Member Info for A-s-h-t-o-n

Thanks CC.

MET1 shares in issue = 70,154,750

MET1 share price today ​(15 May 2025) = 48.5p

80M's percentage shareholding in MET1 = 15.52%

80M's shareholding in MET1 = 10,888,017 (0.1552 x 70,154,750)

Today's value of 80M's shareholding in MET1 (by using today's bid price of 47p) = £5,117,368 (0.47 x 10,888,017)

There is a lock-in period, so 80M cannot sell any part of its shareholding in MET1 until the lock-in period has expired. Would you happen to know when the lock-in period expires?

Good to see the MET1 share price performing well - https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/MET1/metals-one-plc/company-page

https://metals-one.com/investors/#share-capital-information

"they certainly don’t compete with bloomberg or the financial times in terms of editorial authority or journalistic reach. "

poppy****! pr newswire can reach the financial times. date of publication: 12 may 2025

https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=600-202505121202pr_news_usprx____ln85541-1

I was extremely surprised that the news of a U.S company undertaking drilling for oil & gas in Greenland did not receive wider coverage in the U.S, especially given the focus on the island. Now understand 80M has put a media blitz into operation from yesterday (12 May) via PR Newswire to spread the message about Jameson.

https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/about-pr-newswire/

https://www.prnewswire.com/news/80-mile-plc/

Good to see MET1 flying - https://www.londonstockexchange.com/stock/MET1/metals-one-plc/company-page

As of 6 May 2025, 80M's shareholding in MET1 is 15.52% - https://metals-one.com/investors/#share-capital-information

Rach, you ask: "do you have any updated insights or opinions regarding the recent overly optimistic statements made by the 80M Board of Directors?"

In his 3 May podcast, Rod McIllree said we can expect "excellent updates" on Hydrogen Valley. On 6 May, we had the first good news on the civil damages and ownership dispute involving Greenswitch.

We now await further updates. But if you are in a hurry to get information/opinion on the topics you have identified in your post, I suggest you contact the BoD.

You say: "It’s difficult not to notice your continued focus on my posts. Whether it stems from an ongoing personal fixation or simply a tendency to deflect, the pattern i clear. "

Oh dear!

a) Look at your own post from the very first day you arrived here 10 Apr 2024 09:38 - "Hi - new to this board but read a fair few of the posts and my conclusion is that - Ashton is a grade A muppet."

b) Look at your recent post, 5 May 2025 14:29 - "The more you (Ashton) post, the more I post."

