Member Info for The.Italian

agreed .just seen the amendment.still apparently on track for production at beginning of next year,so same commercial impact(i assume),but careless wording.

doesn't seem to be a reach RNS,so presumably regarded as price sensitive.happy to be corrected if wrong.

in fairness,of course,it may just be that the manufacturing news is simply not regarded as sufficiently price sensitive to warrant an announcement, but tbh i would find it hard to follow the logic of such a conclusion.

agreed dougie.although I've carried on with bignose's joke about the not to be opened envelope, i do wonder if there is in fact a determined intention to sit on news until the rights issue is over. we know the new manufacturer has been approved and bearing in mind the difficulties which the lack of a reliable manufacturer has caused and which have been well documented in the various updates, you would think the successful approval of a new one would be something to be broadcast to investors without delay. i assume it will have to be referenced in the prospectus and perhaps there will be other news as well.let us hope so.

dow down 1.55%,nasdaq down 3.36%.not what we were hoping for.

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/juvage-launch-saas-based-aging-clocks-tickets-456840461117. i'm sure it's nothing to get excited about (or probably even interested), but i have come across this. although it refers to it as a "launch", i'm not sure that at this stage it is anything other than a podcast for promotional publicity purposes. really not sure and it may indicate some sort of attempt at potential commercialisation.i have signed up for the webinar, but strongly doubt that my aged macbook operating system,which is now causing me considerable IT difficulties,will actually allow me to participate.obviously if i do get more information i will post it.no mention of anything on erps' news site, but perhaps it,s in there with the other stuff in the "not to be opened until after the rights issue" folder!

morning HM.have a look at Glenstars post on 6th october. he sets out the figures which i think are correct.the next two payments are going to be much smaller than the first one and we don't know (and won't know until after the event) how much is going to be deducted to meet the contingencies against which the funds have been reserved,so could be very small in actuality. the final payment (which will only be made apparently if they don't launch the crypto by end of march) should be a bit higher than the one we have had.just a caveat,in that i have not been provided with a full transcript of the actual deal terms, just second hand through brokers,so although I've been told there will be no final payment if they lunch the crypto,I've not seen the precise wording of the takeover documents giving chapter and verse. that may be something we need to look into further if it becomes an issue.

odd that your holding details have been removed completely. if it were me i ould give them a ring to clarify.

exactly. the minuscule reduction imply serves to put it back on the radar for a brief period.bit like getting one's post on the top of the thread.

stuck the 10k in again just before close to keep us almost flat!

know!

well that's the point really.it may do,but i genuinely don't now what it shows and that is what is irritating me. anyway just a bad tempered observation on my part and i appreciate there will be other views.

https://twitter.com/versarien/status/1584821979470647298?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet does anyone else find these enigmatic tweets extremely irritating now?

https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/968943 anyone else find this a bit weird?

afternoon professor.i hope you are well also.ah the old bottom drawer question.not the first time it's been posed,im sure.whilst i'm personally going to hold until FDA outcome etc(at least that is my current intention,but my age is starting to militate a tad against an indefinite timescale), i must leave it to you to reach your own decision,but good luck with whatever you decide.

ok thanks for that bignose. translation function is not something i'm familiar with, but will now be able to keep an eye on it, thanks

any chance you could kindly elucidate as to what it's saying.thanks

morning bignose.those aren't actually the questions....but they should be!

the trial site has been updated to show QCR on ERP's response submitted(i.e. sent back to ERP)on 20th october.they have two questions now,so apparently edging closer.

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2022/oct/21/the-death-of-the-american-shopping-mall-in-pictures second attempt.

just as an observation on the general shopping climate, i append this from the guardian https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2022/oct/21/the-death-of-the-american-shopping-mall-in-pictures.whilst is comes across as a tad hyperbolic in its presentation,it presumably has at least a kernel of truth behind it.