30 Apr 2009 16:36
ο»Ώ
DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT
Mr Evgueni I. Ivanov, General Director ofΒ OJSC Polyus GoldΒ confirms on behalf of the Board of Directors that:
(a) the consolidated financial statements for the year 2008, prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss ofΒ OJSC Polyus Gold and its consolidated subsidiaries (the "Polyus Group"); and
(b) the management reportΒ Β for the year 2008Β includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Polyus Group, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.
NeitherΒ OJSC Polyus Gold nor the directors accept any liability to any person in relation to the management report except to the extent that such liability could arise under English law. Accordingly, any liability to a person who has demonstrated reliance on any untrue or misleading statement or omission shall be determined in accordance with Section 90A of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000.
EVGUENI I. IVANOV
General Director
30Β April 2009
Management reportΒ
Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operationsΒ for 2008
The followingΒ Management report (ManagementΒ discussion and analysis of the Polyus Group's financial condition and results of operations)Β should be read in conjunction with the Polyus Group's consolidated financial statements and the related notes.Β
The Polyus Group is the largest gold producer in the Russian Federation and among the largest gold mining companies in the world, based on mineral resources and production volumes.Β
Polyus Gold Shares are traded on the leading Russian stock exchanges, MICEX and RTS. Polyus Gold's ADRs are listed on the main market of the London Stock Exchange and traded on the over-the-counter markets in the United States. Polyus Gold Shares are included in the key Russian stock exchange indices of MICEX and RTS, and international stock exchange indices such as FTSE Gold Mines and MSCI Emerging Markets. The Polyus Group produced 1.2 million troy ounces of gold in 2008.
The following discussion and analysisΒ represents the management's opinion in relation to the Polyus Group's operating and financial results, including discussions of:
Β Β Table of contents
1. The Polyus Group's operating results
1.1 External market factors affecting the Polyus Group's financial results
1.2 Gold sales
1.3 Cost of gold sales
1.4 Selling, general and administrative expenses
1.5 Research and exploration expenses
1.6 OtherΒ expenses, net
1.7 Finance costs, income/(loss)Β from investments and foreign exchange gain/(loss)
1.8 Income tax
1.9 Other sales and cost of other sales
2. Non-GAAP financial measures
2.1 EBITDA
2.2 Total Cash CostsΒ
2.3 Adjusted net profit and other profitability indicatorsΒ
3. Summary table of performance results by business units
3.1 Krasnoyarsk business unit (Olimpiada mine)
3.2 Irkutsk alluvial gold business unit (Alluvial deposits)
3.3 Yakutia business unit (Kuranakh mine)
3.4 Irkutsk hard rock business unit (Zapadnoye mine)
4. Review of financial sustainability and solvency
4.1 Analysis of balance sheet items
4.1.1 Assets
4.1.2 Capital and liabilities
4.2 Cash flow analysis
4.3 Capital expenditures, acquisitions of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs
4.4. Cash sources and cashΒ expenditureΒ and impairment
5.Β Description of principal risks
Β Β 1.Β The Polyus Group's operating results
External market factors affecting the Polyus Group's financial results
The results of the Polyus Group are significantly affected by movements in average exchange rates between the USDΒ and the RUB, andΒ theΒ price of commodities, such as gold, oil and steel.
The Polyus Group's revenueΒ from gold salesΒ isΒ denominated in USD, whereas up to 80% of the Polyus Group's expenses are denominated in RUB, which means that movements in the RUB/USDΒ exchange rate impact on the Polyus Group. Many costs included in the Polyus Group's cost of sales are also directly or indirectly impacted by the prices of oil and steel. Changes in oil prices impact the prices ofΒ heating oil,Β diesel fuel, gasoline and lubricants for mining and construction equipment. Steel forms the basis for the price of all rolled metal products, pipes, machinery and vehicles.Β
In the periods under discussion, prices for these products, and the RUB/USDΒ exchange rate,Β demonstratedΒ significant movements, which influenced the Polyus Group's financial results:
|
Average price/ rate |
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
|
Oil (Brent brand) (USDΒ per barrel)(1) |
98.7 |
72.5 |
65.1 |
|
Steel (hot rolled) (USDΒ per tonne)(2) |
924 |
645 |
575 |
|
Average USD/RUBΒ rate |
24.86 |
25.58 |
27.19 |
|
Period end USD/RUBΒ rate |
29.38 |
24.55 |
26.33 |
1. Source:Β Bloomberg.Β
2.Β Source: Metaltorg, spot priceΒ FOB Russia.Β
Summary of performance resultsΒ
The following table shows theΒ summary of performanceΒ results of the Polyus Group's operations in 2008, 2007 and 2006Β related to financial statements:
|
USD' 000 |
Years ended 31 DecemberΒ |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated)(1) |
2006 (restated)(1) |
% |
% |
|
|
Gold salesΒ |
1,062,331Β |
849,023Β |
734,559Β |
25.1Β |
15.6Β |
|
Other sales |
24,987Β |
18,096Β |
18,127Β |
38.1Β |
(0.2) |
|
Cost of gold sales |
(558,118) |
(449,216) |
(426,527) |
24.2Β |
5.3Β |
|
Cost of other sales |
(25,061) |
(25,866) |
(18,816) |
(3.1) |
37.5Β |
|
Gross profit |
504,139Β |
392,037Β |
307,343Β |
28.6Β |
27.6Β |
|
Gross profit on gold sales |
504,213Β |
399,807Β |
308,032Β |
26.1Β |
29.8Β |
|
Gross profit margin |
46.4% |
45.2% |
40.8% |
Β -Β |
Β -Β |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(134,960) |
(261,776) |
(79,678) |
(48.4) |
228.5Β |
|
Profit before income tax |
122,471Β |
177,107Β |
1,228,391Β |
(30.8) |
(85.6) |
|
Pre-tax margin |
11.3% |
20.4% |
163.2% |
Β -Β |
Β -Β |
|
Income tax expense |
(62,110) |
(85,299) |
(73,080) |
(27.2) |
16.7Β |
|
Profit for the year |
60,361Β |
91,808Β |
1,155,311Β |
(34.3) |
(92.1) |
|
Net profit/(loss) attributable to minority interest |
8,854Β |
5,999Β |
(414) |
47.6Β |
Β -Β |
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
51,507Β |
85,809Β |
1,155,725Β |
(40.0) |
(92.6) |
|
Net profit margin |
5.6% |
10.6% |
153.5% |
Β -Β |
Β -Β |
|
Earnings per share - basic and diluted (USD) |
Β 0.29Β |
0.49Β |
0.75Β |
(40.8) |
(34.7) |
The following table shows theΒ summary of performanceΒ results of the Polyus Group's operations in 2008, 2007 and 2006Β related to non-GAAP financial measures:
|
USD' 000 |
Years ended 31 DecemberΒ |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated)(1) |
2006 (restated)(1) |
% |
% |
|
|
Operating profit(2) |
347,164Β |
113,715Β |
208,077Β |
205.3Β |
(45.3) |
|
Operating profit margin |
31.9% |
13.1% |
27.6% |
Β -Β |
Β -Β |
|
EBITDA(3) |
436,470Β |
331,154Β |
300,686Β |
31.8Β |
10.1Β |
1. Refer to Note 5 of consolidated financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2007 (approved on 3 February 2009).
2.Β Operating profit is calculated as Gross profit, less Selling, general and administrative expenses,Β Research and exploration expenses and Other expenses,Β net.
3.Β For details of EBITDA calculation refer to section 2.1 of this document.
Gold sales
The following table shows the resultsΒ and breakdownΒ of the Polyus Group's gold sales for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006:Β
|
USD' 000 |
Years ended 31 December |
||||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
2008Β againstΒ 2007Β % |
2007Β againstΒ 2006Β % |
|
|
Gold sales (USDΒ thousands) |
1,062,331Β |
849,023 |
734,559 |
25.1 |
15.6 |
|
Gold sales (thousand troy ounces) |
1,226 |
1,210 |
1,216 |
1.3 |
(0.5) |
|
In the domestic market (thousand troy ounces) |
1,226 |
1,050 |
875 |
16.8 |
20.0 |
|
In the domestic market (%) |
100 |
87 |
72 |
Β -Β |
Β -Β |
|
For export (thousand troy ounces) |
Β -Β |
160 |
341 |
Β -Β |
(53.1) |
|
Weighted-average gold selling price (USDΒ per troy ounce) |
867.3 |
701.7 |
604.1 |
23.6 |
16.2 |
|
Average evening fixing price in London (USDΒ per troy ounce)(1) |
872.0 |
695.4 |
603.5 |
25.4 |
15.2 |
|
Excess/(deficit)Β of average selling price over/(under)Β average evening fixing price (USDΒ per troy ounce) |
(4.7) |
6.3 |
0.6 |
Β -Β |
- |
1. Source:Β LBMAΒ
In 2008, the Polyus Group's revenue from gold sales reached a historical highΒ levelΒ and was USDΒ 1,062,331Β thousand, an increase of 25.1% as compared to 2007.
The increase in revenue resulted primarily from favourable gold prices, as production and sales volumesΒ in physical unitsΒ remained relativelyΒ constant. In 2008, the Polyus Group produced 1,222 thousand troy ounces (38.0 tonnes) of refined gold,Β showing a slight growth overΒ 2007Β levelsΒ when it produced 1,214Β thousand troy ouncesΒ (37.8 tonnes).Β The slight growth in production resulted from increased output at the Olimpiada mine, which became possible after Mill No.3Β reached its' target production capacity in late 2008,Β and which wasΒ partly offset byΒ the shut down ofΒ Mill. No.1Β after the depletion of oxide ores at the Olimpiada deposit. Among the other factors that influenced theΒ increase inΒ output in 2008 wereΒ the increased average grade of the ore processed at the Kuranakh mine and acquisition of a new alluvial enterprise.Β The Polyus Group sold 1,226Β thousand troy ounces in 2008,Β compared to 1,210 thousand troy ounces soldΒ in 2007.
During 2008, the global gold price was ratherΒ volatile, reaching its highest level of USDΒ 1,011.25Β (London evening fixing)Β in March and the lowest of USDΒ 712.5 in October.Β InΒ the period under review, the average evening fixing price in London was USD 872.0, compared to USD 695.4 inΒ the previous period.Β However,Β forΒ the whole year, the global price of gold increased byΒ only 3%Β between the start of the year and the end of the year, while it grew more than 30%Β during 2007.Β On 2 January 2008, the first business day in the market, the gold price was USDΒ 846.75 per troy ounce, and onΒ 30Β December 2008, the last business day in the market, the gold price was USDΒ 869.75 per troy ounce.
Following itsΒ policyΒ toΒ sell gold at spot market prices (without using any type of hedging instruments)Β the Polyus GroupΒ reflectedΒ the benefit of an increasing gold price in the financial results for 2008Β in full. The average selling price in 2008Β was USDΒ 867.3Β per troy ounce as compared to USDΒ 701.7Β per troy ounce in 2007.Β
In 2008, all the gold produced was sold in the domestic market, while in 2007 export accounted for 13% of sales in USDΒ terms. The Polyus Group decided not to continue working under export contracts in the reporting period becauseΒ export sales are less profitable due to transportation and other related expenses.
