Member Info for Yanis2005

Ha ha, that is funny, but not true. We got the HH oil to come soon, same as for ukog.

Got 88E too, MATD is on my watch list.

Who is BA?

Mullins, I have a very good holding in ukog and angs, but I have more alba. ATB take care.

That was not a sell, it was a buy - the bid was at 1.35 abd ask at 1.4, trade was at 1.3852 - definitely a buy. Is shown as a sell because the ask was moved to 1.45 straight after 4:30.

Why not hold both? :)

IMO, it will hold. We are up against resistance at 1.45p - 50-day moving average. Tomorrow, if we are not already there, we should open above 1.45p. GLTA.

BarryScott, the post got reported because it makes claim of negative facts that may or may not be correct without providing a link to verify the claim. Comes up as an obvious attempt to devalue the company. Same applies to the other way round when making a positive claim of a fact, provide a link to substantiate it. Otherwise, make it clear that it your opinion that you are posting. All companies on AIM raise money mostly by placing shares, or borrow money which in some cases is almost impossible due to lack of revenue. MPL managed to raise money, construct the port, contracts are pending and the share float is low. Also, the directors put a substantial amount of their cash in to buying shares ... something that is generally rare on the AIM. And yes, the institutional investors that hold more than 54% of the company. These guys are in the business of making money, if they believed that MPL was going to go bust as you claim, they will very likely sell and get out of it as much as they can get, that is my opinion. I hope I will be able to add to my MPL holding at these prices. ATB.

comeonvog, still waiting for a response You do not want to look at the institutional shareholders, the big guns holding more than 54% of the shares in issue. Your agenda is obvious. Can you explain why the MPL directors, less than a year ago, purchased shares on the open market? Sep 2017, the directors purchased shares on the London Stock Exchange, more than 1,000,000 at more than 8p. They bought 1,123,803 shares at a total cost to them of £90,383 plus trading costs. Take a look and add them up: http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=MPL&ArticleCode=bhusy5ci&ArticleHeadline=Director39s_Share_Purchase http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=MPL&ArticleCode=k09xjicj&ArticleHeadline=Directors39_Share_Purchases Please, go ahead and explain why these MPL directors paid thousands of pounds of their own money to purchase shares in their company at a much higher price than where the SP currently is, if they did not believe that the SP will substantially increase.

Might not mean anything but I tried dummy buys 5 mil offered 0.267p 10 mil offered 0.299p Ask is at 0.26. Tried the same a couple of days ago and was offered the shares below the ask. Could mean that who ever is selling is running out of shares :). All we now need is another spark. GLTA.

Charlie, many thanks for that link - gave me the answer about disclosure rules that I was looking for.

Reported, looks like MountTeide resurrected.

Comeonvog, You do not want to look at the institutional shareholders, the big guns holding more than 54% of the shares in issue. Your agenda is obvious. Can you explain why the MPL directors, less than a year ago, purchased shares on the open market? Sep 2017, the directors purchased shares on the London Stock Exchange, more than 1,000,000 at more than 8p. They bought 1,123,803 shares at a total cost to them of £90,383 plus trading costs. Take a look and add them up: http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=MPL&ArticleCode=bhusy5ci&ArticleHeadline=Director39s_Share_Purchase http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=MPL&ArticleCode=k09xjicj&ArticleHeadline=Directors39_Share_Purchases Please, go ahead and explain why these MPL directors paid thousands of pounds of their own money to purchase shares in their company at a much higher price than where the SP currently is, if they did not believe that the SP will substantially increase.

Lennie, IMO, Alba sentiment is not related to Solo or any other company. Alba with their diverse mining assets as well as oil & gas has more potential.. Solo has its own problems, consolidation earlier on, YA just had a loan conversion, there is a special shareholder meeting coming requested by the shareholders http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=SOLO&ArticleCode=z8hr3852&ArticleHeadline=Recording_of_Informal_Shareholder_Meeting http://www.lse.co.uk/share-regulatory-news.asp?shareprice=SOLO&ArticleCode=g7u0v3aa&ArticleHeadline=Issue_of_Equity We are down at 0.24p because the move up when the OGA approval was announced was arrested by excessive share sales below placing price, in fact below 0.28p. Since 13 June, 244 million shares traded below 0.28p. Who is selling these? Whoever is selling shares at these levels is responsible for the loss in Alba sentiment. People run to a rising SP, it is a fact. SP falling or stagnant keeps buyers away, nobody wants to have his money trapped for weeks and months. Any ideas as to who is selling down here?

Thorpedo, fully agree with you. I am going to be a little selfish here and wish that the share price stays at this level for a little longer until I free some money from my other shares. :)

After the OGA approval, there would have been an RNS saying that ... Alba knows of no reason why the SP is going up ... But after OGA approval, the SP sunk ... where is the RNS saying Alba knows of no reason why the SP collapsed?

Somebody selling shares, cannot wait, which is strange considering that full customs approval will be coming within weeks (as per last RNS). Personally, if I had more funds I will be topping up, not an insignuation to buy, just my opinion.

Dsfat, very good point, and thanks for emailing and pointing the HHDL website issues to Alba. On the issue of evaluation of possible future revenue and company value, IMO is totally useless for an AIM company with no income at present. Is all down to sentiment. Sentiment. I witnessed a company with no assets at all, only office space, going to $200 million capitalisation, before going bust. As of yesterday, since the OGA announcement on 14th June, Alba traded 187 million shares compared to Ukog trading 1,658 million. This is purely because market sentiment for UKOG is positive and for Alba is negative. Why? IMO, Putting the Alba fire out when the OGA approval was announced did it. 238 million shares sold below 0.28p since OGA approval announcement - Where did these come from? Who sold them? Why is the bid on level 2 now sitting at 0.24p? Alba BOD needs to do something about this. We should all be emailing them asking questions. If the SP doesn’t improve, we will suffer substantial deterioration in the not too distant future. Unless next placing is done at a higher SP we will be in trouble. We should not ignore this fact in future projections. Dowgate initial estimate was 17p then reduced to 6p. Where did the Alba share float go from to when these two evaluations were done? Sentiment has to change and change soon. GF needs to act.

CofE, i added 6 million after the last placings. My average is 0.42.

Thank you Sarir, I am a lot more confident now. Ukog is on fire right now and no amount of water is going to put this fire out. Good luck to all of us. Thanks m8. Take care.