Member Info for Cause17

@Dallasdaz - Isn't 10% of the net proceeds from the $10 million net sales allocated to secured creditors by the courts? do you think they will want more?

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/305500280/trt-8-judiciario-06-07-2020-pg-667?ref=serp

Anyone mind giving me a brief history lesson on him?
What I have seen on twitter and other places haven't been complimentary.

Can you provide a link for me as I can't find it?

Also this was put up last night.

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/305500280/trt-8-judiciario-06-07-2020-pg-667?ref=serp

William Eduardo Freire Advogados Associados - Seems to have represented Zamin back in Feb 2019. Reference link below.
So the one I shared earlier seems to be related to the provisions for services offered by them.

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/processos/81562055/processo-n-0041208-3320158260100-do-tjsp

Case 0041208-33.2015.8.26.0100 (main case 1088747-75.2015.8.26.0100) - Credit Qualification - Power of Attorney - Zamin Amapá Mineração S / A - William Eduardo Freire Advogados Associados - Visas. There is no need for the continuation of powers of attorney, and any creditor may petition directly in the main proceedings, which is why I declare the present extinct. Archive. Int. - ADV: OSANA MARIA DA ROCHA MENDONÇA (OAB 122930 / SP), FABIO ROBERTO LOTTI (OAB 142444 / SP), JOSE ROGERIO LIMA DE ARAUJO (OAB 149578 / SP), MARCO ANTONIO LOTTI (OAB 98089 / SP), WILLIAM FREIRE (OAB 47727 / MG)

Agreed. Few haven't shown up yet.

NPV Numbers please

Fingers crossed

@Eyeguy - I don't think this is the one we were looking for but I am not 100% sure. If you check the case which is mentioned as the (main case 1003764-80.2019.8.26.0011), that seems to from a while back. As there are lot of cases involving Zamin, not sure which talks about which but as a lot of cases are being closed, I am guessing closing up the loose ends.

Thanks LB28

@FrankieH - Ha Ha Ha. I thought you would be on the more patient scale given that you are into Horticulture.

On that subject, any suggestions for companion flowering plants for roses with long stems? or is it better to leave them alone as it is?

@Obs - What would be your approximate timing of this and also what do you think would be best time for this news?

It's relatively small isn't it?

Also I don't think this is the main one we were looking out for reading the history of it.

This is the main case that ruling was referring to.
https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/processos/223774813/processo-n-1003764-8020198260011-do-tjsp?ref=goto

@Maddog - 14 days to pay the court fees. But also talks about applicant challenging the decision and creditors issuing new summons. So a bit confused tbh.

This is the latest update I could find

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/processos/292462734/processo-n-0002901-1020208260011-do-tjsp?ref=goto

@Frankie - Your posts have a fan here, hopefully one of many.

Another earlier ruling I guess.

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/305289390/trt-8-judiciario-03-07-2020-pg-563?ref=serp

I disagree with the request made by the plaintiff by means of petition ID 5823923, since, contrary to what is alleged, in the present case it was not requested to qualify its credit with the bankruptcy court of the defendant.

In fact, the amount owed is centralized in the records of process No. 0000525-21.2017.5.08.0201 , as evidenced by ID 37a52c7. In consultation with this centralizing process, I note that there was a direction of execution in the face of the company Anglo Ferrous Brazil Participações S / A.

Give yourself science.

Return the file to the file.

@bannor- "whether with or without a haircut I'm OK with it to be honest just so long as it moves the project forward in our favour ...."

I feel the same. That would be a big step forward.

https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/diarios/305289606/trt-8-judiciario-03-07-2020-pg-779?ref=serp

Pages 779 to 781. If someone could interpret the last paragraph, would highly appreciate it.

============================================

Also, officiate, the banking institution indicated in petition ID a32c636, to proceed immediately with the cancellation of letter of guarantee No. 180010317, which had been presented by the defendant, but which was not accepted by the court.

Date Movement
07/03/2020 Petition Waiver of Mandate / Attached Charge
Protocol No.: WJMJ.20.40949265-5 Petition Type: Waiver of Mandate / Charge Date: 7/3/2020 4:41 PM