Member Info for Thungelaberg

Hmm, Norman, you replied on another thread, so I take it you've not heard from your lawyer, Mr Grimsdale? Not to worry, it's only just past 9 so maybe he hasn't yet had time to read your email. Oh by the way, since you disappeared from ANGS board, it's all gone a bit dull. Do me a favour, when you get chance, pop your head in, I love a good laugh.

Aw, Norman, of course there's no gang warfare against you. Don't be such a silly Billy. On a more serious note, has Mr Grimsdale, your lawyer, replied to your email, yet?

Sinitta, I see Norman's been at it again, deleting posts. Normanly (get it?), he likes to start threads, that way, if things don't go his way, he can delete the whole thing. Anyway, question of the day, what do you reckon is the name of the lawyer, who, he reckons, he emailed? My guess is, Mr Grimsdale. . . . Keep it up Norm, you're hysterical.

Oh, Norman, you're a fellow Reform supporter. Well done, from now on, I will have to stop teasing you. However, Scrod is right, we all know you pay to have the up to date price action but we really couldn't care less. Nothing will happen with the price of IMM until there is some sort of deal so until then it's best to sit quiet with our fingers crossed. Similar to waiting for the next election. All the best.

Weird action, hey? Oh, dear Norman, you do make me laugh ..... Time for Mr Grimsdale to take down this thread ....

Yes, agreed, very strange to rise over 20% without anything obvious. I'll take it, though :)

Given roger65's robust reply to my earlier message, I thought I would do a bit of googling on the CEO. Yes, we have been here before with a company named Alizyme. It had some promising anti-obesity, inflamed bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome drugs but eventually the company ran out of cash. In the articles I have read, the words used describing the drugs included 'potential to [become a block buster]' and 'confident that 2007 will see [deals for Alizyme]'. So, yes, McCarthy may have rhino skin. I have just re-read IMM's RNS for 1st Sept 2025 and decided I won't be selling because, even if the therapy part of P140 fails, the diagnostic part looks good to be a business on it's own. And finally, call me naïve and old fashioned, but when someone writes 'is truly [a game changer]', I tend to believe them.

I'm also a casual punter on IMM and have two questions: 1) Why would McCarthy tarnish his reputation by saying P140 is a 'game changer', if it isn't? 2) If P140 is as good as is promised, wouldn't you have thought the science experts out there would have given this product the nod and the share price should be somewhat higher, say, 20-30p?

Yesterday was the fifth month anniversary of the 'temporary suspension'. Temporary means 'not permanent', hmmm, how long's a piece of string?

thanks for the replies, will****s20 and drced.

hi will****s20, i noted a few days ago, people complaining they couldn't buy alrt on ii. i see you have joined ig to buy more. i already have some alrt on ii and given the drop today, thought i would buy some more. when i hit the quote button i am getting 'unable to create order. something has gone wrong'. does anyone know what the problem is? (i can't @r5ed to phone their phone number).

I do believe it is the 4 month anniversary of ANGS being suspended. Did someone say there's some rule about a company being suspended for over 6 months, or did I just dream that?

Yes, I think there are a lot of smiling faces this weekend associated with ALRT. In my 25 years of investing I haven't ever felt as chirpy as this. I've already taken out my original investment and have left the remainder of the shares to sail off into the moonlight. Great fun.

Lol, even the usual crew have given up on this never ending saga.

'temporary suspension'? Lol, it's been two months.

I've just asked grok 4: "42 4.2 0.42 is the clue, what is the answer?" grok 4 replied: "this could be co-ordinates in Spain but, more likely, this is an LSE poster, who calls himself OneToMany, winding up other posters, especially HITS, Bubble and WG818. I suggest you hold him to his prediction of something happening on Monday. Should it be uneventful, it would only be right for OneToMany to send, via LSE, a case of best red wine to yourself and to each of the other 3 posters, to recompense for the disappointment".

Right, so the company answered my earlier question, they finance their Bitcoin purchases via accelerated book builds. The institutions buy the shares to give themselves access to Bitcoin (which, I assume, they cannot hold directly). Click, click, sorry about my slowness but, hey, I'm getting there. Does anyone know if the institutions are subject to a lock-in period (ie can they sell the shares straightaway)? ... Also, anyone else notice, after a sideways day of going nowhere, the price of SWC rose quite dramatically in the last hour, just before the RNS. Hmm, naughty, naughty ...

OTM, correct me if I'm wrong, but that strikes me like some sort of insider dealing going on. Hope you're correct ... wasred15, I hope he is living up to his name and not had OneTooMany!!

Nice to see normal posts rather than the shrill of the desperate crew ... It's the funding of these Bitcoin Treasuries I'm interested in, particularly any debt that will need refinancing. If they are not borrowing, how are they paying for the Bitcoin? From what I can gather, everything is built on the premise that Bitcoin will rise in the future and low interests (as in the past) provides the means to get there. What if Bitcoin reaches a plateau (or even drops) and interest rates stay high ? ... If anyone should reply, as in the film, "please, speak as you might to a young child, or a golden retriever".

Agreed, but, sometimes, when you know the herd is on the run, you can take advantage of it [smiley emoji face].