RE: Wait, has he checked first on Eroton's contract with Aiteo?!?23 Jul 2019 14:42
A few days ago, I questioned the supposition that the new Eroton pipeline/FSO proposal would complete in 2019 as suggested by San Leon and enthusiastically embraced by Pavlov's dogs, led by Mclean and Alaric.
The planning of such a development would be highly complex and lead times to fruition can be long but not as long as some for alternative solutions.
I raised some initial questions re the FSO with Mclean regarding fundamentals of it's logistics and operation, as follows:
"Thanks McClean. So you believe the new system will be inplace in 2019.
As you are so knowledgable, can you enlighten me on a few really important matters?
What is the export market for this crude? Will the shuttle tankers be of sufficient dwt to deliver direct economically to end user or will they shuttle to Bonny for VLCC parcel sizes?
If Bonny, does it have the logistics to accept shuttles? It is after all designed to export.
Also, what are the terms of Eroton's pipeline contract with Aiteo? Is Eroton tied in contractually beyond 2019? If so, what are the withdrawl penalties.
I've many more questions but as this is going to be operational in less than 6 months, these are fundamental."
I got the usual barking from the RatPack but not a single answer, except that 2019 was still the FSO operational date (RatPack motto: "In Fanning we trust").
I now quote from an interview with Emofu, Eroton's Chief Executive published today:
"Yes, we are working on the possibility of an alternative crude evacuation line due to the current challenges faced, which we are hopeful would significantly reduce crude theft and improve production uptime from our Asset."
That means that there is a less than 50% chance that this new development will ever happen.
Has anyone considered the most likely scenario? This project could well have been mooted as a negotiating ploy with Aiteo and Shell to get better transmission/terminalling terms. Fat chance.