Member Info for wyndrum

Well how would I know? you are the one making it all up!

You don't infer but you state, that a number of posters incl me are all his. So are you saying we are all the same poster or we work or collude with him? "He's retired, with plenty of time to work for TW. All the accounts such as D-geeman, wyndrum, Touk, MR Adventurous, Bishop and eggy on twitter and more are all his."

you don't infer but state "He gets paid to disrupt and deramp."

so presumably you must know who he is and who he works for (You say" TW", does that Mean Tom Winnifrith?) to be able to know this, or at least have proof of payments he has received to do what you accuse him and presumably you have the same proof that we all are either him or work for him?

(Remember I have told you numerous times to stop this libel but you keep persisting so you can't say you were not aware of your error.)

I brought this up just as reminder that although this is an anonymous BB and banter aside, there are still boundary's and perhaps it would be better if that was remembered and the abuse and lies were halted.

Speranza your post:

"When this BB finally realises that all these accounts are all managed by NDN, this will be a much nicer place.
He's retired, with plenty of time to work for TW. All the accounts such as D-geeman, wyndrum, Touk, MR Adventurous, Bishop and eggy on twitter and more are all his.
you will forever argue with a lonely retired individual with nothing else to do than be on here 24/7.
He gets paid to disrupt and deramp."

Are you not conscious of what you post?

ripley,

commenting on other peoples content within their posts on a BB is not stalking (Stalking might be when others follow somebody's post history and goes to another BB to simply personally attack them and not what they actually are saying).

Asking people to calm down is hardly a form of verbal assault . (That was funny though).

Expressing my opinion on an investment BB that the stock might rise or fall is again something that would be highly amusing if it went further

As for witnesses, knock yourself out. its you (and others) that have for years personally attacked me, libeled me, spread mis-information, misquoted my posts , and attributed to me things I never even said, all to discredit me.

I have been repeatedly called scum, filth, and more as you all know, as well as constantly being told to leave this BB, (and I don't think PL75 your posting history with the references you make to me now where you try to be somewhat oblique would stand any scruitiny as to who you are referring to, coupled with before then when you were routinely banned for the specific abuse you dolled out to me.)

And Speranza, you continue to make false accusations against me and others by claiming we are one person with multiple accounts and working for someone. Its not true its never been true and you have no proof of it at all yet you continue to harass me and by implication defame my character (and others) with these blatant lies. I have told you numerous times its not true yet you have continued to deliberately ignore this and repeat the false claim.

As I say, you should all calm down a bit and keep off the personal abuse and lies. (I don't know why any of you find that request contentious or inflamatory given the legal boundries that exist for this sort of thing.

The ironic part of this is that it would be a much better BB for it. (something that is routinely wished for by the people who cause the disruption.)

But hey ho.

Oh, and in case you are wondering:
"The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 indicates that someone’s actions amount to harassment when they make the victim feel distressed, humiliated, threatened or fearful of further violence. The main goal of harassment is to persuade victims either not to do something that they are entitled or required to do or to do something that they are not obliged to do. Actions listed under the Protection from Harassment Act include, but are not limited to:
stalking
verbal abuse of any kind, including on social media
threats.

If I were you lot I'd calm down a bit.

its absolutely idiotic, clueless even, that if one poster agrees with another on a view that the half dozen or so uber rampers don't like that they must be the same person, on the basis there cannot be more than one individual who disagrees with their view.

By their own definition I guess we have to assume they are all one poster too?

The name calling doesn't bother me but I find it disappointing that the only recourse to a different point of view is to immeditately degenerate to playground name calling and no attempt to ever discuss the different pov.

All they do, all they ever do, is personalize, attack and try to bully the poster because they don't like their view.
At one level it is so childish as to be beyond parody that grown adults react in a way a 7 year old would if he did not get his own way. On the other the spitefulness and venom and the desire to be seen to be so argressive it is simply dispiriting that they think it is acceptable to be like that.

They also should be glad its anonymous because if they carried on like this against a person(s) in a more real environment they would be guilty of harrassment.

Ice,

You seem to be indifferent to the SP short term but when will you care? Forgive me for putting words in your mouth but you might have said this 12 months ago and be saying "just wait until the results of the trial come in", well the results are in and the sp is 144p

When the science day date was released a link here went to an investment bod who said this sort of thing was normally code for a cash raise.

Starbright (who i think offers excellent insights), mentioned this last week as an option that is available to AVCT, to go it alone rather than license, to keep all the profits in house. But that makes it longer term and defo more funding.

So the market I think, is waiting to see what the science day reveals both for the trial results and AVCT's plans to monitise the tech.

You may recall last year that I was trying to figure out why so close (back then) to the end of DE4 was the SP so moribund and I suggested then maybe the market had already priced in that it works. (As i recall not many agreed with that, yet here we are, so how funny do you think it is now given I am only here for the comedy value?

yeah.... turns out the market had priced in the good news....who knew?

