Member Info for wyndrum

dai, re:ECO, chartwise its clearly in a bull run but its just about over bought using the RSI (78.75, with 80 being the red flag.

It might go up a bit more but I would expect in the next trading session or 2, that a pull back is likely to 32.5p.

In the great scheme of things that might not seem much (35p down to 32p ish), but its 10% and I would rather wait and try and get in close to 32p and hopefully get the extra gain when it sets off going back up with the fist target being 40p.

Then I am potentially making 25% and not 15%.

Its the extra percent here and there that makes the difference. (imo) when trading several stocks (as I do)

DYOR and all that...

thats a tough one dai only because every situation is different if you are using a FA approach.

There is no limit as to how far a share can rise and pretty much how far it can fall.

If you look at fundamentals then I guess you would need to look at the current valuation versus the assets to see how over valued it is and that might give you an idea of whether the boat has really been missed or not.

But for me I am always surprised at how far SP's can move (look at boohoo as a good example, its made a ton of money, expanded into many viable brands, good platform and has lost 90% of its value and is below the IPO of years ago.... go figure...)

So I moved away from trying to figure out "fair value" and looked at charting as another avenue to try and make money out of the markets, and as it turned out, it seems to work for me more often than not.

The basic rules though I think apply across the board whatever system you use or sector you prefer to specialise in, and thats never, ever, put more in any stock than you can comfortably afford to lose.

And have a reasonably diverse portfolio.
Which means be wary of too many high risk, binary stocks. There is always the belief that you only need one to win to compensate for all the ones that don't but there are a lot of those type of stocks out there and there is no guarantee, that you will ever hold the one that wins....

Fwiw, I think it is hard, very hard to get rich quick playing this game but not so hard getting rich slowly.

Patience is a virtue and imo, the greatest of them all.

Don't know if any of the above helps.....(probably not, ha ha)

Have a great weekend

yes, Vi all that is true, but HE1 still have to discover the bloody stuff!

fwiw... I like the chart.....topped up just now

Oh... so its my fault for the thread.... the OP and 6 replies before I noted the stupidity of starting it....

No I'm not bitl. Why do you always jump to that absolute wrong conclusion?

If this thread was never started then I for one and I guess others here would have no knowledge of what he posted.

If the trial is successful he will lose his money. Events will determine his fortune (as ours).

And again its this condescending assumption you and ripley have that everyone here is so bloody stupid that they would act on his posts. Which reinforces my opinion that highlighting it here just gives it more oxygen, thinking (under your concerns) that people would act on it.!

So dumb....

well argued...

Or if you did not constantly draw attention to it, absolutely no one on here would know about it.

And at the end of the day, its just his opinion which does not chime with yours. If he agreed with you you would not be posting (or maybe you would to confirm your opinion.)

You just want a different outcome to him. But you are right and as always, everybody else who does not fit in with your view of the world is wrong.

If he is wrong then he will lose his money. Who cares? how does all this vitriol change anything other than as I say, alerting everyone here to the views you can't tolerate

(Plus there is a difference between mockery and abusive language.)

by highlighting this (as you always often do), you just draw attention (and more posts) to the "negative "view". which you seem to spend every waking minute railing against?

Why don't you just ignore it? Its very odd behaviour....

Very strange

well 2 things ripley, don't engage as you keep desperately tell others here to do, and do please post another pointless missive about the buy/sell ratio that always manages to confuse you.

Prof, that's next (142p I think) but first we have to secure a hold above 128p (130p should be enough to lesson the chance of a "false" break out).

In a very classic chart scenario the SP will close around 135-137p pushing the RSI to likely be over bought, with a fall back to around 130p to unwind to then have the room to go on to 142p.

Lets see where we finish, MrA

of course ripley, just nobody on here on this BB. I am pretty sure that if WB came out and said he thought AVCT was a good investment the SP would go up.

As usual you are so wound up that you are just desperate to try and trip me up. Pathetic , also as usual

All I said was, it will be interesting to see if the latest rise sticks because based on previous similar occurrences it hasn't.

And based on previous buy and sells the particular level we are at looks significant for further faster appreciation should it close at 130p or above,

So, what did you mean?

The "break out" will be a hold and close above 130p

there was a small target yesterday at around 120p-122p which was good to see it go.

What makes this interesting is, was it the MM post that caused yesterdays spike as this has happened previously and then drifted down again, or just coincidence that new buyers, seeing the potential of SP appreciation, decided to buy?

So today will be interesting to see if the rise sticks, but certainly we are getting to close to a more significant level then we have for some weeks.

Ripley you keep telling posters not to engage but can't help yourself can you?

PAHOO, you really are mental. I'm not discussing the SP, I'm simply expressing my view that there is an alternative to energy's thoughts on the integrity of AS based on the actual reality of events and not what to me, seems a distortion of what has been said in the past and what has come to pass. Jeeze.....

You really think after all the delay in the TT, he pulled it when he did on a point of integrity? (I mentioned the lack of commercial sales to highlight that when there was no obstacle to selling the test ie omicron was not around, there were precious little sales.

But hey, you are entitled to your view as I am mine, there is no need to be insulting. Just take a breath.

I can hano, but its 30 odd recs, and it could be an example of hearing what you want to hear.

I have no beef with AS, but he has a track record of over egging the AVCT pudding.

I think he promised no cash raise just prior to announcing one. And all thats all fine. I just would not get carried away with the "integrity" bit that was all.

It won't make any difference to the trial results or indeed the SP

"He stopped sale of LFT just as it received home use because it was not up to his standard. Missing out on Millions of sales."

and you really believe that? the fact that there had been hardly any commercial sales at all prior to omicron... These elite sports clubs that were he was dealing with... the inking of contracts.....

The fact he pulled it could not have anything to do with it was too expensive to produce?

Its all water under the bridge now, but I think there is at least an alternative to your impression of him.

My experience is that directors always publically over egg the positive and down play the negative. I don't blame them for this, its part and parcel of what they have to do, I just don't try and read quite so much into it as maybe others do.