Cost of gold salesΒ
The following table shows the results of the Polyus Group'sΒ cost of gold salesΒ for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
USDΒ '000 |
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
Cash operating costs(1)Β |
587,332 |
442,224 |
348,212 |
32.8Β |
27.0Β |
|
LabourΒ |
207,403 |
144,008 |
104,358 |
44.0Β |
38.0Β |
|
Consumables and spares, out of which: |
239,522 |
200,601 |
152,854 |
19.4Β |
31.2Β |
|
Materials and spares |
150,503 |
137,956 |
103,617 |
9.1Β |
33.1Β |
|
Β FuelΒ |
89,019 |
62,645 |
49,237 |
42.1Β |
27.2Β |
|
Utilities,Β out of which: |
26,646 |
23,340 |
24,897 |
14.2Β |
(6.3)Β |
|
PowerΒ |
25,753 |
19,494 |
14,617 |
32.1 |
33.4 |
|
Other |
893 |
3,846 |
10,280 |
(76.8) |
(62.6) |
|
Tax on miningΒ |
72,588 |
51,138 |
42,361 |
41.9Β |
20.7Β |
|
Outsourced mining services |
15,105 |
8,826 |
10,680 |
71.1Β |
(17.4) |
|
Refining costs |
5,383 |
3,569 |
3,462 |
50.8Β |
3.1Β |
|
Sundry costs |
20,685 |
10,742 |
9,600 |
92.6Β |
11.9 |
|
Amortisation and depreciation of operating assetsΒ |
98,999 |
87,196 |
73,718 |
13.5Β |
18.3Β |
|
Change in deferred stripping costs.......... |
(112,804) |
(68,065) |
5,230 |
65.7Β |
- |
|
Change in gold-in-process and refined goldΒ |
(6,879) |
(12,621) |
(7,951) |
(45.5) |
58.7Β |
|
Change in provision for land restoration....... |
(8,530) |
482 |
7,318 |
- |
(93.4) |
|
Cost of gold salesΒ |
558,118 |
449,216 |
426,527 |
24.2Β |
5.3Β |
1. The presentation of cash operating costs is more detailed than that presented inΒ the financialΒ statements.Β The amounts are derived from the management accounts, and agree in total with the amounts presented inΒ the financial statements.
In 2008, cost of gold sales increased byΒ 24.2%,Β orΒ USDΒ 108,902Β thousand,Β to USDΒ 558,118Β thousand.
Cash operating costs
The principal reason for the increase in cost of gold sales was the increase in cash operating costs within all the Polyus Group's production entities. During 2008, cash operating costs included in cost of sales were USDΒ 587,332Β thousand.
The largest item included in cash operating costs in 2008Β and 2007 wasΒ labourΒ expensesΒ (35% of cash operating costs).Β LabourΒ expenses for production staff were USDΒ 207,403Β thousandΒ in 2008, an increase from USD 144,008 thousand in 2007.Β TheΒ 44% increaseΒ occurredΒ mainly on account of the Krasnoyarsk business unit, includingΒ anΒ accruedΒ compensation payment relating toΒ strong operational results.
The second largest item included in cash operating costsΒ (26% of cash operating costs)Β wasΒ expensesΒ for consumables andΒ spares, which include materials and sparesΒ (parts for trucks,Β excavators and for construction machinery, expenses on rolled metal products and cables, technological materials for plants and otherΒ materials and spare parts used during the mining, concentration and smelting)Β and fuel.Β
The cost of materials and spare parts consumed in 2008Β was USDΒ 150,503Β thousand as compared to USDΒ 137,956Β thousand in 2007,Β representingΒ an increase ofΒ 9%.Β The increase was primarily the result of the growth in ore processing. The major contributor of the increase was the Olimpiada mine.Β The cost ofΒ a number of materials and spare parts, purchased byΒ the Polyus Group in the reporting year also increased, primarily due to world-wide changes in underlying commodity pricesΒ (includingΒ oil productsΒ andΒ hot rolled steel)Β especiallyΒ in the first half of the year.
A significant portion ofΒ consumables and sparesΒ is fuel, mainly diesel oil, fuels and lubricants for trucks and excavators andΒ fuelΒ for oil-fired power plant operating at Nezhdaninskoye deposit andΒ theΒ diesel power plant at the Olimpiada mine. The Polyus Group total expenses on fuel grewΒ byΒ 42% from USD 62,645 thousand in 2007 to USDΒ 89,019Β thousand in 2008, consistent with growth in world prices for oil products.Β
As an example the Group providesΒ aΒ comparative tableΒ whichΒ shows the mainΒ consumables and sparesΒ procured by the Krasnoyarsk business unit, whichΒ cost of gold sales contributes for almost 54%Β of Group'sΒ cost of gold sales:
|
USD' 000 |
Unit of measurement |
2008 |
2007 |
||
|
Volume |
Cost, USD'000 |
Volume |
Cost, USD'000 |
||
|
Spare parts for tipper trucks and digging machines |
Β |
Β |
10,371Β |
Β |
12,958Β |
|
Grinding balls |
Tonne |
11,020Β |
13,511Β |
6,580Β |
5,505Β |
|
Pipes for current operations |
Β |
1,212Β |
Β |
1,198Β |
|
|
Spare parts for road-building machines |
Β |
3,428Β |
Β |
1,787Β |
|
|
Rolled metal products for current operations |
Β |
1,859Β |
Β |
784Β |
|
|
Summer diesel fuel |
Tonne |
45,600Β |
31,954Β |
50,075Β |
29,588Β |
|
Winter diesel fuel |
Tonne |
30,400Β |
24,182Β |
33,952Β |
22,740Β |
|
Ai-80 gasoline |
Tonne |
360Β |
316Β |
360Β |
289Β |
|
Ai-92 gasoline |
Tonne |
420Β |
417Β |
300Β |
285Β |
|
Explosives |
Β |
15,575Β |
Β |
17,202Β |
|
|
Cyanides |
Tonne |
19,565Β |
62,232Β |
8,639Β |
18,377Β |
|
Β Total |
Β |
Β |
165,057Β |
Β |
110,713Β |
The purchase ofΒ consumablesΒ and spare parts by theΒ KrasnoyarskΒ business unit in USD terms increased by 49% from USDΒ 110,713Β in 2007 to USDΒ 165,057 in 2008. The volume of purchases in physicalΒ itemsΒ increased primarilyΒ due to purchasesΒ of grinding balls and cyanides due toΒ Mill No.3 achieving its project capacity of 5 mtpa,Β as well asΒ purchasesΒ of gasolineΒ forΒ the constructionΒ on the Titimukhta and Blagodatnoye mines.Β In monetary terms the increaseΒ primarily reflected purchases of spare partsΒ for road-building machinesΒ and rolled metal products.Β These increases wereΒ alsoΒ dueΒ to construction works, including road building,Β carried out at the Krasnoyarsk business unit, which required additional machineryΒ and spares. In 2008, an explosive workshop was constructed at the Olimpiada mine,Β which led toΒ a reduction inΒ explosives costs.Β
The following table shows costs per unit ofΒ consumablesΒ and spare parts procured by the Krasnoyarsk business unit:
|
USD' 000 |
Unit of measurement |
2008 |
2007 |
2008Β against 2007, % |
|
Grinding balls |
USD/tonne |
1,226 |
837 |
46.5Β |
|
Summer diesel fuel |
USD/tonne |
701 |
591 |
18.7Β |
|
Winter diesel fuel |
USD/tonne |
795 |
670 |
18.7Β |
|
Ai-80 gasoline |
USD/tonne |
877 |
804 |
9.1Β |
|
Ai-92 gasoline |
USD/tonne |
994 |
951 |
4.6Β |
|
CyanidesΒ |
USD/tonne |
3,181 |
2,127 |
49.6Β |
During the reporting period the prices for cyanides and grinding ballsΒ increasedΒ substantially.Β The growth of purchase prices for grinding balls resulted from a 43% increase in hot rolled steel prices. Rising costs for diesel fuel and gasoline reflected the global trend of oil products prices growth in the first half of 2008.
In 2008, due to the growth in the gold price, applied to a slightly increased sales volume, the Polyus Group paid USDΒ 72,588Β thousand inΒ miningΒ tax, whichΒ was USDΒ 21,450 thousand more than in 2007. In accordance with Chapter 26 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation, the tax on mining base includes concentrate or any other semi-product containing precious metal obtained by extraction of this metal from ore, alluvial or industrial deposits, such as the gold produced by the Polyus Group. Concentrates and other semi-products containing gold are subject to the tax at the rate equal to 6% of the cost of these semi-products. The cost is determined based on selling prices for the relevant tax period.
Amortisation and depreciation of operating assets
Amortisation and depreciation of operating assets included in cost of sales increased byΒ 13.5% from USDΒ 87,196Β thousandΒ in 2007Β to USDΒ 98,999Β thousandΒ in 2008. The increase was due to commissioning of new fixed assets,Β mainlyΒ inΒ the Krasnoyarsk business unit. This amount included amortisation of the mineral rights in theΒ amountΒ of USDΒ 15,842Β thousand.Β Β
Selling, general and administrative expenses
The following table sets forth the selling, general and administrative expenses of the Polyus Group for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
USDΒ '000 |
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
SalariesΒ |
73,742 |
76,291 |
44,019 |
(3.3) |
73.3Β |
|
Taxes other than mining and income taxesΒ |
18,318 |
20,724 |
11,322 |
(11.6) |
83.0Β |
|
Professional servicesΒ |
13,321 |
8,288 |
6,820 |
60.7Β |
21.5Β |
|
DepreciationΒ |
3,782 |
3,969 |
4,759 |
(4.7) |
(16.6) |
|
Share option planΒ |
- |
132,548 |
- |
- |
-Β |
|
OtherΒ |
25,797 |
19,956 |
12,758 |
29.3Β |
56.4Β |
|
TotalΒ |
134,960 |
261,776 |
79,678 |
(48.4) |
228.5Β |
During 2007, the Polyus Group's selling, general and administrative expenses decreased byΒ 48% from USDΒ 261,776Β thousand in 2007 to USDΒ 134,960Β in 2008.Β ThisΒ decrease wasΒ mainly a result of theΒ absence in 2008 ofΒ expenses relating to the exercise of the share option plan in the amount of USDΒ 132,548 thousand, reflected in 2007 administrative expenses,Β whichΒ more than offset increases in other costs.Β
Salaries
As a result ofΒ theΒ consistentΒ introduction ofΒ aΒ cost-cutting programme, for the first time in its historyΒ theΒ Polyus Group cutΒ administrative staffΒ labour costs on the year-to-year basis. These expenses decreasedΒ by USD 2,549 thousand orΒ 3%Β fromΒ 2007 to USDΒ 73,742Β thousand in 2008.Β
Taxes, other than mining and income taxes
In addition to tax on mining and income taxes, the Polyus Group pays property tax, VAT (which for the purpose of this item only includes non-recoverable VAT), unified social tax and other taxes. In 2008, the Polyus Group paid USDΒ 18,318Β thousand in federal and regionalΒ taxesΒ other than tax on mining and income tax,Β whichΒ wasΒ 12%Β lessΒ than in 2007, primarily due toΒ a decrease of non-recoverable VAT.Β Β In 2007, the amount of non-recoverable VATΒ was significantly higherΒ at CJSC Polyus (Krasnoyarsk business unit),Β because of contributionsΒ it madeΒ to the share capital of new subsidiariesΒ in non-monetary form.Β
The amount of property tax increased substantially as a result ofΒ commissioning of propertyΒ related toΒ theΒ new projects development andΒ theΒ modernization of existingΒ productionΒ facilities.
