Member Info for troutisout

Cornish Knocker,
These are inferred figures, what stages are to go to confirm them and get all the feasibility studies in place?

Cornishknocker, thank you.

Lupi that was my point there is some tin, but the majority is tungsten and some copper. They use a tin equivalent for value, but this is confusing as some think it is all tin.

DVH, I agree with your last sentence, but not sure your stance here can be called that, LOL!

You have just sat it out....Or have you been trading it a little more....

Lupi, I ask because there was an NPV figure of $94m for Redmoor with a $89m Capex figure.
I took that as the project needs $89m Capital expenditure spent on it and that it would have returned a profit of $94m by the end of it's life.
So in essence we need to persuade someone to stump up $89m with the prize of receiving those costs back and $94m, less any share to SML...

Sammybow, Don't let emotions control your investing, there is a flood of positivity coming from the new rampers here and you are filtering someone who has been correct more than most on this BB, and ignored by many including myself. Always listen to the negative views as well as the positive. You might not be so underwater if you had done so before.

Lupi,
If my memory serves me, you weren't exactly positive about this share for quite some time, in fact only becoming positive again after buying back in recently?
The djryan/bitcoin void doesn't need filling, just stick to reasoned debate about the facts.

oops must have hit a raw nerve with the pompous one.....

Morning all,
Why am I not surprised at this news? Bitcoin was just another djryan, using a more pompous tone.
I have to say I still believe others should have taken the opportunity to cut some of their holding on the spike (especially if they were in profit). This share has all the hallmarks of a trading share for the moment, taking 10-20% and entering back in after the drop.
Pump and Dumps are going to happen, but the uninitiated will not realise there are over 100m placing shares out there looking to take a profit and move on, LTHs looking to escape and of course the traders need to take their profits and others their losses as they can't afford to buy their T trades.
Good Luck genuine LTHs, but seriously think about what has happened here before going into some dreamy rose tinted scenario here, I don't believe it is going to happen with the current BoD in charge.

Well they still have just over 400m shares that are authorised to be allotted towards any fundraising, if there is a spike in demand for SML shares then the BoD should think about placing them at say 0.6p, gives £2.4m plenty enough to go it alone on LCCM.
Everyone should be very happy with this idea, as it will mean 100% of LCCM stays with SML, maximising the profits from that project and allowing us to keep more of Redmoor.

A bit sad that a well paid BoD can't do this themselves....
Beware that you don't waste too much time, to find them less than receptive later down the line.

Also Bed and ISAs tend to be different prices and different amounts, as you sell £x's worth and buy back £x's worth at a different price.

Kiwi,
What 3 times? I thought they were rollovers as the previous two pairs of prints have been at the top end of the quoted spread.

Other dates were 22nd December and 14th January....Still on system so not deleted...

This is the third time this pair of trades have been put through in last month or so, have the previous pair been deleted? They were at top end and this is at bottom end.....

The 18k is a sell, but the rest are buys, can still buy at 0.888p atm.

Bitcoin,
Make sure you protect that gain, it can go as easily as it comes.....I made a bundle a couple of years back and put a big chunk of it into SML, down 75%....

Placing, they must have taken 12.5m then.

Are we a mining stock though?

I'd lend you some of mine DVH if I could.....