RE: Made an Offer4 Feb 2021 23:17
I agree that the communication from the BoD is not excessive by any means, that's for sure. However, in situations like this, let's be realistic and assess the facts:
1) It wasn't BMV walking away from the JV. It was SAU.
2) BMV felt they can secure finances to buy the other half and maybe expected the price from the arbiter to be lower.
Despite delays, I think this is still the quickest way to conclude it, rather than waiting for SAU to find a buyer.
3) The figure from the arbiter might seem high but from a mid-long term perspective it's not too bad.
It represents equivalent of 6k oz of gold. Just 6k for the other 50% of the JV.
If we believe the story in the company prospectus, it's no brainer, as long as it can be financed somehow ...
4) Financing: Maybe the Bod expected let's say $6-7m to be paid for the other half but it's $9m instead which is
more difficult to secure. However, they stated that non-dilutive finance is preferred, good for shareholders
5) Lack of timescale: Contract negotiations take time and committing to some fixed dates might give your
opponent advantage. In this case cash, royalty or other options are considered so it needs time to find a solution.
6) SP is drifting on relatively low volume when no news is expected which historically is no surprise here. People chasing
other opportunities.
7) Despite poor communication, the Bod are aligned with shareholders as they don't take big salaries
and have their skin in the game.
Not happy with the overall 12+ months delay but still holding as the story and gold is still there, potentially
more of it for us once we own 100%.
Just my view.
GL