‘’They’ve got to revamp these Q&As they are getting more and more pathetic. We’ve got the chance to question a FTSE CEO…… “what football team do you support?”.
How is this share supposed to be taken seriously?’’
Wolf ofWarks
It’s called being a human and having a sense of humour. Some you are clearly lacking.
Secondly use some intelligence and read between the lines. There is clearly a lot he cannot talk about for obvious reasons. Very few CEO’s do this and it’s great he takes the time to be there for us.
The current share price doesn’t make sense and they have done a very good job on this one.
Think about it with clarity Bitcoin rises then so shall we. Share prices in general don’t always rally how much you would want to in a day.
I can’t help but think that the boatman was a clever attack on Argo as they know a lot of shares are in Personal investors hands.
Institutions do not panic sell, generally Personal investors do.
I think this report was to make personal investors panic sell so they can pick up the cheap shares due to the volume in pi hands.
Don’t have paper hands and try and make informed decisions.
Nice post Argobull, the money spent on Land in Texas bought us time as well as land. It’s a smart move when we only have less than 4 years to the next halving. Scaling up at speed is everything.
've tended to think that as well, but if you look at the % rise in BTC, ARB, RIOT and HUT 8 over the past year, the facts tell something different:
Not comparable timeframe I am afraid, that was in a period where ARB was finding its price and expanding. Riot etec were already at market value.
It’s always been an odd share that always stays on the low side. It has never exceeded my expectations in price.
Only the Nasdaq will ever fix this issue, they love tech stocks and have a stronger appetite. It just the wrong market we are in.
I think MS was leading PW into saying he would buy btc, leading to more IIs buying ARB, raising the sp and allowing them to borrow in the market. I think the question threw PW, who gave it to Benny(?). Benny didn’t twig either, so they both came out with the stock line of “investing in infrastructure “.
I agree with the above, however infrastructure is as important if not more important at this stage, so not a bad answer. Holding and accumulating Bitcoin comes after Texas and most institutions would buy into this too.
It would certainly speed the process up and put America on the map more. If not we also have the option of hosting other companies miners on a lease.
Or gradually filling it up ourselves, any way , this should be very attractive for institutional investors.