Member Info for The.Italian

interesting to see if we get any footage of the demonstration from the concrete expo this week. i am assuming/hoping that we will.

there was a £51k trade @17.40p at 13.41 which won't have helped.

thanks very much bignose.all this and an email as well.im going to have to go and lie down! lol,seriously it's a good sign when company takes the initiative.not seeking to make too much of it as yet, but good to hear thanks.

morning bignose.thank for the additional comments. well jamie certainly was having a good day in the office,wasn't he!lol

incidentally never though i'd read the words"money tree"on here again in anything other than a highly sarcastic or facetious sense.fingers crossed.

is the PSD502 search for the chinese trial link you posted ?. the site comes up with the chinese version.is it possible to switch it to english?

well worth listening to webcast for those who haven't heard it yet. just adding to your points milktrayman, i thought barder's comments at about 13.20 were very interesting .when discussing US strategy, he states that although they have done licensing deals in the more traditional manner, for US they are looking at "other options:" as well, to deliver maximum value. not making too much of this ,but intrigued as to what that may mean.

had chance now to read again at leisure and feel quite encouraged. it is very encouraging to have that level of detail and even if we my have to adjust our timescales a little, there is a very positive tone to the response. i am looking forward to next news in due course.gla

i have no idea what impression other investors get from the sales.mypoint is very simple.he has not sold "most of his stock". that is a simple fact.obviously i understand the impression you are trying to create and if you had said investors may form a poor impression from his sales i would have no issue. that would simply be a matter of opinion.however to state he has sold most of his stock is simply not true.any investors not familiar with the history might think it was accurate. i merely wish investors to be aware of what has actually happened.for the record with reference to "older" investors,whilst i have personally only been holding vrs for a few months in my second foray into it,i have been invested in it on previous occasions,going from about 30p right up to the top of about 180p when i sold out.it was and possibly still is,my best investment ever.i am not suggesting this will happen again,merely pointing out that i do have more than a passing knowledge of the history.last word from me on this issue,as no mileage in continuing.

i am perfectly aware of rickett's history of occasional sales (e.g. twice in last 3 years) my issue is with the phrase"most of his stock". it is simply not accurate and gives a misleading impression,imo. dyor

most encouraging for me is the comprehensive nature of the reply.certainly not equivocating in any way.yes does look as though china may breast the tape ahead of us (am i allows to use that expression anymore?).will look more tonight.

thanks very much bignose.pleased to see such a comprehensive reply.will be looking at it in a bit more detail tonight.excellent job in getting this.!

after selling shares in jan 2021 relating to his divorce settlement, he retains 7.16% shareholding,as well as significant options.not exactly selling"most of his stock" imo.

here you go then!they don't make em like that any more lol.excellent that you have had a response.always pleasing to get a prompt reply(subject to content of course.http://www.turnipnet.com/whirligig/tv/children/bumblies/bumblies.htm

thanks for that bignose.yes all very confusing.obviously interested to hear any response you get.do you remenber the Bumblies from planet Bumble (i think) with michael bentine).now there's a thought! (may be a bit before your time)

morning all i spent some time yesterday reading through the various recent announcements to see if they helped in answering dougie's question as to whether we are near a possible thumbs up for p3. im left feeling confused. the dec 2021 update refers to the EOP2 being anticipated in Q1 2022.this statement is not repeated in the full year results or the AR. the dec update states the company has requested a RLD Type C meeting. the AR (page 18) reads as follows "the CRO has submitted in Q4 2021 and the results of the P11 validation study with a request for a type c meeting submitted inQ1 2022 together with the protocol for the P111 clinical study" i am assuming the word "and" has been inserted in error as it make no sense otherwise. so looks to me like this is a second non RLD type c meeting , to which we are presumably awaiting a response.so could be some time yet (75 days aim to deal with type c requests,although they can do them by phone or in writing apparently).does this make sense or have i missed something?

https://www.concreteexpo.co.uk/index.php?option=com_quix&view=page&preview=true&id=3 version and CyBe collaborating for live 3d printing at concrete expo.apologies if already posted but i don't recall it.

morning bignose.just commenting first on the matter of least importance, i.e. the AR "mystery". it's exactly as you say.they put it up on the announcement section,which is not their normal practice,so have just removed it to its normal position.hardly impressive,which is, im afraid, par for the course.will be looking at the other points later

its the annual report.it was there in glorious technicolour.i read it quickly and couldn't see anything different from the results news,except(and i am not at all certain)it seemed to give details of the supply chain problems in a little more detail than i thought we had already.could be completely wrong.anyway it was up and now its gone.

one could view the willingnessto reveal the problems as positive, indicating they think now they can deal with them. then again....?

no bignose it has gone.very odd.perhaps they have spotted a mistake.lets see what tomorrow brings.

don't know the answer dosanddonts,although would be interested. what i do know from experience in regent pacific(now ERP) is how important a reliable and adequate supply chain is.regent,despite being licensed though recordati,have been bedevilled with supply chain problems,such that its attempts to actually market its otc product in europe basically ground to a halt.i am very pleased to see indications that fum are concentrating on ensuring an adequate and effective supply chain.i take your point re costs of course.