Member Info for w4ttsy

Https://www.google.com/finance/beta/quote/HPOW:LON

@Daz9643 you're clearly invested so I'm assuming your rants are fuelled by frustration. You seem to have missed my point that naming the S&P company is not price sensitive news. If it was, the company would have named them last year. I can't see why they would name them before there is actual news to announce, i.e. a joint project (nobody said the 'news' would come immediately after). Simply naming them before the rebrand would have been even more pointless. If my opinion (that's all it is) makes me a loser then so be it. Any advice on how I can improve myself? Ranting and calling people names on share discussion boards seems to work for you. Maybe I'll give it a try.

@LaryLoungeLizard the RNS clearly states that the website will be live from 8am tomorrow (14th).

Anyway, we're all on the wrong board.

Good luck with your investment by the way :-)

For what its worth I completely agree with the sentiment. I have always thought it would be pointless naming the S&P company and then later rebranding. I for one, completely get the reasons behind the rebrand. Since Wilson etc have come on board it feels like a new start. I'm sure the S&P company feel the same. I also agree with the need to 'settle' before launching news, but in my view the news has to be 'news worthy'. H-Power are unlikely to say "The S&P company is xyz, and we're doing great things together.... great things (said in Trump accent)". In my view the news when it comes will be in respect to a project that has begun, not before.

"Thank you—finally, someone who can think logically! "... still with the subtle derogatory comments to others. Everyone is waiting for you on the new HPOW board.

You’d have a point if AFC wasn’t an abbreviation. The obvious question is ‘what does it stand for?’ Would Arsenal Football Club abbreviate to MUFC?

I wouldn’t class myself as a ramper personally. Each to their own. However it’s hardly price sensitive when they informed us almost 12 months ago they’re working with an S&P company is it??

@Daz9643 I believe I said that as have others. Doesn’t it make sense to you? Otherwise they’d have to rerun all marketing activity 🤷🏻‍♂️

I've been here since the Howard White days so recognise many users. @Ade1234 has already responded I see as I feel you're being a little paranoid (for whatever reason). If you agree that your posts have no influence on the share price then neither will @Ade1234's so why does it upset you so much? And I hope your last sentence is true, but unless you have inside knowledge it is your hope also, not fact as you have written it.

@statethefacts and @Alittlebitmore If I'm reading @Ade1234's recent posts correclty he/she is actually wanting the share price to go up, yet you still resort to derogatory comments that they don't have the same infinite wisdom that you have (let me repeat that for you?). You (as am I) seem to be heavily invested in this share by the sheer volume of posts you push out, but continuing to do so and responding to every LinkedIn post that refers to AFC (sorry but putting some fuel into the only Hydrogen ICE in the UK does not get me excited) will do little to move the share price (however articulate said posts are). When you both continue to use terminology like "this WILL play a crucial role.." and "big news IS imminent", or my favourite using exclamation marks after every post, will attract comments from people with the opposite opinion. I suspect the vast majority of people who post several times a day have an agenda, i.e. to make money, whether that be from the price going up or down. Just because you want the price to go up (as do I) does not make you the superior human being.

I think you missed the sentence about not taking anyone else’s advice.

Maybe you'd have less to be annoyed at if you stopped the childish name calling and insults. I can point at a number of posts only yesterday where you're using derogatory language against others.

What makes you think that @statethefacts ? Not one, but quite a few?

You “hope and assume” I feel was missing from the end of your post. Be careful not to influence potential investors with assumptions.

If the 'optimistic' and 'pessimistic' did not engage with each other, particularly with infantile name-calling, then this board would be a far more pleasant place to be.

One of you guessed correctly 👏🏻

The S&P name won't be announced before the change of company name. Wouldn't make sense to market beforehand.

@statethefacts . I suggest you refrain from stating things that are your opinion only without making it clear to all. Some pour soul maybe investing/gambling on your level of confidence.

I doubt very much if the S&P company will be revealed before the rebrand. Any press releases (assuming both parties will publish) would need to be updated otherwise.