Other perspectives for the delay27 Jan 2021 20:22
1. The company has stated that 90% of its future Capex is in Ghana and 10% is elsewhere. The first question is it a condition of the rollover so that the 90% is not diluted downwards either through ambitions elsewhere in the portfolio or that as a result of say higher oil prices they expand the 10% elsewhere to a higher figure, but not the Ghana asset.
2. If Tullow agrees with that request it begs the question what is their priority of existing assets and my guess is they are actually all up for sale bar the offshore assets in Cote De Ivories that was specifically mentioned in today’s RNS. Of course the company wants to extract best value and not be a distressed seller. As a bond holder being asked to rollover I would want an independent source to give both the current price for assets and what it might be in the next 4 years.
3. The second major issue is how confident can we be of finding 360M barrels of oil in Ghana as described in the Capital Market Day presentation. Again an independent assessment of the calculations provided by the company need to be verified, and how optimistic/realistic is that data. It may be that the reviewer agrees a particular improved life extension of the production asset and say it does work out as 85,000 barrels a day for 3 years on Tullow production. This might support a move out from 2022 to 2025 and the 2025 bonds move out to 2028. It then raises the issue can the bonds be paid off at $55 a barrel when the company is expending $300M or so a year on Capex and would the production profile increase enough as to average out at 85,000 barrels between 2022-2025 and gas off take and other issues are all resolved for that to be possible.
4. So assuming it was possible the revenue per year becomes $1.7B as before. This would yield $200M extra after Ghana Government takes it cut and then have additional profit from the current $1.4B income as costs are spread over more barrels of oil and so the $60M Slift calculated actually becomes more like $100M. So in theory selling the odd asset and delivering $300M additional FCF each year would pay off the bonds and some RBL costs. Ideally a 4 year rollover would allow more variations in oil price to deliver the $55 average per barrel and allow the time to build up to 85,000 barrels a day.
5. The next question for the bond holders would be all the other risks on oil price, production, gas off take, Ghana Government stability and a host of other things to consider. It would be understandable for bond holders to work through and want to appraise those risks.
6. Finally in a pandemic, with home schooling, shielding, people getting ill and can not be treated, should we not expect delays in government decisions, getting agreements with banks, getting reports done by a definitive time and allowing a bit of slippage or leeway from what is usually expected.