Member Info for ADNATROB

The recent drop in CTAI feels more like emotion than valuation. The investment case hasn't disappeared overnight: Alludium continues to execute, commercialisation is underway and the platform is expanding into industry-specific verticals.

Great opportunity for buyers.

Oversold. This will bounce back strong.

Quick search shows North Yorkshire Council full elections will take place in May 2027.

Platform launched, buyers rolling in. The lemmings have created a great opportunity to buy at this price.

No holding this back now.

AI isn’t over, it’s entering its value phase. The wrapper washout clears the noise and shifts focus to real automation. Platforms like Alludium, building agents and workflows (not hype), look well placed to be among the winners.

Worth noting who Alludium is already aligned with: NVIDIA (Inception), AWS Activate, and Atlassian for Startups. Serious AI, cloud and enterprise ecosystems. Early-stage platforms don’t get this level of backing by accident.

ART123. One post on this board. I suggest you do some research. The lowest valuation has the SP at c.11p, rising to 30p+ in the optimistic case. This is a great entry point, before news gets out and the herd arrives.

We do know that Will's recent visit to EG, included advancement of technical/drilling work.

Will appears to be saying and doing as much as he can. Reading between the lines of his recent LinkedIn comment, suggests to me that all is on plan.

Halifax Sharedealing, claim to have not been made aware of the AGM. They are looking into it. I placed my votes over the phone.

Voting against Resolutions 7 and 8 does not prevent the company from raising capital. It simply means that if they want to issue new shares, they must call an EGM and ask shareholders for approval each time.

This gives existing shareholders stronger oversight and prevents the board from issuing large amounts of new shares without our consent.

Given that Will stated in the Q&A that the company has alternative financing options and would only use equity if it’s advantageous, I don’t see a reason to authorise more shares at this stage.

Until we have something concrete; a JV signed, Cloughton planning approval, or a confirmed Wressle drill plan, I’m reluctant to let the company “print” additional shares at the expense of existing holders.

As mentioned previously, I’m comfortable supporting Resolution 7, but I’m voting against Resolution 8.

Retail Investors (us) own over 40% of shares in issue, so we have the power to block resolutions.

My takeaways: Resolution 7 if passed allows the company to raise an aggregate nominal (1p) amount of £1,918,368 equivalent to191.8 million shares.

If the share price is 2p, the company can raise double the amount £3,836,736 equivalent to 383.7 million shares and so on pro rata to the 1p nominal.

Resolution 7 is pre-emptive, gives existing shareholders first refusal before new shares go to outsiders (II’s).

Resolution 8 is Non-pre-emptive, allowing the company to issue shares to new investors (II’s) without offering to existing shareholders first.

I will vote for resolution 7 but AGAINST resolution 8.

Got my eye on this one. A sniff of news from a major player and this will bag from here.

Serenity was always a big risk at 25% commercial COS, yet still got close to 4p. EG-08 Baraccuda at 85% commercial COS is a different proposition and I expect will easily hit double figures leading up to the drill. SP on commercial success is anyone's guess, but will be huge.

One day nearer!

Always remember EG-08 barracuda 80% COS. Practically a certainty in Oil&Gas exploration. Huge

When terms are finalised and the drill frenzy starts, the SP will rocket.

VernetLles. You talk with riddles, are you still invested?