Member Info for kopfkissen

But it's not a director 'sell' in the usual sense of the word - he was gifted options in July and sold some to pay for the rest and tax. Two other directors were in the same allocation of options and they gave both done the same thing recently (see recent RNSs ). At least we can be sure that there will be no other sells for this reason as all 3 have now been RNS-ed . Not a hope in hell of it going back to 5p IMO (or even 6p).

What, to the extent you need to sell 2,000,000 of the 2,700,000 you were granted ? I don't believe it.

More cheap shares likely to be available for folk in 45 minutes.

The RNS says the sell was 'to cover the purchase price and PAYE tax in relation to the share options that were previously exercised by Mr McGarty'. But he only exercised 2,700,000 shares (see RNS of 19 July) - why would you need to sell 2,000,000 of them to cover purchase price and tax ? He now retains the magnificent total of about 795,000 shares - that's commitment.

Perhaps we couyld sell our Finnish assets to someone - seems to be an interest in developing a battery industry there.

https://www.vaasa.fi/en/tiedote/the-battery-industry-has-enormous-potential-to-become-finlands-new-success-storyhttp://www.miningweekly.com/article/dfs-opens-door-for-keliber-to-advance-finland-lithium-project-2018-06-15

I don't see that. Where is there a large late buy ?

I do, and I'm beginning to throw darts at them

"Diamond core from drilling of pegmatites at #MinadoBarroso Mining Lease - at least 9 pegmatites - 3 only comprehensively drilled for 14Mt and W. Europe's largest #spodumene #lithium resource established. 3 rigs on site and drilling away."

3 rigs on site confirmed now - nice.

I've an idea - I could sell some SAV shares to free up cash, which would enable me to buy SAV shares.

Must say I'm tempted. No cash though. How to proceed ... ?

'No trades for 20 mins' - what ? There have been regular trades every minute or two since open.

You are right Brad, but chances are will cause a further dip in sp.

6 out of 9 of our exploration licence applications in Portugal have been rejected. Nor the kind of news we were expectin g.

That article is dated 3 months ago. Do we reckon they should have found the explanation after 3 months ?

Thanks for your honesty. But I am rather shocked - all that time, effort and expense, and it doesn't reflect terribly well on DA if nothing comes of it.

That means the failed trials were all a big mistake and everything is wonderful. Terrier54 told me this so it must be true.

"Gardin says the goal is to sell these investments at a fair price and focus solely on cryptocurrency opportunities." - have you seen the latest Bitcoin price ? Going down the toilet.

What sort of beach ? Mineral sand ?

Aimtodeath - you say 'having us as the lead puts Rio just in the funding seat'. But the 23 April RNS says this : 'The applications were submitted earlier this year in the name of Mutamba Mineral Sands S.A., a wholly owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto Limited and cover a total area of 417.32km²'. From Moz governments point of view looks like Rio are the lead.  

And why does it always have to go to the wire anyway ? Just because you have 6 months to respond doesn't mean you actually have to respond in 6 months - hey, why not make it 5 ?