 114 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to RUB 105 billion in the third quarter of 2012. The increase resulted mainly from the increase in capital expenditures and acquisition of additional share in subsidiaries and affiliates.

Net cash used in investing activities was RUB 445 billion in 2012 compared to RUB 394 billion in 2011. The increase resulted mainly from the increase in capital expenditures and acquisition of additional share in subsidiaries and affiliates, which was partially offset by the positive effect from sale of financial assets.

 

Capital Expenditures

The table below sets forth Rosneft's capital expenditures and licence acquisition costs:

For 3 months

ended

% change between

4 and 3

Quarters

For 12 months

ended December 31

% change for 12 months

ended December 31

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2012

2011

2010

2012 -

2011

2011 -

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Yuganskneftegaz

29

31

(6.5)%

108

96

74

12.5%

29.7%

Vankorneft

21

22

(4.5)%

95

86

63

10.5%

36.5%

Purneftegaz

7

5

40.0%

18

15

15

20.0%

-

Severnaya Neft

2

1

100.0%

6

6

3

-

100.0%

Samaraneftegaz

4

2

100.0%

11

9

6

22.2%

50.0%

Other1

12

6

100.0%

31

28

27

10.7%

3.7%

Total upstream segment

75

67

11.9%

269

240

188

12.1%

27.7%

The Company

-

-

-

1

1

2

-

(50.0)%

Tuapse refinery

17

15

13.3%

76

59

22

28.8%

168.2%

Komsomolsk refinery

2

2

-

9

5

3

80.0%

66.7%

Angarsk refinery

4

2

100.0%

9

6

3

50.0%

100.0%

Achinsk refinery

4

2

100.0%

14

5

4

180.0%

25.0%

Syzran refinery

2

2

-

8

5

3

60.0%

66.7%

Novokuibyshevsk refinery

5

2

150.0%

13

7

3

85.7%

133.3%

Kuibyshev refinery

2

3

(33.3)%

11

6

4

83.3%

50.0%

Marketing Business Units and others2

10

8

25.0%

29

24

18

20.8%

33.3%

Total downstream

46

36

27.8%

170

118

62

44.1%

90.3%

Other activities 3

7

6

16.7%

19

17

14

11.8%

21.4%

Subtotal capital expenditures

128

109

17.4%

458

375

264

22.1%

42.0%

Increase/(decrease) in stock of materials for capital expenditures

(6)

(4)

50.0%

8

16

-

(50.0)%

-

Total capital expenditures

122

105

16.2%

466

391

264

19.2%

48.1%

Licence acquisition costs

2

1

100.0%

4

7

4

(42.9)%

75.0%

 

1 Including: Krasnodarneftegaz, Stavropolneftegaz, Sakhalin-1, Grozneftegaz, VSNK and Dagneftegaz.

2 Relating to companies providing processing and storage services.

3 Relating to other services companies.

In the fourth quarter of 2012 total capital expenditures (including construction material purchases) increased by 16.2% to RUB 122 billion compared with RUB 105 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010, total capital expenditures (including construction material purchases) amounted to RUB 466 billion, RUB 391 billion and RUB 264 billion, respectively.

Upstream capital expenditures increased by 11.9% to RUB 75 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with RUB 67 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010, upstream capital expenditures amounted to RUB 269 billion, RUB 240 billion and RUB 188 billion, respectively. The increase was driven by intensified construction works and equipment purchases at Yuganskneftegaz, Vankorneft, Purneftegaz, Severnaya Neft, and Samaraneftegaz. The construction works mainly include development of oil field infrastructure and construction of associated gas utilization facilities.

Downstream capital expenditures increased by 27.8% to RUB 46 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with RUB 36 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010, downstream capital expenditures amounted to RUB 170 billion, RUB 118 billion and RUB 62 billion, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures was driven by continued programme for capacity upgrade and expansion at Rosneft's refineries, including modernisation of the Tuapse, Komsomolsk, Angarsk, Achinsk, Syzran, Novokuibyshevsk and Kuibyshev refineries.

Capital expenditures for other activities increased by 16.7% to RUB 7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with RUB 6 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010, capital expenditures for other activities amounted to RUB 19 billion, RUB 17 billion and RUB 14 billion, respectively. The increase resulted from the planned acquisition of transportation and other equipment.

Since the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company's subsidiaries have been purchasing construction materials and selling the materials to contractors that provide construction and drilling services at subsidiaries' fields. The net decrease in stock of materials for capital expenditures was RUB 6 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 and RUB 4 billion in the third quarter of 2012. In the years ended 31 December 2012, 2011 and 2010 the net increase in stock of materials for capital expenditures were RUB 8 billion, RUB 16 billion and RUB 0 billion, respectively.

The licence acquisition costs refer to the acquisition of licences for research, exploration and production:

·; In the Barents sea, in the Pechora sea, at blocks in the Ingooshetia and Samara regions in 2012;

·; At blocks in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District, Krasnoyarsk region, Samara region and in the Okhotskoe sea in 2011; and

·; At blocks in Samara region, the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District and in the Black Sea, the Okhotskoe sea, the Kara sea, the Barents sea and the Pechora sea in 2010.

Financing activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was RUB 37 billion in the fourth quarter of 2012 compared to RUB 55 billion of net cash provided byfinancing activities in the third quarter of 2012. Decrease in cash provided by financing activities in the fourth quarter of 2012 is related to payment of current portion of long-term debts.

Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to RUB 68 billion in 2012 in comparison to used in financing activity amounted to RUB 56 billion in 2011. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2012 is related to placement of rouble nominated obligations in amount of RUB 20 billion and attracting financing in the scope of Eurobonds program in amount of USD 3 billion.

On June 20, 2012 the annual general shareholders' meeting approved dividends for 2011 in the amount of RUB 37 billion or RUB 3.45 per share. RUB 33 billion of the above are related to outstanding shares, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares. In August 2012, the approved dividends were fully paid.

 

On November 30, 2012 the extraordinary general Shareholders' meeting approved additional dividends on the Company's common shares for 2011 in amount of RUB 42 billion or 4.08 per share. In December 2012, the approved dividends, including dividend withholding tax on treasury shares were fully paid.

Debt Obligations

Rosneft net debt increased to RUB 581 billion as of December 31, 2012 compared to RUB 542 billion as of September 30, 2012.

Rosneft's total loans and borrowings increased to RUB 963 billion as of December 31, 2012 from RUB 884 billion as of September 30, 2011. The increase resulted from the raise funding through the placement of long-term interest bearing Eurobonds nominated in US$ and issuance of long-term interest bearing bonds nominated in RUB in the fourth quarter of 2012.

Portion of Rosneft's long-term loans are secured by oil export contracts. As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 49.3%, 56.1% and 75.6%, respectively, of Rosneft's borrowings were secured by crude oil export contracts (excluding exports to the CIS).

As of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, pledged oil exports constituted 13.6%, 13.7% and 20.1%, respectively, of the total crude oil export sales for the analysed period (excluding export to the CIS).

The саlculation of the net debt is disclosed in the following table:

As of the date

December 31, 2012

September 30, 2012

December 31, 2011

RUB billions

Short term debt

126

115

152

Long term debt

837

769

596

Total debt

963

884

748

Cash and cash equivalents

296

240

166

Short-term Financial assets

86

102

150

Net debt

581

542

432

Key Financial Ratios

Rosneft monitors and evaluates its activities on an ongoing basis. Key financial ratios for the periods indicated are set forth below:

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2012

September 30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

EBITDA margin

18.2%

24.5%

19.8%

24.4%

30.5%

Net income margin

7.2%

22.4%

11.1%

11.7%

15.7%

Net debt to capital employed ratio

0.20

0.19

0.20

0.17

0.17

Net debt to annualised EBITDA

1.01

0.68

0.95

0.65

0.65

Current ratio

2.15

2.01

2.15

1.97

1.98

RUB / bbl

EBITDA/bbl

689

959

746

832

752

Upstream capital expenditure/bbl

359

324

329

302

241

Upstream operating expenses/bbl

94.8

88.1

89.9

88.8

85.1

Free cash flow before interest/bbl

62

257

55

124

261

RUB / boe

EBITDA/boe

627

881

682

764

691

Upstream capital expenditure/boe

327

298

301

277

222

Upstream operating expenses/boe

86.2

81.0

82.3

81.6

78.2

Free cash flow before interest/boe

57

236

50

114

240

The Company considers EBITDA/bbl, upstream operating expenses/bbl, upstream operating expenses/boe and the related indicators as important measures of its operating performance. In addition, these measures are frequently used by financial analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of oil and gas companies. These measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of the Company's operating results as reported under IFRS.

All the 'per unit of production' indicators are calculated by dividing the total amount in RUB by the total production volume in bbl or boe (in mln. bbl or mln. boe) and are not adjusted for the effect of changes in inventories.

The following tables set forth relevant numbers relating to these measures for and as of the periods indicated:

Upstream Measures

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2012

September30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

Upstream capital expenditures (RUB billion)

75

67

269

240

188

Upstream operating expenses (RUB billion)

19.8

18.2

73.4

70.7

66.3

Barrels of crude oil produced (million)

208.9

206.5

816.5

795.8

779.1

Barrels of oil equivalent produced (million)

229.6

224.6

892.3

866.4

847.5

 

Calculation of Free Cash Flow

 

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2012

September30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion)

Net cash provided by operating activities

137

160

516

487

478

Capital expenditures

(122)

(105)

(466)

(391)

(264)

Trading securities operations

(2)

(2)

(5)

3

(11)

Free cash flow

13

53

45

99

203

 

Calculation of EBITDA Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December

31, 2012

September

30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Operating income

83

139

382

449

384

Accretion expense

-

-

-

-

-

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

61

59

227

213

202

EBITDA

144

198

609

662

586

Sales revenues

790

809

3,078

2,718

1,919

EBITDA margin

18.2%

24.5%

19.8%

24.4%

30.5%

 

Calculation of Net Income Margin

For 3 months

ended

For 12 months

ended December 31

December31, 2012

September30, 2012

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Net income

57

181

342

319

301

Sales revenues

790

809

3,078

2,718

1,919

Net income margin

7.2%

22.4%

11.1%

11.7%

15.7%

 

Current ratio

For 12 months ended December 31

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion, except ratio)

Current assets

920

815

696

Current liabilities

427

414

352

Current ratio

2.15

1.97

1.98

 

Calculation of Capital Employed and Related Indicators

For 12 months ended December 31

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion)

Short‑term loans and current portion of long‑term debt

126

152

167

Long‑term debt

837

596

549

Cash and cash equivalents

(296)

 (166)

 (127)

Short-term financial assets

(86)

 (150)

 (211)

Net debt(1)

581

432

378

Shareholders' equity

2,230

2,035

1,759

Minority interest in subsidiaries' earnings

36

34

32

Equity

2,266

2,069

1,791

Capital employed

2,847

2,501

2,169

Average equity, including minority interest(2)

2,168

1,930

1,653

Average capital employed(3)

2,674

2,335

2,129

 

(1) The net debt estimation is set presented in "Debt obligations" section.

(2) Average equity including minority interest is calculated as a simple average of the equity including minority interest at the start and end of the given period.

(3) Average capital employed is calculated as a simple average of the capital employed at the start and the end of the given period.

|

Calculation of Return on Average Capital Employed (ROACE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Operating income

382

449

384

Income tax expense

 (95)

 (86)

 (58)

Return used for calculation of ROACE

287

363

326

Average capital employed

2,674

2,335

2,129

ROACE

10.7%

15.5%

15.3%

Calculation of Return on Average Equity (ROAE)

For 12 months ended December 31

2012

2011

2010

(RUB billion, except %)

Net income

342

319

301

Average equity, including minority interest

2,168

1,930

1,653

ROAE, annualized where appropriate

15.8%

16.5%

18.2%

  

Main Risk Factors

 

Type of risk

Description and ways of minimizing the risk

Industry risks

Prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products

Prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products are the main factor determining financial and, indirectly, operational indicators of Rosneft's business. Prices for Company outputs depend mainly on world market conditions, and the balance of supply and demand in various Russian regions. Ability of the Company to control prices for its outputs is very limited.

Fall in prices for crude oil, gas or petroleum products has negative impact on the business results and financial position of Rosneft.

Decline of prices may lead to reduction in volumes of crude oil and gas, which the Company can produce profitably, and this may in turn lead to reduction in the volume of reserves, which can be efficiently developed, and to lower economic efficiency of prospecting and exploration programs.

Rosneft has sufficient opportunities for reallocating goods flows in case of significant price difference between domestic and international markets. The Company is also able to reduce capital and operating expenses quickly in order to meet its commitments in case of a sharp decline in prices for crude oil, gas and petroleum products.

Dependence on monopolistic providers of services for the transportation of crude oil, gas and petroleum products and on their tariffs

Rosneft depends on monopolistic providers for transportation of oil and oil products, and has no control over the infrastructure which they use and the charges which they levy.

Rosneft transports the greater part of the crude oil, which it produces, as well as some types of light petroleum products through the system of trunk pipelines owned and operated by OJSC Transneft, which is a state-owned natural monopoly. No serious failures of the Transneft pipeline system have occurred to date and Rosneft has not incurred any serious losses due to breakdown or leakages from the system. However, any serious disruption in operation of the Transneft pipeline system or restriction on access to its capacities could prevent transportation of crude oil and petroleum products, with adverse effect on Rosneft's operating results and financial position.

The level of tariffs charged by Transneft for its transport services is regulated by the Federal Tariff Service ('FTS'). Transneft periodically raises the level of tariffs for use of its system, increasing Rosneft's expenses, and this has adverse effect on business results and financial position of the Company.

Similar risks attach to use of the pipeline system of OJSC Gazprom.

