RE: Oily Jim :10 Oct 2021 17:35
AJW : If that typically rude quip was directed to me , I am not going to repeat the detail of my post last week .
I made my position crystal clear so if you are interested you can check back .
I doubt you will , even in the face of an obvious disastrous situation for share holders , you would appear to be both in denial and remain determined to support this totally inadequate , incompetent BoD .
The failure ( extent as yet to be assessed) or otherwise of this well is now possibly the least important issue that is facing the Company .
What has become clear is that there is an accumulating and accelerating number of very serious issues .
You know what they are : Everything from current finances , Future finance requirement , Geological issues , Confidence destruction , Credibility , Cost of future cash raise , Punitive further dilution , External political interference , Disaffection following perceived on going failure , Reputation and competence of the CEO (and probably the BoD )~~~ETC ~~~ETC .
Despite this horrific backdrop , I am hopeful that the well will be cleaned and to some extent productive , but the damage has been done and recovering a Market value to support further development is going to be a very very serious challenge .
To make a start on those challenges Haywood HAS to go ~~~ ASAP , imo .
~~~ and as I have no doubt you will not bother to check my declaration , I may as well remind you that I stated that I had dumped , at a very painful loss the majority of my shares , but out of curiosity , faint hope , and b****y mindedness I have retained a small holding .
~~~ and Credibility on this thread does not extend exclusively to Haywood and the BoD .