We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
If there was a hostile takeover of nanoco and the two main shareholders accept the sale of their shares are they controlling shareholders alone or would they need the approval of the small shareholders . To breach the share threshold .
This is a great opportunity to buy nanoco right now. Market pulling back due to interest rate rises by boe. I for one will be loading up
I expect to receive confirmation of a continuation of relationship between american group and nanoco around the same time as the IPR RULINGS ARE INSTITUTED.
Also around the time we can expect to receive positive update in respect of the deal to supply the large Asian manufacturer agreement ! And st are pushing forward into production. Heck of a year (2022) to look forward to
Could this be the missing link from the American company
Does anyone know much about the government funded COVID test NANOCO is currently producing . ..?????? In the last investor presentation - They mentioned it being able to test for both COVID and the common cold. in one test .
I am now wondering if it could be adapted to test for both Omicron Vs the other COVID variants . And common cold too !?
The 26 billion dollar question. Would Samsung invest so heavily if they had not already planned to settle with nanoco. I doubt very much. they will have a expectation to settle with nanoco eventually as then they have pretty much sown up the next gen of tv production market . NANOCO + Samsung settlement will happen. More confident of this than in years.
I don't know if people are purposely trying to dampen enthusiasm in this low availability stock but it is obfuscating to say the least to mention gaming monitors . Just focus on one issue at a time . Right now the issue is SAMSUNG And the upcoming damning verdict via Ptab and moving forward that will align with NANOCO securing licensing with a selection of partners. For a variety of patents.
Mention previously in the most recent investor presentation was the ability to grant sole access to any organisation that would obviously have to be willing to compensate NANOCO adequately for such a unique opportunity. Lots to be positive about here with this opportunity rich . Debt free company with low market cap
Break of 22 next upside target 25p then 27p then 29,30 33 35 40 45 . Gotta pay to play
If you get it right you win a prize
Can imagine innumerous uses ! Especially withint the iot. Over 1 million shares bought/ sold£££ today next Tesla incoming
Perhaps we will get one this weekend.
Perhaps it will be a knockout
Could be Sony could be Panasonic toshiba or any other number of "large asians"
Vivodots are continuing and will be transformational on their own. Your mistaken if you think otherwise
:)
: xx@xxx.com>
Sent: Tuesday,August 31 2021
Cc: #Samsung_Nanoco_IPR
Counsel:
To resolve the parties’ dispute over the appropriate designation of the protected materials for purposes of the IPR
proceedings, we propose that the parties agree to a joint request to expunge the existing Ex. 2032 and replace it with
the attached version containing a proposed redaction. It does not appear that Nanoco has relied in any of its Patent
Owner’s Responses on the proposed redacted portion, nor has Dr. Cossairt relied on such information in her
declarations. If Nanoco agrees to do so, Samsung will inform the Board that Nanoco’s motion to seal and for entry of a
protective order is moot. For the avoidance of doubt, Samsung maintains the other objections to Exs. 2032 and 2034.
Please confirm Nanoco accepts our proposal. If not, we seek a meet and confer to discuss the next steps, including
possibly a motion at the district court.
Regards,
Xx
-----------------------------------------------------
Xx
Unconfirmed rumours of a big contract in from far east .. will be added to the year end total revenue to transform current numbers
Technicals and fundamentals point to further upside in this share.
https://www.ptablitigationblog.com/district-court-indefiniteness-ruling-leads-to-denial/
Speaking of samsung putting up a defense claiming that not "skilled" bs repeatedly .. samsung are not acknowledging that it is obvious from the submission from Dr Cossart that samsung has NOT put forward any sufficient method of creating the aforementioned quantum dots which are in question in both the Ptab and the court case.
In the Ptab filings it is clear, The burden of proof on them. SAMSUNG to prove their own method via prior art etc which they have Not done in Any way.
I can't imagine these sort of head in the sand submissions will be allowed to continue for much further.
GLA
NANOCO as the patent holder has worked diligently and patiently over time to sufficiently show Samsung have utilised NANOCO QD patents. Without licensing them.
Samsung has to PROVE THEY have not done this in the Ptab they will not and have not put forward any substantive argument.
This last post is laughable.
An expert's CV speaks for itself. . Samsung are not going to win in the Ptab nor the Trial.
Holding NANOCO til 2022 end is guaranteed to be transformational.
Potential for early settlement increases with every passing day.
https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txedce/2:2020cv00038/195566/1
https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/texas/txedce/2:2020cv00038/195566/1/8.htm
The exhibit 6 and 8 both highlight the extensive range of products that use nanoco dots. also specifically on the exhibit 7
(upload 8) If you read the simplified breakdown of large scale dot production on page 29 hansol is mentioned specifically in Samsung literature. I think when reading stuff like this it outlines the extent to which Samsung have really done one on NANOCO over half a decades worth of high end TVs https://displaysolutions.samsung.com/digital-signage/detail/1435/QP82R-8K bet that's not cheap. 82" 8k hd business display
Reassuring to see honour amongst peers. Clearly showing respect to the patent and the scientific facts that cannot be denied, I felt a great sense of respect for the 365 patent when reading the Dr Brandi's submission. They are clear and concise points, well made & in many cases In BOLD which when read in their totality offer a definite rebuttal.
As highlighted amongst many other opportunities and strengths . The late 2021 release of lidar scanners in higher end phones showcases the likelihood that 1 year could well be orders of magnitude away in terms of valuation we could be talking multiple standard deviations :)