Rosneft also transports crude oil and petroleum products by railway. The railway network in Russia belongs to the state-owned natural monopoly OJSC Russian Railways ('RZhD'). Use of railway services exposes Rosneft to risks, such as potential failure of deliveries due to deterioration of railway infrastructure in Russia. Incompatibility of Russia's wide-gauge track with rail track in most foreign countries leads to additional expenses and logistical limitations, associated with ability of the Company to export its production via the RZhD rail network. Moreover, although RZhD tariffs are subject to antimonopoly control, they have been on a rising trend. Regular tariff increases entail increase of expenses for crude oil and petroleum product transportation, and may have adverse effect on the Company's business results and financial position.

Other substantial risks are associated with high levels of traffic on rail routes to the Far East due to growth in exports of coal from Western Siberia and Krasnoyarsk Territory, and also on routes to Russia's Black Sea ports due to delivery of Olympic cargoes.

Geographical and climatic conditions

Rosneft operates in regions that have stable climates and are not generally subject to natural hazards and disasters. However, abnormally low temperatures during the winter in a number of northern regions may complicate operations of the Company's oil production enterprises.

Exports via Black Sea terminals to Mediterranean ports may be restricted by throughput capacity of the Bosporus Strait and by weather conditions (storm winds) in the Black Sea during the autumn. Also, severe ice conditions may lead to closure of export terminals on the Baltic Sea and at De-Kastri during the winter.

Any extended hold-ups in functioning of export terminals may have adverse effect on the Company's operating results and financial position.

Rosneft minimizes these risks by taking account of complex climate conditions when planning field construction. Ability to reallocate goods flows enables Rosneft to minimize a part of its logistics risks.

Sale of gas output

Rosneft is exposed to several risks in connection with sale of the gas it produces. The Unified Gas Supply System ('UGSS') is owned and operated by OJSC Gazprom and transports practically all gas in Russia. Under existing regulations, Gazprom should provide access to UGSS for all internal independent suppliers on an equal basis, since Gazprom itself does not fully use capacity of the system. However, these 'equal access' regulations may not operate and OJSC Gazprom may fail to observe them in the future. Moreover, by virtue of its priority right to use of UGSS capacities, OJSC Gazprom has substantial freedom in assigning third-party access to the system.

OJSC Gazprom is a monopolistic supplier of gas in Russia and prices for gas sold by the company in Russia are regulated by the Government. Regulated gas prices in Russia are rising and it is probable that this trend will continue in the future until they attain parity with the export alternative. However, at present prices are substantially below that level. Regulated prices are reflected and, possibly, will continue to be reflected in the price for gas, which Rosneft sells to OJSC Gazprom or its subsidiaries. If rates of increase of regulated gas prices are lower than expected, this may have adverse effect on business results and the financial position of the Company.

Further growth in gas output as well as increasing gas sales to independent regional traders and independent industrial consumers will depend on sufficient access to UGSS capacity, which is not guaranteed at present.

The Company minimizes these risks by reaching agreements with Gazprom and by using conservative forecasts for gas price growth when taking decisions on implementation of gas projects.

Factual amounts of reserves

Crude oil and gas reserve data are only estimates and are inherently uncertain and the actual size of reserves may differ materially from these estimates.

Data on oil & gas reserves in the present report are estimative and are based mainly on the results of internal analytical work by the company DeGolyer&MacNaughton, which is an independent consultant to Rosneft on petroleum engineering issues.

Petroleum engineering is a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of crude oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact manner. Estimates of the value and amount of economically recoverable crude oil and gas reserves, rates of production, net present value of future cash flows and the timing of development expenditures necessarily depend upon several variables and assumptions.

Many of the assumptions, which have been used in reserve estimation, do not depend on the Company and may turn out to be inaccurate over time. Estimate of reserves and use of alternative systems of reserve calculation in accordance with the Russian system of reserve classification are inevitably subject to many indeterminacies. Accurate estimation of any reserves and resources depend on the quality of available information and interpretation of petroleum engineering and geological data. Exploration drilling, interpretation of data, testing and production, which are carried out after the estimates are made, could necessitate significant upward or downward adjustment of data on Rosneft's reserves and resources. Moreover, different reserve assessment specialists may give differing estimates of reserves and of potential income from those reserves on the basis of the same data. Factual amounts of production, revenues and expenses associated with reserves and resources will differ from estimative figures, and these differences may be substantial.

There are also various indeterminacies associated with the Russian system of reserve classification, which takes only geological factors into consideration and does not consider financial viability of extracting reserves..

Prospecting drilling is also associated with numerous risks, including the risk that oil & gas companies will not discover oil & gas reserves that are commercially productive.

Rosneft carries out prospecting and exploration work in various geographical regions, including territories with unfavorable climatic conditions and high levels of expenses. Expenses for drilling, construction and operation of wells are often partially undefined. As a result, Rosneft may incur additional costs or be constrained to downsize, suspend or curtail drilling work due to a variety of factors, including: unforeseen geological conditions, encountered during drilling work; anomalous levels of formation pressure (either high or low), heterogeneity in geological formations, equipment breakdowns and accidents, unfavorable weather, the need to observe environmental law and prescriptions by Government agencies, and shortages or late delivery of drilling rigs and equipment.

If Rosneft is unable to carry out efficient exploration work or acquire assets, which contain confirmed reserves, the amount of its confirmed reserves will diminish proportionally to production as those reserves are exhausted. Future production by the Company depends to a significant extent on successful discovery, acquisition and development of oil & gas fields. If efforts by Rosneft do not prove successful, this will lead to reduction in the total amount of the Company's confirmed reserves and lowering of production volumes, which will have adverse effect on business results and the financial position of the Company.

Rosneft is a world leader by amounts of oil reserves and has an enormous resource base, which minimizes risks associated with decline of oil production due to future revision of reserve amounts.

Competition risks

The oil & gas industry is intensely competitive. Rosneft competes mainly with other leading Russian oil & gas companies in the following areas of business:

- purchase of exploration and production licenses at auctions and sales held by Russian Government agencies;

- acquisition of other Russian companies, that may already own mineral licenses or existing assets associated with hydrocarbon production;

- engaging the services of leading independent service companies, whose capacity to render the required services may be limited;

- obtaining equipment for capital projects, which may be in short supply;

- employment of highly skilled and experienced staff;

- acquisition of existing retail enterprises and of land plots to develop new retail enterprises;

- acquisition of, or gaining access to, oil refining facilities.

Rosneft is among industry leaders in Russia and globally, which substantially improves its competitive positions. The Company has a substantial portfolio of new projects to maintain and strengthen its competitive positions in the future.

Rosneft may encounter risks arising from intensification of competition in sale of its production on domestic and external markets. The following steps are being taken to minimize risks in sale of petroleum products on the domestic market in a context of intense competition:

- capacity loading of Company refineries is planned with due regard to market forecasts in order to avoid inventory build-up of certain petroleum products;

- the Company uses the Russia-wide structure of its oil refining and oil product wholesaling business and system of counterparties to best advantage in order to quickly reallocate regional goods flows on the domestic market and to ensure rapid adjustment of volumes between the domestic market and export.

- upgrading work, which is being carried out at refineries, will increase refining depth, helping to meet growing demand for high-octane gasolines and petroleum products with low sulphur content;

- the Company is working continuously to develop its own network of filling stations and refueling complexes meeting the latest European standards, since retail is the most stable segment for petroleum product sales on the domestic market, being less subject to sudden price fluctuations and falls in demand in comparison with other segments. A system of payment for fuel sales at filling stations using electronic cards is widely used in order to attract more customers (particularly corporate customers) and Rosneft stations can also serve cards of other providers.

In case of special need, ownership by the Company of four sea terminals for transhipment at the ports of Arkhangelsk, Nakhodka, De-Kastri and Tuapse enables quick reallocation of Company products in favor of the export market;

Geographical diversity, which enables reallocation of crude oil and petroleum product deliveries from one region to another, is one of the most effective means of managing competition risk on export markets. For example, opening of an export route via Arkhangelsk and Murmansk and arrangements for crude oil deliveries by railway to China have created more opportunity for adjusting export flows by opening markets in the Far East, South-East Asia and the USA. This has been done by reducing traditional export flows through Black and Baltic Sea ports and Transneft's Druzhba pipeline, all of which are oriented to Europe. Increase of capacities for pipeline-to-rail transhipment and commissioning of the Eastern Siberia-Pacific Ocean pipeline adds to these opportunities.

Country and regional risks

Country and region

Rosneft has operations in all Federal Districts of the Russian Federation. Development prospects for the Federal Districts are discussed in the Program for Medium-term Socio-Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Risks of armed conflicts, civil unrest, strikes and declaration of a state of emergency in regions of Company operations are negligible

The Company is also exposed to risks related to its international operations. These are countries with developing markets and are more prone to political, economic, social and legal risks than countries with more developed markets. Overall, the risks related to carrying out business activities in these countries are comparable or higher than those related to business operations in Russia.

In order to minimize its economic and financial risks Rosneft strives to diversify its types of business and the regions where it carries out investment projects, expanding the geography of its business and the nature of its various projects.

In case of the occurrence of risks, which are connected with the political, economic and social situation in Russia as a whole or in certain parts of it, and risks connected with fluctuations in the global economy, the Company will take all possible measures to limit their negative impact. The parameters of such measures will depend on the specifics of the situation, which comes about in each actual case.

The Company plans to carry out the following measures of a general nature to maintain its business in case of negative impact on its business due to country or regional changes:

- to carry out all possible measures to support projects, which are already being developed with the Company's support;

- to work closely with executive bodies of the Government of the Russian Federation, administrative regions of the Russian Federation and municipal government bodies;

- to optimize and limit expenses.

Financial risks

Currency

Most of Rosneft's gross revenue is generated from export of crude oil and petroleum products. Consequently, fluctuations in exchange rates of currencies against the rouble have impact on the Company's business results, subjecting the Company to currency risk.

The Company's currency risk is substantially reduced by the existence of expenses that are denominated in foreign currency. Rosneft is a large borrower in the international debt capital markets, and the bulk of its loans are denominated in US dollars. Current liabilities for servicing of these loans are also denominated in dollars.

This currency structure of revenues and liabilities acts as an in-built hedging mechanism, where factors compensate one another by acting in opposite directions.

A balanced structure of claims and liabilities in foreign currency minimizes the impact of currency risk on the Company's business results..

Changes in interest rates

As a major borrower, Rosneft is exposed to risks associated with changes in interest rates. The Company's primary source of debt financing is international debt capital markets. The majority of its debt portfolio is represented by US dollar-denominated loans that bear interest at rates determined with reference to LIBOR and EURIBOR interbank loan rates. Accordingly, an increase in LIBOR/EURIBOR rates can lead to higher costs of debt servicing, which, in turn, may adversely affect the Company's solvency and liquidity.

The Company has a balanced policy for use of internal and loan financing and has active ratings from Moody's (Ваа1), Fitch (BBB) and S&P (BВB-). Rosneft carries out transactions with derivative financial instruments in order to obtain a fixed rate of interest on a part of its loan portfolio. Growth of the Company's credit rating and that of the Russian Federation are important factors in reducing the cost of borrowing for the Company in the future, and also help to keep down the cost of hedging risks associated with changes of interest rates.

Inflation

Change in the consumer price index has some impact on the Company's financial position. However, existing and forecast levels of inflation are far from critical for the Company and the oil & gas industry as a whole. The Company defines as critical a level of inflation, which is double the level forecast by the Ministry of Economic Development for the current year. Rosneft is not taking any special measures to reduce this risk, viewing it as insignificant.

Legal risks

Changes to currency regulation

Rosneft is heavily involved in foreign economic relations. Part of the Company's assets and liabilities are denominated in foreign currency. So the Government mechanism of currency regulation has impact on Company business.

A number of regulatory acts were approved in 2012 to optimize and simplify currency control procedures.

Overall, Russian legislation governing currency regulation and currency control did not undergo substantial changes having impact on the business of Rosneft during the reporting period. Federal Law № 194-FZ (12.11.2012) on Amendments to Articles 3.5 and 15.25 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Violations expands the list of administrative violations associated with failure to observe currency legislation of the Russian Federation and the acts of bodies responsible for currency regulation.

Rosneft constantly monitors changes in currency legislation and strictly adheres to the provisions of legislation in the sphere of foreign currency.

Changes to tax legislation

The most substantial changes to tax legislation in the reporting period are:

- indexation of excise rates for automotive gasoline, diesel fuel, straight-run gasoline and engine oils for gasoline and (or) carburettor (injection) engines for the period 2013-2014, setting of new excise rates for 2015, and additions to the list of goods that are subject to excises;

- indexation of rates of mineral extraction tax for natural gas and gas condensate in 2013-2015;

- amendments and clarifications to tax accounting of property in the process of amortization;

- exemption from property tax for movable property of organizations, which was recorded in accounts from 01.01.2013;

- Cancellation of preferences in taxation of the property of organizations and setting of maximum tax rates with respect to railways in public use, federal roads in public use, trunk pipelines, electricity transmission cables, and structures, which are an integral functioning part of these facilities.

Tax legislation is a particularly changeable branch of law, where legal statutes are subject to frequent amendments, additions and clarifications. In order to reduce risks associated with changes in tax law the Company carries out careful analysis of law drafts and newly passed legal acts in the field of taxation. Rosneft constantly monitors changes to tax legislation and assesses and forecasts the impact of such changes on its business, so that likelihood of risks arising in connection with amendments to legislation on tax and duties that have come into force is not high.

Changes to rules for customs control and duties

Rosneft is involved in foreign economic relations, and is therefore subject to several risks that arise from changes to legislation governing foreign economic relations, and to customs legislation governing procedures for transportation of goods across the customs border, the establishment and application of customs regimes, and the setting, introduction and levying of customs charges.

Customs regulation is carried out in accordance with international agreements of the Russian Federation in the area of customs issues, with the provisions of the Customs Code of the Customs Union, the Federal Law on Customs Regulation, the Customs Code of the Russian Federation, the Federal Law on the Customs Tariff and other federal laws and legal acts adopted in accordance with such laws in the sphere of Government regulation of foreign trade.

