The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Date Lodged: 29 September 2021
RNS 30th September 2021
Publication date 10 November 2021
Difference = 6 weeks
If you had checked the IPO website BEFORE 10 November 2021 the patent APPLICATION would not have shown until after the PUBLICATION date
RKB said he topped up on Friday and his buy appeared as a sell. The transaction was under £2k (approx £1,800 from memory) If I was RKB and I knew that a patent application was being made I would be investing more than that.
His patent lodging timescales are not correct. The patent website updates on a Wednesday not a Thursday and the patent application does not appear on the IPO website for around 6 weeks. For it to appear this week, the application would already have to be made (approx 6 weeks ago) and the last patent RNS was issued on the date of application and not the date it was published
This of course does not mean that what he is saying about a patent RNS this week is not correct. He's the closest thing we have to someone that may know what is going on
One of the insurance companies was held liable for a max of 450k however there are 12 defendants and FG stated that he would be chasing them for payment. RKB has stated that there is a waterpark which may be obtained
From the final results :
Finally, in respect of its “Legacy Assets”, the Company, via its wholly owned subsidiary Clear Leisure
2017 Limited (“CL17”) continues to pursue the legal claim against the previous management and
internal audit committee of Sipiem in Liquidazione S.p.A’s (“Sipiem”) . A crucial step forward was
achieved during the year: in May 2021 the Venice Court appointed independent expert valued
damages suffered by Sipiem at up to €7.8m (subject to the Judge ruling that the conduct of Sipiem’s
former board and internal audit committee was unlawful). Furthermore, in November 2021, the Judge
granted CL17’s request to file additional relevant documentation giving evidence of further damages
of up to €1m, which the Court appointed independent expert did not previously take into
consideration, bringing the value of the claim up to €8.8m.
22 - If results are bad this is not necessarily wave good bye... There are multiple methods being looked at, plus the court case outcome potentially funding QBT for the next 12 months. Personally don't think FG releases bad news on a method before he released good new on another
Argo plans to sell 3,400 mining machines for cash proceeds of £6.0 million ($6.8m)
PLANS TO SELL
In addition, the Company has signed an agreement to sell to a third party
SIGNED AN AGREEMENT
And, if you listen to the interview there are LOI's ... so no evidence money has changed hands yet
£6 Million could be easily raised so your statement is not correct
QBT are due to receive that amount of money (from the court case)
They could also raise that amount of money via a placing should they announce news
I am not saying it is them. I haven't stated it is them (it still could be?). But to say it is not them based on no facts whatsoever is poor, even from you