Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
actually have you been a previous LSE member and came back with a new account and name ?
————-
Yes, would be my guess Floater, same fingers, different alias. I doubt you will get a simple yes/no answer imho.
If anyone is deliberately trying to con others into buying or selling, it’s pretty despicable imo and worse to try to rinse and repeat (with multiple aliases) - humour, fact and opinion is great either way but only the person behind the keys really knows and has to live with themselves, a very bitter, bitter taste I would imagine - and that’s not even including the cohorting I believe that goes on.
Despite the (somewhat shaky imo) interview I still believe the placing should not have incurred a 10% discount with a mirage of letting existing holders in. Even if there is not so great news around the corner it wouldn’t make the manner in which the $16m was acquired any more palatable. Even if there is great news around the corner, doesn’t mean LTH should forget.
I’m hoping we get brilliant news and new positive threads to read and debate.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
Tend to agree TT. SD has the bank loan termsheets so perhaps they require a stronger balance to lend. Perhaps there are targets to invest in.
However, a placing so shortly after being on record as saying no action is required is either really bending the truth if the placement wasn’t close to final or pretty much false information to shareholders if it was final - of course it was an interview and not RNS but the timing and 14.5p hardly says to existing shareholders “come join me” so I’m very wary, yet uber positive about Hav and tenements.
He could have got II’s to come with him at 17-18p if the coffers needed filling - with his erm, track record - imho.
Also wish CB would chip in on interviews or media.
Added a few this pm.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
???
D100 - brave but reasoned. I wish you the very best as I do all the investors. No reason why we shouldn’t start higher highs and higher lows once the Hav MRE update is given, other good news a bonus.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
Dumb the noise as most of the noise is dumb
Sorry, unless you meant 15.5p which meant you initially invested £542k in total - possible ?
GLA genuine investors - TFG
now hold 1.4m at 11p average, after some buying in the18s and 16s and selling in the 22s.
——-
That is fantastic well done.
Not sure how your remaining 1.4mm is averaged at 11p not 0.155p, especially when you made more money on additional buys in the 16-18p range - must have been a loss somewhere to get the average up to 11p ?
GLA genuine investors - TFG
One of the many benefits of Brexit is increased complexity in this area as the London Exchange was (essentially) forced to open up EU-based "venues" in order to continue to compete for order-flow from certain types of investor.
———
Whilst I don’t disagree with some of the (factual) points - @Starbright are you sure these apply to Aim stocks. I can see the access and multiple trading venues apply to FTSE listings and the inevitable access changes between the UK and Europe but for Aim shares as well ?
GLA genuine investors - TFG
you have to understand that an awful lot of people got on board here at 30p or higher.
———
Big, big difference between people bailing out at the next run up to 30p versus an actual structured takeover at that price .whilst t/o is a possibility, I do not believe it’s odds on as someone put it. If NCM then, MM’s, brokers, UK II don’t make any money, GDXJ doesn’t make any money. If another miner then it’s a complex deal and would be quite aggressive. Miners out of favour, manipulation and a host of other possibilities for the slide and stall come before a t/o imho.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
….and keep sewing !
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, because that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
…..that started to post frequently and funnily enough at the onset of the bans. Hmmm….
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, becuase that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, becuase that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
It was a very odd series of posts. An interpretation of the PFS that was deemed as negativity and then a series of increasingly nasty posts from long term holders / posters.
Green box or other means to resolve the altercation.
Bamps, understand why you got upset and it would be a real shame if you stopped posting here. Myself, most on here and in fact the two posters involved value your input imho.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
I remember SD saying that if the sp didn’t react accordingly then there is a real potential for us to get ‘taken out’.
———-
I remember it as: ‘if the management do not perform i.e. maximising value for GGP shareholders from a world class asset.
I think it is way too early to be judging that and whilst there is a possibility of a t/o I think we are not even close and look forward to further positive news.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
but I despise those who try to con people out of a fantastic opportunity
———
Well said SaS - I think despise is too generous a word but good enough for the bb.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
Agree, good to see some assay results and not wait for all of them to come back. Of course, SD and SB have an idea of mineralisation before the cores are sent to the lab - importantly the continue to be very excited about Hav and other JV prospects and certainly SD with the continued references to ‘potential next Havieron’ - still a long game but getting more de-risked with increasing frequency imho.
The number of traders and number of over-stretched/anxious posters has certainly increased lately.
GLA genuine sensible investors - TFG
although I probably hold more shares than a lot of these mean girls.
——-
You seem very troubled with your holding to the point you seem out of your depth. I pick up on what you are posting.
SD laughed off the T/O and attributed any poor attempt as a slight on his own performance - you seem to have got ultra nervous over it, suggest you de-risk.
Of course it seems you know certain folk on here in person - perhaps green with en** comes to mind. I’ve not seen many disciples on here to be fair, except 2xHoney.
We’ll leave it there.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
he has sunk a sizeable amount of only in this share and has got a lot to lose if the company is taken out for wallies
———
That’s not smart, not smart at all.
A take over at a premium should give virtually all holders a break even or modest profit so how could that result in a massive loss ? Just dross with a lot of posts trying to generate credibility.
T/O is still the biggest risk, as is CEO performance/agenda - the asset is not in question just the players. SD was very credible yesterday and imho the biggest tipping point for GGP is Q1 -2022, like Matt been here so long will hold to the end, don’t invest (in AIM) what you can’t afford to lose.
See Encore, Xcite, Orogen Gold and others to know that AIM and CEO’s can take defeat from the jaws of victory.
Blog, Penton, Colin and a host of others are on a different page to most on here.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
SD is a very smart chap and words used would have been carefully considered
——-
Totally agree, I take words like ‘centre of the earth’ not as flippant but as enthusiastic and a nod that they will have a depth cut off maybe constrained by technology and technique with a belief that there could still be deeper gold/copper but perhaps as yet unaccessible. Despite this we are still only looking at a ‘fraction of a fraction’ of the permitted or shared newsflow .
Up to to folk to interpret for themselves just don't have time for the fools.
GLA genuine investors - TFG
Thanks TT. There you go Majestic, the folk at Artemis have got one specifically for you “For anyone struggling to understand the Havieron starter PFS’.
“I’m all in” but waiting for the bottom - some folk eh !!
GLA genuine investors- TFG
Blog, try reading with your sharp mind then, only the latter part of the post was directed towards yourself.
If your looking after your investment you might want to take a long sabbatical away from this bb as it clearly doesn’t suit your needs…..unless you’re not a single PI acting on your own behalf, like myself. I tend to think you’ll be posting frequently from today though…..
GLA genuine holders - TFG