Member Info for WeTookPelham

2000 and 20000 shares atm, more or less is ok though (@23.75 if > 20000).
Just FYI.

That article IMO highlights how far Scancell are compared to competition both in terms of progress/science and also size and funding,

Apologies I misread that, I thought it read if Redmile were to add to their exsiting shareholding.

Vulpes don't have enough firepower to make that big a difference RE Covidity trials though, do they?

"...Good question. Can we expect Vulpes to add to their shareholding..."

Wouldn't that take Redmile over the 30% threshold? If so what are the implications (if any)?

...can only mean one thing, the contracts have been signed, worth 100's of millions! If not billions!*
*Wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend!
*100p on market open on Tuesday morning!
*Guaranteed RNS on Tuesday morning!
*Load up whilst you still can dammit!!

(*Team Ramp Bingo calls #TeamRampToTheMoon)

"Global experts warn that uneven access to vaccines is fuelling risk of new variants emerging"

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/covid-vaccine-variants-mutation-latest-b1824057.html

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/30/canada-suspends-use-of-astrazeneca-covid-vaccine-for-those-under-55

"...BioNTech, with whom we have a relationship been dropped by Pfizer" @Krafty, I know Pfzizer has somewhat sneakliy(?) decided to start making mRNA vaccines by them selves now, but they droipped BionTech?

P.S. I wonder if this recent action by Pfzizer would put off Scancell partnering with a big pharma i.e. patents/knowledge transfer?

Typo* "...the future of SCLP..."

P.s. dare i say i'll miss Knowelsi's unwavering consistency too!???

Likewise sorry to hear C7 has been banned, does seem a bit harsh. Do people ever get reinstated? And who's going to update us with prices now!?

But I do think it will be better for C7's health not to post on here perhaps, C7 if you're reading this take care of yourself first and foremost, the future is SCLP is out of the hands of us saddos posting on here anyway...oh and start supporting a proper team ;)

"..You can bet further ahead than it seems...again I would not be surprised if CEPI funding came pre ph1 just because there is plenty to fund but certainly on ph1 positive results"

Another key point you make crumbs. They started work on Covidity last April so it's been virtually a year, and since then Redmile came in, UKRI funding, appointment of CMO and Medical Director and at least five new scientific staff.

And we know now how vaccine life cycle stages now overlap in a big way.

An uncrossed trade however.

As mentioned over the weekend, it's the relative (and concurrent) radio silence that's interesting... IMO.

Great spot/observations crumbs.
Could it be...?

"...I do not think the issue is with trading but sentiment shifting with being in or out ..."

A very good point crumbs, perhaps I looked at it incorrectly.

But as I've mentioned, my original post was somewhat of a moot point, nothing more than a weekend vent, so I'll be happy to move along here. Much more important and interesting things to talk about RE Scancell.

P.S... Still no RNS?

"....I should have said that the "short" trader wants the price to fall SHORT TERM, against a LONG TERM RISE. So wouldn't it be reasonable to expect some people to change their immediate short term expectation of the SP even though long term they want the market North? Surely those who express that view are being (perhaps a little too) honest"

Hi AB, this is the scenario I was referring to, and no absolutely nothing wrong with it at all, my issue is when normally bullish posters suddenly start posting scaremongering posts designed to "specifically" to spook other readers. I'd rather they just be honest and say they are trading/waiting for a re-entry price. Just find it very disingenuous. But I guess it is the way of all share bulletin boards?

Anyway as I say it's a free country, a free open bulletin board so i guess my argument is somewhat irrelevant.

Oh and well done Chelsea 11...holding strong is the best team to be in :)

Team Two-Face A.K.A. Team Flip flop....

Like C7 i have traded a little here* but kept a majority bulk holding, and like C7 at no point have I thougt i should change the way I post or think, I have firmly remained in Team Ramp, but others (it seems... IMO) wanted to subtly/subvertedly talk the company down to fit an agenda i.e. trading with a bigger pot or wanting to make sure ISA's are maxed out before the end of the tax year so dont want anyone talking up the SP etc

As much as it pains me to say it, at least Knowelsi is consistent with his bearishness/negativity. I would much rather have than the flip flopping we have seen here last week.

But yes i appreaciate it's a public forum and anyone is allowed to post how they want, but just does not sit well with me personally. And yes any posts may have negligible impact on the bigger picture anyway.

P.s. No real point to this message, just wanted to vent, and pehaps enough has been said about already, so no arguements neccesary...and most importantly..all IMO. Here's to exciting week I hope.

*If it does drop to a certain orice I'm ready, like many others i'm sure, to top up with a decent amount, but being a fully paid up member of Team Ramp won't suddenly flip flop in my posting style, i want it to fly, i've always wanted it to fly and in fact wish it flew years ago!

#TeamRampToThe Moon!

Now I love a good ding dong between Team Ramp and Team Damp probably more than anyone, but as Balerno says, proabably all worth taking a little breather guys and girls...IMO.

Anyway I think it was crumbs(?) that said this a little earlier, RE Twitter and radio silence. If recent history is anything to go by, relative Twitter silence and Scancell going quiet has often(?) been a pre-cursor to some news, plus the simple fact that you could argue news is overdue anyway! The late big-ish buys on Friday too. A more interesting week ahead perhaps. CEPI news due end of March did someone say?

Also chart wise*, in the midst of a tight bollinger squeeze, "another" bounce off support and a pennant flag(?) forming?*

(* I may or may not have any clue what i'm taking about here)

@14:10...A buy you'd assume?

And a 212,678 @13:15 for 23.50p, any ideas?

Just IMO I saw the tweet when it was originally posted, I think the tweeter in question has negligible influence and even less scientific expertise. And as inferred, I don't think the motive for them selling their shares (assuming they actually had any in the first place) was based on their flawed science.