Who was fixated from Day 1 and still is? You're talking through your hat!

~~~

You ask: “If the content (of calling Sarah Lowther an 'absolute tart') was truly so objectionable, why continue to amplify it?”

I brought it up again for two reasons:

a) You criticise someone else for using inappropriate language when you are guilty of the same. You are therefore in no position to criticise others (people who live in glass houses ......). I despise double standards.

b) You have not (so far) retracted your vile/filthy personal attack on Sarah Lowther and offered her an apology. Instead, you now go on and justify your behaviour. That is despicable.

I have responded to your post and therefore have no intention to pursue this matter any further.

Don't duck the issue, Rach. Regardless of your reasons, there was no justification whatsoever for resorting to such a vile/filthy personal attack on Sarah Lowther.

Hey Rach, you say to MrTHC: "oh no, just a personal attack on someone that does take the time to post on some pertinent matters."

That's a bit rich coming from you. What about your vile/filthy personal attack on Sarah Lowther (Total Market Solutions) after Eric Sondergaard's podcast with her? You called Sarah an "absolute tart " in your post on 2 May 2024, 7:51. LSE took your post down. Wasn't that an abhorrent personal attack on someone also talking about pertinent matters? Pot calling the kettle......

This interview was two days ago - https://www.nbcnews.com/video/trump-won-t-rule-out-military-force-on-greenland-238876741745

Rach's 1st post (user name then RachT) 10 Apr 2024 09:38

"Hi - new to this board but read a fair few of the posts and my conclusion is that - Ashton is a grade A muppet.

Repeated quotes such as the latest gem "Never stop wishing, because when you do, you stop believing in the magic of life." have been put forward to encourage support of JAY all the way down from the 7.46p (since he / she first started to post here) to the present 0.29p - a loss of >96% if he / she bought / held the shares when they initially started posting. Of course Ashton's reply will be that is only a paper loss until the shares are sold - no Ashton - it is a loss, plain and simple. Try to kid yourself otherwise if you wish but that merely serves to add to your delusional behaviour."

https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/racht/?page=4

Telling porkies again Rach!

That post from me on 16 Apr 2025 19:49 was NOT addressed to CC but to the general readers here. It was under the thread "World Economic Forum & White Hydrogen". Here is that post - https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/a-s-h-t-o-n/?page=2

As recently as yesterday 4 May 2025 11:42, I posted this to CC: "I asked you to go back and watch the June 2024 Jameson podcast with RM. I repeated the suggestion again on 26 Apr 2025. In that podcast, RM said Jameson was drill-ready, and that's why I asked you to watch that podcast and I am glad we had confirmation of Jameson drilling RNS on 28 Apr 2025."

Here is another example of repeating the same message to spread FUD. Look at the number of times she has posted the message within such a short space of time.

4 May 2025 12:55: "HV haven't yet paid the money they owe on it and ownership is being decided in the Italian courts, so HV probably doesn't "own" it yet."

28 Mar 2025 12:10: "How much of a certainty is that when ownership is being disputed in the Italian courts?"

27 Feb 2025 09:43: "There's an outstanding mortgage, ownership of Greenswitch is being contested in the courts"

24 Feb 2025 19:43: "Greenswitch is the subject of various disputes before the Italian courts including the ownership of the project.

13 Feb 2025 12:15: "Greenswitch is the subject of various disputes before the Italian courts including the ownership of the Project."

In the Hydrogen Valley (Greenswitch) acquisition RNS 19 December 2024, 80M has already informed the market of the outstanding issues that will need to be resolved before 80M acquires a 100% interest in HV. So, the company has been transparent about the issues right from the start (as required by stock exchange rules). Anyone can read about the issues in the RNS. But Rach goes on regurgitating the same message ad nauseum as her way of spreading FUD. She then accuses me of regurgitating company messages. What's good for the goose......

RM referred to them as "investors and oil people".

CC - At the very start of the podcast, RM referred to the March GL syndicate as "oil men" and then said JL is a "very significant oil project." It makes me wonder whether the priority is oil - https://youtu.be/HGLMGm0zyEU?t=1

Not only did you refer to it as green hydrogen, but you also highlighted the word 'green'. Telling porkies again!

You say: " Less than 3 weeks ago you advised CC to look back at an 80M RNS from June 24 to see just how great the BoD were portraying hydrogen / helium to be."

I did not ask CC to watch that podcast again because the BoD was portraying hydrogen/helium. I asked him to watch the podcast because RM said JL is drill-ready. Telling porkies again!

IvRoche described Rach as a FUD spreader. Here is another example of her spreading FUD.