Β Β The following table shows the components of taxes, other than mining and income taxes, for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
USDΒ '000 |
Years ended 31 December |
2008Β againstΒ 2007 |
2007Β againstΒ 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
Taxes, other than mining and income taxes |
18,318 |
20,724 |
11,322 |
(11.6) |
83.0 |
|
VAT |
3,100 |
10,092 |
3,377 |
(69.3) |
198.8 |
|
Property tax |
11,561 |
8,231 |
5,135 |
40.5Β |
60.3 |
|
Other taxes |
3,657 |
2,401 |
2,810 |
52.3Β |
(14.6) |
Professional services
In 2008,Β professional servicesΒ expenses increased by USDΒ 5,033Β thousandΒ from USDΒ 8,288Β thousand in 2007 to USDΒ 13,321Β thousand in 2008.Β The increase inΒ professional services expenses was due toΒ consulting services provided on a proposal to carve out the exploration assets.
OtherΒ selling, general and administrativeΒ expensesΒ
OtherΒ selling, general and administrativeΒ expensesΒ areΒ presented with rent expenses,Β communication services, repair and maintenance costs.Β Rent expenses increased from USD 1,799 thousand inΒ 2007Β to USDΒ 4,609Β thousand inΒ 2008,Β primarilyΒ as a result ofΒ the revision of terms ofΒ theΒ rent agreementΒ for the Moscow head office.Β The following table shows the components ofΒ otherΒ selling, general and administrative expensesΒ for 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
USDΒ '000 |
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
OtherΒ |
25,797 |
19,956 |
12,758 |
29.3Β |
56.4Β |
|
Rent expensesΒ |
4,609 |
1,799 |
1,445 |
156.2Β |
24.5Β |
|
Repair and maintenanceΒ |
1,541 |
1,734 |
1,025 |
(11.1) |
69.2Β |
|
Communication servicesΒ |
1,749 |
1,278 |
1,415 |
36.9Β |
(9.7) |
|
OtherΒ |
17,898 |
15,145 |
8,873 |
18.2 |
70.7Β |
Research and exploration expenses
In 2008, research and exploration costs decreased by USDΒ 1,258Β thousand, orΒ 20%,Β from USD 6,217 thousand in 2007 to USDΒ 4,959Β thousand inΒ 2008, reflectingΒ the Group's decision to substantially reduceΒ exploration works due to theΒ deterioration of global market conditions in the second half of the year.Β
Other expenses, net
In the period under review, other operating income was USD 5,569 thousand compared to USD 7,696 thousand in the previous period. In 2008,Β deferred considerationΒ amounted toΒ USD 3,152 thousandΒ andΒ other operating incomeΒ totaled USD 2,417 thousand.Β InΒ 2007Β other operating income comprisedΒ changes in the allowance for reimbursable VAT in the amount of USD 3,641 thousand and an interest payable written off as a result ofΒ anΒ amicable settlement withΒ a creditorΒ totalingΒ USD 4,055 thousand.
Other operating expenses increased by 26% from USD 18,025 thousandΒ in 2007Β to USD 22,625 thousand in 2008. This was largely due to a significant increase inΒ charity contributionsΒ to USD 7,135 thousand,Β changesΒ in theΒ allowance for obsolescence of inventories and inventories written off in the sum of USD 2,243, as well asΒ changesΒ inΒ theΒ allowance for reimbursable VATΒ totalingΒ USD 7,078, which were partly offset by a substantial decrease in loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment (a decrease of USD 5,873), change in allowance for doubtful debts (a decrease of USD 1,337 thousand), tax fines and penalties (a decrease of USD 585 thousand) and other operatingΒ expensesΒ (a decrease of USD 1,608 thousand).Β
Β Β
Finance costs, incomeΒ (loss)Β from investments and foreign exchange gain/(loss)
The following table sets forth the components of financial and investment activity in 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
USD' 000 |
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
||
|
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
Finance costs |
(4,417) |
(6,629) |
(6,453) |
(33.4) |
2.7 |
|
Income/(loss)Β from investments |
(217,591) |
61,537 |
1,102,111 |
Β -Β |
(94.4) |
|
Foreign exchange gain/(loss) |
(2,685)Β |
8,484 |
(75,344) |
- |
- |
In 2008, finance expensesΒ decreased by approximately one third andΒ amounted to USDΒ 4,417Β thousand.Β This was a result ofΒ redemptionΒ ofΒ short-term borrowings in the first half of the reporting year.Β
In 2008, the Polyus Group recognized a net loss fromΒ investmentsΒ totalingΒ USDΒ 217,591Β thousand.Β
During 2008, the Group incurred lossesΒ from investments inΒ securitiesΒ held for trading underΒ asset management agreements by the Managing Company Rosbank. These investments are carried at fair value through profit and loss. As a result ofΒ significant declines in financial markets, a USD 178,377 thousand lossΒ in the value of the securitiesΒ was reflected in the Polyus Group consolidated income statement.Β Moreover, the Polyus Group holds an investment share inΒ Management CompanyΒ RosfundΒ whichΒ is accounted for asΒ available-for-sale investments. During the year, the Polyus Group disposed of USDΒ 51,230 thousand of its sharesΒ which resulted in a loss on disposal of investments in the amount of 16,230 thousand and cash proceeds of USD 35,000 thousand. The decrease in fair value of this investmentΒ is considered to be permanent, and impairment has been recognized through a reduction in theΒ investment revaluation reserve andΒ asΒ investment impairmentΒ in the income statementΒ in the sum of USDΒ 100,090Β thousandΒ
In July 2008 the Polyus Group subsidiary OJSC Lenzoloto disposed of its 6.7% stake inΒ OJSCΒ VysochaishyΒ resulting inΒ a gain of USDΒ 30,000Β thousand.Β InΒ 2008Β the Polyus GroupΒ alsoΒ received interest income on bank deposits, loans under repurchase agreements and promissory notes for the total amount ofΒ USDΒ 47,106Β thousand as compared to USDΒ 51,493Β thousand in the previous period.Β
During 2008,Β as a result of exchange rate movements the Polyus GroupΒ recognized a foreign exchangeΒ lossΒ of USDΒ 2,685Β thousand,Β USDΒ 2,604Β thousand of which related toΒ investing activities, while in 2007 foreign exchange gainΒ totaledΒ USDΒ 8,484 thousand.Β
Income tax
During 2008, the Polyus Group accrued USDΒ 62,110Β thousand in income tax, whichΒ wasΒ 27% less than in 2007.Β This was largely affected byΒ theΒ reductionΒ in theΒ statutory income tax rate from 24% to 20% starting from 1 JanuaryΒ 2009,Β which led toΒ aΒ recalculationΒ ofΒ deferred tax liabilities.Β The effective income tax rate (ratio of current and deferred tax expense to IFRS income before tax) in 2008Β wasΒ 51%, whereas the statutory income tax rate in Russia established in 2008Β was 24%. The differenceΒ between the statutory andΒ the effective tax ratesΒ was mainly becauseΒ ofΒ deferred tax assets not recognized on loss from investmentsΒ underΒ asset management agreementsΒ in theΒ sumΒ of USDΒ 42,810Β thousand, as well asΒ aΒ significant amount of non-deductible items for tax purposes and other permanent differences in the sum of USD 7,396 thousand.Β .Β
Other sales and cost of other sales
Revenue received by the Polyus Group from the sale of products other than gold and servicesΒ grewΒ byΒ 38%Β inΒ the reporting period and amounted to USDΒ 24,987Β compared toΒ USD 18,096 thousandΒ in the previous period. This revenue includes sales of electricity,Β rent services sales,Β revenue from transportation, handling andΒ storageΒ services, and otherΒ sales.Β The growth occurred mainly on account of sales of electricity, housing maintenance and gold mining under contractors'Β agreement.Β In 2008, other sales revenue wasΒ slightly lower thanΒ cost ofΒ their salesΒ which resulted in a netΒ lossΒ from other sales in the amount ofΒ 74Β thousand, compared toΒ a net loss ofΒ USDΒ 7,770Β in 2007.Β Cost ofΒ otherΒ sales also includedΒ fuel andΒ materialsΒ expensesΒ and payroll costsΒ in non-mining activities.
Non-GAAP financial measures
In its analysis of the Polyus Group's results, Polyus Gold uses key performance indicators which are not measures determined in accordance with IFRS.
EBITDA
"EBITDA" is defined by Polyus Gold as profit before finance costs, income tax,Β income (losses) from in vestments,Β depreciation, amortisation and interest, and is further adjusted by certain items included in the table below. As these line items are not of a recurring nature, Polyus Gold has made these adjustments in calculating EBITDA to provide a clearer view of the performance of its underlying business operations and to generate a metric that it believes will give greater comparability over time with peers in its industry. Polyus Gold believes that EBITDA is a meaningful indicator of its profitability and performance. This measure should not be considered as an alternative to profit for the year and operating cash flows based on IFRS and should not necessarily be construed as a comprehensive indicator of the Polyus Group's measure of profitability or liquidity.Β
The following table sets forth the Polyus Group's EBITDA for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
|||
|
USD'000 |
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
|
Profit for the year |
60,361Β |
91,808 |
1,155,311 |
|
+ Income tax charged |
62,110Β |
85,299 |
73,080 |
|
+ Depreciation and amortisation for the year |
86,927Β |
82,066 |
79,025 |
|
+ Interest expenseΒ |
4,417Β |
6,629 |
6,453 |
|
- Interest payable written off |
- |
(4,055) |
- |
|
- Interest income |
(47,106) |
(51,493) |
(107,616) |
|
-Β GainΒ on disposal of investments |
(13,770) |
-Β |
(980,462) |
|
+ Loss/(gain)Β from investments in listed companies held for trading |
178,377 |
(9,898) |
(7,234) |
|
+Β Impairment of available-for-sale investments |
100,090 |
- |
- |
|
- Foreign exchangeΒ (gain)/loss |
2,685 |
(8,484) |
75,344 |
|
+ Loss from disposal of property, plant and equipment and work-in-progress |
548Β |
6,421 |
1,494 |
|
+ Impairment of property, plant and equipment |
1,831Β |
313 |
383 |
|
+ Reversal of environmental obligations |
- |
- |
2,094 |
|
+ Change of provision for VAT receivable |
- |
- |
2,814 |
|
+ Charge from share option plan obligations |
- |
132,548 |
- |
|
EBITDA |
436,470Β |
331,154 |
300,686 |
The Polyus Group's EBITDA in 2008Β was USDΒ 436,470Β thousand, whichΒ wasΒ USDΒ 105,316Β thousand orΒ 32% more than in 2007,Β reflecting growth inΒ goldΒ selling prices.
