Member Info for ROBERSON

I simply ask for clarity from the company, and that there be no false expectations that we might later regret.

Shareholders are free to do what they want with their money, but they should be aware of the risks involved, based on real data, which, by the way, I believe is optimistic and considerably better than in previous years, even if it's not spectacular... but that's not necessary. It's good to improve little by little, but with a solid foundation.

Merciaman, I completely understand what you're saying, and I agree. But I think it would have been necessary to know the company's current state a year after the last general meeting, where the difficult situation the company was going through was clearly explained. Well, if things have improved now, even if not dramatically, but the measures they decided to take a year ago have managed to improve things, even if only slightly, it would be fair to say so, just as they bluntly stated last year that things were going badly and outlined the adjustments they had to make.

That's fine, we need to be clear and realistic and know where we stand. Because it seems that shareholders went into the offer to acquire new shares with enthusiasm, but without real information, and the same mistakes of the past are being repeated, which is why many shareholders are disappointed with the company's performance, especially those who have been invested longer and made disastrous investments.

Doing things haphazardly breeds distrust. If they don't present results until after raising all the new capital, it conveys the feeling that everything announced so far hasn't yielded sufficiently strong or interesting financial results for shareholders to invest their money in the company. Then it makes sense that they did it the way they did.

"First we raise the money, and then we give the results, just in case they disappoint the investors, we already have the money."

I don't think it's honest.

But that's just my personal opinion.

I was happy with the company's progress and excited about the recent good news, but not with this move.

And personally, I don't care if the shares skyrocket or rise gradually; that's not what my opinion is about. I'm talking about transparency, good faith, and honesty. Simply put.

On the other hand, the overbuying of newly issued shares also seems strange to me, because there isn't a very advantageous offer at the initial offering price for existing shareholders, given that the price was practically at market value, with only a minimal advantage. Where is the offer for shareholders? You can buy them at that price today, so why don't you go to the market to buy the ones you couldn't buy at the discounted price? I have my doubts about the effectiveness of how things have been handled, in such a rushed manner. Time will tell

One thing doesn't negate the other. I mean, you can't start building a house from the roof down.

The new company is currently losing money. But I'm not just referring to the new acquisition; Haydale has had financial problems from the beginning, a decade ago. Now it was starting to recover, after bleeding dry for a long time. First, get your house in order, and then you do whatever else is necessary.

Present results, confirm the promised cost reductions, and confirm according to management. From there, we continue moving forward. There's no need to mortgage your resources again if there's no rush, because the company hasn't yet confirmed its good performance with strong financial results, aside from some good news, but without any clear results. The first thing to do is start there, consolidating the foundations, which you don't have.

The dilution of the current share price through a new capital increase of over three billion new shares to buy a loss-making company—after having to auction off and enter bankruptcy proceedings this year (2025) for its US branch, and selling off its Thai branch at a loss due to financial problems—doesn't seem very reasonable to me. At a time that seemed opportune to strengthen the company's value by improving the current share price and thereby appease the long-suffering shareholders by presenting positive financial results and driving up the share price, are they embarking on the risky project of asking for yet another sacrifice from the already hard-suffering shareholders?

They say this move is to compensate the long-suffering shareholders. I don't agree, with all due respect to the board's decisions.

Sell, sell, sell, please. Thank you very much.

At this rate, we'll see them for 0.11p. Great job!

The recent good news is reflected in the stock's price. Yes sir, the stock is performing well.

Https://www.openpr.com/news/4072580/global-graphene-semiconductor-industry-investment-rises

The company will provide updates once information such as license approvals, new patents, etc., is confirmed. A little patience and trust are essential for everyone's peace of mind.

