Member Info for YTeeBack

Bids recovered a bit would help if directors bought some.

Not quiet elswhere for me doing well in a late santa rally but mfai letting me down, doesnt help they will report 2024 accounts not until late june, someone have a word it is unacceptable for such a tiny co, whichever way you look they need to up their game the discount is ridicules.

There seems to a late santa rally here seems it will rise alot again to feb relaunch.

Does look like another p&d by the advfn crew and who leaked this news?

Anyone else see the bullflag forming

Nice move indeed looks like first few month in 2026 will be interesting here.

There should be nice rises here up to the February relaunch 2.0, 0.6p again.

Consensus forward pe for 2026 is 7, if they confirm this is on track in q1/q2 could do 50% by end of q2.

Just treat napster like the 26 other investments for now.

They can help the market by announcing the 2025 results a bit earlier it shouldn't take them to do in late in June when many inc multinationals do it within a months of the new year.

Its in the bottom draw now for me somethings not making sense with all the talk of realisation but a depressed share price, i am young enough to leave it in the sipp for as long as it takes but without napster the wind seems to be gone.

Should have waited one more day maybe but all things considered this could be in the 650p's come May'ish so no worries.

Thanks, i thought it was a cpi competitor.

Am i right to compare cpi to serco who are on pe of 14 whilst cpi is on 10.

Sure results seem ok although an uplift in the nav would have been a positive, so the selling here is baffling.

Thanks Warrie

Anyone can confirm this this is huge if true

MFAI holds 22.9% of Vizgard

They are dodgy fca should investigate them.

Napster say they are the victim, I don't think Napster is the issue here this news been out for while now.

Mfai need to come out do some pr i dont like this hanging sp while sells are going through.

Whilst they had £1.4m maybe the market are unsure about how much of that been called up by sv for svv2 and svv3, cannot find another reason for this lackluster performance.