Total Cash CostsΒ
The Polyus Group presents the financial itemsΒ "total cash costs" ("TCC")Β and "total cash costs per troy ounce"Β which have been calculated and presented by management as TCC presentation is common industry practice,Β Although its calculations of these items may differ from those of its industry peers. These items are not IFRS measures. An investor should not consider these items in isolation or as alternatives to cost of sales, profit for the year attributable to shareholders of the parent company, net cash generated from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance presented in accordance with IFRS. The calculation of total cash costs may vary significantly among gold mining companies, and by themselves do not necessarily provide a basis for comparison with other gold mining companies.Β
Total cash costsΒ areΒ defined by the Polyus Group as cost of sales reduced by property, plant and equipment depreciation, provision for annual vacation payment, provision for land rehabilitation and adjusted by non-monetary changes in inventories and non-monetary changes inΒ deferredΒ stripping works. Total cash costs per troy ounce are the attributable total cash costs divided by the attributable troy ounce of gold sold.Β
The following table shows the Polyus Group's TCC for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
|||
|
2008Β |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
|
Cost of gold sales (USDΒ thousand) |
558,118Β |
449,216 |
426,527 |
24.2Β |
5.3 |
|
- property, plant and equipment depreciation (USDΒ thousand) |
(98,999) |
(87,196) |
(73,718) |
13.5Β |
18.3 |
|
- provision for annual vacation payment (USDΒ thousand) |
(6,124) |
(4,190) |
(2,663) |
46.2Β |
57.3 |
|
- provision for land rehabilitation (USDΒ thousand) |
8,530Β |
(482) |
(7,318) |
- |
(93.4) |
|
+ non-monetary changes in inventories(1)Β (USDΒ thousand) |
1,140Β |
2,383 |
1,349 |
(52.2) |
76.6 |
|
+ non-monetary changes inΒ deferredΒ stripping works(2)Β (USDΒ thousand) |
17,490Β |
10,429 |
- |
67.7Β |
- |
|
Π’Π‘Π‘ (USDΒ thousand) |
480,155Β |
370,160 |
344,177 |
29.7Β |
7.5 |
|
Gold sales, thousand troy ounces |
1,226 |
1,210 |
1,216 |
1.3 |
(0.5) |
|
TCC, USD/oz |
392Β |
306 |
283 |
28.0Β |
8.1 |
|
TCC, RUB/oz |
9,737Β |
7,825 |
7,695 |
24.4Β |
1.7 |
1. "Non-monetary changes in inventories" is a calculation to estimate the non-cash portion of costs included in the change in the amount of inventory, primarily representing depreciation and amortisation.
2. "Non-monetary changes inΒ deferredΒ stripping works" is a calculation to estimate the non-cash portion of costs included in the change in the amount of deferred stripping costs, primarily representing depreciation and amortisation.
In 2008, TCC per troy ounce grew byΒ 24%Β on a RUB basisΒ and byΒ 28% on a USDΒ basis.
The increase in TCC was mainly due to the fact that cash operating costs increased byΒ 33% for theΒ yearΒ while the volume of sales accounted for on the basis of troy ouncesΒ changed insignificantly. See paragraph 1.3Β above ("Cost of gold sales").
Analysis ofΒ profitability indicatorsΒ
Adjusted net profit is defined as net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company adjusted for the charge from stock option plan obligations in 2007 and the gain on disposal of Gold Fields shares in 2006. Adjusted return on assets is calculated as the adjusted net profit divided by the average assets for the year. Adjusted return on equity is calculated as the adjusted net profit divided by the average equity attributable to shareholders of the parent for the year. Adjusted return on invested capital is calculated as the adjusted net profit divided by the sum of the average equity attributable to shareholders of the parent and average non-current and current loans and borrowings for year.
We have made these adjustments as these items are not of a recurring nature, to provide a clearer view of the performance of our underlying business operations and to generate a metric that we believe will give greater comparability over time with peers in our industry. Polyus Group believes that adjusted net profit, adjusted return on assets, adjusted return on equity and adjusted return on invested capital are meaningful indicators of its profitability and performance. These measures should not be considered alternatives to profit for the year and operating cash flows based on IFRS and should not necessarily be construed as a comprehensive indicator of Polyus Group's measure of profitability or as a measure of liquidity.Β
Β Β The following table shows the Polyus Group's calculation of adjusted net profit, adjusted return on assets, adjusted return on equity and adjusted return on invested capital for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
2008 against 2007 |
2007 against 2006 |
|||
|
USD'000, unless otherwise indicated |
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
% |
% |
|
Net profit attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
51,507Β |
85,809Β |
1,155,725Β |
(40.0) |
(92.6) |
|
+ Charge from share option plan obligations.......................................... |
Β -Β |
132,548Β |
Β -Β |
(100.0) |
- |
|
- Gain on disposal of investments |
(13,770) |
-Β |
(980,462) |
- |
- |
|
+ Loss/(gain)Β from investments in listed companies held for trading |
178,377 |
(9,898) |
(7,234) |
- |
36.8 |
|
+ Impairment of available-for-sale investments |
100,090 |
- |
- |
100.0 |
|
|
Adjusted net profit |
316,204Β |
208,459Β |
168,029Β |
51.7Β |
24.1Β |
|
Assets (average for the year) |
Β 3,426,156Β |
3,527,817Β |
3,452,244Β |
(2.9) |
2.2Β |
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of the parent (average for the year) |
3,009,254Β |
3,043,901Β |
2,979,152Β |
(1.1) |
2.2Β |
|
Non-current and current loans and borrowings (average for the year) |
10,455Β |
17,955Β |
20,544Β |
(41.8) |
(12.6) |
|
Adjusted return on assets, % |
9.23Β |
5.91Β |
4.87Β |
- |
- |
|
Adjusted return on equity, % |
10.51 |
6.85Β |
5.64Β |
- |
- |
|
Adjusted return on invested capital, % |
10.47Β |
6.81Β |
5.60Β |
- |
- |
Adjusted return on assets equalled toΒ 9.23Β percentage points, adjusted return on equityΒ equalled toΒ 10.51Β percentage points and adjusted return on invested capitalΒ equalled toΒ 10.47Β percentage points.Β In 2008 theΒ asset baseΒ slightly decreased, whileΒ loans and borrowings were redeemed. At the same time, the Group's net profit adjusted forΒ lossΒ from investments showedΒ a growth ofΒ 52%. ThisΒ led to aΒ considerableΒ increaseΒ in profitability indicators.
Summary table of performance results by business units
The following table shows the Polyus Group's performance results by business units for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
|||||||||
|
2008 |
2007 |
2006 |
|||||||
|
Revenue |
Production |
Sales |
Revenue |
Production |
Sales |
Revenue |
Production |
Sales |
|
|
USDΒ '000 |
000 oz |
000 oz |
USDΒ '000 |
000 oz |
000 oz |
USDΒ '000 |
000 oz |
000 oz |
|
|
Krasnoyarsk business unit |
761,318 |
873 |
877 |
603,649 |
861 |
856 |
516,076 |
854 |
855 |
|
Irkutsk hard rock business unit |
21,466 |
25 |
25 |
23,231 |
32 |
33 |
18,517 |
32 |
31 |
|
Irkutsk alluvial business unit |
154,906 |
181 |
181 |
124,111 |
179 |
179 |
103,984 |
172 |
172 |
|
Yakutia business unit |
124,640 |
144 |
144 |
98,032 |
142 |
142 |
95,982 |
157 |
158 |
|
Group total(1) |
1,062,331Β |
1,222 |
1,226 |
849,023 |
1,214 |
1,210 |
734,559 |
1,215 |
1,216 |
1. Totals may not add due toΒ theΒ roundingΒ error.
3.1Β KrasnoyarskΒ business unit (Olimpiada mine)
|
USD'000, unless otherwise indicated |
2008 |
|
Revenue |
761,318Β |
|
Cost of sales |
(298,903) |
|
Gross profit |
462,415Β |
|
Gross profit margin |
61% |
|
TCC, USD perΒ troyΒ ounce |
293 |
The Krasnoyarsk business unit is the Polyus Group's leading mining operation.Β TheΒ KrasnoyarskΒ business unitΒ also acts as a distributing agent and sells its own gold and that of its subsidiaries.
Refined gold output at the Olimpiada mineΒ totaledΒ 873 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (27.1 tonnes) in 2008, compared to 861 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (26.8 tonnes) in 2007. The enhanced productionΒ wasΒ related to Mill No.3 achieving its projected capacity of 5Β mtpaΒ as well as theΒ processingΒ ofΒ additional volumes of oxide ore from Vostochny Pit of Olimpiada mine and ore from the Olenye deposit which was mined in 2007.
InΒ 2008,Β gold sales of the Krasnoyarsk business unit were USDΒ 761,318Β thousandΒ as compared to USD 603,649 thousand in 2007. In the reporting yearΒ the entity sold 877 thousand troy ounces (27.3 tonnes), which includes 873 thousandΒ troyΒ ouncesΒ (27.1 tonnes)Β produced during the yearΒ as well as 4 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (0.2 tonnes) of gold produced in the previous year.Β
In 2008, theΒ OlimpiadaΒ mine was successfullyΒ transitionedΒ to sulphide ores processing. Whereas in 2006 sulphide ores represented 71%Β of the total volume of ores processed, this figure increased to 84% in 2007 and to 94% in 2008.Β
DespiteΒ fullΒ conversion to the processing of sulphide oresΒ in 2008,Β in the period under reviewΒ theΒ Krasnoyarsk business unitΒ TCC indicator remains one of the lowest in the world goldΒ industry. The gross profit margin in 2008 was 61%.Β
3.2Β IrkutskΒ alluvial gold business unit (Alluvial deposits)
|
USD'000, unless otherwise indicated |
2008 |
|
Revenue |
163,024Β |
|
Cost of sales |
(137,591) |
|
Gross profit |
25,434Β |
|
Gross profit margin |
16% |
|
TCC, USD perΒ troyΒ ounce |
633Β |
In 2008, gold production at the alluvial deposits in theΒ IrkutskΒ regionΒ totaledΒ 181 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (5.6 tonnes), while in 2007 theΒ alluvial deposits produced 179 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (5.57 tonnes) of gold. The main factors that influenced alluvial gold production in the reporting period wereΒ organisationalΒ improvementsΒ within theΒ PolyusΒ Group's main alluvial enterprise andΒ theΒ acquisition of a new alluvial enterprise, as well as favorable weather conditions.
During the reporting period allΒ ofΒ the gold produced by the Irkutsk alluvial business unit was sold.Β As a result, the positive gold price movements resulted in a 25%Β increase inΒ revenues over the 2007 levelsΒ to USD 163,024 in 2008.Β The gross profit margin was 16%.
Alluvial deposits' TCCΒ amounted to USD 633 perΒ troyΒ ounce,2008, compared toΒ USD 607 perΒ troyΒ ounceΒ in 2007.Β The slight increase of 4%Β was principally due to increaseΒ of salaries and mining tax.
