We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
London South East prides itself on its community spirit, and in order to keep the chat section problem free, we ask all members to follow these simple rules. In these rules, we refer to ourselves as "we", "us", "our". The user of the website is referred to as "you" and "your".
By posting on our share chat boards you are agreeing to the following:
The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. As a user you agree to any information you have entered being stored in a database. You agree that we have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic or board at any time should we see fit. You agree that we have the right to remove any post without notice. You agree that we have the right to suspend your account without notice.
Please note some users may not behave properly and may post content that is misleading, untrue or offensive.
It is not possible for us to fully monitor all content all of the time but where we have actually received notice of any content that is potentially misleading, untrue, offensive, unlawful, infringes third party rights or is potentially in breach of these terms and conditions, then we will review such content, decide whether to remove it from this website and act accordingly.
Premium Members are members that have a premium subscription with London South East. You can subscribe here.
London South East does not endorse such members, and posts should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Ltd, or its affiliates.
hmm.................previously when we are anticipating imminent good news and hoping for a jump in the sp, there is no buying activity at all, the sp does nothing but sink a bit and nothing happens, this is subtly different somehow. I think you are right SB, it doesn't look like II's and I think most of us seasoned PI's have had their positions for some little while and like me are already heavily over invested to get the buy price down so it may well be potential new buyers who have been watching and now feel this is MMX's time, another week of this interest could give us a little boost......... well now, wouldn't that be nice? ....Huckster
ram - trading is certainly on the up but i don't think its II's at these volume levels - unless MM's have instructions and are drip feeding into a lager purchase - or sale! Perhaps we have a bigger investor base than we think. Would be really good to close the week at 8p+ and see where next week takes us. SB
It has to be II buying. Soon maybe a holdings announcement
Nice - all bases covered!
I hope it is a big success!
I've tried some dummy sells around 2 and I got offered 7.7 to sell some, or 7.5 for larger quantity. And not all trades show, most of my buys were never shown. But I was interested in his view on the company progress
Notdenying: On my phone it lists the only 7.70 trade as a UT trade..........?? Maybe that was a mistake.....and it was indeed your sell...lol
Mac,
I hear and acknowledge everything you are saying.
We even built and launched AgeBlock you can download at the app stores and is very device specific for parents who want an easy way to apply device level filtering of sites AND apps.....
just launched...
What was the reason for selling now? If anything we are expecting good news that will drive the price higher in just few days. Cheers
sold another 100k at 7.7p today
good to see the bid
Hi SB, you would be amazed if you search on Baidu vip websites. There will be lots of this random live genuine sites of Chinese companies. The random letters and numbers mean nothing to us but they have meaning to other cultures. Cheers
you might be right leader - it just seems strange that investors would register tens and sometimes hundreds of thousands of what appear to be completely random domains as an investment. I can almost get the short letter/numbers regs - but the total randoms? I guess i wondered if there was some other corporate use - or the dark web? SB
No, domain investors are sitting on them, huge problem for the sector generally, they are not seeing the light of day so really hard to gain traction.
Looks like the anticipated deletes on .work have started. It will be interesting to see what they top out at - realistically we will see 100K plus deletes from 2019 registrations based on the low renewal rates (30/40%?) - plus 2018 deletes thrown in as well. On the plus side - renewals presumably add decent revenue ($5?) versus the $1/free initial registration - and clearly there was appetite for the domain based on the scale of registrations which have come through in the last 24 months. It would be good to understand what the large scale registrations in .work (and .vip for that matter, .fit also....) are actually being used for - clearly they are not personal use - in which case what value do the registrars see in the domains? SB
Led to believe bakky, don't make me quote the 2018 full year statement. I know things do change but some of us invested here on the base of the annuity stream carrot!
''LIKE WE WERE PROMISED 20 MONTHS AGO!!! '' Ramp,..No we were not. I can't find ANY ''promises'' mentioned anywhere!