The Agreement on the Customs Code of the Eurasian Economic Union was approved by Decree № 17 of the Inter-governmental Council of the Eurasian Economic Union on 27.11.2009, and the Agreement has been in force in the Russian Federation since 01.07.2010. Federal Law № 311 setting out procedures and rules for customs regulation in the Russian Federation, dated 27.11.20120, was passed and is in force for purposes of execution in the Russian Federation of the international agreements, which constitute the contractual and legal basis of the Customs Union of the Eurasian Economic Union. Decree №54 (dated 16.07.2012) of the Council of the Eurasian Economic Commission approved a single list of goods for foreign trade activities of the Customs Union and a single customs tariff for the Customs Union, and the previous versions of the list of goods and customs tariff were declared to be no longer in force.

At the present time, in accordance with the Federal Law № 164-FZ on the Principles of Government Regulation of Foreign Trade Activity (dated 08.12.2003), crude oil can be exported without quantitative limitations or export licensing. Quantitative limitations on exports can only be introduced by decision of the Government of the Russian Federation in exceptional cases. Rosneft uses the services of professional organizations - customs brokers, acting in the Company's name and on its instructions - for documentation of customs operations, payment of customs duties and other actions connected with observance of the customs regime for export of the Company's crude oil and petroleum products and for representation of the Company's interests in customs matters. However, it should be noted that delegation of customs operations to customs brokers does not exempt Rosneft from potential risk of civil liability in case of violations of customs legislation. In order to avoid such eventualities Rosneft constantly works with and monitors the actions of customs brokers.

The procedure for setting rates of export customs duties on crude oil and specific goods categories, produced from crude oil, as listed by the Russian Government, is described in clause 4 of Article 3 of the Federal Law № 5003-I on Customs Tariffs (dated 21.05.1993). According to this procedure export duty rates on crude oil and petroleum products are set for a period of one month taking account of the average price for Urals crude oil on international commodity markets (Mediterranean and Rotterdam) during the most recent monitoring period.

In order to improve efficiency in development of operating fields, maintain the rates of modernization of Russian oil refineries and increase levels of output of high-quality, in May 2011 the export duty on gasoline was set at 90% of the duty rate for crude oil, in October 2011 the 60/66 regime was introduced, stipulating reduction of the percentage of the difference between the monitoring price of crude oil and the cut-off price from 65% to 60% and unification of the rate for dark and light products at a level of 66% of the export duty for crude oil.

It should be noted that, in accordance with Federal Law № 239-FZ (03.12.2012) the procedure for the setting of export duties on crude oil and certain categories of goods obtained from crude oil is changed with effect from

01.04.2013. Under the new procedure the Government will define a formula for the calculation of export duties, taking account of the average price of Urals crude, and an authorized Government body will use the formulas to calculate the duty rates, and the rates will be recalculated each month and made known to participants in international trade operations through official sources. Maximum levels of the calculated export duty rates are set depending on prices for crude oil on international markets. Special formulas are established by the Russian Government for calculating export duty rates on high-viscosity crude oil and crude oil with particular physical and chemical features.

Changes to antimonopoly legislation

Rosneft has significant shares of wholesale markets in the Russian Federation for automotive gasoline, diesel fuel, jet fuel and fuel oil, so Company business in this sphere is subject to additional requirements designed to protect competition, entailing risks associated with changes to antimonopoly legislation. Antimonopoly regulation is carried out in accordance with Russian federal laws and legal acts associated with these laws. The principal law governing antimonopoly regulation is the Federal Law on Protection of Competition. At the end of 2011 substantial amendments were made to antimonopoly legislation, having impact on Company business. The amendments came into force in January 2012. Amendments which could have positive impact on Company business include: clarification of the concept of concerted actions and their decriminalization, which will minimize the number of antimonopoly actions initiated by territorial antimonopoly agencies in respect of Rosneft's sales companies; establishment of conditions in which a price cannot be recognized as monopolistically high; and differentiation of administrative liability for abuse of dominant position (Article 14.31 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation) depending on consequences of the abuse. Inclusion in the Administrative Code of a procedure for setting fines for violations described in Articles 14.31 and 14.32 of the Code and a list of circumstances that mitigate and aggravate responsibility can be seen as a negative amendment, since its application will substantially increase the level of fines for antimonopoly violations (by eight times on average).

Rosneft constantly monitors both amendments to existing legislation and law drafts, which are in preparation, assessing the nature of any amendments and taking account of them in its business in order to minimize risks arising from changes in antimonopoly requirements. The Company takes all necessary measures in its business selling petroleum products on the domestic market to minimize the risks indicated above, constantly monitoring market price levels and making full use of market instruments when carrying out sales of petroleum products, and also implementing other recommendations of antimonopoly bodies which are intended to ensure that petroleum product pricing is economically justified.

.

Legal regulation of sub-soil use

During 2012 a Resolution on the establishment of and change to the boundaries of sub-soil areas provided for use was approved by Russian Government Decree № 429 (03.05.2012) for the purpose of amendments to the Russian Federal Law on Sub-Soil Resources, in order to enable adjustment of the boundary of a sub-surface area, which is provided for use on a paid basis, to ensure completeness in geological study, rational use and protection of sub-soil resources.

The Resolution states that the establishment of and change to the boundaries of sub-soil areas provided for use on a paid basis are carried out by the Federal Agency for Sub-Soil Resources ('Rosnedra') and its territorial bodies, and by executive government bodies in administrative regions of the Russian Federation in the limits of their authorities. Definition of the boundaries of a sub-soil area, fixed by the use of geographical coordinates, is included in the license for sub-soil use as an integral part of that license.

The following factors are taken into account when establishing the borders of sub-soil areas: geological and other information on mineral resources; data from expert government study of mineral reserves, geological, economic and environmental information on sub-soil areas (if such study has been carried out); the boundaries of specially protected natural territories (governed by rules, which do not permit sub-soil use); and proposals by the Russian Ministry of Defence, the Federal Security Service, the Russian Nature Agency ('Rosprirodnadzor') and the Russian Fisheries Agency ('Rosrybolovstva'). It is also stated the boundaries of an area may be expanded on a single occasion (regardless of how many times sub-soil usage rights have been transferred and a license has been re-issued) in case of technical needs for expansion of the area's boundaries without increase of mineral reserves or confirmation of data that minerals outside the boundaries of the areas are part of the same field. The Resolution sets out the content of an application for change to the boundaries of a sub-soil area, a list of documents to support such an application, and the procedure for its consideration, including the procedure for its agreement with the above-mentioned Federal Government bodies.

Rosneft takes a positive view of the proposed plans for greater efficiency in use of sub-soil resources at areas that have been allocated from the Government fund and is taking account of these changes to legislation in its business.

Provisions came into force in the reporting period, which establish a new procedure for the organisation and conduct of competitions and auctions for usage rights at sub-soil areas. Specifically, it has been established that tendering for usage rights at areas with federal status must be carried out through an auction process. Such areas could previously also be provided for use on the basis of a competition. These amendments refer to sub-soil areas with federal status, with the exception of sub-soil areas with federal status on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation.

In essence, these amendments deprive the Company of the opportunity of obtaining sub-soil usage rights to areas of federal status on a competition basis, but leave the possibility of obtaining sub-soil usage rights by offering the largest single payment (auction). In evaluating these amendments it is important to take account of the small number of unallocated hydrocarbon sub-soil areas with federal status, as well as the fact that competitions organised by government bodies for hydrocarbon fields have very rarely been held using a tendering format.

Risks associated with the above-mentioned changes will not have substantial impact on the business of Rosneft since the Company monitors amendments to current Russian legislation and takes account of them in its business.

Legislation regarding property relations

Federal Law № 302-FZ (30.12.2012) on Amendments to Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation was approved during the reporting period and its provisions come into force on March 1, 2013.

This Federal Law clarifies and supplements the provisions of legislation on state registration of property rights. In particular, obligatory registration by a notary may be established by law or by agreement between the parties in transactions, which entail the creation, amendment or termination of property rights that are subject to state registration. In such an instance a record may be made in the state register on the application of any of the transaction parties, and this may be done through a notary. At the present time there are no federal laws establishing obligatory registration by a notary for transactions with real estate, so this provision will not have substantial impact on the Company's interests at the present time.

The above-mentioned Federal Law also introduces a new institution, making it possible for a notice of objection in respect of a registered right to be entered in the state register by a person, whose respective right was registered earlier. The procedure for entering such a notice is regulated by a federal law, which has not yet been enacted. The legal significance of entering such a notice has not been established, so the notice will effectively be in the nature of information of the existence of certain assertions of legal rights by previously registered rights-holders. Due to the lack of a legal procedure for entering such a notice, we suppose that the innovation will not have any substantial impact on Company interests at the present time.

In addition the Federal Law cancels the requirement for obligatory state registration of a series of transactions with real estate, i.e. sale-and-purchase agreements for residential premises, sale of enterprises, making of gifts, and leasing (of buildings, facilities and enterprises). This innovation excludes unnecessary 'dual' registration in carrying out such transactions - simultaneous registration of an agreement and the transfer of rights under the agreement, - which will entail a reduction of expenses when the Company registers such transactions.

Legislation regarding land use and urban construction

The Federal Law № 289 (30.12.2012) on Amendments to the Urban Construction Code of the Russian Federation and to Certain Legal Acts of the Russian Federation came into force in the reporting period. The Law extends until June 30, 2013 for municipal districts, December 31, 2013 for urban settlements and urban districts and June 1, 2014 for rural districts the legal rules that permit the provision of land plots, issue of construction permits, and the issue on a specific (transitional) basis of urban construction plans for land plots and the making of decisions on change from one type to another type of permitted use of land plots and sites for capital construction in the absence of rules for land use and development.

The above-mentioned Federal Law also extends until December 31, 2013 the force of the rule, which permits urban construction plans for land plots to be submitted instead of planning documentation with respect to land plots that have been designated for the construction or reconstruction of lines of utility transportation.

In the absence (in most cases) of approved rules for land use and development, the above-mentioned rules will allow the present practise of obtaining permissions and documentation regarding land and urban construction to be maintained, which will be positive for Company business.

Health, safety and environment

The following legal and regulatory acts were passed during the reporting period in the sphere of health, safety and protection of the environment:

The Federal Law N 93 (25.06.12) on Amendments to Specific Legal Acts of the Russian Federation regarding State Control (Supervision) and Municipal Control amends the Federal Law № 99- on Licensing of Certain Types of Activity, of May 4, 2011, by making voluntary fire-safety measures and the collection and use of waste in hazard classes I-IV exempt from licensing. The Company will take account of the above-mentioned changes when obtaining permit-documents.

The Government Decree N 1148 (08.11.12) on aspects of payment for emission of pollutants due to flare combustion and (or) dispersion of associated petroleum gas, effective from January 1, 2013 raises the payment for emission of pollutants due to flare combustion and (or) dispersion of associated petroleum gas in excess of established limits. The permissible level for flare combustion and (or) dispersion has remained unchanged at 5% of gas production, but this limit is not applicable at fields with a low level of depletion. Payment for exceeding the limit on flare combustion and (or) dispersion is calculated using an additional coefficient, which was set at 12 for 2013 and will rise to 25 from 2014. Increasing coefficients will not be used if annual gas production does not exceed 5 mln cubic meters or if the volume content of the non-hydrocarbon component is greater than 50%.

The Company is carrying out detailed analysis of the measures applied by the Russian Government to stimulate use of associated gas and is taking account of them in implementation of its gas programme.

Government Decree N 1193 (19.11.12) on approval of a list of violations of laws for protection of the environment, which cause a risk of harm to the environment, for the purposes of state environmental supervision, defines violations, which represent a risk of harm to the environment, for the purposes of state environmental supervision in compliance with Article 65 of the Federal Law N 7 (10.01.2002) on Protection of the Environment.

The Federal Law N 287 (30.12.12) on Amendments to the Federal Law on the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation and the  Federal Law on Inland Seas, Territorial Waters and the Zone Adjoining the Russian Federation sets out the specifics of exploitation and use of artificial islands, units, facilities, underwater pipelines, and the conduct of drilling in inland seas and territorial waters. The Federal Law comes into force from July 1, 2013.

These forms of activity can only be carried out as part of regional geological study, geological study, exploration and production of raw hydrocarbons, and also in respect of storage of crude oil and petroleum products on the basis of a plan, which includes actions for prevention and elimination of spillages of oil and petroleum products in the maritime environment. The plan is approved by the operating organization on the basis of a positive assessment by a Government environmental panel with subsequent notification of federal bodies, nominated for that purpose by the Russian President and the Russian Government.

The duties of the operating organization are to implement the plan, create a system for monitoring of the state of the maritime environment in the area where works are being carried out, to maintain its own emergency and rescue services and (or) formations, capacities and resources. Financial support for the plan is also required. This may be in the form of a bank guarantee, insurance agreement or document, confirming the creation of a reserve fund.

If a spillage cannot be overcome by implementation of the plan, the organization requests the mobilization of additional capacities and resources of the unified state system for prevention and elimination of emergency situations. The organization must compensate the respective costs. The duties of the operating organizations in instances of oil and petroleum product spillages are defined. Specifically, the organization must fully compensate the harm, which has been caused to the environment.

The legislative amendments, which have been described require the approval of respective subordinate legislation, after consideration of which it will possible to assess the scale and character of the Company's additional obligations, arising as a result of the development of mineral areas on the continental shelf.