3.3Β Yakutia business unit (Kuranakh mine)
|
USD'000, unless otherwise indicated |
2008 |
|
Revenue |
128,988Β |
|
Cost of sales |
(117,639) |
|
Gross profit |
11,348Β |
|
Gross profit margin |
9% |
|
TCC, USD per ounce |
681Β |
In 2008,Β the Kuranakh mine in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia) produced 144 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (4.5 tonnes) of refined gold, compared to 142 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (4.4 tonnes) inΒ 2007.Β A slight growth in production was due toΒ anΒ increase of the average gold grade in the ore processed from 1.37 to 1.44 grammes per tonne.Β
InΒ 2008, the gold salesΒ revenue of the Yakutia business unitΒ totaledΒ USD 124,640 thousand compared to USD 98,032 thousand in 2007. The revenue growthΒ relatedΒ mainly to the growth of the selling price. The gross profit margin equalledΒ 9%.
TheΒ Kuranakh mine's TCCΒ amounted to USD 681 perΒ troyΒ ounceΒ inΒ 2008, compared to USD 452 perΒ troyΒ ounce in 2007. TransportationΒ costs represent a large part of the Yakutia business unit's TCC due to dispersion of deposits of the Kuranakh ore field.Β In 2008,Β the growth in prices for materials and spare parts for trucksΒ led to a substantial increase in transportation costs and repair and maintenance costs.Β TCC alsoΒ increased because ofΒ growthΒ in labour andΒ fuel costs.
The Kuranakh mill was commissioned in 1965 and is one of the oldest in the industry.Β Obsolescence of its production facilitiesΒ have resulted in a gradual reduction of profitability.Β The Polyus GroupΒ is in the processΒ of modernizingΒ the millΒ in order to increaseΒ itsΒ capacity from 3.6 mtpa to 4.5 mtpa.Β The mainΒ stages of itsΒ modernizationΒ processΒ are expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2009.
3.4Β IrkutskΒ hard rock business unit (Zapadnoye mine)
|
USD'000, unless otherwise indicated |
2008 |
|
Revenue |
44,016Β |
|
Cost of sales |
(39,313) |
|
Gross profit |
4,703Β |
|
Gross profit margin |
11% |
|
TCC, USD per troy ounce |
895Β |
In 2008, refined gold productionΒ ofΒ the Zapadnoye mine was 25 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (0.767 tonnes), compared to 32 thousandΒ troyΒ ounces (1 tonne) in 2007. The mainΒ reasonsΒ forΒ theΒ reductionΒ inΒ outputΒ wereΒ decreasesΒ in the average gold grade of the ore processed and in the volumes of ore processed, the latterΒ resulting from the impact of theΒ modernizationΒ programme carried outΒ withΒ the aimΒ ofΒ improving the plant's technological processes.
In the reporting periodΒ theΒ IrkutskΒ hard rock business unit sold all the gold produced within the year.Β
Gold sales revenue decreased from USD 23,231 thousand in 2007 to USDΒ 21,466Β thousand in 2008Β and theΒ gross profit margin equalled 11%.
The Zapadnoye mine's TCC amounted to USD 895 perΒ troyΒ ounceΒ in 2008,Β compared to USD 537 perΒ troyΒ ounce in 2007.Β TheΒ growth in TCC reflected anΒ increase in labour and power expenses, growth ofΒ material expensesΒ through inflationΒ andΒ anΒ increase in repair and maintenance costs. TheΒ increase inΒ costs wasΒ due toΒ a decrease in the recovery rateΒ ofΒ the ore processed andΒ tariffΒ growth.Β Although,Β aΒ 2-weeks plant downtime due to roller engine breakage resulted in a decrease in production while the Group continued fixed costs accrual (fixed partΒ ofΒ salaries, electricity costs).Β In addition, the Polyus GroupΒ reviewed the carrying amounts ofΒ theΒ Irkutsk hard rock business unit's tangible assets to determine whether there is anyΒ indication that those assets are impaired. As the results of making an assessment of impairment the Polyus Group did not recognize any impairment losses specifically related toΒ theΒ Irkutsk hard rock business unit.
The ZapadnoyeΒ millΒ was commissioned in 2004 and theΒ Polyus GroupΒ is in the process of improving mining technologyΒ at the mill.Β TheΒ Polyus GroupΒ believes thatΒ theΒ application of modern technologies and transportation systemsΒ shouldΒ allowΒ theΒ Zapadnoye mine to become a profitable enterprise in the near future.
Β Β
Review of financial sustainability and solvency
Analysis of balance sheet itemsΒ
The table below shows extracts of the Polyus Group's consolidated balance sheet as at 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
As at 31 December |
|||
|
USDΒ '000 |
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
|
ASSETS |
|||
|
Non-current assets |
|||
|
Property, plant and equipment |
1,772,319Β |
1,783,432 |
1,395,605 |
|
Deferred stripping costs |
163,988Β |
82,061 |
10,382 |
|
Other non-current assets(1) |
54,510Β |
13,971 |
12,940 |
|
Total non-current assets |
1,990,817Β |
1,879,464 |
1,418,927 |
|
Current assets |
|||
|
Inventories |
233,001Β |
224,209 |
169,471 |
|
Investments in securities and other financial assets |
285,236Β |
1,270,918 |
1,238,429 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
398,826Β |
226,174 |
294,197 |
|
Other current assets(2) |
170,982Β |
172,685 |
161,160 |
|
Total current assets |
1,088,045Β |
1,893,986 |
1,863,257 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
3,078,862Β |
3,773,450 |
3,282,184 |
|
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|||
|
Equity attributable to shareholders of the parent company |
2,756,733Β |
3,261,774 |
2,826,027 |
|
Minority interest |
37,808Β |
47,187 |
32,647 |
|
TOTAL EQUITY |
2,794,541Β |
3,308,961 |
2,858,674 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
182,623Β |
281,950 |
252,175 |
|
Current liabilities |
|||
|
Short-term borrowings |
- |
20,909 |
15,001 |
|
Trade and other payables and accrued expenses |
83,527Β |
105,583 |
70,513 |
|
Other current liabilities(3) |
18,171Β |
56,047 |
85,821 |
|
Total current liabilities |
101,698Β |
182,539 |
171,335 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
284,321Β |
464,489 |
423,510 |
|
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
3,078,862Β |
3,773,450 |
3,282,184 |
1. Other non-current assets consist of investments in securities and other financial assets and the long-term portion of reimbursable value added tax.
2.Β Other current assets consist of reimbursable value added tax, accounts receivable, advances paid to suppliers, income tax receivable and other current assets.
3.Β Other current liabilities consist of contingent consideration on acquisition of subsidiaries, dividends payable, minority interest liability, income tax payable and other taxes payable.
Β Β
Assets
Non-current assets
The table below analyses the Polyus Group's property, plant and equipment at 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
|||
|
USDΒ '000 |
2008Β |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
|
Exploration and evaluation assets |
214,920 |
301,238 |
133,811 |
|
Mining assetsΒ (1) Building, structures and utilities Machinery, equipment and transport Mineral rights |
1,218,349 471,987 313,250 433,112 |
1,253,565 353,043 366,071 534,451 |
1,061,939 256,757 291,238 513,944 |
|
Non-mining assets |
39,814 |
41,084 |
37,350 |
|
Capital construction-in-progress |
299,236 |
187,545 |
162,505 |
|
Total property, plant and equipment |
1,772,319 |
1,783,432 |
1,395,605 |
In 2008, the Polyus Group's assets structureΒ underwentΒ significant change. Whereas in 2007Β non-current assets accounted forΒ 50% of all the assets, in 2008Β their share reachedΒ 65%. This change was primarily due toΒ anΒ almost twofold increase inΒ capitalisedΒ deferred stripping costs andΒ aΒ substantial reduction in current assets,Β mainly relating toΒ decreases inΒ securitiesΒ investments.Β
In the period under review the Polyus Group was actively involved in constructionΒ and mine developmentΒ works.Β As a result,Β the value ofΒ capital construction-in-progress showed a substantial increase, growingΒ from USD 187,545 thousandΒ in 2007Β to USD 299,236 thousandΒ in 2008.Β Mining assetsΒ account forΒ the most significant group of assetsΒ in the Polyus Group. In the reporting year, the value of mining assets declined by 3% from USD 1,253,565 thousandΒ in 2007Β to USD 1,218,349 thousandΒ in 2008.Β Additions and transfers from capital construction-in-progress were partly offset by re-estimation of decommissioning liability and disposals. Exploration and evaluation assets decreased by 29% and amounted to USD 214,920 thousand as of the year end. ThisΒ wasΒ due toΒ the reduction inΒ explorationΒ work,Β throughout the Polyus Group,Β as well asΒ aΒ transferΒ in assetsΒ from exploration to mining assets. The value of non-mining assets decreased by 3% and amounted to USD 39,814 thousand, principally due toΒ exchange rate movements. Material RUBΒ depreciation led to a net USD 344,839 thousand drop in the value of property, plant and equipment. As a result, the closing balance of the Polyus Group'sΒ property plant and equipmentΒ totaledΒ USD 1,772,319 thousand as at 31 December 2008, compared to USD 1,783,432 thousand as at 31 December 2007.
