RE: Telegram "discussion" board14 Feb 2023 16:29
The thing about TA is on stocks that can move about quite a bit you have larger stops which increases the risk profile which in turn means you don't risk over-committing to the trade.
When done properly TA is actually a risk averse way of investing. The "problem" is its very hard not to get emotionally caught up in the stock itself and then the plan can go out of the window.
Put it this way, for those that disparage TA and cite Warren Buffett as an example, how many "investors" here are as good as WB? Does that mean value investing is wrong? or that you are simply not good enough?
Its the same with TA.
The majority are hopeless at it (TA), and don't have a plan let alone follow it when entering a stock.
TA can get knocked out of the park by a surprise RNS, but so can any system, incl Value/growth picks.
But I would point out that often the SP moves prior to a RNS coming out and gives a clue as to what is coming.
But in any event , trading a stock like this, does not mean you have to be all in or all out.
You might hold 10,000 shares and decide to sell 60% when you have 50% profit letting the rest run for only a potential 10% loss if the shares went to zero but still hold 40% of your original purchase.
Its much more mechanical than some here realise, I think.