Current court cases in which the Company is involved

Rosneft has previously participated or is currently participating in the following court cases, which may have substantial impact on the Company's financial results:

 

1.) In 2006 the International Commercial Arbitrage Court of the Russian Chamber of Commerce upheld claims by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. for recovery of debt from OJSC Yuganskneftegaz (the legal predecessor of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company) under four loan agreements. These court decisions are hereafter referred to as the 'Arbitrage Verdicts'. The sum to be recovered consisted of RUB 11,233.0 mln loan principal, RUB 1,702.9 mln accrued interest and USD 0.9 mln arbitrage fees and court costs. Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made an application to the Court of Amsterdam (Netherlands) for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the Netherlands. In May 2007 Rosneft successfully contested the Arbitrage Verdicts in the Moscow Arbitrage Court based on procedural violations in the earlier court case. This decision was upheld by appeal and supervisory courts in the Russian Federation. On 28.02.2008 the Amsterdam Court refused to uphold the Arbitrage Verdicts and order their execution in the Netherlands. On 28.04.2009 the Amsterdam Appeal Court overturned the ruling of the Amsterdam Court and ordered that the Arbitrage Verdicts should be executed in the Netherlands. The Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled on 25.06.2010 that an appeal by the Company against the ruling of the Amsterdam Appeal Court of 28.04.2009 should not be heard.

 

In addition to the legal case in the Netherlands, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. made a further claim in 2009 and at the start of 2010 for the Arbitrage Verdicts to be upheld and implemented in the USA, and in England and Wales, Ireland, and Jersey, and also for awarding of interest on the sums referred to in the Arbitrage Verdicts. In accordance with a court order by the English court on 06.04.2010, the Company agreed to provide security agreed by the parties for purposes of the courts cases in England and the Netherlands, and the court cases in the USA, Ireland, and Jersey were terminated. As stated above, on 28.06.2010 the Supreme Court of the Netherlands ruled that the appeal by the Company against the verdict of the Amsterdam Appeal Court from April 28, 2010 should not be heard. Although Rosneft disagrees with the rulings of the aforementioned Dutch courts, on 11.08.2010 it made a payment equivalent to the sum indicated in the Arbitrage Verdicts.

Apart from the above-mentioned payments, Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. is maintaining its application to the High Court of Justice in London for payment of interest, calculated by reference to legal statutes, amounting to USD 160 mln at the time when the application was made. On 14.06.2011 the London High Court delivered a provisional verdict on two preliminary matters, which it had agreed to consider before delivering a verdict on the substance of the claim. Although the Court found in favour of Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. in both instances, it allowed Rosneft to appeal against the decisions. The English Appeal Court delivered a verdict in favour of Rosneft on one of the two preliminary matters. Neither of the sides sought any further appeal. After the case was returned to the High Court, the Court delivered a procedural verdict on 27.02.2013 calling for hearings on further preliminary matters of the competence of the Court to enact cancelled verdicts of the International Commercial Arbitrage Court in accordance with the standards of English common law and to decide whether Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. in principle has the right to seek payment of interest on sums awarded by the International Commercial Arbitrage Court in English courts. The High Court stated that the sides must agree a date after 07.10.2013 for hearings on the further preliminary matters. The Company intends to make every effort to defend its position in the remaining court proceedings in England.

2) In 2007 CJSC Vesta Investment Company, which is a shareholder of Rosneft, brought a claim in the Moscow Arbitrage Court for four loan agreements between the company Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. as lender and OJSC Yuganskneftegaz as borrower to be declared void (fictitious). Total amount of the borrowing under the terms of the disputed agreements is RUB 11.2 bln. Rosneft, as the legal successor of OJSC Yuganskneftegaz, is participating in the proceedings as co-defendant. On 11.07.2012 the Moscow Arbitrage Court ruled the loans to be invalid. On 15.10.2012 the Ninth Arbitrage Appeal Court ruled that the verdict of the first-level court should be left unchanged. An appeal by Yukos Capital S.a.r.l. contesting these verdicts has not been upheld.

3) In 2007 the company Glendale Group Ltd. presented a claim against Rosneft to the Court in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) for RUB 3.53 bln of debt principal, interest on promissory notes (18% annualized), interest and late payment charges, justifying the application by the existence of a RUB 3.5 bln debt on eight promissory notes issued by OJSC Yuganskneftegaz in 2003. Rosneft contests legality of the declared claims on various grounds. Hearings on the merits of the case were held on 30.08.2012 and 19.11.2012, and the Amsterdam Court set a date of 06.02.2013 for the delivery of a verdict. However, on 04.02.2013 the Court postponed the delivery of a verdict until a later time without specification of the exact date.

4) The company Yukos International UK BV has initiated court proceedings against Rosneft and other co-defendants not affiliated with Rosneft in the Amsterdam District Court, demanding the compensation of losses amounting to USD 333 mln as well as interest accrued as established by law since February 7, 2011, together with costs. In these proceedings Yukos International UK BV is claiming damages, which it asserts to have been caused as a result of delivery by the Amsterdam Court in 2007 of an order for the arrest of a bank account, which, as Yukos International UK BV asserts, limited its ability to invest certain sums at its discretion. The first court hearings on this matter were held on June 27, 2012. On October 3, 2012 Rosneft submitted an objection to the claim. The objection includes various grounds of defence, including the fact that the Court issued the arrest order in a proper manner, and that Yukos International UK BV did not suffer any losses since its funds were placed on an interest-bearing account of its choice. Yukos International UK BV submitted an application in response to the objection on February 20, 2013 and Rosneft must submit additions to its objections by 15.05.2013.

Rosneft is also involved in a number of other courts cases, which arise in the course of its ordinary business and do not entail substantial financial risk for the Company.

Rosneft regularly monitors verdicts delivered by higher courts and assesses trends in the interpretation of laws at the level of regional arbitrage courts, making full use of its monitoring data both for the purposes of defending its rights and lawful interests in court and for regulation of issues that arise in the course of Company business. Risks associated with changes in court practice are therefore believed to be insignificant.

 

 

System of Corporate Governance

 

The sustainable development of Rosneft, its levels of social responsibility with respect to all interested parties, as well as its attractiveness to investors depend to a great extent on a transparent system of corporate governance. As a public company, Rosneft does all it can to consistently improve the efficiency of its corporate governance system, monitoring and applying the latest international practice.

The Company's main tasks in the field of corporate governance are as follows:

 

·; application, dissemination, monitoring and enforcement of efficient unified governance standards at all of the Group's structural divisions and subsidiaries;

·; constant improvement of relationships with shareholders and institutional investors, employees, business partners and other interested parties;

·; improvement of information policy and achievement of greater information transparency;

·; ensuring efficient long-term cooperation with local government to support socioeconomic development in Russian regions.

 

Rosneft's system of corporate governance consists of the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors, a Collegial Executive Body (the Management Board), and a Chief Executive Officer (the Company President). The principles and foundations of this system are formulated in Rosneft's Code of Corporate Conduct, which was designed to comply with the Russian Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, with the Code of Corporate Conduct recommended by the Russian Federal Commission for the Securities Market, with OECD principles of corporate governance, and with the Company Charter.

The system of corporate governance is also regulated by the following internal documents:

 

§ Regulation on the General Shareholders Meeting;

§ Regulation on the Board of Directors;

§ Regulation on the Collegial Executive Body (the Management Board);

§ Regulation on the sole Executive Body (the Company President);

§ Regulation on the formation and work structure of the Board of Directors Committees;

§ Regulation on the Board of Directors Audit Committee;

§ Regulation on the Board of Directors Human Resources and Remuneration Committee;

§ Regulation on the Board of Directors Strategic Planning Committee;

§ Regulation on the Corporate Secretary;

§ Regulation on Dividend Policy;

§ Regulation on Insider Information;

§ Regulation on Information Policy;

§ Regulation on Internal Control of Operations and Finances;

§ Regulation on the Accounting Commission;

§ Code of Business Ethics;

§ Regulation on Provision of Information to Shareholders.

 

All of these documents are available on the Company website together with Rosneft's Charter. Information on compliance by Rosneft with the Code of Corporate Conduct is provided in an appendix to the present Annual Report. The Company's system of corporate governance is being constantly improved through amendments to the above-mentioned internal documents.

 

The General Meeting of Shareholders

The General Meeting of Shareholders is the Company's supreme governing body. The Company implements the Regulation on the General Meeting of Shareholders, which was approved in an amended version by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, 29.06.2009).

 

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

The Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to review Company results in 2011 was held on June 20, 2012 in St. Petersburg (unnumbered minutes, 25.06.2012). The meeting was attended by 97.18% of Company shareholders.

Showing of a live broadcast of the Meeting was arranged in Moscow, Krasnodar, Krasnoyarsk, Nefteyugansk, Samara, Neftekumsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur for individuals in those cities who had the right to take part in the Meeting.

The Meeting approved the following items: the Company's Annual Report and financial accounts for 2011; distribution of Company income for 2011; the amount, schedule and form of payment of dividends for 2011; and remuneration and compensation of expenses for members of the Company Board of Directors. Decisions were also taken on election of members of the Board of Directors and of the Audit Commission, approval of the Company Auditor, and approval of related-party transactions. Decisions taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders had been fully executed as of December 31, 2012.

The first meeting of the newly appointed Board of Directors was held at the end of the Shareholders' Meeting, and the Board appointed a Chairman and Deputy Chairmen. The Board also confirmed membership of its three committees, each of them headed by an independent director.

 

Extraordinary General Meetings of Shareholders

Two Extraordinary General Meetings (EGMs) of Rosneft Shareholders were held in 2012.

The EGM held in absentia on April 10, 2012 (unnumbered minutes, 13.04.2012) approved an amendment to the previously completed transaction with the Chinese National Petroleum Corporation, and also approved completion of an amendment to related-party transactions (transactions of Rosneft with OJSC Transneft and CJSC Vankorneft).

The second EGM took place in Khabarovsk on November 30, 2012 (unnumbered minutes, 05.12.2012), and 97.64% of Company shares were represented at the Meeting.

The Meeting made resolutions on distribution of income and additional payment of dividends for 2011, on early termination of the authorities of the Board of Directors and election of new Board members, and also approved a number of related-party transactions. At the end of the Meeting the newly elected Board of Directors met to elect the Board Chairman and his deputies. The Board also confirmed the membership of its three committees, each of them headed by an independent director, and appointed a new member of the Management Board to replace a member who had stepped down.

 

The Board of Directors

The Board of Directors is the principal component of Rosneft's system of corporate governance.

Activities by the Board of Directors are governed by current legislation, the Company's Charter provisions, and the Regulation on the Board of Directors, which was approved with amendments by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009).

The Board of Directors carries out general management of Company business on behalf and in the interests of all its shareholders within the limits of its authority, as prescribed by law and by the Company Charter. 

The Board of Directors also supervises the system of control over the activities of the Company's executive bodies, and ensures efficient interaction between Company bodies and observance and protection of the rights and lawful interests of shareholders.

In carrying out these functions the Board of Directors works closely with the Company's external auditor, with management and structural sub-divisions of the Company, and with Company officials.

The Board of Directors is governed in its decision-making by the following principles:

 

·; that decisions should be taken based on accurate information about Company business;

·; that no limitations should be placed on the rights of shareholders, including the right to participate in management of Company affairs, and to receive dividends and information about the Company;

·; the achievement of a balance between the interests of various groups of shareholders to ensure the greatest possible objectivity in decision-making for the benefit of all Company shareholders.

 

Rosneft aims to attain maximum efficiency in the activities of the Board of Directors through high levels of qualification of its members, the personal responsibility of each member of the Board and the responsibility of the Board as a whole for the decisions, which it makes, and also through achieving an optimal balance between executive, non-executive and independent members of the Board.

Newly appointed members of the Board of Directors undergo an induction program, in which they are familiarized with the Company's internal documents and decisions made by the General Meeting of Shareholders. Other information, which Board members may require for proper execution of their duties, is supplied to them on request.

The composition of the current Board of Directors corresponds to standards set out in Rosneft's Code of Corporate Conduct and to international corporate governance practice. As of December 31, 2012 eight of the nine directors were non-executives and four of them were independent.

 

Members of the Board of Directors (as of 31.12.2012)

From January 1, 2012 to June 20,2012 the authorities of the Board of Directors were exercised by the membership, which was elected by the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders on September 13, 2011. From June 20, 2012 to November 30,2012 the authorities of the Board of Directors were exercised by the membership, which was elected by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on June 20,2012. From November 30, 2012 the authorities of the Board of Directors were exercised by the membership, which was elected by the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders on November 30, 2012.

 

Alexander Nekipelov

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Member of the BoD Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1951. Graduated from the Economics Faculty of Lomonosov Moscow State University in 1973. Doctor of Economic Science. Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Author of 3 monograph and more than 200 published in Russia and abroad scientific articles. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1998 to 2001 - Director of the Institute of International Economic and Political Studies at the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2001 - Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Presidium Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2004 - Director of the Moscow School of Economics at Lomonosov Moscow State University.

From 2006 - member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

From 2008 - member of the Board of Directors of Zarubezhneft.

From 2011 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Sergey Shishin

Independent member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the BoD HR and Remuneration Committee, Member of the Audit Committee.

Born in 1963. Graduated in 1984 from the Higher Border Guard School of the Committee for State Security of the USSR, in 1990 from the Higher Institute of the Committee for State Security, and in 1999 from the Russian Civil Service Academy attached to the President of the Russian Federation. Doctor of Economic Science. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1980 to 2007 - service in the Committee for State Security of the USSR and the Russian Federal Security Service.

From 2007 - Senior Vice-President of VTB Bank.

Holds positions in the governing bodies of a number of commercial organizations (member of the Board of Directors of OJSC RusHydro and member of the Supervisory Board of OJSC VBRR).

From 2011- member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Nikolay Laverov

Independent member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the BoD Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1930. Graduated in 1954 from Moscow Institute of Non-ferrous Metals and Gold. Doctor of Geology and Mineral Science. Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Professor. Publications include 25 monographs and more than 700 articles and scientific publications in Russia and abroad. Originator of scientific work and inventions. Holds orders of distinction, state and industry prizes and awards, and medals and orders of other countries.

From 1991 - Vice-President of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

From 2012 - member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Rosgeologia.

From 2012 - member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Rosneft.

 

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

Independent Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the Audit Committee, Member of the HR and Remuneration Committee.

Born in 1940. Graduated from the Economics Faculty of Berne University in 1965.

From 1998 - Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Barclays Capital.

From 2012 - Chairman of Barclays Investment Bank.