CapitalisedΒ deferred stripping costsΒ grew significantlyΒ fromΒ USD 82,061 thousandΒ asΒ at 31Β DecemberΒ 2007 toΒ USDΒ 163,988Β thousandΒ asΒ at 31 DecemberΒ 2008.Β This increase was due toΒ continuedΒ stripping works andΒ deferral of costs at theΒ Krasnoyarsk business unitΒ in respect of accessing the sulphide ore bodyΒ after the depletion of the oxide ores of Olimpiada.Β
Current assets
Current assetsΒ ofΒ the Polyus Group decreased byΒ 43%Β from USDΒ 1,893,986 thousandΒ as at 31 December 2007Β to USDΒ 1,088,045Β thousandΒ as at 31 December 2008,Β mostlyΒ due to a USDΒ 985,682Β decrease in investments in securities and other financial assets.Β
As at 31 December 2008,Β the value of short-term investments in securities and other financial assetsΒ totaledΒ USDΒ 285,236Β thousand, comparedΒ toΒ USDΒ 1,270,918 thousandΒ as at 31 December 2007.Β TheΒ major reason forΒ theΒ substantialΒ decreaseΒ in short-term investments was a 48%Β decline in equity investments available-for-sale and aΒ 78%Β decrease in investments in listed companies held for trading.Β
InΒ 2008,Β available-for-sale investmentsΒ included a share inΒ RosfundΒ whichΒ declined by USDΒ 191,803Β thousand.Β DuringΒ 2008,Β the Polyus Group disposed ofΒ USD 51,230 thousandΒ of theΒ shareΒ in Rosfund,Β whichΒ resultedΒ in aΒ loss of USDΒ 16,230 thousandΒ as well as a disposalΒ of USDΒ 5,558 thousand of investment revaluation reserve. The decrease inΒ theΒ fair value of this investment over the purchase price wasΒ also offset by investment revaluation reserveΒ forΒ the sum ofΒ USDΒ 31,349 thousand.Β The furtherΒ impairmentΒ was recognisedΒ asΒ aΒ lossΒ from investmentsΒ ofΒ USDΒ 100,090Β thousand.Β
Investments in listed companies held for tradingΒ areΒ represented byΒ financial assets underΒ theΒ trust management of RosbankΒ and areΒ carried at fair value.Β In the beginning ofΒ 2008,Β their valueΒ totaledΒ USD 187,628 thousand. During 2008,Β a significant part ofΒ these investmentsΒ wasΒ withdrawn.Β The Polyus Group recognizedΒ lossesΒ from investments in listed companies held for tradingΒ in the amount of USDΒ 178,377Β thousandΒ in theΒ income statement.Β At the endΒ 2008,Β the value of these investmentsΒ totaledΒ USDΒ 40,628Β thousand.Β
The Polyus Group sold certain promissory notes receivable during 2008. Thus, their value decreased by USDΒ 74,937 thousandΒ to USD 35,928 thousand as of the year end.Β In addition, by the end of 2008,Β the Polyus Group withdrewΒ itsΒ investmentΒ bank deposits,Β disposedΒ ofΒ loans under repurchase agreements andΒ closed its investmentΒ depositΒ inΒ Rosbank.Β
ReleasedΒ funds wereΒ partlyΒ usedΒ forΒ the capital expenditure programmeΒ and working capital financing,Β repayment of borrowings, dividends payment, acquisition of stakes in subsidiaries,Β and partlyΒ depositedΒ inΒ current bank accounts.Β As a result of this redistributionΒ the Group's cash and cash equivalents increased by 76% from USDΒ 226,174 thousand at 31 December 2007 to USDΒ 398,826 thousand 31 December 2008.Β
Inventories increased byΒ 4% to USDΒ 233,001Β thousand as at 31 December 2008. Stores and materials (net of allowance for obsolescence), which accounted for 78% of the total inventories value at 31 December 2008, increased byΒ 8%Β and equalledΒ to USDΒ 182,100Β thousand as at 31 December 2008. The volumes ofΒ grinding balls,Β spare parts,Β andΒ rolled metal productsΒ purchased for mining equipment,Β as well as cyanides,Β increasedΒ both in terms of volume and costs. This wasΒ becauseΒ Mill No. 3 at the Olimpiada mineΒ increased its capacity up to projected 5 mtpa, and the volumes of gasoline procured increased due to active constructionΒ works within theΒ PolyusΒ Group.Β At the same time,Β the cost of gold under processingΒ fellΒ fromΒ USDΒ 54,961 thousand as at 31 December 2007 to USDΒ 49,052Β thousand as at 31 December 2008.Β
Capital and liabilities
Since 1 January 2007, the Polyus Group has been financed by equity capital and has had no significant bank debt.
Share capital and reserves
As at 31 DecemberΒ 2008,Β share capital and reserves were USD 2,794,541 thousand, compared to USD 3,308,961 thousandΒ asΒ at 31 December 2007. This declineΒ wasΒ primarilyΒ dueΒ toΒ the reduction inΒ translationΒ and investment revaluationΒ reserves. DuringΒ 2008,Β the translation reserve decreased by USD 469,133 thousandΒ due to the changes inΒ the RUB/USD exchange rate. In addition, the investmentΒ revaluation reserve wasΒ eliminatedΒ as a result ofΒ the recognition of an impairment ofΒ available-for-saleΒ investmentsΒ in the sum of USD 36,907 thousand.Β
Β During 2008, the value of the Polyus Group treasury shares and additional paid-in capital decreased by USD 5,523 thousand and USD 1,510 thousand respectively. ThisΒ wasΒ related toΒ theΒ acquisition ofΒ 95,314 treasury sharesΒ byΒ management under the share option plan.Β As at 31 December 2008Β the value of treasury sharesΒ wasΒ USDΒ 724,927Β thousand,Β and theΒ additional paid-in capital totaledΒ USDΒ 2,116,655 thousand .
During the period,Β the Polyus Group'Β retained earningsΒ decreasedΒ by USDΒ 3,014Β thousand, reflecting a net profitΒ attributable to the parent companyΒ of USDΒ 51,507Β thousand less dividendsΒ paidΒ of USDΒ 22,258Β thousand (in respect of 2007 results),Β adjustments in connection withΒ theΒ increase inΒ theΒ share capital of subsidiaries and change of shareholding structure of subsidiariesΒ in aΒ netΒ amount of USDΒ 32,263Β thousand.Β Β
Non-current liabilities
In 2008, deferred tax liabilities which account for the largest portion of non-current liabilitiesΒ totaledΒ USDΒ 148,244Β thousand which isΒ 26% less than in the previous year (USDΒ 200,609 thousand).Β This change related toΒ theΒ partialΒ taxΒ recognition in the income statement for the period of USDΒ 22,893Β thousand,Β as well asΒ exchange rateΒ movements,Β which led toΒ aΒ decreaseΒ inΒ deferred tax liabilities ofΒ USDΒ 29,472 thousand.Β Environmental obligationsΒ decreased byΒ 58% from USDΒ 81,341 thousandΒ asΒ at 31 December 2007 to USDΒ 34,379Β thousandΒ as at 31 December 2008. This wasΒ primarilyΒ due to a substantial re-estimation of decommissioningΒ assets and provision for land restorationΒ inΒ the total amount of USDΒ 48,305Β thousand,Β as well asΒ aΒ weakeningΒ of the Russian rouble.
Current liabilities
In 2008, borrowings were all repaid. Trade payables decreased by USD 3,733 thousand to USD 17,918 thousand. Other payables and accrued expensesΒ asΒ at 31 December 2008 were USD 65,609 thousand compared to 83,932 thousandΒ asΒ at 31 December 2007.Β AccruedΒ annual leave paymentsΒ totaledΒ USD 18,542 thousand at the end of the reporting period, compared to USD 16,482 thousand at the end of the previous period. The Polyus Group outstanding amounts on payroll settlements as of the year end were USD 37,159Β thousand, reflectingΒ aΒ 32% increase over 2007 levels.Β The 44% increase mainly comes from the Krasnoyarsk business unit, where a bonus for successful achievement of operational targets was accrued. Other payables reduced by 68%, whichΒ wasΒ mostlyΒ due toΒ settlementΒ of outstandingΒ accountsΒ relating toΒ theΒ Rosbank asset management agreementsΒ andΒ theΒ final settlementΒ of share option plan liabilities by Jenington.
Of theΒ unsettled liabilities under the share option plan, 50%Β were partly settled, and the remaining 50%Β were cancelledΒ and written through the income statement. At the beginning of the period these liabilities amounted to USD 5,357 thousand, which corresponds to the fair value of the option for 0.1% of the Polyus GoldΒ Shares.
AtΒ a General Shareholders' meetingΒ which took place onΒ 26 June 2008,the decision was made to pay out dividends based onΒ 2007 results.Β During 2008Β the Group paid out USD 22,258 thousand as dividends to Polyus Gold shareholders.
In May 2008, Polyus Gold's subsidiary, CJSC Polyus, purchased 2.7% of OJSC MatrosovΒ Mine shares in addition to its stake of 94.8% as of 31 December 2007. Thus, the total percentage ofΒ CJSC PolyusΒ ownershipΒ in Matrosov MineΒ increasedΒ to 97.5%. Under Russian legislation, the Polyus Group was obliged to make an offer to purchase the remaining shares held by MatrosovΒ Mine's minority shareholders.Β Following a squeeze-out offer made in July 2008, CJSC Polyus consolidated 100% of OJSC Matrosov Mine shares in October 2008.Β During the year 2008, the Polyus GroupΒ alsoΒ consolidated its stake in OJSC Aldanzoloto GRKΒ (as at 31 December 2007 CJSCΒ Polyus ownership in OJSC Aldanzoloto GRKΒ totaledΒ 99.37%).Β Thus, accumulated reserve on contingent consideration onΒ acquisition ofΒ subsidiaries was redeemed byΒ the end ofΒ the reporting year.Β FollowingΒ the transaction, theΒ Polyus Group recognized aΒ decrease inΒ minority interest in the amount of USDΒ 10,073Β thousand in its consolidated statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2008.Β
Current tax liabilities as atΒ 31 DecemberΒ 2008Β wereΒ USD 18,171 thousand, which isΒ 46%Β less thanΒ atΒ 31Β December 2007.Β The decrease mainly occurred on account of income tax and VAT liabilities.Β Current incomeΒ tax liabilities reduced by 89%Β from USDΒ 12,663 thousand to USDΒ 1,344 thousandΒ as a result ofΒ significant amounts of current income tax prepaid in the Krasnoyarsk business unit.Β The amount ofΒ VATΒ payable decreased byΒ 81% to USDΒ 1,417 thousand, compared to USDΒ 7,420 thousand in the previousΒ period, which resultedΒ mainlyΒ fromΒ reduction in non-recoverable items as compared to the previous year.Β This was partly offset by a substantial increase in social tax liabilitiesΒ mainlyΒ caused by compensations payable liability accrued by 31 December 2008.Β
Cash flow analysis
The following table shows extracts of the Polyus Group's consolidated cash flow statement for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:Β
|
Years ended 31 December |
|||
|
USDΒ '000 |
2008 |
2007 (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
|
Operating activities |
|||
|
Profit before income tax |
122,471Β |
177,107 |
1,228,391 |
|
Adjustments(1) |
308,564Β |
159,594 |
(918,134) |
|
Operating profit before working capital changes |
431,035Β |
336,701 |
310,257 |
|
Changes in working capital |
(145,947) |
(40,197) |
(69,771) |
|
Cash flows from operations |
285,088Β |
296,504 |
240,486 |
|
Interest paid |
(2,434) |
(1,671) |
(3,552) |
|
Income tax paid |
(90,421) |
(50,187) |
(89,897) |
|
Net cash generated from operating activities |
192,233Β |
244,646 |
147,037 |
|
Investing activities |
|||
|
Capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs(2) |
(629,842) |
(459,394) |
(625,005) |
|
Other investments spendings/proceeds(3) |
700,728Β |
90,648 |
1,320,495 |
|
Net cash (used in)/generated from investing activities |
70,886Β |
(368,746) |
695,490 |
|
Net cash generated from/(used in) financing activities |
(43,588) |
42,337 |
(632,895) |
|
Effect of translation to presentation currency |
(46,879) |
13,740 |
56,157 |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
172,652Β |
(68,023) |
265,789 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
226,174Β |
294,197 |
28,408 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year |
398,826Β |
226,174 |
294,197 |
1. Adjustments for non-cash items include: the share option plan, amortisation and depreciation, expensed stripping costs, finance costs, loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment, change in allowance for doubtful debts, impairment of advances paid to suppliers (reversed)/recognised, change in provision for land restoration, impairment of property, plant and equipment, change in allowance for reimbursable value added tax, income from investments, foreign exchange (gain)/loss, net and other items.
2. Capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costsΒ include purchases of property, plant and equipment, acquisition of shares in subsidiaries, deferred stripping costs capitalised, proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and proceeds from sale of shares in subsidiaries.
3. Other investments spendings/proceeds include repayment of contingent consideration, proceeds from sale of shares in Gold Fields, dividends received,Β interest received,Β purchase of promissory notes and other financial assets and proceeds from sale of promissory notes and other financial assets.