SB, do you have a view/opinion on how much money AVCT would need if it wanted to keep 100% of their tech in house to keep 100% of the eventual profits?

volume is an indicator but again I find it unreliable, so don't use it also the same with MA's.

Its not that they never "work" but there are too many times when they don't.

Support and resistance levels are very useful, the trick knowing how close to, you use them when deciding to buy/sell.

yes indeed RR, but for many here logic goes right out the window if it ever points to a reason why the SP might fall or is falling.

maybe you are right yeboa, still, bought some this morning at 143.96 when the Sp was 142p (potential support line so even it does fall to 138p it might be a 141p ish buy price so given the risk of maybe further falls against maybe 142p will be the low for now thought it was worth a punt.)

Truley I am not kicking this off again but..

"Recently, buys have almost consistently outnumbered sells, yet the SP is in its third session of falls . . ."

Just maybe that's the correlation..... when there are more buys (given buyers want the lowest price) thats the cause of the fall?

So rather being perplexed maybe the cause and effect is staring you in the face.

oh ripley give it up.

I use the one indicator because I found it be reliable while the others unreliable.

I don't day trade and stocks like this generally don't lend themselves to it anyway.

Your "method" has not helped you and although you claim you will be a millionaire at 800p per share i thought you already had "life changing contracts" some time ago when you sold out at a loss when if memory serves it was less than 90p (or to put it another way when you were selling I was buying . Which given your constant devotion to this BB does not ring true to me.)

So by all means let off steam and poke fun at other ways of figuring out when to buy and sell, but it just looks to me as though you are trying to kid yourself that you know better when in fact you flounder along like many here with no objective view of your investment.

yes largo I did and it was wrong... shock horror I too thought this was going to propel the SP higher but it hasn't so i have tried to understand why. Why is that so bad? I sold that tranche at 154p when it was apparent to me this was likely to fall further.

let me help you out then.

I use the RSI. (just one indicator that PL75 constantly ridicules me for)

When it hit its high last week at close of 161p the RSI was 78. (The books will tell you a value of 70 indicates a sell but I work on 80 as a more reliable number.)

So at 78 it was pretty toppy with little if any movement left for further rises, so in my view it was most likely to fall, (certainly there was no incentive to buy), and it has.

The target is 138p. I do not know if it will go that far but there will be a number of traders waiting for that to be hit before buying. just my opinion dyor etc etc.

Doc, You and a few others need to calm down

When the Jan 17th rns was released the SP opened at 150p having closed the night before at 138p, 12p rise not even a 10% mark up.

It closed last night, 9 days later, at 148p.

Why was that?

As always (although you seem to think, I think I know everything), I don't know.

However those are the facts and rather than trying to fit a universe that revolves around the earth I try to see if there is another simpler possible explanation.

I know many here just look at AVCt and the work they are doing and don't care about the SP. Thats fine but I don't know why they bought in in the first place if the potential gain is not important.

So to the ones where an increasing SP which should be driven by good news who might be wondering why the lack of a more robust revaluation has not happened then I have offered my thoughts as to why the market has reacted the way it has.

Ultimately there was no news in January, except to say its working. but we all knew that (incl the market), didn't we? We wanted to know how well it was working, and it seems it is at least matching what the AVCT team expected but there was no qualified detail to say what that was.

So, the market knew it was already working but not how well, and now the only difference is the first part of the trial is being extended further.

Its actually anti-climatic. 6 biopsis with dox in them, fantastic, but until we all know how much dox ,what does that mean for how well it works?

Science day now is what the market iswaiting for. Waiting to get some real data as to how well this is performing. Thats my opinion on why its been a lack lustre SP performance

because Jackster last week was then. How do i know whats going to happen?

The news on the face of it looks fantastic so why would the SP fall.

This week we have had continuous falls, and its this day after day, pull back that Is a fact (not an assumption) that makes me rethink what MIGHT be going on.

How do you value the company if you don't know what the results are, when its coming to market, or even when the trial will finish?

I thought initially the news was good enough for it to be revalued and hoped the smallish rise on the day would continue over the next few days as it sunk in. But the opposite has happened so as a result I try to think what might cause that.

Hopefully the science day will answer most or all of these questions. in the meantime we are where we are.

why is it in the MM's advantage to keep the price low? wouldn't a higher price make some/more sell their stock?

If a short is buying then who are all these sellers? If the MM's are holding the stock then why would they want to keep the price artificailly low?

cj, how do you know the delay was caused by a patient dying?

All I am suggesting is that given the news some find it odd that the SP is falling. I am simply giving a scenario why that might be the case.

There is no need for you to off on one with all your assumptions.

"The number of Dose Escalations and their time frames is not within Dr Smith's gift."

Really? then why did he say there would be 4? why did he say before4 4 DE that MTD may never be found? Why has he given a time frame for completion of first half 2023?

Why say all these things if he has no control over any of it? why not say "this is what we expect but we are not in control of the DE's?"