RE: MA Stake2 Apr 2019 21:40
Daniel even when they rejected MA’s 40m then 150m they said it wasn’t in the best interest of other SH because in return he wanted 5% stake and be installed as ceo, too much politics is involved in the current issue, the moment he said he wanted an EGM to boot them it became either SH or them and of course they won’t favour us over themselves. Even their latest RNS says it all if MA calls off the EGM and participate in the funding things should work out just fine. “If you still a bottle of perfume you get done for that, but if you strip SH there’s always a loophole to come out just fine”