Holds positions in the governing bodies of several major foreign companies.

From 2006 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Mikhail Kuzovlev

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, member of the BoD Committee for HR and Remuneration, member of the BoD Committee for Strategic Planning.

Born in 1966. Graduated in 1988 from Moscow State Institute of International Relations, attached to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the USSR.

From 2005 to 2008 - Managing Director of Russian Commercial Bank (Cyprus) Ltd.

From 2008 to 2011 - First Deputy President, Chairman of the Executive Board of VTB Bank.

From 2011 - President - Chairman of the Executive Board of Bank of Moscow.

Holds positions in the governing bodies of a number of commercial organizations (Chairman of the Board of Directors of Russian Commercial Bank (Cyprus) Ltd., member of the Board of Directors of OJSC VTB-Leasing and OJSC Stolichnaya Insurance Group) and OJSC Insurance Group MSK.

From 2012 - Vice-President, member of the Executive Board of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs.

From 2012 - member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Igor Sechin

Chairman of the Management Board, President of Rosneft.

Born in 1960. Graduated in 1984 from Leningrad State University. Doctoral Candidate in Economics. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 2000 to 2004 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.

From 2004 to 2008 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, Aide to the President of the Russian Federation.

From 2008 to 2012 - Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation.

From 2004 to 2011 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

From May 2012 - President, Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

Holds positions on supervisory boards of several large Russian companies i.e. Chairman of BoD of OJSC Rosneftegaz and National Oil Consorcium Ltd., Chairman of Supervision Board of PHK CSKA Ltd.

From 2012 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Dmitry Shugaev

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, member of the Strategic Planning Committee.

Born in 1965. Graduated in 1987 from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations, attached to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the USSR. Doctoral Candidate in Economic Science.

From 2001 to 2008 - various posts at State Unitary Enterprise, Rosoboronexport.

From 2008 to 2009 - Head of the CEO's Office at the State Corporation, Rostec.

From 2009 - Deputy CEO of the State Corporation, Rostec.

Holds positions in the management bodies of several commercial organizations (member of the Boards of Directors of OJSC INTER RAO UES and NPO Saturn).

From 2011 - member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Matthias Warnig

Independent member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, member of the Strategic Planning Committee, member of the Audit Committee.

Born in 1955. Graduated in 1981 from the Bruno Leuschner Higher School of Economics, specializing in National Economics.

From 2006 - Managing Director of Nord-Stream AG (Switzerland).

Holds posts in the governing bodies of several Russian and foreign companies, including positions as member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Bank Rossiya, member of the Supervisory Boards of OJSC VTB Bank and Verbundnetz Gas Aktiengesellschaft, Chairman of the Administrative Board of GAZPROM Schweiz AG, Chairman of the Board of Directors of OJSC Transneft and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Russian Aluminum.

From 2011 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Ilya Shcherbovich

Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, member of the BoD Committee for Strategic Planning.

Born in 1974. Graduated in 1995 from the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.

From 2007 - President of UCP Group of companies.

Holds positions in the governing bodies of several commercial organizations (member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Transneft, OJSC Federal Grid Company, Uralmash Oil & Gas Equipment Holding LLC.

From 2012 - member of the Board of Directors of OJSC Rosneft.

 

Attendance of Board members at Board meetings and meetings of Board Committees in 2012

Board of Directors

Audit Committee

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

Strategic Planning Committee

Members

Executive

Non-executive

Independent

Attendance at meetings

Persons who were members of the Board of Directors throughout 2012

Matthias Warnig

Х

Х

36/36

9/9

9/9

Alexander Nekipelov

Х

36/36

8/8

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

X

X

36/36

9/9

9/9

Sergey Shishin

X

X

36/36

4/4

4/4

4/4

Dmitry Shugaev

X

36/36

8/8

Persons who left the Board of Directors on 20.06.2012

Vladimir Bogdanov

Х

12/14

Andrey Kostin

X

Х

14/14

5/5

5/5

Nikolay Tokarev

X

14/14

4/4

Persons who joined the Board of Directors on 20.06.2012

Mikhail Kuzovlev

X

22/22

4/4

4/4

Nikolay Laverov

X

X

22/22

4/4

Ilya Shcherbovich

Х

22/22

4/4

Persons who left the Board of Directors on 30.11.2012

Eduard Khudainatov

Х

29/29

Persons who joined the Board of Directors on 30.11.2012

Igor Sechin

Х

7/7

Note: the first figure shows the number of meetings that a member of the Board of Directors attended; the second figure shows the total number of meetings that the member could have attended in 2012.

 

Activity of the Board of Directors in 2012

The Board of Directors held 36 meetings during 2012 (9 in the form of joint presence and 27 by voting in absentia), at which it reviewed and took decisions on various aspects of Company business.

Matters considered by the Board of Directors during the reporting period (matters in the competence of the Board of Directors in accordance with Article 65 of the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies as well as other matters concerning the Company's current business, which are in the Board's competence) were as follows:

 

·; organization of work by the Board of Directors and committees of the Board of Directors (12);

·; cooperation and implementation of business projects (22);

·; work of the Management Board (1);

·; membership of the Management Board and members of the Management Board who are concurrently members of the management bodies of other organizations (6);

·; approval of performance criteria and satisfaction of performance criteria by senior managers (2);

·; the carrying оut/approval of transactions, which fall within the competence of the Board of Directors in accordance with the Company Charter (53);

·; bonds placement and issue documents approval (on approval of bonds issue and listing prospectus) (1);

·; approval of performance indicators for CEOs of key Group companies (2);

·; approval, adjustment, and implementation of Company business plans (4);

·; amendments to organizational structure (2);

·; defining the position of the Company with respect to election (appointment) and early termination of the authorities of CEOs of key companies within the Group (7);

·; preparations for and holding of the Annual General and Extraordinary General Meetings of Shareholders (21);

·; approval of internal regulatory documents of the Company (6);

·; decisions on the making of amendments to the Company Charter as regards the creation of subsidiaries, and the opening and closing of Company representative offices (3).

 

Information concerning the most important issues has been disclosed by the Company in press-releases and in the form of communications on material facts/information, which may have substantial impact on the price of Company securities .

 

Committees of the Board of Directors

Rosneft has Board Committees for Audit, HR and Remuneration, and Strategic Planning, which carry out preliminary consideration of important issues and prepare relevant recommendations to the Board of Directors.

The formation and operation of Rosneft's BoD Committees is in accordance with the Regulation on the procedure for formation and operation of BoD Committees of Rosneft, the Regulation on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, the Regulation on the HR and Remuneration Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, and the Regulation on the Strategic Planning Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft (these Regulations were approved by decision of the Board of Directors on October 18, 2008, minutes №5).

The Committees consist of non-executive members of the Board of Directors of Rosneft and are headed by independent directors as of December 31, 2012.

Memberships of the Committees in the reporting year were determined by decisions of the Board of Directors of Rosneft in September 2011, June 2012 and November 2012.

 

Name of the Committee

Membership on 31.12.2012

Committee Functions

The Committee ensures interaction between the BoD and the following groups

Audit Committee

 

 

Hans-Joerg Rudloff (Chairman);

Sergey Shishin;

Matthias Warnig.

 

- - ensuring BoD participation in control over the Company's financial and operating activity;

- assessment of candidates to be Rosneft's external auditor, assessment of the auditor's opinion, of the quality of auditing services provided and observance by the auditor of auditing independence;

- assessment of the efficacy of procedures for internal control and risk management, and preparing proposals for their improvement;

- preliminary review of the Company's financial accounts;

- oversight of the completeness and accuracy of Rosneft's tax, financial and management accounting;

- oversight of the efficiency of work by structural subdivisions that carry out internal control and audit functions.

- - external auditors;

- - the Internal Audit Commission;

- - structural sub-divisions carrying out internal control and audit functions;

- - executive bodies.

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

 

 

Sergey Shishin (Chairman);

Matthias Warnig;

Hans-Joerg Rudloff;

Mikhail Kuzovlev.

 

Members of the HR and Remuneration Committee are not entitled to participate in evaluation of their own performance and decisions about their remuneration.

- ensuring that highly qualified specialists are hired to work as Company managers and creating necessary incentives for them to work successfully;

- participation in HR policy formation, design of principles and criteria for determining the scale of remuneration and compensation to members of the Board of Directors, Management Board, and senior executives of Rosneft;

- development of long-term remuneration programmes for Company employees;

- reviewing reports on sustainable development by the Company, prepared in compliance with international standards;

- jointly with the personnel department: preliminary assessment of candidates to key positions, and also preliminary approval of the forms and amounts of remuneration, compensation and other payments to such persons.

- structural sub-divisions responsible for personnel policy;

- executive bodies.

 

Strategic Planning Committee

 

 

Nikolay Laverov (Chairman);

Alexander Nekipelov;

Mikhail Kuzovlev;

Dmitry Shugaev;

Ilya Shcherbovich.

 

- defining strategic goals and developing business priorities of Rosneft;

- business planning, design of budgets and other business plans, and monitoring of their implementation;

- review and preparation for the Board of Directors of recommendations on issues concerning strategic development and management of the Company;

- monitoring and assessment of efficiency in the implementation of strategy, which has been approved by the Board of Directors;

- assessment of the efficiency of Company interaction with investors;

- analysis and provision of information to the Board of Directors concerning the main aspects of economic policy of the Russian Government in the Company's sphere of business;

- analysis of proposals by structural subdivisions responsible for strategic planning concerning approval, amendment, and implementation of Company development strategy;

- review of strategic investment projects.

- structural sub-divisions responsible for strategic planning;

- executive bodies.

 

Activity of Committees of the Board of Directors in 2012

 

Audit Committee

Activities of the Audit Committee were based on six-month plans. The Committee met 9 times in the course of the year, including five meetings in the form of joint presence and four meetings in absentia.

In each quarter, the Audit Committee carried out preliminary reviews of the consolidated financial accounts of Rosneft prepared in accordance with US GAAP (later IFRS) and also reviewed audits or overviews of these accounts. The Committee approved the work plan of the Internal Audit Department for 2012 and a report on the results of its work in 2011.

The Committee also gave consideration in the reporting year to:

·; Resolution on the Internal Audit Department of OJSC Rosneft

·; setting the price for ordinary shares of OJSC Rosneft for purposes of a buy-back of shares by the Company in line with the norms of the Federal law on Joint-Stock Companies, in accordance with the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting decision dated April 30, 2012 on major transactions approval;

·; anti-corruption policy. The policy sets out main goals and tasks, and approaches for achieving them, as well as main risks associated with anti-corruption work and actions to manage such risk. The Committee recommended the Board of Directors to approve the document, which was prepared in compliance the requirements of acting Russian law and applicable anti-corruption laws of Great Britain and any other country where the Company does business or is planning to do business.

·; Company policy for combatting corporate fraud. The policy sets goals and tasks for the Company and defines main approaches for carrying them out, as well as main risks associated with combatting corporate fraud and actions to manage such risks. The Committee recommended the Board of Directors to approve a document prepared in compliance with the requirements of current Russian law and with applicable anti-corruption law of Great Britain and any other country, where the Company does business or intends to do business;

·; reviewing the results of a competition among auditing organizations and giving an assessment of candidates to carry out audit of financial accounts of Rosneft and its subsidiaries, and of consolidated financial accounts in accordance with RAS. Recommendations were made on remuneration for the auditor's services in 2012.

·; (on a preliminary basis jointly with the Audit Commission) reviewing: conclusions of the Internal Audit Commission for 2011 (based on checks of Company operations and finances; checks of annual accounts; and of the accuracy of data in the Annual Report); recommendations to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders concerning the procedure for distribution of Company income, the amount of dividends to be paid for 2011, and the procedure for their payment; an assessment of the opinion of the Rosneft auditor concerning the Company's financial accounts for 2011 (including sub-divisions and subsidiaries);

·; recommending the Board of Directors to approve a method for calculation of a cost reduction applicable to procurement of goods (works, services) per unit of production by at least 10% annually for three years in real terms in 2010 prices, compliant with instructions issued by the President and Government of the Russian Federation.

 

The Audit Committee also prepared recommendations to the Rosneft Board of Directors on the following issues: preliminary approval of the Rosneft Annual Report for 2011 and of financial accounts for 2011.

In the course of 2012, the Chairman of the Audit Committee held regular meetings with senior managers of Rosneft, with representatives of external auditors, and with the head of the Internal Audit Department.

 

HR and Remuneration Committee

Actions by the Committee were based on approved six-month plans and the Committee held nine meetings in 2011.

The Committee prepared recommendations to the Board of Directors for the making of resolutions on issues, which included the following:

·; approval of performance indicators for senior managers of Rosneft in 2012;

·; achievement of performance targets by senior managers of Rosneft and amounts of their annual remuneration for 2011;

·; approval of individual performance indicators of CEOs and collective indicators for key companies in the Group for 2012;

·; defining the Company position in setting of annual bonuses for CEOs of key companies in the Group for 2011;

·; approving the Regulation on the Rosneft Council for Business Ethics;

·; reviewing the Company's sustainability report for 2011.

 

The Committee also reviewed the early termination of authorities of the Company President and appointment of a new President and members of the Company's Management Board.

The Chairman of the HR and Remuneration Committee met regularly with senior Company managers and the head of the HR Department as part of work for creation of a new organizational structure at Rosneft, and as part of joint design of an annual incentive system for Company personnel, based on performance indicators. Use of the new system will enable greater objectivity in assessing levels of achievement.

 

Strategic Planning Committee

Actions by the Strategic Planning Committee were based on approved six-month plans and five meetings were held during the reporting period.

The Committee prepared recommendations to the Board of Directors on the following issues:

·; approval of the full list of Group companies and programme (plan) for liquidation of companies;

·; review of the report on results of innovation work by Rosneft;

·; placement of securities;

·; on the expected results of the financinal and operational activities of Rosneft in first quarter 2012;

·; review of the development concept for CJSC RN-Energoneft up to 2014;

·; approval of the Company's Innovation Policy.