In 2008, the Polyus Group generated income before tax of USDΒ 122,471Β thousand. Operating profit before working capital changes amounted to USDΒ 431,035Β thousand, whichΒ wasΒ 28% higher than in the previous year.Β InΒ the reporting period,Β net cash provided by operating activitiesΒ decreased by USDΒ 52,413Β thousandΒ toΒ USDΒ 192,233Β thousand. TheΒ decreaseΒ inΒ netΒ cashΒ inflow from operations resulted mainly fromΒ a substantial increase in current income tax expense andΒ working capital financing.Β The increase of the latterΒ costs was a result of increased prices on fuel, materials and spares, as well asΒ anΒ increase in the physical volume of purchases.
During 2008, the Polyus Group substantially increased itsΒ capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs. In the period under reviewΒ these expensesΒ totaledΒ USDΒ 629,842Β thousand, compared to USDΒ 459,394Β thousand in the previous period. However, while capital expenditures were high, the Polyus Group had cash inflow from investments as it closed its positions onΒ theΒ Rosbank promissory notes and a number of deposits and trust management contractsΒ for a total amount of USDΒ 664,151Β thousand. As a result, inΒ 2008Β the Polyus GroupΒ receivedΒ USDΒ 70,886Β thousandΒ in investment activities, while in 2007Β itΒ usedΒ USDΒ 368,746Β thousandΒ inΒ investment activities. Total change of net cash flows from investment activities was USDΒ 439,632Β thousand.Β
Cash outflowΒ from financing activities in the year ended 31 December 2008Β totaledΒ USDΒ 43,588Β thousand compared to cashΒ receivedΒ fromΒ financing activities in the amount of USDΒ 42,337Β thousand in the year ended 31Β December 2007.Β The major cash outflows during the reporting year were repayment of borrowings and dividend payments. In 2008, the Polyus Group repaid the loan obtained by its associated company OJSC SVMC for the total amount of USDΒ 19,034 thousand. In accordance with the General Shareholders meeting decision, in 2008 the Group paid out dividends based on year 2007 results. This resulted in a cash outflow of USDΒ 24,266Β thousand.
Capital expenditures, acquisitions of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs
Capital expenditures represent the Polyus Group's purchase of property, plant and equipment adjusted for the proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment. The Polyus Group also presentsΒ capitalised deferred stripping costs and the acquisition of subsidiaries adjusted for the repayment of contingent consideration and proceeds from the disposal of such subsidiaries.Β
The following table shows the Polyus Group's capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs for the years ended 31 December 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
Years ended 31 December |
|||
|
USD'000 |
2008 |
2007 Β (restated) |
2006 (restated) |
|
+ Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
481,504Β |
382,802Β |
267,551Β |
|
- Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
(5,747) |
(17,952) |
(12,030) |
|
Net capital expenditures |
475,757Β |
364,850Β |
255,521Β |
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired, and increase of ownership in subsidiaries |
39,156Β |
- |
307,667Β |
|
+ Repayment of contingent consideration on acquisition of subsidiaries |
19,616Β |
38,228Β |
61,817Β |
|
- Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary, net of cash disposed of |
- |
(1,320) |
- |
|
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of adjustments above |
58,772Β |
36,908Β |
369,484Β |
|
+ Deferred stripping costs capitalised |
95,313Β |
57,636Β |
- |
|
+ Interest expenses capitalised |
- |
- |
- |
|
Total capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs |
629,842Β |
459,394Β |
625,005Β |
In 2008, the Polyus Group spent USDΒ 629,842Β thousand on total capital expenditures, acquisition of subsidiaries and deferred stripping costs. ThisΒ wasΒ 37%Β moreΒ than in 2007,Β mostlyΒ due toΒ an increase in theΒ amountsΒ expended onΒ purchase of property, plant and equipment, acquisition of subsidiariesΒ as well as deferred stripping costs capitalisation. InΒ the reporting period, the Polyus GroupΒ continued implementing its extensive capital expenditures programme andΒ spent USDΒ 475,757Β thousand on property, plant and equipment,Β including equipment for mills under construction, mining and construction equipment and rolled metal products. The largestΒ shareΒ of the Group's capital expenditures was spent on theΒ developmentΒ of theΒ BlagodatnoyeΒ project,Β reconstruction ofΒ MillΒ No.1 at Olimpiada to process Titimukhta ores and Olimpiada transition to sulphide oresΒ processingΒ as well as modernization programme carried out at the Kuranakh mine.Β During the period under review, the Group spent USDΒ 39,156Β thousand on acquisitionsΒ and increasedΒ ownership in its subsidiaries, mainlyΒ consolidatingΒ 100%Β interestΒ inΒ OJSC MatrosovΒ Mine.Β In 2008, stripping costs capitalised wereΒ USDΒ 95,313Β thousand, compared toΒ USDΒ 57,636Β thousandΒ in 2007,Β due to the costs incurred on deferred stripping relating to the transition of productionΒ from oxide oresΒ to sulphide oresΒ atΒ theΒ Olimpiada mine.
Cash sources and cashΒ expenditureΒ and impairment
At the beginning of 2008, the Polyus Group's available highly liquid assetΒ positionΒ totaledΒ USD 1,497 million, which included USD 1,271 million of short-term investments and USD 226 million of cash and cash equivalents. By the end of the year, the Group'sΒ highly liquid assetΒ positionΒ wasΒ reduced by USD 813 million and amounted to USD 684 million.Β Β We have prepared an analysis of the liquid asset movement for the year in a format that differs from IFRS, as we believe it provides useful information in a combined format for users. This format should not be considered as an alternative to IFRS. The table below showsΒ liquid assetΒ sources,Β outflowsΒ and impairment of investments during 2008
|
USD million
|
Cash
|
ST investments
|
Β
|
|
1. Total cash and short-term investments at the beginning of the year, of which:
|
Β
|
Β
|
1,497
|
|
1.1 Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January 2008
|
226
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
1.1 Short-term investments at 1 January 2008
|
Β
|
1,271
|
Β
|
|
Movement in short-term investments during the year:
|
Β
|
(634)
|
Β
|
|
1.1.1 Disposal of bank deposits classified as investments
|
Β
|
(277)
|
Β
|
|
1.1.2 Proceeds from investments in listed companies held for trading (Rosbank MC)
|
Β
|
(160)
|
Β
|
|
1.1.3 Proceeds from investments in listed companies held for trading (AKB Rosbank)
|
Β
|
(37)
|
Β
|
|
1.1.4 Proceeds from Rosbank promissory notes
|
Β
|
(125)
|
Β
|
|
Β 1.1.5 Disposal of available-for-sale investments (part of Rosfund Share)
|
Β
|
(35)
|
Β
|
|
2. Cash sources raised during the year
|
272
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.1 Cash sources from investing activities
|
80
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.1.1. Interest received
|
44
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.1.2 Proceeds from sale of Vysochaishy
|
30
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.1.3 Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
6
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2 Cash sources from operating activities
|
192
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2.1 Net inflow before working capital changes
|
431
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2.2 Increase in inventories
|
(102)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2.3 Increase in VAT reimbursable
|
(49)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2.4 Income tax paid
|
(90)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
2.2.5 Other, net
|
2
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3. Cash expenditure during the year
|
(687)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1 Cash expenditure in investing activities
|
(643)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1.1 Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
(482)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1.2 Deferred stripping at the Olimpiada mine
|
(95)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1.3 Increase of ownership in OJSC Matrosov Mine and OJSC Aldanzoloto GRK
|
(39)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1.4 Repayment of contingent consideration on acquisition of subsidiaries
|
(20)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.1.5 Other, net
|
(7)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.2 Cash expenditure in financing activities
|
(44)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.2.1 Repayment of borrowings
|
(19)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.2.2 Dividends paid
|
(22)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
3.2.3 Other, net
|
(3)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
4. Foreign exchange loss due to RUB depreciation
|
(47)
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
5. Total cash and short-term investments before impairment and foreign exchange
|
Β
|
Β
|
1,035
|
|
6. Impairment of investments in listed companies held for trading
|
Β
|
(178)
|
Β
|
|
7. FOREX loss onΒ investments in listed companies held for trading
|
Β
|
(10)
|
Β
|
|
8. Impairment of available-for-sale investments
|
Β
|
(100)
|
Β
|
|
9. Loss on sale of Shares of Rosfund
|
Β
|
(16)
|
Β
|
|
10. Investments revaluation reserve
|
Β
|
(37)
|
Β
|
|
11. Other
|
Β
|
(10)
|
Β
|
|
12. Total cash and short-term investments at the end of the year
|
Β
|
Β
|
684
|
|
12.1 Cash and cash equivalents
|
399
|
Β
|
Β
|
|
12.2 Short-term investments in securities
|
Β
|
285
|
Β
|
Β
Β Β Section 1.1Β presentsΒ movements in short-term investments during the yearΒ as a result of convertingΒ funds from a number of investment instruments held by the Group, namely bank deposits, equity investments under asset management of AKB Rosbank and Rosbank Management Company, promissory notes and available-for-sale investments represented by a Share in Rosfund. As Polyus GoldΒ considersΒ short-term investments asΒ highly liquid assets,Β these movements do not influence theΒ total position of the Group's highly liquid assets.
During the year Polyus GoldΒ generatedΒ USD 272 million of cash, out of which USD 80 million related to investing activities and USD 192 millionΒ represents the net cash flow from operations.
Total cash spending in 2008 equaled USD 687Β million. The cash spent was used in investing and financing activities.Β Cash spent on investing activities wasΒ mainly represented by capital expenditures, consolidation 100% stakes in OJSC Matrosov Mine and OJSC Aldanzoloto GRK and cash deferred stripping costs at the Olimpiada mine.Β CashΒ spent by the Group inΒ financing activitiesΒ representsΒ primarily repayment of borrowings received and dividends payment based on 2007 results.
Due to adverse movements inΒ theΒ RUB/USD exchange rate,Β the Polyus Group incurred a foreign exchange loss of USD 47 million. As a result, by the end of the year the cash position of the Polyus Group before impairmentΒ totaledΒ USD 1,035Β million.Β
FollowingΒ the deterioration ofΒ theΒ global financial markets, investments in various securities had to be marked to marketΒ such that theΒ PolyusΒ Group recognizedΒ anΒ impairment of investments in the amount of USD 351Β million. As a result,Β theΒ highly liquid assetΒ position at the end of 2008Β totaledΒ USD 684 million (represented by USD 399 million of cash and cash equivalents and by USD 285 million of short-term investments in securities).