Of course, I agree that we don't want young kids stumbling across porn, but the government's responsibility is secondary - It is the parent's responsibility. The government should just be providing the information to help the parents do their job.
There are tools on all devices to prevent the content being shown - better than any age verification tool (but certainly not perfect) and you can even ask your ISP to block it at that level. If you have young children in your home then just take a small amount of your time to go and learn how to block this content from them. The majority of homes do not have children in them and they certainly don't have young children, so why force all adults to go through this process?
When children become teenagers they will search out the content. Only the big sites, which show legal content, will use the age verification and it will ultimately lead to teenagers:
1) Viewing content on other sites that are not legally required to get verification
2) Teaching an entire generation about VPN's and why every household should have one - which the government definitely doesn't want
3) Worst of all, they search and go down the rabbit hole of dodgy sites until they get viruses, illegal content and who knows what other possibilities, grooming, blackmail, etc.
I also think that the age verification tools will very quickly be cracked or credentials shared should a great demand appear for that and, if you're not logging access, then how can you stop them? If you are logging them, then you're a data risk.
I also fear for how far they might let it go. The two most annoying/frustrating parts of the internet are the sheer number of ads that are shown, severely degrading performance/the experience and pop-ups that get in the way. Yet, the EU government basically enforced every single website in the EU to have a pop-up telling you about cookies when you visit it!! People that don't understand the internet shouldn't be making decisions on it.
Imagine browsing the internet and having to authenticate again and again through different age verification providers as you browse your favourite "discovery" site, like facebook, reddit or even the likes of the bbc. Any video that's 18+ being required to verify your age. It's already there on some video sites... you won't believe the number of people that were born on January 1st 19XX! :)
I think that there is a place for age verification and twitter/Facebook are good examples. However, I believe that enforcing it on porn sites will lead to greater problems. A better solution is for parents to learn to block at the household level and for schools to educate the children on this and the many other modern online issues.
I do wish you luck with your business SJL and my comments are not going to affect anything, I just think it was a bad idea from the start... and the government has treated your company badly because of the initial decision.
That's all I have to say on this
That will definitely happen with the firm intention of starting a progressive dividend.
LIKE WE WERE PROMISED 20 MONTHS AGO!!!
Shareholders need to see a tangible return
I would like to think there will be some decent purchase in the next few days - working on the assumption that the trading update will come out early next week - could be late this week before the team head out to the domain conference in Austin (although only Christa appears to be on the panel discussions to date). Could this be the year we build up to the update with a nice increase, hold onto it, and move up into a better place.....just maybe!! SB
a bit of buying showing after hours. Wonder if this continues upto the update and hopefully good news. I notice .Vip deletes are now 35k. Don't want to see that trend continuing for too long.
If the income dry out I guess...
Lol
Looks like Harry sees a bit of value in his own domain....sussexroyal.sex! SB
Well said Bakky ,
With today’s technology advances it is totally possible to age verify someone , discard and destroy the “ proof “ given and then rely on tokenized “ credentials “ via the blockchain to allow consumers to visit multiple age restricted sites without the site knowing the “ identity “ of the consumer . Those that get in a flap worry about hacked files and leaked personal details . With a well designed credential system there is no information to be hacked . Totally anonymous when done properly ... age verification is going to become a “ thing “ with credentials issued for 13+ ( FB, Twitter ) , 15/16 + , 18+ and even 21 + ( new US vaping age ) . Separating age from identity is all it takes . No one can say it is ok for someone’s 8 year old daughter / granddaughter to be able to stumble on , with one click of the mouse, hardcore content . I am a true libertarian and free speech advocate . The technology now exists to protect all members of society from harmful content where appropriate, without infringing on anyone’s privacy ..
why is protecting kids against porn a bad decision? Surely this decision will be reversed?
I think there is definitely some scope in getting compensation considering that they said what they were looking to implement and then asking other companies to actually do the work... then changed their minds.
However, in my opinion, I do think they were right to change their minds as it was a bad decision in the first place.