Roundtable Discussion; The Future of Mineral Sands. Watch the video here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
Notice you never mention how I called it right here and traded down my average price while you sat and attacked. I also was first and vocal for a sale and now folks all would welcome it for closure.
Yup, get it done!!
This has been one promise after another disappointment. Latest best New hope currently Ranger. Sounds very promising. A bit like the Land grab did.
Oh Nutdan, what a world class bore you are!
Truly, even on your hols you need to post about yours truly. The only surprise is that nobody seems to call you out and ask you to stfu!
Enjoy your hols and try to get me out of your head you sad sack.
at 8/10x revenue, yeah, get it done!!
Thought I’d take a look-in whilst on vacation, good to see twix arguing with anyone who cares to listen with his newly discovered science of market-forecasts. As incoherent and unreliable as his regular ‘market crash’ predictions (its coming one day, don’t you know).
My main concern remains with the pitiful level of trades this Co. generates, which must be increasingly tempting for the BOD or any backers they can secure to come in with a derisory offer to take this one private.
'be greedy when others are fearful ' or summat like that .lol
Get the megalab signed along with one or two others in the pipeline and it won't matter much what they forecast.
As LR said they have been cautious with their figures, maybe on purpose to then over deliver. Always the best way to do it, imo.
Well, it would appear from the tone of GLT post that is the case?
You havecan a point daveand. No argument from me. They give a target price so I'd like to know if it's changed it should be related to their overall view and direction of comparative travel rather than the actual number. So a reduction like Stifel indicates a loss ofof confidence. I don't expect the actual number to mean much. It never has before, so I agree there. I would be disappointed though to learn they have reduced their target. That's why I WOULD like to know. Aimho
Matters not a jot, especially if half the info isn't included as per GLT . Just what is the point?
Could hardly be lower as a target lolof
Well, I'd still appreciate knowing none the less if it's maintained, reduced or increased to give an indication of all the hidden excitement that never ends - or gets delivered for that matter. If it's maintained or increased is one thing. If like Stifel it's decreased then that sends a different message and imv worth asking......anyone?
Whatever it is, it's higher than today's sp.
Sure, it's never hit and usually the share price adds to divergence as soon as announced BUT it is of interest not least to see if the old target price is even reduced just like Stifel. I'd like to know simply if Singers target price is maintained, reduced or increased, irrespective of all the other points that require a mountain of Salt added.
What is the point of a research note if they don't include many relevant points?
Who's target was 11p ? Can't remember.
Sounds like they've set the bar low on purpose, so can beat forecast and upgrade as GLT says .
Who cares?!, they never get close so take it with a pinch if salt. We've had target prices much higher before and got nowhere near. Finger in the air it seems half the time would be closer . One or two good bits of news can completely change things, like a summer revolution maybe! Best to under promise and over deliver. As LR said, they will show caution at this point.
GLTader
Able to divulge their target share price?
(Just wondering if it's only 15p in line with reduced Stifel target )
I have just seen it Stats20. Can't share as it is not meant for distribution.
Valuation out of kilter with position & outlook.
And reads like they haven't included quite a bit in their forecasts - which is consistent with what Lynn said in CMD.
So, I am hoping for similar to FY22 where upgrades will come during the year.
Has a new research note out apparently, I cannot see it as behind a firewall, anyone access, got a copy?