Member Info for Wolster

Amers,

Dont be silly.

The only (special) divy will be on a company/component sale - which will likely only occur after flank news - so lets just focus on one thing at a time shall we.

If we get flanks (highly likely), then I would say the last hurdle is swept away for a sale (at decent value), if we get a sale (probable) then a special divy will be paid from proceeds.

If we dont get a sale - no divy (& will lead to a a SP loss - but hopefully still higher than today as we will have flanks & working operation)

Tricky,

All that really needs to be said is that most of us invested believe that the company value will substatially rerate upwards when 2m oz turns into 15m oz. How you dont beleive that is mind boggling.

Ofc the market wont value the 15m oz yet as its not cast iron (its only estimated/flank isnt agreed with all agencies yet etc...) but thats the game we are playing for.

Couple that with all the MM games / tool posters (maybe yourself included)when the share price did try to rerate itself upwards from 4p - I would suggest that the big players were caught on the hop & did all in there power (& still prolly are) to rein it back.

Lets face it the rise from 0.5p has shown the market is waking up to this & it'll only go one way (up if in doubt) from here on flanks, news of sale/ or news of going into production (tho not as fast as sale news granted), so where is the risk.

The only risk is if you believe that the BOD are russian cowboys & have lied about everything so far (inc reserve levels), I am choosing not to believe that risk as I have NO EVIDENCE to support it.

Someone posts that every after close at about this time, despite quite obvious sell/buys getting reported wrongly all day (given how close the bid/offer were), not to mention the late reported buys every night.

It'll be interesting tonight to see the scale of any background buying.

Is there ever a point at which these valuations (even if accurate based on the metals in the ground) just become to expensive a risk or to unaffordable for any player to buy us out.

Would it not be more sensible to just buy a large stake in our business & also a large fund to scale up production to the max - & therefore put less cash on the table up front, but longer term all parties win big when the stuff comes out of the ground.

Here he is Mr negative **** off a share I want in on cheaper.

You add nothing to the BB Lame, except to pollute it with argumentative drivel.

Back to the ignore with you.

Also notice on the rise - the absence of the scum (back to their caves till the next drop)

As soon as you sell, you post about it - for only one reason.

FEAR OF MISSING OUT.

Yep that covers it, & why EUA (When Russians are on Hol & we arnt expecting an RNS) because the Palladium opportunity is still there & this is still a massively undervalued asset base.

Therefore it could rise (like over Christmas) without news just as esay as fall - its sentiment driven until the next news.

Thats where I am sitting atm EUA.

Done very well & tbh I think its got potential for further uplift based on -

Flanks acquistion -(which takes it fro 2m oz to 15m oz Palladium+ other metals)
Possible sale of MT asset - (& resulting special divy)
All directors heavily invested & in line with Share holders - (Unlike Amer / selfish scum)

Good luck to all the rest of you guys on here in the new year.

Nice rise today gents - Im still here (was just avoiding the de-ramp games) + I had vowed not to interact with my broker until the silly games sending this below 3p were over (had a rest from aim).

Oh yep happy christmas LTH - screw u shorters+de-rampers (esp Laimtree - hope he has been waiting for his drop entry point that didn't come - the scum bag)

I would think even under "a go on your own basis" 1p is lowball.

Flank additions, Palladium/Plat price rises + the company moving from an explorer to a producer would increase the SP beyond its original base point.

Not to mention always the possibility of a future season takeover if not this season.

At least Kalan your posts are constructive (but you only have to read back a few weeks on here to see the unfounded attacks on the stock - to see why many are defensive on here - tho things do appear to be more normal atm)

Full take over or not - if I was the party to make the move on even MT alone, I would still be buying up chunks of shares at these values.

As soon as the news of even a component sale spreads that early investment will help fund the buy price.

Also WT does appear to be being kept, why else move your offices closer to it.

I'm just saying it as I see it tbh + I am flexible in my thinking - if given decent arguments to counter me.

However your timing for a battle seems timed to conincide with the current minor drop in SP - so I will now put you on ignore - by all means feel free to criticise my viewpoints, but i will only respond this evening after close of play.

TTFN (ignore)

Maybe we ought to join the derampers, so they firstly fill up their buy quota faster & then because they hoovered up all the shares so cheaply - they will offer more for the company in the end :)

(I wont tho - against my principles)

"the price is held where it is by buys and sells. If it's falling - more people are selling than buying - all this guff about market makers is made up tosh - their job is to make a market - they only make money when they buy and sell shares - they get the margin - so they move the share price to where the action is - hence my thoughts about the sp going to 2.1p or 4p this morning - if there was an appetite for buying they would have moved it up to bring in the buyers scared of missing out. If there is an appetite for selling they drop it to get the sellers and buyers (looking for a bargain) to match up - that's it - it's not a mystery."

However if the MM gets overstretched as they did on our rise to 4p they will do all things possible to regain control of the market & bring the SP down to what their big player buyers want the price to be - hence the bear attack.

Having had a very successful bear attack they will be highly reluctant to allow the share to break up again (as this may put the SP beyond where there larger buyers want the price to be) hence they will seek to control the upper price range.

All this is made ALOT easier due to the damaged sentiment - which you artfully ignore in your posts.

Should the company continue with there strong RNS's eventually the MM stranglehold will break, alongside a sentiment return.

We need the company to break the deadlock with the MM's (or more relevant the larger buyers become more willing to up their offers) - so I agree with you we are locked into a range at the moment - until a damb breaks.

I suppose the investors have bought in with a variety of timelines to expect profit - but they have a strong case that at some point ther 2.whatever p price could get blasted into orbit.

Others posting on here not invested are obviously interested in the above senario - but are hoping for lower entry to the rocket ship imo...

So my next question would be, if we are considered the finder of a new claim & we have pushed out our flanks to the allowable extent.

What stops any Tom Dick or Nor Nickle - plotting the trajectory of our strike path & sticking a claim on an area just outside our reach, but still on the same path.

Also what would stop us plotting this path ourselves & putting fresh claims in to mine (separate from our existing one)these areas in the future ?

So when/if the flanks are agreed & added to our mineable acreage what happens next.

Can we just keep testing the new flank positions of our claim & push out our borders more - or are there limits to how far we can go (cashflow dependent etc...) before the Russian government shut the shop & say thats your lot ?

OOhh Eerrrr - lets just sow some seeds of doubt (in a completly unarguable post, where every outcome is predicted), what an utter waste of space post.

Thats what my septic peg charts tell me.

Oh yes im an Aries gonna go check me my horoscope - it'll tell me the future.

Couldn't give a rats ass till it get back past 3p - I wont even bother logging in HL

O while im at it
"why havent you called out the many ramping lies posted here or emergence of new posters promoting a short term and extremely positive outcome."

Simply because whilst I may not agree with the highest of the high ramps, they do still echo my feeling of growth in the share price from where we are now (2.7p) to the future - so honestly I dont feel the need.

But attacks on the share that I am invested in (& mainly unsupported attacks at that) I am ofc more inclined to counter as my overriding thoughts are highly positive on this share - hence my investment.

Anyway as sintillating as this conversation is (& frankly a better one than is the norm between our rival factions) we really arnt discussing any item relevant to company RNS'd facts - so its ultimately pointless.