RE: UK sales?9 Jul 2020 09:29
Hi BigAl, it would have been a test organised by Genedrive, most likely in combination with an appropriate research organisation like one of the tropical disease centres. They would have run a study comparing Genedrive against another test, likely the Primer Design test. The data shows that Genedrive identified all the positive samples correctly, sensitivity, and also gave positive results for 1 or 2 samples that the other test had determined as negative, hence specificity was not 100%. This could be because the combative test was not as sensitive as Genedrive - I say that because the Genedrive test picks up 2 targets and the Novacyt test for example only picks up 1 so the Genedrive test is less likely to call false positives.