Member Info for w4ttsy

I'm assuming that's a rhetorical question. I'm positive, but keep to the facts.

I just don't agree with your perception that everyone can judge rationally. I'm pretty sure you feel the same, otherwise I see no point in you being so upset with the 'shorters'. Surely the same individuals can simply ignore the 'doom and gloom' without your hostile responses?

Do you remember a company called Stanelco (now Biome Technologies) @Alittlebitmore ? They were going to change the world of biodegradable packaging. Huge trials with Asda and Walmart. Many rampers predicting 10+ bagging. I remember one in particular, SirMark who I think had hundreds of thousands invested.

And then a part burns out and the whole product is shelved... Wind forward several years and now the company is delisted.

By the way I'm not suggesting our tech is not stable, just pointing out that there is rarely a sure thing (with fundamentals of Quantas), irrespective of what the rampers confidently forecast.

I have very little skepticism, thank you, and also think all will come good. I just don't bend the truth to indicate it's a foregone conclusion.

@gingerT . On the 20th May you said "This could fall to just below 13 (hope not) but undoubtedly will surpass 17 as soon as the figures are released as well as that jolly in Rotterdam concludes GLA".

Did I miss something in the last 2 weeks (other than a modest price rise)?

"they are delivering mass-produced, scalable high-tech!" Mass-produced? Please elaborate.

"The preparatory work under John Wilson is complete, the technology is fully established, and the commercial rollout is kicking off right now." Certification yet to happen. Please enlighten us on the roll-out. Volumes, timescale etc?

"As the order books ramp up over the coming months, a rapid revaluation of the stock will begin instantly." 2 ramps for the price of one. You have no idea on the orders or share price prediction.

"No fund is going to wait until the calendar hits 2027 to start driving the share price toward the £1 mark." The infamous £1 again. I look forward to it. Why don't they pile in now if it's such a sure thing?

"The fundamentals are as solid as Qantas, but when it comes to the rollout, we’re going to see the speed and scale of EasyJet" So good I had to quote it again.

And you expect to be taken seriously with such a blinkered view of the future. I hope for your sake (as mine) this does hit £1, but I suspect one of us is more reliant on that than the other.

I really hope any new potential investors read all of your posts before parting with their hard-earned money. Not so 'high risk' anymore then? I missed that in this particular ramp, but hopefully the newbies haven't.

"Fundamentals are as solid as Qantas"? I think that's a stretch even for Uwe.

Thanks @PepeT2 That’s far more positive to hear.

Q...Are the S&P Partner paying anything towards cracker development?.

A... They are paying no costs towards development of cracker.

No mention of reimbursement in that specific Q&A.

But the way @LaryLoungeLizard stated the Q&A it was in respect to future development costs? Not reimbursement for past. Correct?

@ShineOnYou, I agree. Particularly the ones who have multiple aliases on here and LinkedIn (even impersonating Mercedes staff)..... I tell a lie, the original LinkedIn profile seems to have been dropped for a snappier name.

This time next year, we'll be millionaires....

Yes that is quite a contradiction if that was the exact question and answer. I could swear another attendee mentioned they were funding development but not production.

@LaryLoungeLizard. You say: “We were told that the S&P company would be funding cracker development, we now know they are not(from AGM Q&A).”

Are you sure about that? Wasn’t the distinction made between development and production costs. The former being covered the latter not?

And also explain to me how H-Power is responsible for the S&P company's request to withhold their name? Are you expecting them to ignore the request? That wouldn't be the best start to a lucrative partnership, would it?

I'm as impatient as the next investor, but still remain positive that when the news does come, it will be incredibly beneficial to all shareholders. I see no reason to be negative, and comparing JW to AB is pretty unfair.

Don't forget the size of the prize has increased significantly with the new-sized cracker being discussed, so I, for one, would rather wait a little longer to get the increased reward.

Not quite true.... the S&P company were concerned not H-Power. Yes, its been longer than we hoped and expected but as I've said before the naming has to come with actual RNS worthy news. Simply naming won't be sufficient without an update on projects (hopefully plural) that the companies are now engaged on.

As I've said before, folk predicting positive sales RNS's ahead of publicised timelines are no better than those predicting doom and gloom. However, I've yet to see a post where a delay to certification has been predicted.

To be honest, I'm more interested in hearing about these lucrative RNS's for orders of an uncertified product, particularly after the CPH2 news. I suspect I won't get a response.

@statethefacts, I'd say they have at least until Aug/Sep to make a few quid if you seriously think they're shorting? Or are you expecting these very lucrative RNS's to come before the certification timescale?

As somebody once said "Wouldn't want to be out of this over the weekend" 😉

It does!! My sarcasm was clearly too subtle. I guess the jokes aren't funny when you have to explain them! 😆