Member Info for The.Italian

Iklekov,have you tried emailing srsacquiom for their take on exactly what they are waiting for before making payment? i emailed them back in april i think and had a pleasant and moderately helpful reply.i t might produce something you could copy to IB to prompt them into pushing matters. their email is "support@srsacquiom.com"

https://www.investorschronicle.co.uk/ideas/2022/09/12/a-building-materials-recovery-buy/ from yesterday

well at least it voids the embarrassment of getting the gift tags mixed up on the christmas presents!

https://eu.eventscloud.com/file_uploads/b3fe47d3f9f3a5089bbeb832cfd7eda8_GlobalAidandDevelopmentDirectory2022UKGov.pdf vrs included under shelters. courtesy of smokeyjohnson on ADVFN. not suggesting it is of any potential commercial significance,but interesting that they have been included.must have met some sort of criterial i imagine, but not certain.

agree that the absence of any revenue in the form of upfront payments is very disappointing.either there have been none up to 30th june or they were too small to impact the accounts.if payments were received after 30th surely a reference could have been made in post account info.in fairness i think barder does refer rather obliquely in the proactive interview to payments starting come in now (or something like that) so perhaps concerns here are a bit premature,but it was an aspect of particular concern to me (and i suspect others), where i was hoping for grater clarity.

good point about the manufactures approval i had forgotten about that.last 3 months of this year could be quite interesting.

yes bignose,it certainly seems as though they use these 10k trades on occasion to move the price around.question is to what end.hoping for news of p3 in october. possibly that could/should move the s/p.

certainly has!

looks like excellent results.also the new joint venture is extremely interesting in terms of future development.it's going to be a medium term project from the looks of things,but potentially a very significant development.

happy with that Dg,thanks.

odd.the link doesn't seem to work,but if you google "dean amery linked in " you get a reference to it.not sure how valid it is,so just posting out of interest.

seems its on linked inhttps://uk.linkedin.com/in/dean-amery-24a98332.not sure if it's his post or if he is simply reposting it.

https://www.designlondon.co.uk/island-steps-steuart-padwick 21st to 24th sept.courtesy of fireball on advfn.

chill pill,it was the concrete developments which drew me back in recently,having been out completely since the high point.it will doubtless take some time for certification etc,but potential is,imo,massive.

morning bignose.didnt know they had a special button for manipulation,but now it makes sense! lol

as to how we get marked up almost 7.5% on no trades!

afternoon albert.i do keep checking to see if any news re napster token,but nothing since beginning of july.just have to be patient and keep an eye out for news.hope they don't run it right up to the last minute though.fingers crossed as always.

you are welcome matt.it's a tad concerning to hear they have not yet received any payment.if it were me i would immediately ask for full copies of all communications iWeb have received from napster and srs acquiom on the matter, so that you can see exactly what they have asked for.also copies of iWeb's responses.i expect they will try and fob you off with rubbish about confidentiality etc and im by no means certain you are actually entitled to see them,but i cannot immediately see why not.you may get extracts if not the full detail(which is what i got from HL).i sense the platforms are reluctant to provide full details as they are unsure how to proceed (particularly with the crypto aspect).i can understand the uncertainty over the crypto element,but surely the provision of whatever the collection agents(acquiom) need must be relatively straightforward.good luck.

well darth my thoughts as to why they might want to wait for fda approval before marketing,mainly centred around the idea that this might make uniformity of marketing and promotional material easier to achieve across the board. they have said they wish to build a global brand( or words to that effect) and with the fda trial in th bag i would suspect it might be more straightforward to standardise promotion. this is a rather vague and largely amorphous thought and probably wrong, but it has remained with me as a result of the discussions about whether they can say "clinically proven". i really don't want to go over all the arguments again on here,as they have been done to death over on advfn and so far as im concerned there is no mileage remaining in the discussion. that said, if there is substance in the argument that they cannot reliably use "clinically proven" just on the basis of the ce mark, then hopefully any doubts about this would be removed by a successful fda trial (even though technically not a P111 as such). im just thinking aloud really and certainly don't hold any categorical views one way or the other. the other factors you mention would certainly seem to militate towards a launch asap, but it may just be that as the fda trial seems to be progressing slightly faster than they might have expected (i was pleased to see the headline results announced a little earlier that expected )they might just feel it is better now to wait for the full trial results.hoping matters may be clarified a little next week.

thank you darth.it does indeed refer to product launch during 2022 and i stand corrected.not sure if that remains the intention,bearing in mind Jet's reference to barders statement about april 2023, but as always time will tell (unless we get an update on monday).anyway i appreciate the response.

Matt there are two further payments due after the initial payment and independent of the crypto.they are referred to apparently as the escrow and shareholder fund payments and are due to be paid,so i understand,after the 12 month anniversary of the t/o agreement(30th march2022).the actual amounts will be subject to the relevant contingency deductions from the reserved funds. there may be a fourth payment if the napster token cryptos are not launched by the 12month anniversary.if the crypto fund is launched within that time scale no cash payment will be made in lieu.this is my understanding of the position,although i have not been provided with a full analysis by my own provider,HL. i have however received the full initial payment several months ago.