We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
And if you're sick of this board you're more than welcome to go back under the rock you came from just over a week ago, with your constant false predictions, fake claims about when RNS's will land and false claims about funding being sorted
Here before you and will be here after you. Trader scum
"Funding will be confirmed Wednesday"
That's a lie
Doe you understand
Yours forever blowing bubbles ..
Slurms
Stop telling lies
You're an an absolute fraud.
A Jonny come lately fraud.
They don't know what the final figure is yet, it's being reviewed independently.
It's clearly a different board to last week Tornado T. Looks like they made an effect to answer your question via the message so thanks for asking.
I'm in the camp of watch and learn and sit it out until the report is in. I don't think think it's going to a penny but I don't think you'll see more than 40p or so in the next year.
Shame it came to this.
Over and out (until the dust settles)
Ok some people have got it into their heads that because of the companies act 2006 section 580 the company can't offer shares at a discount. I really really doubt that's applicable here. Sorry.
I wish I knew!
I'd never heard that in all my time here and I've never heard it said about any other share, so if some rampers (I'm talking about the day traders here) are spreading BS it needs sorting
People on the blue channel (and maybe here) saying they can't raise below 20p, is this true? Seems strange to me and I've heard so much bs this last few days.
Can personally verify,I took a 30% haircut on that (I'm glad I did most of my panicking at 8am on the Monday).
It did knock my confidence in AIM though as a result I've taken a bit of profit elsewhere including here.
I've reduced my holding by a third, but I'm done now (not that you should believe me as this is s BB)
Prisoners dilemma. Shaft or get shafted.
Decent chance I think, my guess and it is just that an uneducated guesss
1). The share price goes a bit lower
2) the costs of *at least* 35% come in higher, JM praises this as definitely derisking this time.
3) a bid comes in, there might be competition but I can see shareholders getting too much more than where we are now.
This is just wild speculation on my part. It's clearly a traders plaything for the next few days.
Never trust a trader
Why didn't they put a figure?
My guess is because 35% sound less than. 200, 150,50 million or whatever it's going to be. My own thought is the higher value and that's what my actions earlier today were based on. Unlike others though I'm not ruling out yet another badly worded RNS causing confusion.
Unfortunately as well the quoted figure is "at least 35%". The whole things stinks of incompetence or worse.
Your reading of my reading is wrong.
Thanks Tornado ...
Paul B, t isn't clear to me, I originally read it as being the total capex, which justifies the share price movement. Other people have said it's just what's left, and I can see why they'd say that.
Guess we'll know soon enough.
The remaining balance?
The original budget
The last quoted capex total?
Massive difference to outcomes imo depending on this.
Might start bouncing now.
I've sold some to leave me with pocket money in here now.
So the chances of a bounce are higher because someone has to be buying when plebs like me on II are getting orders filled.
My guess is this really is the last of the problems, but I don't like the uncertainty regarding future funding.
Good luck all
Autocorrect fail again?
That's camping.
Yeah I don't think we'll see a pump and dump here , someone is definitely building up a few accounts for nefarious purposes in the future. I doubt it's going to even be for ATM they seem to have a wide spread of companies they're commenting on.
Bots or an orchestrated pump and dump, I'm not sure ...
But these posts all smell off from the language used to the number and timing of these posts.