Member Info for Toukankahmoon

Chai

In which case you are a poor guesser.

What actual evidence do you have for this ramp?

Timster

The SP tells us BP aren’t interested in Avacta No doubt that in the Summer when first efficacy results are available for 6103 then BP will be interested. Until then we drift along roughly sideways.

Why let facts spoil a ramp. Never has before.

BV

Because in the past I have succumbed to believing the hype over upcoming conferences and been disappointed like the rest of us over lack of new data and minimal impact on SP.

Thanks. For sharing

Laughable baseless ramping and yet I get accused of lying. There is no logical reason fora 75p close today.

However it would be a good thing to maintain a gentle upward drift into the Summer pivotal inflection.

BV

I apologise regarding the 500

I await the conference in trepidation

HarChris

On what grounds is my post nonsense?

It’s factual and in the context of Avacta progress over many years comes to reasonable conclusions.

It doesn’t dispute the progress made or the potential success of 6103.

So what is it that you dislike or disbelieve?

BV

1. FPD has not happened yet [-----This is true - no RNS yet, well done Sherlock. The point is I predicted this in January when others lied and said it would be in January or February or it had already happened. So no lies from me.

2. There will be no deal until decent results from 6000 or 6103 are published, probably June earliest. [-----Maybe, maybe not, but that's just your opinion about the two pipeline candidates.

No it’s pretty much what CC outlined in Dec/Jan.

Why do you ignore the possibility that deals could come from licensing out the tech, either from amongst the 500 or so undisclosed Avacta pipeline assets or for the development of other companies' in-house assets?-----]

That is a possibility but not until irrefutable reform 6000 or 6103.

No lies from me but kindly supply the link to disclosure that there are 500 or so pipeline assets? Lies.

3. We need funds hopefully with another top up from Zeus or whoever we can be tided over until a decent licensing deal can be struck. [-----Why do you want the needed funds to come from a dilutive raise rather than a licensing deal?-----]. I don’t. I’ve always stated my prey is to licence AVA6000 to Novartis. Again no lies from me.

4. It is odd that no new data on 6000 has been published since October. [-----It has already been explained to you that further AVA6000 data will be presented at a conference in the first half of this year. In fact, CC stated that THREE times during her TD Cowen presentation. Here's a challenge for you: Which conference might that be, and when?-----]. OK. I was questioning whether anyone else was concerned about the 4 months data on AVA 6000 that hasn’t been published. Answer seems to be no no one is concerned

BV

Thanks for taking the time.

Pedrol

I was accused of posting untruths. Just tell me why each of the 4 points which summarise my view of Avacta are not based in fact.

They don’t need to be addressed as such. Because they are fact based. You can’t dispute them. All you can do is ignore what happened or is likely to happen. Or post vulgar abuse.

What about all the tribe that were trying to tell us that FPD took place in January. I said that was a carp lie. But it’s me that gets abuse when it turns out I was right

Ok baseless rampers. You still haven’t said which categories each of my 4 points fall into. You’ve just gone back to name calling.

You are frustrated and keep making these ridiculously optimistic predictions. I keep saying nothing will happen until at least June. I have recognised this. If the Summer comes and goes and the can continues to get kicked down the road with a 60p SP. THEN yes I will be frustrated.

Regarding AVA6000 progress, the subject of this thread, then the masses have spoke - you are all happy with no new data published since October.

BV

You really are a nasty spiteful person just like those referred to in the BBC article.

You talk about “Anyone can go through this thread and count the contradictions, straw men, moving goal posts, and other fallacious arguments.”. But when I challenge you to specify an example you always back down.

So I’ll remind you of my main posts and you can tell me which are the “contradictions, straw men, moving goal posts, and other fallacious arguments.”

1. FPD has not happened yet and given the work yet to complete beforehand probably won’t until mid April at least. I will be pleased if it is sooner.

2. There will be no deal until decent results from 6000 or 6103 are published, probably June earliest.

3. We need funds hopefully with another top up from Zeus or whoever we can be tided over until a decent licensing deal can be struck.

4. It is odd that no new data on 6000 has been published since October.

I think the above compare favourably with usual baseless ramping predictions such as “takeover next week”, etc

But don’t worry if the rampers keep reiterating on a weekly basis the may be right eventually.

BV

To which conference in particular are you referring?

They’ve all been damp squids (sic) as I recall. Ask Tim.

Break a leg!

Oops no that’s actors isn’t it.

Shame. Some good news on 6000 would certainly help the SP

Excellent find. Thanks for posting.

Disappointing for the uber rampers though as status shows not started recruiting. Might be difficult to get FPD this month 🤡

BV

I know. But it did refer to data. And that data was from an October cut off date.

Why haven’t we seen any data from the last 4+ months?

Can’t help thinking that if they had some good stuff then CC would have shared it. But in December she said 6000 would have to go another cycle to complete P1b with results to be published in the Summer.

But they must have recorded results since October. What is in those results that we haven’t been told???

Pedrol

None of us can be accurate because we are never given enough information. I thought best to model it on 6000 development targets achieved but taking into account lessons learned.

Anyhow my best guess for FPD is 14th April but even that is being optimistic.

Was anyone else expecting some 6000 clinical trial data to be published. December presentation was based on a cut off in October. Surely there have been more recent results than this. ??