Member Info for wyndrum

Holy, " If so, there’s no real benefit of admin at these low levels."

Surely all debts, staff costs, liabilities, would go if bought from admin?

(I am not sure the company would be debt free as there must be contractural liablities)

well the 490p target is there for the taking.

RA:"Everyone assumes the two mains shorts (Bronte and JUP) have a dedicated focus on AVCT, rather than just throwing darts at a board and assuming UK AIM will be rocky. It has, after all."

Really? what evidence do you have for assuming these companies throw "darts at a board" when deciding to short companies?

As ludicrous statements go this must be right at the top...

"still it ain’t over as I can’t hear any fat ladies singing!"

Unfortunately Chicken, its not a situation where you will hear anything. Either an offer will be announced or there will be an RNS with bad news. But either way its unlikely anyone will be able to react to take immediate advantage of the news.

Ha! Ade, I am holding a bit of candle for WOSG and have traded it fairly well recently and bow just tend to top up on falls. I think it shows a lot of potential over the next 12-36 months and would assume in that time a divi will be introduced too.

Ade, depending on how strong your convictions are, in these circumstances I sometimes buy half of the sum I had put aside should the stock fall to my buy price but at the same time realising I don't want to miss out if that bottom does not come around again, use the other half to buy in at higher price?

(if it does fall, top up with the remaining half)

Just a thought and obviously not advice, just what I have done in the past.

Hurst, what difference has that made?

I understand...
Ah AVCT..... one day (I'd like to think one day... soon)

COPL, I am pretty much done with loss makers presently. I have a few and that risk profile, even allowing for the amounts invested, is very high. Again it just depends on your expected returns I guess. It is at the top ish of a range and will look ok if it breaks and holds 16.5p to onto 21p. but charts are less reliable in these small stocks with large spreads.

Generally I am happy with anything above the rate of inflation (annually) , but I "expect" at least to double my spend on these binary plays. (and a bit more from AVCT but I think big returns are 3-5 years away)

Anyway GL

Yes thats true D, I was forgetting about the returns policy rather than the guarantee.

How are you feeling about your sale?

(I ask only because my experience has been on bigger losses that it helps emotionally not to look or revisit the scene (unless there is an intention to potentially buy in again)

Obviously you do not need to answer. ATB

Maybe Ade, more likely it might look at 490p before going again certainly if it brakes 506p then its set to go higher.

I guess you have to take a view if its stuck in a trading range of 440p-506p or is starting an upward trend where those lows won't be revisited. GL

The reputational damage D would surely come from if you wanted to return the faulty product but could not. If the product continues to (out) perform would you not buy another one in 10 years time?

B:F I try to explain the difference in the company and the SP but normally to no avail.

AVCT the company don't really care about the SP (except for when they need to raise money which is typically years apart).

So they do their thing as a company and all the buys and sells of the stock make no difference to their bottom line. (Yes the directors and staff get to see their paper wealth go up and down like we do, but they know what's actually going on).

So as there has been little or no extra buying from institutions, the movement is generally being shifted through small investors (PI's). These are notoriously fickle and easily spooked and panicked.

The market is presently testing the 98-100p support level to see exactly how robust the long termers are and if at these levels, it brings in new buyers.

So far it has held up.

Your fear is typical when you see your paper wealth decreasing and it becomes ever more painful the lower it goes until you can bear the pain no more and eventually sell. Thats often when shares rally and drives most PI's mad and then they assume the whole market is corrupt. In fact its not its just how you can sometimes make money by understanding the psychological pressures the "average" PI endures and their likely reaction.

Get a job! Get a Job! Geta job!!!!

For those that insist on knowing what I do, nice place to add some so I have.

perhaps there is a difference between the SP and the actual company?

certainly there is a bit of gentle support (at last), but given that drilling has started perhaps that is the least to be expected..... Anyway, topped up yesterday and this morning think it would jump but who knows, the day is not done yet!

I think so too Neut but its a knockout rather than a points decision given how subdued the SP has been for so long now.

Rope a dope I guess.....

If you want to personalise it Neut, then, oh yeah, we have got them just where we want them with a SP at 106p.....

All the time IVIM, you try to drfine my posts with words like negativity and positivity you completely mis read and misunderstand my thoughts. I have stated this before to you so you know this.

IT will not make the SP rise just because I or anyone are "positive" about EVE.

The general point of buying shares in a company is to at some stage sell them for a profit. If that is not likely (likely mind, no one can forecast the future), then is it not just as useful to discuss that to potentially save people buying into a company that might lose them money just as highlighting some of the ideas and strategies they have to increase profits?

And for goodness sake lay off with the childish " It’s not surprising that the good folk at London South East are kindly monitoring your every key stroke. " no they are not. But by saying that you imply untruths about my motives and are attempting to discredit me as a person for simply expressing my reasoned views. You should look a little more closely in the mirror, when it comes to motives.

fwiw and it just an observation but INVESTINME's attitude that he posts is just about the worst way of looking at a company.

I think you have to be a lot more critical and a lot more objective when looking at companies to invest in and closely monitor them.

What difference does it make to EVE or the SP to say that neither DG or I have any "..... genuine interest in seeing this company succeed and grow IMO"

As it happens I do have an interest (you can add genuine if you like), in EVE, all IVIM is saying that he does not agree with my view.

To then come to a conclusion that we must be working for "someone" is pretty stupid because of this.

It just shuts down different views and you will notice that posters who post this sort of rubbish rarely engage in discussing the different POV's.

This BB's are not generally good for your wealth and people should be wary of coming to them. Just my opinion DYOR etc etc.