 

The Chairman and members of the Committee held regular working meetings in the course of the year with senior managers of the Company, and with the heads of structural sub-divisions involved in business planning and development of the Rosneft Development Strategy.

 

Management Bodies of Rosneft

Management of the current business of Rosneft is the responsibility of the Company's executive bodies: the Management Board (Collegial Executive Body) and the President (Chief Executive Officer), which are subordinated to the Board of Directors and the General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company.

The system of Rosneft management bodies and their work are regulated by:

·; the Rosneft Charter;

·; the Regulation on the Collegial Executive Body (Management Board), approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009);

·; the Regulation on the Chief Executive Office (President) , approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009);

·; the Code of Corporate Conduct, approved by the Board of Directors of the Company (minutes № 6, dated 17.05.2006) and amendments approved by the Board of Directors on 22.05.2007 and 30.12.2011.

 

The Management Board of Rosneft

In accordance with clause 12.3 of the Company Charter, members of the Management Board are appointed by the Board of Directors for a period of three years. The procedure for formation of the Management Board and requirements for professional qualifications of its members (including education and experience) are established by internal documents of the Company.

The following changes were made during 2012 to membership of the Company's Management Board:

 

·; the authorities of Pavel Fedorov as member of the Management Board were terminated ahead of schedule as from 24.04.2012 (minutes №18, dated 25.04.2012, of the Board of Directors meeting on 24.04.2012);

·; the authorities of Larisa Kalanda as Deputy Chairman of the Management Board were terminated as from 24.05.2012 without termination of her authorities as a member of the Management Board and Eduard Khudainatov was appointed as a member of the Management Board(he was appointed Deputy Chairman of the Management Board as from 25.05.2012) (minutes №23, dated 28.05.2012, of the Board of Directors meeting on 24.05.2012);

·; the number of members of the Management Board was increased from 5 to 11 as from 09.06.2012 and the following new members of the Management Board were appointed: Dmitry Avdeyev, Igor Pavlov, Didier Casimiro, Nail Mukhitov, Alexey Perepelkin (minutes №25, dated 13.06.2012, of the Board of Directors meeting on 09.06.2012);

·; the authorities of Alexey Perepelkin as member of the Management Board were terminated ahead of schedule as of 30.11.2012 and Zeljko Runje was appointed to the Board (minutes №1, dated 03.12.2012, of the Board of Directors meeting on 30.11.2012);

·; membership of the Management Board remained unchanged from December 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012.

 

Members of the Management Board of Rosneft (as of December 31, 2012)

 

Igor Sechin

Chairman of the Management Board, President of Rosneft.

Born in 1960. Graduated in 1984 from Leningrad State University. Doctoral Candidate in Economics. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 2000 to 2004 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.

From 2004 to 2008 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, Aide to the President of the Russian Federation.

From 2008 to 2012 - Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation.

From 2004 to 2011 - Chairman of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

From May 2012 - President, Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From November 2012 - member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

 

Eduard Khudainatov

Deputy Chairman of the Management Board.

Born in 1960. Graduated in 1996 from the International Business Academy, specializing in Trade. Completed a second higher education in 2000 at Tyumen State University, specializing in Law. Awarded state and industry prizes.

From 1993 to 1996 - Head of the companies Evikhon, Evikhon-2 and Yuganskpromfinco.

In 1996 - Deputy Head of the Administration of the town of Nefteyugansk, with responsibility for general issues.

From 1996 to 2000 - First Deputy Head of Nefteyugansk District, Head of Administration of the town of Poikovsky.

From 2000 to 2003 - Chief Federal Inspector for Nenets Autonomous District in the Office of the Representative of the President of the Russian Federation in the North-Western Federal District.

From 2003 to 2008 - CEO of OJSC Severneftegazprom.

From 2008 - Vice-President of Rosneft.

From 2009 to 2010 - First Vice-President of Rosneft, member of the Management Board.

From 2010 to 2012 - President and Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From 2011 until November 2012 - Member of the Board of Directors of Rosneft.

From June until November 2012 - Member of the Board of Directors Strategic and Planning Committee.

From May 2012 - First Vice-President, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

 

Dmitry Avdeyev

Vice-President of Rosneft

Born in 1973. Graduated in 1995 from Lomonosov Moscow State University, specializing in Applied Mathematics.

From 2006 to 2008 - Executive Director of Investment Banking at Morgan Stanley Bank LLC.

From 2008 to 2010 - Chief Financial Director of CJSC Integra Management.

From 2010 to 2012 - Managing Director of Investment Banking at Morgan Stanley Bank LLC.

From June 2012 to March 2013- Vice-President for Economics and Finance, member of the Management Board.

 

 

Gani Gilayev

Vice-President of Rosneft.

Born in 1956. Graduated in 1990 from Ufa Oil Institute specializing in development and operation of oil & gas fields.

From 1975 - Drilling Assistant at Vostokneft production unit (part of the Sakhalinneft conglomerate).

From 1993 to 2006 - management positions at Sakhalinmorneftegaz, Rosneft-Termneft and RN-Krasnodarneftegaz.

From 2006 to 2008 - CEO of Udmurtneft.

From 2008 to 2010 - Director of the Oil & Gas Production Department of Rosneft.

From 2010 to 2011 - Acting Vice-President of Rosneft with responsibility for production.

From November 2010 - member of the Management Board.

From September 2011 until December 2012 - Vice-President of Rosneft with responsibility for exploration and production.

 

Larisa Kalanda

State Secretary, Vice-President of Rosneft.

Born in 1964. Graduated from the Sverdlov Institute of Law in 1985, specializing in Law. Completed postgraduate studies at the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Belarus Academy of Sciences in 1994. Distinguished lawyer of the Russian Federation.

From 1997 - Deputy Head of the Legal Service of OJSC TNK and OJSC TNK-BP Management. From 2004 to 2006 - Vice-President of OJSC TNK-BP Management, responsible for legal support.

From 2006 to 2012 - Vice-President of Rosneft, responsible for legal support of Company business, and for designing and implementing legal policy to protect the assets and interests of the Company (of Company shareholders) and of subsidiary companies (equity affiliates). Also responsible for corporate governance since February 2011.

From 2009 until May 2012 - Deputy Chairman of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From May 2012 - member of the Management Board.

From December 2012 - State Secretary, Vice-President of Rosneft.

 

Didier Casimiro

Vice-President of Rosneft

Born in 1966. Graduated with distinction in 1991 from the University of Ghent ( Belgium), and in 1992 from the University of Ghent (Belgium)/University of Lisbon (Portugal). Fluent in seven languages.

From 1996 - Senior positions at BP.

From 2005 to 2012 - Senior positions at TNK-ВР.

From May 2012 - Vice-President of Rosneft for Commerce and Logistics

From June 2012 - member of the Management Board of Rosneft.

 

Petr Lazarev

Financial Director of Rosneft

Born in 1967. Graduated in 1990 from the Plekhanov Economics Institute (Moscow) specializing in finance and credit.

From 1990 to 1993 - occupied various posts at the USSR Ministry of Finance and the Russian Ministry of Economics and Finance.

From 1993 to 1995 - occupied various posts at the Securities Department of the International Joint-Stock Bank of Savings Banks.

From 1995 to 1996 - member of the Executive Board, Head of the Securities Department at the International Joint-Stock Bank of Savings Banks.

From 1996 to 1999 - occupied senior positions at ACB Center, CJSC Finco-Invest Finance Company, and Russian Industrial Bank.

From 2000 to 2004 - Head of Promissory Note and Investment Programmes in the Finance Department of OJSC Rosneft, Deputy Director, Head of the Securities Section of the Finance Department.

From June 2004 to 2012 - Head of Treasury at Rosneft.

From 2011 - member of the Management Board of Rosneft.

From February 2012 - Financial Director of Rosneft.

 

Nail Mukhitov

Vice-President - Head of the Security service of OJSC Rosneft.

In 2012 - Vice-President, Head of the Security Service of OJSC Rosneft.

In June 2012 - appointed as the member of the Management Board of Rosneft.

 

Igor Pavlov

Vice-President of Rosneft

Born in 1967. Graduated in 1995 from Angarsk Technology Institute, in 2001 from Irkutsk State Academy of Economics, in 2011 from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations attached to the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia.

From 1989 to 2008 - series of promotions at OJSC Angarsk Petrochemical Company (from equipment operator to Head of the Lubricants Plant).

From 2008 to 2012 - CEO of OJSC Achinsk Refinery (Eastern Oil Company).

In March 2012 - appointed as Vice-President of Rosneft for Refining.

In June 2012 - appointed as the member of the Management Board of Rosneft..

 

Zeljko Runje

Vice President of Rosneft

Born in 1954. Graduated with distinction from Alaska State University

From 1979 to 1993 - Management positions in drilling and production projects in the Arctic region of Alaska.

From 1993 to 1997 - Worked in oil projects in Yemen, Algeria, Australia, Thailand, Japan, Angola, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan.

From 1997 to October 2012 - Senior posts in the Sakhalin-1 project, Vice-President of ExxonMobil Russia Inc.

From October 2012 - Vice President of Rosneft for Shelf Projects.

In November 2012 - appointed as the member of the Management Board of Rosneft.

 

The President of Rosneft

In accordance with clause 11.3 of the Company Charter, the President is appointed by the Board of Directors for a period of three years.

The authorities of the President of Rosneft, Eduard Khudainatov, were terminated ahead of schedule with effect from May 23, 2012 by a resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company on May 23, 2012 (minutes №22, 23.05.2012); Igor Sechin was appointed President of the Company for a period of three years with effect from May 24, 2012.

Remuneration of Members of the Board of Directors and Management

 

The Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies stipulates that, by decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders, members of the Board of Directors may be paid remuneration and/or compensation of their costs associated with exercise by them of their functions during the period when they are in office. The scale of such remuneration and compensation is established by decision of the General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Criteria for levels of remuneration

Criteria for setting levels of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors are established by the Regulation on the procedure for calculation and payment of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors and compensation of their expenses, which was approved by the Rosneft Board of Directors on April 28, 2009 (minutes №4), with amendments approved by the Board of Directors on April 27, 2012 (minutes №19).

In accordance with this Regulation, remuneration is paid to members of the Board of Directors who have independent status, and to members of the Board of Directors who are authorized representatives of the interests of the Russian Federation in the Board of Directors, except for Board members who are also state officials and the CEO of Rosneft (the Company President).

A maximum possible level of remuneration during the reporting period is set for members of the Board of Directors, and this level is approved by the Board of Directors.

Factors taken into account in setting the final amount of remuneration for work in the reporting period are:

- actual participation in work as Chairman of the Board of Directors and as a member of the Board of Directors;

- actual participation in work of the Board of Directors Committee as the Chairman and as a member of the Committee.

 

The Board of Directors of Rosneft can recommend lowering the final amount of remuneration to members of the Board of Directors taking account of the financial situation of the Company. The Board of Directors also gives recommendations as to whether remuneration will be paid in the form of cash or shares of Rosneft.

Rosneft compensates all expenses associated with execution by members of the Board of Directors of their functions (accommodation, meals, travel, including VIP lounge services, and other payments and tariffs for air and (or) rail transport services), as well as costs arising for a Board member in connection with proceedings brought by third parties (including expenses for defense in court, etc.) as a result of actions by the Board member if the actions which caused the proceedings to be brought were carried out by the Board member in the interests of the Company. The Company also compensates expenses which may be incurred by a member of the Board of Directors in connection with administrative, criminal or other court action arising from his or her activities as a member of the Board.

 

Based on a recommendation of the Board of Directors Rosneft dated April 27, 2012 (minutes №19, 02.05.2012) the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 20, 2012 resolved to approve remuneration to the following members of the Board of Directors for the period of execution of their duties by transfer of the following amounts of shares in Rosneft:

·; Alexander Nekipelov - 28,944 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Andrey Kostin - 26,925 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Hans-Joerg Rudloff - 26,925 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Sergey Shishin - 24,906 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Nikolay Tokarev - 22,213 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Dmitry Shugaev - 22,213 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Vladimir Bogdanov - 17,408 shares (for the periods from 10.06.2011 to 13.09.2011 and from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012);

·; Matthias Warnig - 16,260 shares (for the period from 13.09.2011 to 20.06.2012).

 

The Shareholder Meeting also confirmed payment of compensation for expenses incurred by members of the Board of Directors in connection with exercise by them of their functions, specifically expenses for: accommodation, meals, travel (including VIP lounge services), and other payments and tariffs for air and (or) railway transport services.

 

Remuneration of Management

Remuneration paid to senior management (President, First Vice-President, Vice-Presidents and officials of equivalent rank) and the heads of independent sub-divisions of Rosneft consists of monthly salary and an annual premium.

No additional remuneration is paid to Company managers for their work in management bodies of Rosneft or its subsidiaries and equity affiliates (the Rosneft Management Board, the boards of directors of subsidiaries).

The level of monthly wage is stipulated in labor contracts, which are made when managers are hired.

An annual bonus is paid to managers only after approval by the Board of Directors of a relevant decision based on Company performance in the reporting year. The bonus consists of two parts: a part referring to the manager's individual results and a part referring to team results (in the manager's sphere of business and for the Company as a whole).The annual bonus of the Company President is established depending on achievement by him or her of individual performance indicators, which correspond to key indicators of Company performance.

Approval of key performance indicators and review of their achievement are carried out as follows:

·; performance criteria are compiled on the basis of the Company's development strategy and Company tasks in the reporting year;

·; individual performance criteria for senior managers and collective performance indicators are approved by the Board of Directors of Rosneft;

·; individual criteria for performance by heads of independent sub-divisions are approved by the Management Board of Rosneft;

·; at the end of the reporting year appropriate services within the Company measure achievement of key performance criteria (collective and individual), using audited consolidated financial accounts and management accounts;

·; the amount of bonuses for senior managers are approved by the Rosneft Board of Directors, and bonuses for the heads of independent sub-divisions are approved by the Management Board.