5. Description of principal risks
TheΒ activities ofΒ the Polyus Group (hereinafter the Company)Β are associatedΒ with a number of risks that may affect the Company's production and financial results.Β WhilstΒ theΒ currentΒ global financial crisisΒ has added furtherΒ risks toΒ those traditionally faced by the mining industry, the Company believesΒ that gold mining companies, in general,Β areΒ in a better position to weather such additional risks thanΒ producers of other metals.Β
The Company is committed to achievingΒ successful development, not least through ensuringΒ an effectiveΒ risk management system designed toΒ achieve optimalΒ results,Β an efficientΒ distribution of resources,Β andΒ Β strengthening of the Company's competitiveness.Β Successful riskΒ managementΒ requires, amongst other things,Β the identification and assessment ofΒ potential threat parameters,Β and the development of measures aimed at the regulation ofΒ risk levels. The Company has developed internal documents governing theΒ process though which risks should be managed. Such documents require thatΒ each business unit has aΒ designatedΒ risk manager, develops a list of basic risks, and takes measures aimed atΒ loweringΒ risk levels.Β
5.1 Risks connected with the financial and economic crisis
RisksΒ associated with failuresΒ to perform under existing agreements andΒ of securingΒ new equipment and material supply agreementsΒ
One of the consequences of theΒ global financialΒ crisisΒ isΒ a material drop in the financial statusΒ or credit ratingsΒ of a number of enterprises inΒ RussiaΒ andΒ internationallyΒ that manufacture and supply spare parts and equipment.Β AnyΒ possible suspension of theirΒ activities would increaseΒ the risk ofΒ them failingΒ to perform their contractual obligations, possibly resulting in theΒ late delivery of equipment and materials.Β Further failuresΒ to observe the Company's logistic schedules may affect theΒ launchΒ time of new production capacities and the fulfilment of theΒ Company'sΒ production plans.Β
ToΒ attempt toΒ mitigate the risk of late delivery,Β the Company monitors the financial status of its majorΒ counterparties on a regular basisΒ and takes measures toΒ increaseΒ theΒ numberΒ ofΒ actual, andΒ potential, counterparties with which it conducts business.
Risks associated with insufficient credit resourcesΒ
TheΒ CompanyΒ currentlyΒ has no significant debts payableΒ and is currently facingΒ high prices and demand for gold.. Coupled with ampleΒ liquidity reserves in the form of the Company's own money resources,Β the Company believes it hasΒ a sufficientΒ level ofΒ capital to continue theΒ current activitiesΒ of the Company's enterprises and to fulfilΒ Β currentlyΒ approved plans aimed at the expansion of production capacities and production volumes.Β However, the global financial crisis has resulted in little, if any, access to the capital markets and increased costs associated with securing credit resources. This may lead to adjustments in the implementation times for a number of major projects.
Risk of the government's rejection to take part in the implementation of projectsΒ
As a resultΒ of theΒ currentΒ economic recession, it is likely thatΒ the Government of the Russian Federation will have toΒ revisitΒ the priorities of the Investment Fund project with due regard forΒ its social consequences and regional effects.Β
The absence ofΒ accurateΒ forecastsΒ with regard to the economic development rate and the indefinite macroeconomic trends may lead to a partial reduction of the investment budget andΒ mayΒ limit the Government's ability to co-finance a number of the Company's projects, which may lead to such projects being indefinitely postponed.Β
5.2 Risks characteristic of mining industry enterprises
Operational risks
Ore and mineral reservesΒ are difficult to quantify,Β actualΒ volumes mayΒ beΒ inaccurateΒ Β and are therefore subject to significant correction
The Company'sΒ activities are heavily reliant upon itsΒ available stocks and resources. The evaluation of the ore and mineral reservesΒ depends to a certain extent on the statistic conclusions made on the basis of the results of restricted volumes of drilling and other analyses that may turn out to be incorrect.Β OreΒ and mineral reserves evaluation and classification may also be affected by the changes in the end product prices. If the quantity and quality of the explored reserves are not confirmed the production efficiency may deteriorateΒ as a result of laborΒ consuming mining operations.Β
TheΒ CompanyΒ engagesΒ independent experts to conduct auditsΒ onΒ prospective and existing deposits and to provideΒ reports on the results of the exploration activity, mineral and ore resources and reserves.
Risks connected with mining and production activity
TheΒ Company'sΒ productionΒ activities areΒ carried out in remote regionsΒ which are subject toΒ severe climatic conditions. As a result,Β the delivery of equipment, technological materialsΒ and spare partsΒ is more difficult,Β thus affectingΒ production costs. MiningΒ machinery,Β transportΒ andΒ new technologies,Β including those developed by the Company,Β are used for operations inΒ areas which haveΒ complicated geological and climatic conditions.Β
There are increased risks ofΒ flooding, pit slope and rim slide,Β accidents causedΒ by the use of the mining transport equipmentΒ andΒ preparation and performance of explosion works in the pit, reduction of gold production due toΒ adverseΒ weather conditionsΒ and problems inΒ the power supply facilities and recovery plants.Β TheseΒ risksΒ couldΒ result in suspended ore production and recovery,Β increased costs, health, safety and environmental issues andΒ affect the Company's productionΒ activities.
The Company aims to mitigate the risks associated with stalled and unplanned production activity through various processes, including probability analysis and effective risk management. Such risk management includes the identification of potential threat parameters, the identification of defined risk categories and the adoption of measures designed to prevent accidentsΒ and emergencies. AΒ risk reduction programme is also currently in the process of being developed.
RisksΒ associatedΒ with the implementation of investment projects
The implementation of the Company's investment projects isΒ subjectΒ to market, technical, production and operational risks.
Market risks induced by the changes in the price of gold, exchangeΒ rates andΒ inflation may affect the implementation ofΒ suchΒ projects. Technical, production and operational risks includeΒ construction delays, malfunctionΒ due to errors in the design, constructionΒ orΒ installation, which may lead to higher costs and affect the Company'sΒ results.
To reduceΒ theseΒ project risks the Company has developed a procedure for a careful and comprehensive study, selection and analysis of investment projects offered forΒ implementation. Each projectΒ is subject toΒ approval by the Company's Investment Committee, which is constituted by members with expertise in economics, production and law. Control over investment projects is exercised at all the stages of implementation.Β
Risks connected with acquisition and merger transactionsΒ
The CompanyΒ actively looks forΒ opportunities toΒ investΒ in the gold mining industry both inΒ RussiaΒ and abroad.Β Such acquisitions and mergers inevitably entail a variety of risks.Β To reduce the risks connected with any acquisition and merger transactions the Company conducts a comprehensive analysis of the pending transactions andΒ anΒ assessment of the consequences with due regard for the political, economic, ecological and social factors.
5.3 Financial RisksΒ
Inflation and market risksΒ
Increased inflationΒ induced by theΒ currentΒ economicΒ climateΒ mayΒ haveΒ an adverse impact on theΒ Company'sΒ financialΒ results. Costs which areΒ subject toΒ inflationary changesΒ areΒ denominatedΒ in RussianΒ rublesΒ and, in particular, include:Β materials and utilities, wages andΒ services. Furthermore,Β increasing tariff rates of the natural monopolies mayΒ result in increased costs.Β
In order toΒ reduce the impact ofΒ increasing tariff rates,Β the Company seeks to develop and modernize its own energy-generating facilities and to purchase and consume energy resources based on long - term fixed-price contracts.Β Prospective inflationary changesΒ are also considered as a part ofΒ theΒ analysis when planning budget and costs of implementing investment projects.Β
TheΒ Company'sΒ incomeΒ is sourced fromΒ gold sales effected bothΒ throughΒ long-term contracts and at spotΒ prices. Gold prices are quoted inΒ international markets in US dollars. Accordingly, the economic results of the Company calculated in the national currency depend, to a considerable extent, on theΒ fluctuations inΒ goldΒ pricesΒ andΒ the ruble/dollarΒ exchangeΒ rates. Β The gold market is cyclical and sensitive to any economic changes. TheΒ priceΒ of goldΒ is subject to substantial fluctuations under the influence ofΒ factors beyond control of the Company.Β AΒ substantial continued price reduction may result in profitability reduction of the gold exploration and extraction activities. In theΒ current economic climate, gold is used to hedge potential losses inΒ currency and capital markets.Β Therefore currentlyΒ the level of demand for gold remainsΒ stable and maintains high rates of price indexes. The observableΒ rubleΒ devaluation results in increasing theΒ rubleΒ equivalent ofΒ incomeΒ of the Company and partially compensates for losses generated by inflation-related price growth. Nevertheless, inΒ theΒ future, as the marketΒ conditions change, possibleΒ exchange rateΒ andΒ inflationΒ adjustmentsΒ may result in an adverse impact on the financial standing and performance of the Company.Β
Liquidity Risk
Management of liquidity risk is intended to maintain a sufficient level of monetary resources to fund production-, management-, and investment-related needs, to ensure stability of compliance with the financial obligations of the Company and to develop the appropriate capital structure. The Company monitors on a regular basis the followingΒ risks: productionΒ levels, operational expenditures,Β prices of raw materials, volumesΒ of floating assets and capitalΒ expenditure. The enterprises of the Company implementΒ a co-ordinated and automaticΒ program ofΒ cash assetΒ record-keeping. The measures taken to regulate liquidity risk enable the Company to maintain its competitiveness and long-term financial solvency.Β
5.4 Regulatory Risks
The activities of the Company may be adversely impacted byΒ the failure to obtain,Β or theΒ terminationΒ or non-renewal o,f itsΒ licenses.
TheΒ ability of the Company to carry out its activities depends on its licenses, in particular those licenses relating to the use ofΒ mineral resources, as well as onΒ being able to obtain new licenses andΒ complying withΒ their terms. The terms of the license agreements require the Company to comply withΒ a number ofΒ industrial standards, employ qualified personnel,Β ensure that the necessary equipment and operation quality control systems are available,Β maintainΒ relevantΒ documentation and provideΒ informationΒ toΒ the licensing authoritiesΒ when requested. Failure to comply withΒ suchΒ terms may result inΒ theΒ termination of the licenses critical to the operations of the CompanyΒ or confer obligations on the Company, which mayΒ decrease its profitability.Β
The CompanyΒ is focusedΒ on improving the system control over compliance with license agreements and industrial standard requirements.Β Any comments or reports made byΒ state regulatory and supervisory authoritiesΒ as a result of inspections of operative and industrial activities of the Company areΒ scrutinized.Β
Tax Legislation Risks
As with all Russian mining companies, theΒ Company pays aΒ significantΒ amount of taxes. TheΒ tax obligationsΒ ofΒ the CompanyΒ can result inΒ uncertaintiesΒ due to the imperfection ofΒ taxΒ legislation. The risksΒ include: ambiguous interpretation of law, inconsistentΒ application ofΒ legislation, amendments toΒ tax legislation or practice change.Β Such risksΒ may result in fines, penalties and other sanctions. One of tasks of managing the risks of the Company is to promptly identify, assess and eliminate the risks. The current level of tax risks faced by the Company is regarded asΒ immaterial.Β
ChangesΒ ofΒ EnvironmentalΒ Legislation
TheΒ Company'sΒ activitiesΒ are subject toΒ environmental control and regulationΒ as a result of the use ofΒ environmentally hazardous substances,Β as well as ejecting operational waste and hazardous substances into the environment, soil disturbance, potential harm to wildlife and other factorsΒ
The CompanyΒ aims to complyΒ with its environmental obligations and follows the principles and requirements of Russian and international standards, agreements, conventions and protocols. The task of enhancing efficiency ofΒ Company performance is intended, among other things, to reduce emissions of hazardous substances and develop waste disposal sites. The changesΒ inΒ environmental legislation and introduction of stricter licensing requirements may result in additional expenditures to change industrial process and increase in environmental charges.
Follow the stocks