Member Info for joebop

I'd a funny feeling that was going to be the case.

Isn't it amazing how after people get up close with their due diligence, be it with the site visit a few months back, or sniffing around the top job, they walk? Funds and dignity intact though.

Funds for the investors anyway. The shameful ramping indicates they lacked the dignity to start with.

Apologies Cagney! Using the phone lends a hand to that.

You're absolutely right. Delays, objections, planning obstacles and cost blowouts are a guaranteed unfortunately. Exchequer returns will be limited.

With the failure of corrib in that regard, barryroe is going to be a hard sell to the people. It will be harder as time goes by. It's an ugly truth.

I'd like to be proven wrong.

Producing 50% and the exchequer won't see a penny in its lifetime. Quality.

If they learned from corrib, they wouldn't have been caught out by an taisce?

Capacity at whitegate is 75k bopd I believe? Bit of a turnaround in the business this year, alot of creative accounting though. For an asset that was struggling to sell/verging on closure, will it still be an option when barryroe comes online?

And let's face it, the nimbyism crew don't have this on their radar at all.

Security of supply. Nonsense really. Impossible unless the state own all the infrastructure. Leaving it in the hands of corporations does not guarantee energy security. The complete opposite in fact.

Only thing it does is reduces the greenhouse emissions a bit, having the field so close reduces transport. Sell that one to the crusties! (But barryroe oil will probably get sent to Canada and vice versa!)

Brexit will be long gone by the time this gets flowing.

How naive of you.

One word - Corrib.

An Taisce is there to stop half cocked playboys wrecking the country.

Do it right, or F off. What's wrong with that??

Lol, share talk as pr to top it all off.

These guys are just pathetic at interviews. Absolutely pathetic.

Nf, best poster here by a country mile. Keep it up mate.

You've highlighted some pretty serious issues. Saved some folk a lot but money I would imagine. Those who didn't pay any heed or bought in early....not so much you can do about that now. Sour grapes will wither out in the end.

No humour allowed chesh!?

He still has the same office. Same seats. Just moved his position around the bod table.

He also bought his next job, with red rock money. From the same office.

Let's call a spade a spade here. Or a leech a leech.

Careful now. You're alleging ruffer are out.

No real way to tell. The volume could be anybody scrambling for their cash.

I seemed to strike a nerve alright in4.

Soft precious type, seemed to do it. (Appropriate emoji)

Only the soft precious types with more money than sense Ross. I'm not particularly fussed about that cabal.

It was a standalone statement mate.

You doubled the words and twisted the meaning.

First offers are normally rebuffed. That's all.

In fairness, first offers are rebuffed in most cases.

Ross, you're losing the plot a bit here.

Go back to the nub of my post. People investing with ZERO knowledge of calculating basic revenue. That is acceptable to you because.....???

These people are swimming with sharks. They'll get swallowed whole. Some are playing with pension pots. See the chaos on flybe. Crazy, crazy stuff.

If a stranger started spouting that sort of nonsense, you'd better believe I'd have words. If they didn't see sense after it being spelt out (and a slap across the face!) then I might go and find some turkey to sell them.

Being genuine never stopped anyone from doing anything, be it losing every penny, taking a bit of advice or ignoring it.

My simple bit of advice. Learn what constitutes a companies revenue stream.

That really shouldn't have to be highlighted, should it?

I remember chatting to someone about shares a few years ago. A company underwent a consolidation. Spent ten minutes trying to explain reasonably that the sp did not do a ten bagger. Market cap remained the same. Nothing getting through. So, revert to fcuks, swears, and a slap across the face....and the penny dropped.

Horses for courses this education malarkey I guess is my point.

Ross, that wasn't abusive.

Some people don't pick up on subtlety. They need a good firm slap across the face. As you well know, many more people look at these boards than post. Newbs need to hear some cold hard truths.

I stand by my post and it's tone. It would be easier if virtual slaps were a possibility. Harsh words will have to suffice for now.

But it's their money to lose I guess. Hope I don't dry up the well on you!! I jest.

Rugby, I don't consider that by any means at all. But I do start with the basics. It helps. It really does.

Zero point in my answering your question. Yes or No, how will you know!? So don't worry about it.

I point out what I point out, usually because posters are portraying false or biased information. Cest la vie.

For this evening, I wouldn't call it, but at 3-1 that's not a bad bet. You just never know what England team are going to show up on the day. I didn't think France would throw away that lead last night! Going to be a tough campaign all round. Epic, even. Hopefully!

Now there's some interesting revelations. Rugby, philipy and 5 or 6 more who rec'd that post, with no understanding of the basics of revenue after how many years invested now?

SPT - the one tax that fcuks up all triny oiler balance sheets. The one that is always mentioned here and in the press. Everywhere. Even from cerp themselves.

You ain't going to have an easy time at this game lads. Time to ask yourselves some questions about your research or stock pick methods.

I mean...Wow. WTF are you trying to do? Race each other to the poor house? Scary stuff.

"1. We've picked capex rather than exploration spending because reporting of the latter by element tends to be spotty. For the same reason, we're looking at overall capex, as not all miners separate sustaining from expansion capex.

2. We’ve excluded some major miners, such as Freeport-McMoRan Inc. and the entire gold-mining industry, which essentially focus on a single commodity; and also left out those such as MMC Norilsk Nickel PJSC which don’t break out their capital spending by element."

Sustaining Capex is included. Makes a mockery of the whole argument.

Click bait article is all that was. Echo chamber stuff.