Chris Heminway, Exec-Chair at Time To ACT, explains why now is the right time for the Group to IPO. Watch the video here.
366m shares, SP 0.5p, £0.4m cash, no assets
Today - 1,556m shares, SP 1.2p.
List the assets and cash, Lee and Cash.
Cash, not until you list the assets and cash at hand.
366m shares, SP 0.5p, £0.4m cash, no assets
Today - 1,156m shares, SP 1.2p.
List the assets and cash Lee.
18 month suspension for rto!
I thought he nailed it mannan.
I'll refer again to the questions I posed to you earlier, which you skirted rather deviously.
Mannan, what are the liabilities?
How are they going to pay?
What of the MET deal structure?
You seem a bit of a charlatan. Well matched to the bod.
My background is in geology so I do have some small inkling of the complexities involved here.
Let's put it another way. If co2 eor was as much of a guaranteed success in TI as you lot purport, there isn't a snowballs chance in hell that they would have brought this company public.
Not in a million years.
You're not hearing the relevant part, which is that it has to be trialled and proven across each individual compartment on TI.
Just because it works in 1, or 100 fields, does not mean it works sufficiently well or viably in every field that it can be applied too.
It is not a one size fits all situation. It's a little bit more complex with many variables.
Always a risk of mechanical failure
Oh dear is right hedge man.
All that means Jack diddly squat until it is tried and proven on the reservoirs/compartments on the TI field.
The naivety is astonishing, but not surprising.
It is helpful that they have sourced a supply of co2 to be fair.
Oh bradleybear, do show us all where co2 eor has been in place and boosted oil production economically across enough of the TI field to be called a success.
Actually, forget that, just point me to the approval of the CEC for this project by the EMA if you can?
My research is done bradleybear. You and the person who rec'd your post would want to do some.
Hulltiger - the market doesn't matter a damn. Pedantic comment.
https://www.hraadvisory.com/a-self-dealing-market
Good article, saying how buybacks are worse than insider dealing. They were illegal before.
What's not in an rns, and what a ceo says in an interview is where the damage is done on aim companies. Assets rarely matter.
Trinity-innis, minefield or oilfield?
Company is going to have to tap the markets for cash too often for my liking before any sufficient progress. Trial co2, early doors morocco, and ireland is a liability if they still have that one?
Nice jet setting there eh!?
We made a quick buck last year in this, too risky now imo.
Bradley - none of your concern.
Gizzard - why doesn't he say these things in an rns, is it because there is a legal recourse if he lies?
TC - I post occasionally on cerp, always cynically I might add. No position there. With all due respect, lol at you contemplating buying in on ramps.
Same point before re CEO talks. They can say what they want with no legal responsibility. It's all paid for fluffy bs advertising.
People who got burnt on cerp would have lost their money elsewhere. Fools be fools is all I can say after observing for many years. Harsh but true.
T3 project is 25km2 in size
Why August? Let's go back to may '16, circa 5p on t3 discovery.
Now take a look at the "life cycle of a junior mining share" graph. (Google " " phrase for graph for those who don't know this)
It's following this to a T.
Anyone who is overly worried about this shouldn't be investing in aim stocks, as I've said on numerous occasions.
Nice quip about Alex btw, I'd to think about that one for a second!
Cash, once upon a time, you used post about legitimate concerns...