4 Feb 2025 22:11:  "Contrary to the hype posted by rampers bigging up JL that's exactly what I've been saying for quite some time now. Any 'green' hydrogen that may be present isn't likely to be monetised - and if (BIG if) it ever is it will be long after Greenswitch produce it. So of zilch value to shareholders in 80M."

This claim is quite laughable. For a start, green hydrogen is not present naturally. It is produced artificially through a process called electrolysis, unlike white hydrogen, which evolves naturally. In any case, it is white hydrogen that is present at Jameson Land. Moreover, there is a big difference between green and white hydrogen, and if anyone is interested, they can easily look it up. If you’re new to 80M, please read the section "White Hydrogen Prospectivity" in Jameson Land RNS 20 June 2024.

Rach is not only an FUD spreader but is also confused, since she can’t tell the difference between facts and fiction, as IvRoche has put it. Now wait for it, she is going to come back saying it was another honest mistake and she simply got the colours green and white mixed up! There are also other examples of her spreading FUD.

Sovereign Wealth Fund - White House Executive Order (February 2025) - https://tinyurl.com/5n9a9y3w

"Washington is eying the possible creation of an American sovereign wealth fund (SWF) to compete with China’s state-controlled extractive industries by directly investing in miners, both domestic and FOREIGN, as the administration scrambles to collect new critical minerals allies. An American SWF would be similar to those found in Saudi Arabia and Norway, where they hold significant stakes in mining and energy assets worldwide. If implemented, the sovereign fund would signal a significant escalation in the U.S. critical minerals strategy - shifting from regulatory support to DIRECT STATE-BACK CAPITAL DEPLOYMENT. The implications for miners, markets, and geopolitics could be far-reaching."

https://tinyurl.com/2ct2unvc

CC - Going back to last year's Jameson RNS 19 November 2024, Eric Sondergaard made what appeared to be an inconsequential statement then: "The Company is also currently evaluating downstream opportunities in the sector and will advise as and if opportunities arise." Since no one discussed the statement here, you will recall I highlighted its significance on 15 December 2024, and on 19 December 2024, we had the RNS that 80M would be acquiring Greenswitch, a downstream opportunity.

I want to now highlight another, what might appear to be another inconsequential statement, again from ES, but this time in the latest Jameson drilling RNS 28 April 2025: "As part of a broader Arctic and North Atlantic energy corridor, Jameson has the potential to attract a broader range of funding sources and long-term investment into Greenland."

The message from ES was clear to me. In ES's opinion, Jameson has the potential to attract a broader range of funding and long-term investment, provided the scheduled drilling is successful. Interestingly, Rod McIllree, in his podcast yesterday, went one step further. He talked about "optionality" for funding Jameson, and referred to potential sovereign wealth funding and highlighted Norway's sovereign wealth fund as an example (Note: That was just an example). But then he went on to say, there are other similar sovereign funds. This raises the important question: Has the company been talking to third parties about the possibility of sovereign funding Jameson beyond Project 1 and Project 2 with March GL? Please go back and listen to the podcast again from 6:00 mins and pick up from the point where RM uses the word "optionality" - https://youtu.be/HGLMGm0zyEU?t=1

I would not underestimate the significance of the interrelated statements from ES and RM in this regard for long-term funding of the Jameson project beyond Project 1 and Project 2 with March GL.. For example, from a sovereign fund, provided the scheduled drilling is successful, and therein lies the challenge!

CC - You ask whether Disko will be drilled this year. I do not know for sure, but I ​hope/expect it to happen. A few days ago, I said the next update on Disko was due soon, pretty soon. I am glad that in his podcast yesterday, RM confirmed that we can expect the update in the next two weeks or so. Not long to find out the answer to your question. In his podcast, did you note RM saying now that funding for Jameson has been taken care of for drilling two holes, 80M can now focus on Disko. What did he mean? Forward the podcast to 5:00 mins and listen - https://youtu.be/HGLMGm0zyEU?t=1

Talking about RM's podcast, in my note to you on 7 Apr 2025, I asked you to go back and watch the June 2024 Jameson podcast with RM. I repeated the suggestion again on 26 Apr 2025. In that podcast, RM said Jameson was drill-ready, and that's why I asked you to watch that podcast and I am glad we had confirmation of Jameson drilling RNS on 28 Apr 2025. Now I am going to ask you to go back and watch the latest podcast with RM again. It is to do with the future funding of Jameson​ beyond Project 1 and Project 2 with March GL. ​Did you pick up something important he said in this regard, which may have come across as inconsequential, but not so? Please see my next post, which I will post later.

Https://youtu.be/HGLMGm0zyEU?t=1