RE: If4 Nov 2021 08:47
Well, having taken some time to digest and try to understand what the letter means, confess to not really being sure whether it’s a good thing or not, but here’s what I have concluded. Usual caveats, DYOR etc, and be aware I’ve been wrong more often than I’ve been right with Solgold.
I believe I am now in the position of having to support a board I’ve got precious little confidence in, in order to preserve my investment, and ensure it realises its true value sooner or later. In all likelihood later, given the track record here. We’re I to revolt against the current board, I would, in effect, be paving the way for a lowball takeover by BHP. Whilst part of me has had enough here, and just wants out even at a much smaller profit than the assets deserve, my sheer stubbornness won’t allow it. I’m in for the long haul. So I’ve therefore decided to support the board, NM et al, but can’t say I’m happy about it. It’s their sheer inability to progress anything on time, and provide meaningful and clear communication for years that has led us to this point. On the plus side, surely this fires the starting pistol for the end game.