Member Info for Intrusivethought

If Nanoco win LG will be licking their lips.

N has patented improvements to the seeding process which enables the production of better red and green dots, green in particular (+15 yrs of patent life remaining). As such, N are able produce red and green dots superior to Samsung's, and entirely free of both cadmium AND indium phosphide.

Furthermore, N have invented a method for producing high quality 2d QDs and other nanomaterials at scale. 2d QDs have the potential to significantly exceed the performance of the current generation of QDs.

Ok, thank you. That makes sense. I still find it odd though.

But why then a summary judgement? On what basis?

Do the red dots not exhibit evidence of molecular clustering? Are S using a different process to produce the red dots? I think it's very doubtful.... why use two different processes when N's is capable of producing both red and green.

Curious to know the basis for the summary judgement re red QDs?

Correct DickyH.

You are correct Morbox.

People, have a read of some of the delusional BS ppe is spouting on the other side....

Samsung have been selling CFQD based TVs since 2015, not just the past 5 years. If you include their initial SUHD range, a figure of 12 to 15 million units in the US sounds about right. Slightly more if you include monitors.

Agree Sammy. Mediation was suspended before the MCC motion to change was denied.

https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/quantum-dot-boost-for-microled-displays/

The Trading Update clear and straightforward. It is not difficult to understand.

Sigh.

To be fair to you Nig, I don't always agree with you, but I do sometimes understand (and share) your frustration with some of the comments here.

Also, yes there exists precedent for global damages, but Nanoco are not making a claim for global damages in the East Texas Court.

Incorrect re wilfulness multiplier, frostbar12.

That's a great example BC.

That calculation is misleading poppy****.

Nanoco's claim in the East Texas Court is for US sales only, not global sales.

25 million US? I dont think that is right.