In the event that the company were to carry out a capital increase through the creation of new shares, which is not guaranteed (it's a possibility), even in that case, although in the short term it might seem like negative news for the market, it's important to consider that of all the financing methods, it's the most positive for both the company and its shareholders, who don't have to resort to more expensive bank loans and mortgages. This is beneficial in the long run for everyone—investors and employees alike. Furthermore, the fact that some of the company's employees and managers are shareholders is a motivating incentive for their involvement in the project, and they know that if it goes wrong, they too will suffer losses.

Anyway, in recent days we have again seen investors, or at least people who participated in messages in this forum, and I say this respectfully, speculating about the possibility of agreements with Tesla or Nvidia, without having any information, news, or data to confirm it, and that is not positive for anyone.

Regarding the market's doubts and caution due to past mistakes by graphene companies, I can understand that. However, I believe the main problem stemmed from investors' expectations of quick profits, without considering that graphene was a very new technology that needed to mature through research and development, and wouldn't be as rapid as they anticipated. But that moment has arrived, and I understand that investors who have suffered losses may find it difficult to see this after losing a significant portion of their stock value. But they took the risk of speculating. Now they have the opportunity to average their losses by buying shares at current, lower prices and taking advantage of the upcoming price increases. With new projects and signed contracts, coupled with a 70% cost reduction, these increases are just a matter of time. And the time is now, not when large funds enter the market or the company is acquired by a larger firm, although that could also happen. Best regards.

Believing they will need more funding for their projects, both Justheat and this latest announcement, seems unnecessary given the recent news where they claim to have achieved their goal of reducing costs by 70%, a target they expected to reach by the end of 2025, and which they achieved a quarter ahead of schedule, in September to be exact. This news is no small matter.

According to them, they achieved this by outsourcing manufacturing costs for the Justheat product in the contract with Interfloor, as well as in this new contract. As for the idea that graphene has lost its appeal, nothing could be further from the truth. There are reports based on studies of the new needs of graphene in all fields of biomedicine, conductivity and energy dissipation, aeronautics, resistance and many other matters, that graphene is more alive than ever, even mixed with other components such as gold (Goldfeno), steel, etc., and it is expected that by the year 2030 the use of graphene will increase by 300,000%. Quite something.

Sometimes. Look at all the delayed trades from Thursday that appeared at the close of trading on Friday. These trades, which weren't presented to the market on Thursday, only serve to distort the share price at the time of execution, thus altering the overall market price of Haydale shares.

What I don't know is whether Haydale's management is aware of these market maker maneuvers, as I don't think they're happy about them because they negatively impact the company's finances.

In the latest statement on Haydale's website, the market maker's contact information is provided so investors can get in touch. I don't know if it's time to ask the market maker directly for an explanation regarding these manipulations or to send a brief note to the company's director to inform them of these unusual actions.

That's why it makes no sense that, after yesterday's big news and the resulting surge in buying and selling, we're now in the same or worse position than before. The only apparent reason is the one I explained earlier.

The only way to stop this business from collapsing is if Haydale's financial results are very positive when they're released soon, forcing the short sellers to exit, even if only temporarily.

Late Thursday, just as the market was about to close, the market maker sold over 10,000,000 unknown shares. Theoretically, it's unclear whether these were purchases or sales, but a little investigation reveals they were purchases. These transactions occurred with minimal price movement, almost all at a maximum of 0.75p. Given the volume and the type of activity, the price should have risen above 0.90p, and today's opening price should have been around 0.90p. These over 10,000,000 shares represent short positions, taken by investors to offset rising prices with further sales. That's why they were sold so cheaply and are listed as unknown—to conceal this information.

It's called self-interest. There are many investors who want the company to do poorly so they can profit from their short positions.

And on the other hand, the intermediary executes buy orders at low cost and sell orders at excessively high prices. I only see the point of these operations if the intermediary earns substantial commissions and doesn't want prices to skyrocket, because that way there are more transactions and more profits for them.

Many people are selling today, just on the day there is positive news..... Sell, sell everything, I need to buy it.

We need to get rid of the bears

Whoever sells Haydale today will regret it tomorrow.

Good luck and have a good journey.