RE: Dual listing30 Sep 2021 13:58
TS , I'm talking cost with the dual listing nonsense , dual costs if it is on two markets and they need shares to service another market and pay the broker for organising it all , the loser in that type of deal will be PI's yet again .
It is something he spoke about in relation to the sp and value of the company but he also said when asked that there was enough money for some time which has turned into a vague response.
If Creswick on the new property doesn't have the shoots that he expects (although he does seem confident about that so it raises the question was one of the core drills quite close to the property).
If it has the shoots then he said that will finance the company going forward which is great if that is the case, also if that is the case the sp/value of the company would go up so why would they need a dual listing .
Also no mention of the warrants , either the ones being sold or the ones higher up that would provide funding as the sp progresses , a raise on a different listing would only dilute the company , exclude PI's from being able to buy any and probably increase their loss.
Brokers don't care about PI's , no institutions were brought in and they won't be interested until the company has a reasonable strike on the gold.
Not negative about the company but uncomfortable with the dual listing comment and associated costs and probable dilution .