We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Between the 5 person BOD ~17000 shares. Why don’t this bunch dip their slippery hands in their pockets & have some skin in the game(?) (unless memorandum /articles prevent?)
Sanderson needs hold 150000-200000 shares minimum IMO. Other 4 , 50000+ shares each. Focus their minds on what they believe is a worthy strategy. Accountability/responsibility can only come from their shareholding’s.
These people have taken board remunerations & freebie share awards all their working lives……exemplary lifestyles/houses etc…………..
Spare few shillings change from your pension pot Eric, old boy?
BRGE 4000 shares…………joke!
JEMA 2500 shares…………LOL!
If only 20% of the votes were required to be used for any vote to carry, it’s hardly a vote?
Least they can do now is give us ‘pre’ RI shareholders a seperate class of share that appreciates & compensates us for our ongoing WILLING carry of ALL risk on Russian assets.
Doubt this bod will be forking out on a RI, as they own NO shares. They’re pleased they have their(JPMAM) ‘income’ reinstated though.
Of the same opinion, the accountant ‘yes’ man Sanderson has to go.
Regards ownthing/dog,
Credential wise Lazards are well endowed to provide
‘capital restructuring’ advice input. Their staff highly motivated owning two thirds of Lazards shares.
Hypothetically the short time frame of 5years to tender/continuation 2027 vote , this target probably allow ‘favourable’…..’capital restructuring’ of the RI type. With JRS capital/income payout & bumper IB bonuses all round?
All *!@!* ankers (bankers) together.
As HL receive commissions to promote investment trusts , anyone’s guess where their loyalties lie. Voted a staunch NO anyway. GLTA.
Why after all the hard work (£70m+ spent buying back 12m shares@£5-£8.80 [2017-2021) would we want diluted to the hilt?
RI(plural?) benefit shareholders with access large cash (CLIG etc.?)
Shareholders with MOST shares after RI(plural?) own/get paid MORE of NAV/dividends/continuation & tender(vote2027)
Fee rise £140K now - £3m+ future & ‘backscratching’
maybe enough motivation.
For ‘benefit of members as a whole’(???)
Me I’m voting NO & think Sanderson should GO.
Eric meaning ‘sole ruler’ or ‘ever powerful’
Mr. Sanderson:
theaic.co.uk. ‘ could continue as a going concern for
several years’ (3/8/2022)
this is money.co.uk: £20000 trips for ex-MyTravel boss (29/4/2004)
Companies House Appointments 17of 31 dissolved/liquidation.(MWB Group,MyTravel etc.)
‘Proclaimed’Company doctor but no evidence of resuscitations.
Extra shareholder vote required at upcoming general
meeting to remove Eric Sanderson’s short tenure
forthwith.
CLIG (quoted) looks healthy? If it was selling JRS on way down, wonder how much of potential RI + benefits (frozen divis) it’s looking to buy with cash pile? Sweet for our bod & other major holders?
In turn we’d have to subsidise this kind of behaviour
of course?
Maybe a smell here?, as newco sounds an idea amalgamation of Sanderson’s blackrock greater europe & oleg’s jpm ME/jpm Africa /jpm Emerging etc.
‘Transaction in own shares’ (RNS 2017-2022).
Back of fag packet calculation best part of £71m spent? More latent value accrued & owed to present ‘ordinary’ share class holders? To my mind yes.
Divis like that begs the question why any mandate to change company name/remit is required?
Other than to justify & pay JP Morgan ongoing fees?
More plausible believe POLY/EVR might have inside
track & hence sitting on their hands?
What inside track do JPR Bod have?, I fear none.
Patience is a virtue
That happens ,then delisted into the jersey jurisdiction then we’re fooked
Unfortunately none of us have ESP. Can’t see what
Nesis is thinking , far less Putin. Would love company
preserved in present state though.