Member Info for wyndrum

I'm not sure I'd characterise the rise today as a SP collapse.....

stock looks to be on short supply presently...

Now its getting interesting...

Happy,

Its pretty simple:

DM says we will have a drill this year (but with a couple of caveats regarding supplies arriving in time) which has caused uncertainty. This uncertainty has been compounded by the seemingly long time it has taken to get to even this stage from lasts year's failed "discovery".

The SP is slowing slipping downwards as the market increasingly suspects this year will be missed.

And a further complication is the small cash on hand that HE1 has.

A cash raise or new injection of funds has to come and the longer it goes on without the "discovery" happening the more likely that the cash rise will need to be had at these lower prices meaning dilution (if thats the way it went) would be pretty substantial.

So lots of uncertainty but underpinned by good potential is pulling the SP in both directions but as I said, the uncertainty is currently winning this tug of war.

You pays your money and all that....

maybe they have cut staff to save money?

DGU, you have been banging this drum for a while now.

Rather than post here, take it to a lawyer who specialises in this stuff and see if there are any grounds. You won't get any definitive answers here.

ping, I understand these are your views, thats fine...You say its logical that no news means talks are ongoing, I don't . Thats all.

I guess Ping, as EVE are not going to give out an RNS every day, saying "no interest today" then if, if, no interest is forthcoming a statement will be made via and included in, a trading update.

Equally they could be in advance negotiations with a company... I just don't see how the silence leans more one way or the other

" Certainly more chance of something positive taking a longer while than a ‘no deal’...."

Huh?
If there is no deal so far, then obviously there would be no news... so how do you figure that to mean it more likely a deal is going on in the background?

Really, just asking...

Hi D, Hope you had a nice holiday.

The only observation I would make is that the "good product" will still be a good product whether or not the SP goes up or the company no longer trades on the stock market.

Yanis, I make fairly quick decisions if and when I think events change.

I have been in and out of EVE for years (I even fluked a win when I bought in around 90p and got out at 100p plus if memory serves).

The EVE SP can and often does move by big margins and because I have my own personal history with this stock I stay in touch with it to see if I can benefit from it. I have traded it 3 or 4 times since the June for sale RNS for instance.

As a BB generally I have always found this to be a particularly friendly and courteous place to exchange different views.

Regarding shorting this (or any stock), I don't have that facility so have never done so and never will. This then probably leads onto , because you may think I do short the stock, that I have ulterior motives for my posts. All I can tell you is I don't.

I just concern myself with what I think is likely to happen that might affect the SP. I sincerely believe that nothing , absolutely nothing posted on these BB's affect the SP. I think it somewhere between hilarious and unbelievable, that anyone thinks us very small PI's move the SP with what we post here.

On that basis, I give honest views as to what i think may influence the SP as events unfold or my thought process takes me.

Again the fact that people come to incorrect conclusions about my intentions only confirms that incorrect assumptions are made on very little info and that these assumptions are often assumed only to bolster/confirm the view the poster already holds rather than read the content of what i post and maybe make them reconsider their original views.

For instance: Are the reasons you bought EVE in the first place still valid now? If not why do you still hold? Very basic obvious questions that I ask myself frequently on all of my portfolio to take stock of where I am at any given time.

76p/78p has been a bit of a ceiling chartwise. If and when it closes above then 91p hoves into view as the next target.

So fingers crossed it does that soon, as it should then pull in more buyers who will also note the 91p target

Pingu "..but it’s a seriously tedious read for investors haha. Can anyone give us an idea of share price targets? Estimates timescales to an offer? What is plan b if no offer?"

I agree there is quite the element of tedium to the exchanges I get involved in, but todays problems investors have here with EVE will be resolved one way or the other over the coming weeks and months.

Plus most here will have a portfolio of other stocks too.

What is more important than the specific ups and downs of any particular stock is how we deal with those situations.

Thats why i try to probe other people idea and thoughts.

The process of how you pick stocks, the plan/methodology the individual uses, their actions when events don't pan out as expected, these are the crucial areas when looking at making money in the stock markets.

Its a game (like most), that is played between the ears.

I try to highlight the psychological aspects of the process that most get afflicted by in case they are not aware of it.
The assumptions made (usually baseless), simply to confirm a pov, that these BB, encourage by being for the most part echo chambers. These aspects usually, universally, damage the successful decision making process.