The structure of remuneration to management (ratio of its fixed and variable parts) corresponds to generally accepted international practice.

A bonus may be paid to senior managers and to other personnel for outstanding contributions to Company development during the reporting period.

 

Internal Control and Audit

 

Rosneft has a system of supervisory control over its business, consisting of the Audit Commission, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, Company governing bodies, Company management, the Internal Audit Department.

Subordination and coordination between elements of the control system ensure a level of independence which is essential for efficient functioning, and which corresponds to the latest international practice in this field.

 

Audit Commission

The Audit Commission is a key part of the system of control over Company financial and operating activities. The Company has a Regulation on the Audit Commission, approved with amendments by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 19, 2009 (unnumbered minutes, dated 29.06.2009).

The Commission consists of five members elected by the General Meeting of Shareholders and exercises its function until the next year's General Meeting. A Company shareholder and any person proposed by a shareholder can serve as a member of the Commission. Members of the Audit Commission cannot serve at the same time as members of the Board of Directors or occupy other posts in Company management bodies. The principal function of the Audit Commission is to exercise oversight over Rosneft's business, its management bodies, officials, sub-divisions, services and representative offices.

Audit of the business of Rosneft is carried out on the basis of business results for the year (a scheduled audit) or at any other time, subject to a decision or order by entities or persons who have the right to initiate such an audit. An internal audit may be carried out following a decision by the Audit Commission, by the General Meeting of Shareholders, or by the Board of Directors, and at the request of a shareholder (shareholders), who own (alone or jointly) no less than 10% of voting shares of the Company.

The following tasks fall within the scope of the Audit Commission:

 

·; review of the Company's financial documents, financial accounts, reports by inventory commissions, and comparison of these documents with primary book-keeping data;

·; analysis of accuracy and completeness of financial, tax, management and statistical accounting;

·; audit of correct execution of the Company's operating and financial planning, as approved by the Board of Directors;

·; audit of correct execution of the procedure, approved by the General Meeting of Shareholders, for distribution of Company income for the financial year;

·; analysis of the financial position of the Company, its solvency, asset liquidity, gearing ratio, net assets, and charter capital, identification of ways of improving the financial position of the Company, and preparing recommendations to management bodies;

·; audit of timeliness and correctness of payments to suppliers of goods and services, of payments to the state budget and to non-budget funds, accrual and payment of dividends and bond interest, and settlement of other liabilities;

·; confirmation of the accuracy of data in the Company's Annual Report(s), in annual financial accounts, and in accounting documentation prepared for tax and statistics agencies and for executive government bodies;

·; audit of competence of the President to make agreements in the Company's name;

·; audit of competence in decisions taken by the Board of Directors, the President, Management Board and the Liquidation Commission, and their compliance with the Company Charter and decisions by the General Meeting of Shareholders;

·; analysis of decisions by the General Meeting of Shareholders to determine their compliance with law and with the Company Charter.

 In accordance with its approved work schedule for 2012-2013, the Audit Commission carried out two audits: on implementation of refinery modernization program in the frames of obligation execution, prescribed by the Agreement, and on audit (examination) of Company financial and operational activities; prepared reports on audit results, accounts for the year, and also concerning the accuracy of information in the Annual Report.

 

Membership of the Audit Commission (as of December 31, 2012)

The following membership of the Audit Commission was elected by resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft on June 20, 2012:

 

Georgy Nozadze

Chairman of the Audit Commission

Year of birth: 1979

Education: Higher

Organization: Administration of the President of the Russian Federation

Official post: Referent of the Expert Directorate of the President of the Russian Federation 

 

Elena Litvina

Year of birth: 1987

Education: Higher

 

Sergey Pakhomov

Year of birth: 1983

Education: Higher

Organization: Chief Control Directorate for the City of Moscow

Official post: Deputy Head

Tatyana Fisenko

Year of birth: 1961
Education: Higher professional
Organization: Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation

Official post: Department Director

 

Alexander Yugov

Year of birth: 1981

Education: Higher professional

Organization: Federal Agency for State Property Management

Official post: Head of Directorate

 

Members of the Audit Commission did not receive any remuneration for their work in the Audit Commission during the reporting year.

 

Audit Committee of the Board of Directors

The formation and activities of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors are defined by the Regulation on the procedure for formation and operation of BoD Committees of Rosneft and the Regulation on the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Rosneft, approved by a decision of the Board of Directors of the Company on October 18, 2008 (minutes № 5).

In addition to its principal functions, the Committee also carries out preliminary review and preparation of draft resolutions of the Board of Directors on the following matters:

·; preliminary approval of the Company Annual Report;

·; setting the level of remuneration for the services of the external auditor;

·; recommendations to the General Meeting of Shareholders concerning distribution of profit and loss from business in the financial year, and the amount of dividends and the procedure for their payment;

·; coordination of internal procedures for risk management, analysis of their efficiency, ensuring their observance;

·; approval of the Regulation on internal control over Company business including approval of the Regulation on internal control, document audits and reviews;

·; approval of major transactions in the instances specified by the Federal Law on Joint-stock Companies and of non-standard operations and transactions (transactions not foreseen in Company business plans), which entail or may entail adjustments to the Company business plan;

·; a decision on audit of Company business by the Audit Commission;

 

Internal Audit Department

The Internal Audit Department was set up in 2011 and combines Control and Audit Division, the Directorate for Internal Audit and Directorate for Internal Audit Methodology.

The Department reports directly to the Company President and accountable to the Board of Directors through the Board's Audit Committee.

The main tasks of the Internal Audit Department are:

 

·; assessing efficiency of the internal control system of the Company at the corporate level and the level of business processes, and consultation with Company management regarding the efficiency of the system;

·; control over the efficiency of Company investment projects;

·; conduct of reviews of Company business and of the business of subsidiaries and equity affiliates;

·; assessing risk management efficiency and design of recommendations for improving risk management processes;

·; assessing the efficiency of management processes at the Company and its subsidiaries (equity affiliates) and designing recommendations for their improvement.

 

The Department collaborates with Company management bodies and with the Audit Commission and external auditors of the Company, and with audit commissions (internal auditors) and external auditors of subsidiaries (equity affiliates) of the Company.

The results of internal audit are presented for review by the Company President, who is also the Chairman of the Management Board.

The Internal Audit Department works with the heads of structural sub-divisions on ways of dealing with violations and failures, which have been identified, and on design of measures to avoid risks.

The Director of the Internal Audit Department reports periodically to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the Company President concerning the objectives, authorities and duties of internal auditors, and also concerning the schedule for audit, supervision and control work.

 

Company Auditors

 

CJSC ACG RBS

By decision of the General Meeting of Company Shareholders, Closed Joint-stock Company Auditing and Consulting Group Business Systems Development (CJSC ACG RBS) was appointed to carry out independent audit of book-keeping and financial accounts of Rosneft for 2012, prepared to Russian Accounting Standards.

 

Procedure for selection of the external auditor

As prescribed by clause 1 of Article 5 of the Federal Law on Auditing and Article 86 of the Federal Law on Joint Stock Companies, the annual financial accounts of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company, prepared under RAS, are subject to obligatory audit to confirm the accuracy of the reporting data, which they contain.

The Company therefore holds an annual open tendering competition to select an auditor, as stipulated by internal documents. The Company's tendering sub-committee selects the winner of the competition after reviewing the tenders received, and assessing and comparing them in accordance with criteria and procedures indicated in the call to tender and the tender documentation, and also taking account of the price of the tender services.

The proposed winner of the annual tendering competition for choice of an auditing organization is put forward for consideration by the BoD Audit Committee of Rosneft. Based on the recommendation of the BoD Audit Committee, the Board of Directors takes a decision on the candidacy for the role of auditor to be proposed for approval by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.

 

Payment for the services of the external auditor

Remuneration payable to the auditor is determined on the basis of planned working time and hourly rates of the auditor's specialists, as indicated in the auditor's commercial proposal.

Based on the recommendation of the BoD Audit Committee, the Board of Directors set the price for audit by CJSC ACG RBS of Rosneft annual financial accounts to Russian Accounting Standards for 2011 at RUB 2,823,150 including VAT.

Rosneft occasionally calls on the services of CJSC ACG RBS for execution of special tasks and resolution of methodological issues.

 

LLC Ernst & Young

LLC Ernst & Young audits consolidated annual accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards as well as overview of interim (quarterly) consolidated accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards.

 

Procedure for selection of the external auditor

The auditor is selected through a closed tender, carried out by the Company among the Big 4 auditing firms. The selection is made on the basis of a thorough analysis of tendering proposals in order to establish their suitability for Company needs.

The candidate for the role of auditor of annual accounts prepared in accordance with international accounting standards is assessed and approved by the BoD Audit Committee. Confirmation of the candidate by the General Meeting of Shareholders is not required.

Based on the analysis of proposals, the BoD Audit Committee decided to appoint the company Ernst & Young LLC as the auditor of Rosneft's consolidated annual accounts for 2012 prepared in accordance with international accounting standards.

 

Payment for services of the external auditor

Remuneration payable to LLC Ernst & Young for its services is determined by the BoD Audit Committee on the basis of planned working time and hourly rates of the auditor's specialists, as indicated in the auditor's commercial proposal. In accordance with the contract for provision of auditing services between Rosneft and LLC Ernst & Young, the terms and sum of remuneration are confidential information and cannot be disclosed.

 

Share Capital

 

The authorized capital of Rosneft as of December 31, 2012, was RUB 105,981,778.17 and was divided into 10,598,177,817 ordinary shares with par value of RUB 0.01 each.

In accordance with the Charter, the Company has the right to additional placement of 6,332,510,632 ordinary shares with par value of RUB 0.01 each and with total par value of RUB 63,325,106.32 (authorized shares) and offering the same rights as outstanding ordinary shares of Rosneft. A decision on increase of Rosneft charter capital by placement through open subscription of additional authorized shares in the Company, not exceeding 25% of total outstanding shares of Rosneft, is taken by the Board of Directors. In other instances a decision is taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders.

The state registration number of issue of ordinary shares of the Company is 1‑02-00122‑А.

The date of state registration of issue of ordinary shares of the Company is September 29, 2005.

No issues or placement of additional shares of Rosneft were carried out in 2012.

The number of shareholders registered in the shareholder register of Rosneft as of December 31, 2012 (without disclosure of information by nominee shareholders) was 30,966 (including 12 nominee shareholders). The number of nominee shareholders decreased by three in comparison with December 31, 2011.

Rosneft had no preferred shares as of December 31, 2012.

In 2007-2012 the Russian Government owned 75.16 % of shares in Rosneft through OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ, which is in 100% federal ownership. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (in the person of the Federal Agency for State Property Management) was 0.000000009%. The Russian Federation did not have a special right to participation in management of Rosneft (a 'golden share').

 

Shareholders of Rosneft owning more than 1% of share capital

Main shareholders of Rosneft

December 31, 2011

December 31, 2012

Shareholders

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

Number of shares

Stake in share capital, %

OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ*

7,965,816,383

75.16

7,965,816,383

75.16

LLC RN-Razvitie**

1,010,158,003

9.53

1,038,671,642

9.80

OJSC Sberbank of Russia (nominee)

1,343,007,712

12.67

1,079,159,409

10.18

Other legal entities owning more than 1% of shares

229,595,839

2.17

139,741,822

1.32

The Russian Federation in the person of the Federal Agency for State Property Management

1

less than 0.01

1

less than 0.01

Individuals

49,599,879

0.47

53,010,405

0.50

Treasury shares on the balance sheet of Rosneft***

0

0.00

321,778,155

3.04

TOTAL

10 598 177 817

100.00

10 598 177 817

100.00

 

* OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ is in 100% federal ownership. The stake in OJSC Rosneft Oil Company owned directly by the Russian Government (in the person of the Federal Agency for State Property Management) is 0.000000009% (one share).

** 100% in LLC RN-Razvitie is held by LLC RN-Trade. 99.9999% in LLC RN-Trade is held by OJSC Rosneft and 0.0001% is held by LLC Neft-Aktiv, which is a 100% subsidiary of OJSC Rosneft. Consequently OJSC Rosneft indirectly holds a 100% stake in LLC RN-Razvitie. Rosneft shares owned by LLC RN-Razvitie are reflected as treasury shares in the Company's consolidated financial statements under IFRS.

*** Shares purchased at the request of shareholders in 2012 in accordance with Articles 75 and 76 of the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies.

 

Rosneft updated information each month during 2012 on its corporate Internet site concerning shareholders who own more than 1% of its Charter capital. Rosneft's management has no information about any shareholders with equity stakes exceeding 1% (shareholders of Rosneft with equity stakes exceeding 1% of total outstanding shares), other than those listed above.

Rosneft's shares are traded on an organized securities market in Russia: CJSC MICEX Stock Exchange (B List). The rights of a shareholder (owner of ordinary shares), including voting rights on each voting share of Rosneft, are specified by Article 5.8 of the Company Charter.

Order № 06-1380/pz-i of the Federal Service for Financial Markets dated June 20, 2006, permits placement and trading of 2,140,000,000 ordinary shares of Rosneft outside the Russian Federation.

In July 2006, Rosneft carried out listing of Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs) on the London Stock Exchange. The issue of GDRs, which certify rights in respect of ordinary shares of Rosneft in accordance with foreign law, was carried out by J.P. Morgan Europe Limited. One Global Depositary Receipt is equivalent to one ordinary share of Rosneft. As of December 31, 2012, GDRs were issued for 978 mln ordinary shares, representing 9.2% of total outstanding shares.

A list of the rights of owners of common shares of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company is presented in Paragraph 5.8 of the Company Charter, which is posted on the Rosneft website (www.rosneft.ru).

