Member Info for WeTookPelham

Edit - confusing overuse of the word "following"!
Replace "..., i was following this with interest recently..."
With "..., i was watching this with interest recently..."

@@C7 - followers are the people interested i.e. following Scancell, so see Scancell's tweets on their feed.

So the following you are referring to on Scancell's page is who Scancell(RG?) themselves are following, i was following this with interest recently but did not check last week, interestingly they were following 111, then it went down to 110, now back to 111. But I can't remember who has been "swapped".

However, whoever has been swapped, has been replaced with.......................CEPI.
I.e. Scancell have only just started following them. Make of that what you will.

To be honest surprised they weren't always following CEPI, so the timing is interesting?

@hasiba - don't expect a proper answer, he simply wants, wishes, prays, demands, pleads, begs for the share price to fall from where it is currently. He says he doesn't believe in charts yet seems to appreciate 20p as a support level, so he used that as his argument, strange that?

....What happened to the bazooka boys prediction?? He's gone quiet at the same time though, strange?

@knowelesi - when was the last time you posted something relevant/informative? Not to mention factual?

@Caiskin, great find.
But posting something relevant? Risky move IMO, don't you know this BB is about one-upmanship and counting who has the most recs?

...seems like a pretty accurate summary to me?
#justsaying

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.08.14.20174920v2

Not sure if a new paper?

"I feel the price will be slipping back below 20p "...Classic K-man! He's back! But just replace 20p with 4.5p, and replace the "I feel" with "will 100% definitely" (a la classic K-man). You and me know the fools on the bulletin board will fall for anything! Nudge nudge wink wink ;)

Fill your boots!
Will you be selling all your holding?
Please say yes.

...getting close to my top up target price :)

(But fair post earlier kashdog, no reward without risk though?)

Well we know there won't be another Vox markets presentation for a good while, that's great news in my opinion!

"If this is the case then IMO it could be still lagging behind what Covidity may provide. It could be 1st gen+ but not really 2nd gen."

I'm sure Inanaco said exactly this on A D V f N, i.e. it's not a true next gen?

"Well mRNA and logistical issues aside - they have secured an order!"

A very fair point! However as IB888 says, this is old news is it not?

Also can mRNA vaccines target the n protein, and if so does this Curevac one do it?

The Curevac one is mRNA again isn't it? Same logistical issues as with the others?

https://www.cancerresearch.org/join-the-cause/cancer-immunotherapy-month/30-facts/18

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-biden-cancer/biden-says-world-on-cusp-of-some-real-breakthroughs-on-cancer-idUSKCN2AV2O2

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-cancer-research

I wonder if any new additional gov funding was waiting for the official announcement at the budget itself?

Tick up?

@crumbs - a very significant statement IMO. And the first official mention by the government of "Next Generation Vaccines"??
And yes good point RE potential partners.
This could spark some very serious interest now IMO.

"...Future Research
We have identified a common process that occurs in most cancer that can be recognised by the immune system. This would allow us to design a vaccine to stimulate an immune response which would recognise and kill early cancerous cells. This may have to be boosted yearly as for seasonal flu vaccines. It could be given to people at high risk of cancer or to adults over 60 which are the most common age group for this disease."

@hyms, I was equally astounded when I first heard this too, a cancer prevention vaccine! I think this statement needs reiterating often.