But yeah, it does get tedious....

not bad but a fair pull back from the intra day high.

Might fall back to to test 885p but in any event its another in a line now, of positive chart moves.

(I hit the send button a bit early... sorry..) the SP
As to why there is a 5.56% fall today. I don't know.

Logic says the MM's want to discourage any more sells as they have now enough/too much stock and by also lowering the buy price it will/may encourage new buyers to come in.

(I don't look for conspiracy or convoluted theories and unless I have some reason to think differently, use Occams Razor approach to events)

Personally I have found that level 2 data is unreliable in determining likely future SP movement, and as a result, because I can't use it to help me make money I ignore it.

If one is just looking at buys and sells (ala LSE) then its my understanding its based on an algo, which does not seem to be accurate (enough) in actually determining what is a buy and what is a sell.

Plus there are many after hour transactions and some are even reported the following day. So given the inaccuracy of knowing what amount buys and sells are even taking place it seems a pointless and fruitless task as to what info is displayed to be able to draw any meaningful, helpful info from it.

And finally in a more general sense, every buy has to have sell (and vice versa), So if someone for instance bought a million EVE shares, is that a sign of confidence? But what about the person who sold the million shares? is that a sign of bad things to come?

For all of the above I have never bothered giving any weight to that particular indicator. (I don't like Volume as a related indicator either, for many of the same reasons)

Invest,
Assumption no 1: I am prickly (No, just a bit tired/frustrated with people jumping to incorrect conclusions as to my state of mind
Assumption no 2: That I don't want you to post. (I just asked for you to explain your thoughts/reasonings as to why you come to the conclusion you do against general market expectation.)
Assumption no 3: Clearly signs of a troubled childhood.... really?

Inaccuracy No 1: I wasn't pointing out anything about your character. I was simply trying to highlight how your posts come across when devoid of any context. thats all

Inaccuracy No2: "it’s been a genuine pleasure schooling you." you didn't and you haven't

Plus I am not sure what words I have twisted.
But I did ask you a question which you did not answer: "Its my belief that we may well witness a deluge of highly active buying over the coming hours and days .. #buy&hold. GLA"

That was nearly 3 weeks ago, what happened? what made you think in the "coming hours" there would be a deluge of buying activity? Why, having made that statement do you refuse to discuss it?

So, rather than have a pop at me, why can't we just discuss EVE and the basis of your views?

Ok, but I get a bit tired of this.

You have done this for a while so you know a share price movements is nothing to do with "positivity" or "negativity"
You also know that the SP only has a fleeting relationship with the company.

As for me being "negative"..... How has the SP price performed since IPO and over the last 6 months?

If I (or anyone), has a view that the SP is more likely to go down than up and it does, then how is that somehow negative in the sense that it is a bad thing to have posted?

As for me thriving on having the last word, well, I see these BB's as a forum for discussion so you naturally have an amount of to and fro.

I, for better or worse, will outline my thinking and respond to others views to either dig a bit deeper into their thought process to see if I can learn something, or potentially expose their flawed logic.

Normally I "have the last word" because the poster refuses to answer a query I have.

You are typical.

You post your opinion with no reasoning.

It is like a stranger (which you are) coming up to me at a race meet and saying horse no. 3 will win the 2:30.

So what? I would not bet on that, and if it happened to you you would not either.

But if you said you think Horse no.3 will win because the trainer has only one horse in the meet, the jockey is a very good one, the ground suits the horse, it prefers left hand bends and its last 3 races show its coming into form, then I might give it some more consideration.

But you don't do that do you. You avoid any explanation of your pronouncements.

But as you say, do what you like but by your tone and lack of any supporting thought or links, I have no idea why you think anybody would listen to your views, and if you think that too, then why bother posting at all?

Invest, rather than get what seems a little prickly about some responses, perhaps you could just include your thoughts and reasoning as to why you come to the conclusions you do?

I'm not trying to be confrontational but by going stratight to the conclusion without any explanation it is hard to put into any sort of context what and why you are posting:

For instance you said on the 28th of July: "Its my belief that we may well witness a deluge of highly active buying over the coming hours and days .. #buy&hold. GLA"

That was weeks ago. so what happened? As I say I am not trying to be confrontational or argumentative, just that showing your workings would I think be helpful to most here.

Hano, have you read the posts I receive?