Dibs, they are removing unprofitable business elements that were costing money. Even at the cost of revenue, so removal of the losses becomes a gain on smaller revenue, thus your margins become greater. that streamlining will effectivley ADD to proit. A point some fail to see.
Like I said the results are pre history, so looks worse than it is imo. The old ceo was clueless, NS has a total grasp of things.
The shift from ebit nutral statement to positive indicates progress.
Again fully funded for a whole 12 months, so no dilution, and expectations of the big deals.
.I agree the downside risks here substantial "from where", i only see change and improvement on what one consider an almost possible position considering we are still here. Nothing in those numbers other than the revenue drop which was explaned would trigger a substantial risk.
If revenues kept dropping than yes, but thats what i am not reading, so comments not warranted on these accounts. but he did say trading EBITDA neutral, so correct there but you did say early days.
You can read into them what you want are they better than last year simple yes or no given new CEO, would have lent you a shirt after losing yours. Still think you will make money on this but foe me long term.
Sorry I meant 'element of interest' in previous post. Just another point. Had the SP not been pumped up so much the other day based on the oops a daisy leak - just before results - where do peeps think the SP would be now? I reckon 4.5/5p tops ( and that's being generous. JAT
Dibs don't you understand that revenue is different to profit ? Previously they were running around chasing unprofitable business, they have ceased those activities, reduced costs by cutting down the workforce that weren't making them any money.
Turnover is vain, profit is sane, first rule of business.
I held my hands up straight away first thing this morning mate ;) You must've missed it in amongst all the gnashing of teeth.
I spoke to, let's say, a senior manager at Pinn yesterday who advised me they had to make an announcement to the market first when they were going to release results before they actually do so. I took him at his word that this would mean an RNS to announce results date first. Reasonable? Never take what an AIM CEO tells you at face value. (Like we didn't know that already eh?)
Datafeed and UK data supplied by NBTrader and Digital Look.
While London South East do their best to maintain the high quality of the information displayed on this site,
we cannot be held responsible for any loss due to incorrect information found here. All information is provided free of charge, 'as-is', and you use it at your own risk.
The contents of all 'Chat' messages should not be construed as advice and represent the opinions of the authors, not those of London South East Limited, or its affiliates.
London South East does not authorise or approve this content, and reserves the right to remove items at its discretion.