Member Info for Legalwolf

3LB - the answer is in the RNS: " The Company will continue to make all announcements and disclosures to the London Stock Exchange through the Regulatory News Service and is not subject to any Sarbanes-Oxley or US Securities and Exchange Commission reporting requirements."

So there will be no change and RNS will continue to land here as at present.

We know news is close simply because it's overdue. Close meaning within the next 4 weeks.

Easy money if they remain on track. IF....

This could be big for HEX. Just look at what OTC is doing for shares like coinsillium right now.

Just read this, fantastic news and the timing couldn't be any better with mega news about to land shortly as well.

OTC can really generate huge moves up in a single trading session.

We should be looking at new all time highs if everything goes well.

Good to see the strong buying coming back in here and looks like a bottom is forming. Probably suggestive that news is close. Personally I would have preferred a delay to the bottom forming here, so that I could exit another position and double down here, so I am hoping it doesn't fly back up too quickly!

Did OMI miss a trick by not releasing the Pepas holes first? We were trading higher up in the range, when those results would have been received, and they would likely have generated a move up with a RNS titled "Exceptional results continue" or something eye catching. By waiting for the Pepas North holes, which were the first holes and were unguided - so perhaps always unlikely to hit big first time - the overall scenario has been very different.

Whilst we don't want BG to be like Jose Mourinho, he's a little bit too Roy Hodgson when it comes to "banging the drum" and uncharacteristic for an AIM CEO.

Seingred - you seem to like twisting things to make your point. Dr R has comprehensively dealt with the APTA resource point. It was BG who initially indicated it would be done by year end. That's why some of us referred to it.

In terms of the 20p predictions, most of us have predicated the 20p as being based on results. Are you seriously arguing that a strike at Pepas North would not take the share price to new recent highs, or even have the chance of doing so? If so, what is the point of you holding any shares at a low average. Why not sell them all at 14p. The fact that you haven't sold, means that you must also believe that 20p is a possibility here? Otherwise, you must be really dumb to still be holding when you don't see any further upside from the recent high of 14-15p.

That would be mega! I think the next few RNSs here will bring some strong buying, so continuing to build what I can at these prices.

Really decent risk to reward from this level. Instant 50% rise from here simply on a RNS which reveals that all remains on track. If I can free up some funds, I will take some more.

I think the Canadian bb has descended even more than this one. Re the share price, a lot of cheap shares have been scooped up today!!!

Not always easy to properly digest a RNS during market hours, with all the commentary going on. The drilling results at the main Pepas deposit continue to be world class, and were amongst the best holes we have had so far. Encouragingly, they suggest potential for extension of the deposit towards the south and west of the main deposit. The RNS also details the work OMI are doing to "better understand the optionality of Pepas and to map out work programs to further explore and advance these options." I am looking forward to hearing more about these plans from BG.

We also now have some initial holes from Pepas North - and whilst not worldies like the previous holes, they still found gold in them (inc 13.8m at 1.24 and 4m at 2.36). These were unguided holes. However, it's still all to play for in that full analysis of these holes, alongside airborne magnetics and surface sampling will help them vector in on the gold in subsequent drilling. Again, would be good to hear from BG about this and his confidence levels re Pepas North. Finally, we have had exceptional soil sampling results at El Cedro. It's a shame that rain has stopped play, but it's shaping up to be a really exciting project for drill testing, whenever that point will arrive.

Also interesting that not much is being said about El Pantano. I believe OMI have a minimum spend requirement, so would expect this to be addressed at the webinar. Has it gone quiet because of the JV?

So for me, we need two DAILY closes above 21p and we will have filled the gap. Will we do it simply on this price momentum, or will it require another RNS? That remains to be seen, but confident we will do it either way. Anyway, just my two pennies worth...

"Gaps appear more frequently on daily charts—every day presents an opportunity to create an opening gap. Gaps on weekly or monthly charts are rare. If you're looking at a weekly chart, the gap would have to occur between Friday's close and Monday's open. If you're looking at a monthly chart, the gap would have to be between the last day of the month's close and the first day of the next month's open for monthly charts. A price chart with gaps that occur almost daily is typical for thinly-traded securities and should probably be avoided. Prices often gap up or down at market open, but the gap does not last until the market closes. Such temporary intraday gaps should not be considered as having any more significance than normal market volatility."

Hamilton always made it seem quite straightforward, including with the 15 day turnaround. Now it's become anything but straightforward.

Has the TW noise gone away? Thought they would be crying foul play again at the ongoing delays.

JH - intraday attempts were made but ultimately failed by close of day. Can you say a gap has been filled if it has simply been touched intraday but rejected by the end of the day? I dunno, but would incline to the view that the gap has to be closed at close i.e. end of day, and not just intraday, and even then you need successive closes for confirmation. But happy for TA experts to say I'm wrong about this and the gap has already been filled.

I guess different charting platforms might show different results as well. Anyway, each to their own, it probably matters not much in the overall scheme of things.

As I've said before, we are approaching a gap fill scenario. In order to fill it, we need successive closes above 21p. If we do fill it, then 21p might act as a new support. I expect to fill the gap by close of play this week at the latest. Then where the share price goes will obviously depend on the next few RNS. But all looking good so far. All imo and dyor

JH- you've confused me (easily done). The share price was 21p on 26 Nov. It gapped down to 17p the following day. There was an attempt to go back up to 21p on 12-16 Dec, but this failed. Sine then the share price has always closed below 21p. So the gap has NOT been filled i.e. closed and then remained above 21p after 27 Nov. We are now making another attempt to fill it.

Easy 50-100% gains from here for the traders.

Bid and Ask now gone up. Those funds are hungry to scoop up whatever small supply there is below the placing price. They know the next results are likely to be belters and El Cerro is also opening up as another potential big one.