 

Information on ownership of Rosneft shares by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board of the Company

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Number of common shares (as of December 31, 2012)

Stake in share capital, %

Alexander Nekipelov

28,944

0.0003%

Nikolay Laverov

-

-

Hans-Joerg Rudloff

511,876 (shares and GDRs)

0.0048%

Sergey Shishin

24,906

0.0002%

Mikhail Kuzovlev

-

-

Ilya Shcherbovich

-

-

Dmitry Shugaev

22,213

0.0002%

Matthias Warnig

16,260

0.0002%

Igor Sechin

-

-

Eduard Khudainatov

6,414,330

0.0605%

Dmitry Avdeyev

393,770

0.0037%

Didier Casimiro

-

-

Gani Gilaev

337,832

0.0032%

Larisa Kalanda

1,250,958

0.0118%

Petr Lazarev

111,575

0.0011%

Nail Mukhitov

-

-

Igor Pavlov

295

0.000003%

Zeljko Runje

-

-

 

Transactions by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board with securities of Rosneft

 

The Company's Regulation on insider information obliges members of the Board of Directors, the Management Board, and the Company President to disclose information on any transactions which they carry out with Rosneft securities.

Transactions were carried out with Company securities in 2012 by members of the Board of Directors and Management Board of Rosneft. Details of such transactions were presented to the Company in compliance with the procedure and time limits stipulated by internal documents and were disclosed on the securities market in compliance with acting legislation.

 

Members of the Board of Directors and Management Board

Transaction date

Number of shares/GDRs bought or sold

Transaction type

Alexander Nekipelov

August 2012

25,852

Disposal

Eduard Khudainatov

June 2012

844,270

Purchase

Dmitry Avdeyev

August 2012

393,770

Purchase

Gani Gilaev

June 2012

214,040

Purchase

Larisa Kalanda

June 2012

376,790

Purchase

Petr Lazarev

June 2012

40,680

Purchase

Dividend Policy

On May 17, 2006 Rosneft's Board of Directors voted to approve the Regulation on dividend policy, which was developed in accordance with Russian legislation, the Company Charter, and the Code of Corporate Conduct.

Rosneft's dividend policy strikes a balance between shareholders' interests and the Company's business needs, and is intended to improve Rosneft's investment attractiveness and shareholder value. The Company strictly observes the rights, and does all it can to increase the returns of its shareholders.

On June 10, 2011, the General Meeting of Shareholders approved amendments to the Rosneft Charter, reducing the period for payment of dividends to 60 days (from the date of the decision to pay dividends). It was also established that payment of dividends on shares of each category is carried out simultaneously to all holders of shares in that category.

The decision to pay dividends (and the amount of dividends and the form of payment) is taken by the General Meeting of Shareholders of Rosneft, based on recommendations of the Board of Directors. As stated in the Regulation on Dividend Policy, the Board is guided in its decisions on dividend amounts by the level of net income, as reflected in the non-consolidated financial accounts of Rosneft to Russian Accounting Standards. Recommendations by the Board of Directors on the amount of dividends to be paid are determined by the Company's financial results for the year, but are usually equal to at least 10% of net income.

On April 27, 2012 the Board of Directors recommended the General Meeting of Shareholders to allocate 15.4% of non-consolidated net income of Rosneft in 2011, or RUB 36,563.7 mln, for the payment of dividends. The recommended payment was RUB 3.45 per ordinary share, exceeding the level in the previous year by 25%. On June 20, 2012 the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders accepted the Board recommendation for payment of dividends. A total of RUB 36,530.8 mln were paid to shareholders.

Rosneft pursues a strategy of steady increase in the amount of its dividend payments. In determining the amount of annual dividends, the Board of Directors takes account of the dividend policy of other leading oil & gas companies. A number of other factors may also have an impact on the size of dividend payments, including: the Company's business prospects, its financial situation and financing needs, and the overall macroeconomic situation and market environment, as well as other factors, including aspects connected with tax and legislation.

On September 17, 2012 the Board of Directors recommended the General Meeting of Shareholders to allocate a further RUB 41,927.7 mln for the payment of dividends on business results in 2011, representing RUB 4.08 per ordinary share. An Extraordinary Meeting of Shareholders on November 30, 2012 decided to pay dividends in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors.

As a result the total amount of net income allocated for payment of dividends on business results in 2011 was RUB 78,491.4 mln (25% of IFRS net income), and the total dividend per ordinary share was RUB 7.53. A sum of RUB 7.53 was paid to the Russian Federal Budget and RUB 59,983 mln were paid to OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ (in 100% federal ownership).

Rosneft had no dividend payments outstanding to the Federal Budget and to OJSC ROSNEFTEGAZ at the end of 2012.

Dividends were paid to all persons recorded in the Rosneft register of shareholders, except for persons, information on whom was not provided in full by a nominee shareholder, and persons who had not informed the register holder in a timely fashion of a change in the data recorded on their registration form.

Rosneft has carried out the instruction of the President of the Russian Federation to increase dividend payments for 2011 to 25% of net income to international accounting standards.

On April 30 2013 the Board of Directors of Rosneft will consider the size of dividends for 2012 to be recommended  to the General Meeting of Shareholders for approval.

 

Dividend history of Rosneft

Dividends per share1, RUB

Total dividends announced, RUB mln

Total dividends paid, RUB mln

Payout ratio under RAS, %

1999

0.0221

200

200

3.4%

2000

0.0887

800

800

5.3%

2001

0.1219

1,100

 1,100

 11.0%

2002

0.1663

1,500

1,500

16.8%

2003

0.1650

1,500

1,500

8.1%

2004

0.1931

1,775

1,775

10.0%

Dividends paid out after the IPO, which closed on July 18, 2006

2005

1.25

11,335

11,336

20.0%

2006

1.33

14,096

14,079

13.3%2

2007

1.60

16,957

16,936

10.5%

2008

1.92

20,349

20,326

14.4%

2009

2.30

24,376

24,341

11.7%

2010

2.76

29,251

29,218

15.2%

2011

3.45

36,564

36,531

33.1%

4.08

41,928

41,881

(1) The dividend amounts, which are shown, take account of the 1:100 share split carried out in September 2005

(2) Net income for 2006 corrected for non-recurring items.

Information Disclosure

Rosneft policy on information disclosure is governed by the requirements of the Federal Law on the Securities Market, the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies, and the Regulation on Information Disclosure by Issuers of Securities, as approved by the Order No.11-46/pz-n of the Federal Financial Markets Service, dated October 4, 2011 ('the Regulation on Information Disclosure'). Company policy in this sphere is also guided by the requirements of stock exchanges where the Company's shares are listed, Rosneft's own Regulation on Information Policy, and other requirements and regulatory acts.

Rosneft's information disclosure policy is based on the principles of regularity, timeliness, accessibility, accuracy, and completeness. The Company provides timely and full disclosure of information to interested parties on all aspects of its business (except for instances where the information represents a commercial secret).

The main disclosure mechanism is the Rosneft website, which provides information on material facts and events, management structure, and the Company's business results. The Rosneft website presents the Charter and other internal documents, annual reports and sustainable development reports, quarterly reports to Russian accounting standards and quarterly reports to IFRS standards as well as management discussion and analysis (MD&A), the Analyst Data Book, presentations, press releases, and information on affiliated entities and other information, which may influence prices for Company shares. Rosneft's corporate website is updated regularly, in accordance with the Company's internal regulations.

In compliance with the requirements of the Regulation on information disclosure, the Company also uses the Internet page provided by CJSC Interfax (a distributor of securities market information) for the publication of information in the Internet.

The Company also provides information in the form of brochures and booklets, and through regular meetings, conference calls and press conferences with interested parties. At the request of shareholders, the Company provides copies of main internal documents, documentation connected with holding of the General Meeting of Shareholders, lists of affiliated entities and other documents in accordance with the standards set out in the Federal Law on Joint-Stock Companies.

 

Enhancing information transparency

Information transparency is among the chief corporate governance principles at Rosneft. The latest study by the international rating agency Standard & Poor's found Rosneft to be the leader among Russian companies in the sphere of information transparency. During 2012 the Company continued to work intensively to raise levels of information transparency and to ensure an efficient system of shareholder and investor relations, as evidenced by the following facts:

 

·; the Company took first place in the nomination 'Best annual report in the oil & gas sector' and third place in the nomination 'Best design and production of an annual report' at the 15th Annual Reports Competition held in 2012 by the Joint RTS-MICEX Stock Exchange;

·; Rosneft was a prize winner in the competition 'Best Annual Reports in 2011', organized by Expert RA rating agency, in the category 'Best level of information disclosure on corporate governance in an annual report' and was short-listed in the category 'Best design and production of an annual report';

·; Rosneft won a prize for 'Best work with investors by the CFO of a large-cap company' in the competition held annually by IR Magazine among Russian companies.

The Company devotes particular attention to raising the efficiency of its interactions with shareholders and investors as part of its efforts to further increase information transparency and openness. Telephone numbers and electronic mail boxes are constantly available for enquires by shareholders and investors. A call center (including a hot line) has also been set up for shareholders.

In 2012, as part of its interaction with institutional investors and analysts, Rosneft held regular presentations of its financial results under IFRS, as well as meetings in Russia and main international financial centers, and teleconferences.

Transparency of financial information is another important element of corporate governance. On February 1, 2013 Rosneft was the first large international oil & gas company to publish audited consolidated financial accounts under IFRS for 2012.

As part of its interaction with interested parties and in compliance with the Company's sustainable development policy, Rosneft has held round tables every year since 2007 in regions where it has operations (15 round tables were held in the course of 2012). The themes of the round tables are as follows:

Socio-economic cooperation;

Cooperation with respect to the environment and protection of the environment;

Cooperation in the sphere of health & safety;

Cooperation in the sphere of charity and sponsorship .

In addition to round tables, held by the Company on a voluntary basis, Rosneft subsidiaries comply with legislation by holding obligatory social and environmental hearings regarding new projects and projects associated with the modernization and restructuring of production capacities.

Rosneft pays special attention to improving information disclosure in preparation of its Sustainable Development Report. In 2012 the Report was prepared at level A+ (the highest level for information disclosure under the international GRI sustainability reporting guidelines) and passed an independent audit by Ernst & Young as well as public affirmation by a council of experts.

 

Responsibility Statement

 

To the best of my knowledge, and in accordance with the applicable reporting principles, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of Rosneft. The management report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal opportunities and risks associated with the expected development of Rosneft.

 

Igor Sechin

President of OJSC Rosneft Oil Company

 

February 1, 2013

 

This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
 
END
 
 
FR IMMMTMBTJBMJ
Date   Source Headline
17th Oct 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Listing Cancellation
15th Sep 20228:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: 1H 2022 IFRS Results
16th Aug 20225:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft informs about submission of a notification for automatic conversion of GDRs
1st Jul 20227:21 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Holds Annual General Meeting of Shareholders
30th Jun 20223:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Report on Payments to Governments for 2021
30th May 20228:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft’s Board of Directors Recommends Record-High Dividends for 2021
14th Mar 20221:15 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft's Board of Directors Approved Resumption of Share Acquisition Program
2nd Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20224:41 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
1st Mar 20224:36 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
1st Mar 20222:30 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: PDMR Shareholding
24th Feb 20224:42 pmRNSSecond Price Monitoring Extn
24th Feb 20224:37 pmRNSPrice Monitoring Extension
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
11th Feb 20227:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for 4Q and 12M 2021
4th Feb 202210:33 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC agreed to cooperate in the field of low carbon development
4th Feb 20229:16 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and CNPC strengthen oil supply cooperation
18th Jan 202212:40 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and SPIMEX sign an agreement on cooperation in the development of exchange trading in carbon units
28th Dec 202111:20 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is the best Russian oil and gas company in the RAEX-Europe ESG rating
21st Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Board of Directors Approves 'ROSNEFT-2030' Strategy
17th Dec 20214:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
15th Dec 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Upgraded its Position in S&P Global's International ESG Rating
13th Dec 20219:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft is among the Best Performing Oil and Gas Companies in CDP's International Climate Rating
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for Q3 2021
12th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for Q3 2021
11th Nov 20217:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividend Payment for H1 2021
14th Oct 20212:20 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Sale of 5% in Vostok Oil to a Consortium of Vitol and MME
1st Oct 20211:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: EGM Results
20th Sep 202112:00 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft became the only Russian O&G company announced as Global Compact LEAD
1st Sep 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Director/PDMR Shareholding
24th Aug 20217:48 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft BoD recommended first half of 2021 dividends at 18.03 rubles per share, representing 50% of the Company's IFRS net profit attributable to Rosneft shareholders
13th Aug 20218:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating results for 2Q and 1H 2021
13th Aug 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 2Q 2021 and 1H 2021
15th Jul 20219:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Completion of Dividends Payment for 2020
30th Jun 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Report on Payments to Governments for 2020
10th Jun 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Signes Heads of Terms for the Sale of a 5% stake in Vostok Oil
2nd Jun 20211:02 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: AGM Results
14th May 20218:01 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial Results for Q1 2021
14th May 20218:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operating Results for Q1 2021
30th Apr 202112:39 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft Publishes Annual Report for 2020
23rd Apr 20217:45 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: BoD Approves AGM Agenda and Recommends Dividends for 2020
12th Mar 20212:05 pmEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Nominees to the Board of Directors
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Operatings results for 4Q and 12M 2020
12th Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Financial results for 4Q 2020 and 12M 2020
5th Feb 202110:30 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Agreement Signed on Investment Incentives for Priobskoye Field
4th Feb 20219:38 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Rosneft and BP Agree to Cooperate on Carbon Management and Sustainability
3rd Feb 202111:00 amEQSROSNEFT OIL COMPANY: Reconfirmed as a Constituent in the FTSE4Good Index Series Leading on Core Sustainability Metrics
4th Jan 20217:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransactions Completion
29th Dec 20207:00 amRNSTransaction in Own Shares

Due to London Stock Exchange licensing terms, we stipulate that you must be a private investor. We apologise for the inconvenience.

To access our Live RNS you must confirm you are a private investor by using the button below.

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.

Quickpicks are a member only feature

Login to your account

Don't have an account? Click here to register.