Member Info for Surfit

It's a good job the the MMs keep changing the spread % otherwise the RKH chart would be even duller.
Still the BoD will probably be redecorating their houses this spring, no need to look around for a helping loan to pay for their needs.
Rgds Sft

Hey Mark, have you tried calling them? If you do not have an email address to request?
I am with ii and used their message service (used Glens wording) and then after 2 days followed up with a phone call to their standard operator, they checked, then contacted the person dealing with it.
The request was completed that evening and they emailed me the letter.
Rgds Sft

Cut and paste from below:
For those who have not listed previously, Please add your user name, shares committed and a YES confirming ALL of Glen's Criteria has been met and sent.
Note: Again just go onto Glen's page for full detail if required.

Current Grand Total 19, 518,504
New Name, Shares, YES

Rgds Sft

Correction sorry space hoppa

Note added Space hoppa's additional 85k
Not added additional share(friends) until cert sent
Thank you Spacehoppa. Inching forward.
Many thanks to those already committed here and ADFN. You do not have to vote on all aspects of the additional resolutions but by supporting you make our concerns public and ensure the resolutions are put into the next AGM.

Cut and paste from below:
ethos who have not listed previously, Please add your user name, shares committed and a YES confirming ALL of Glen's Criteria has been met and sent.
Note: Again just go onto Glen's page for full detail if required.

Current Grand Total 19, 518,504
New Name, Shares, YES

Rgds Sft

Note added Space hoppa's additional 56k
Not added additional share(friends) until cert sent
Thank you Spacehoppa. Inching forward.
Many thanks to those already committed here and ADFN. You do not have to vote on all aspects of the additional resolutions but by supporting you make our concerns public and ensure the resolutions are put into the next AGM.

Cut and paste from below:
ethos who have not listed previously, Please add your user name, shares committed and a YES confirming ALL of Glen's Criteria has been met and sent.
Note: Again just go onto Glen's page for full detail if required.

Current Grand Total 19, 489,504
New Name, Shares, YES

Rgds Sft

Hello all just added up all below
I have calculated current Grand total as 19, 433, 504
So we still need a few more.

Note: Cross checked from The-Bear post and confirmed he added 259k someone added 113k after. Easy done.
I think we must assume that all who have added there user name to the list have sent off.
So any unlisted share holders that want to reduce the BoD salary to not twice that of the Britsh prime ministers salary: Please add your user name, shares committed and a YES confirming all of Glen's Criteria has been met and sent.
Note: Again just go onto Glen's page for full detail if required.

Cut and paste from below:

Current Grand Total 19, 433, 504
New Name, Shares, Yes
Continue.....

Rgds Sft

Thank you for the clarification Taxing, appreciated.
Rgds Sft

Not seen that artical Mike33 thank you for posting.
Yes a nice read (raining here too).
I know some (not on this bb) have been very dismissive on the Argentinians influence on project development but its good to see Linda Cook comment, as they obviously realise this is a real influence on going forward. I, along with others (rational posters), have always felt there would have to be real government green lighting on the project due to the potential international fall out for HM Gov, the Falklands Island and the operating / service/ contracting companies involved in the project.
Some people just THINK they know.
The present government (and of course Boris) I belive, would be supporting, maybe not up to UKEF funding due to the Green requirements, but if HE can get it to Co2 neutral (more work for FEED, not sure on the projects current Co2 status, potentially?) that I think would also be a factor to consider in.
Anyway thank you for the post. Feeling positive again.
Rgds Sft

And btw Shell are selling Tullos Aberdeen
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.energyvoice.com/oilandgas/north-sea/310420/shell-looking-options-new-aberdeen-headquarters/amp/

Fit with YOUR clever idea's and "smart" comments.
Rgds Sft

Mine was rhetorical. Yours was obtuse.
SA
Rgds Sft

Contracts being selling oil to Shell, correct?
Rgds Sft

Totally pointless artical went on to say Covid/ oil price issues then ended with...."The company hinted recently that it was well placed to expand but some market watchers said that Harbour was itself likely to attract bid interest, with some claiming suitors were already running the numbers"
Do not even know why it was printed?
The new Management have to bed themselves in, double check the assets bought (espec Solan for additional drilling) deal with Zama/Mexico, assess FEED on Sealion (falklands), look at how best to deploy tax credits, look at asset production and
PoO for strategy time line on paying off debt, look at the dividend, Co2 adjustment for new assets....seems they have their hands full for at least a couple of years.
So (IMO) unless there is another steal out there...its journo Chinese wispers and he is at the end of the chain.
(IMO) Rgds Sft

I think your right barnyards, I have trouble sleeping off shift if I make one error.
Operations very different to SOME (not all) staff types: but I still prefer the dirty end to the talking end of the stick.
Sam cuddles up to Stu and says "night night, they just do not understand, let's ignore them. Keith will vote us more money tomorrow. Great job this, you know we can do what ever we want"
Raise the resolutions, make it public, put the concerns out there for all to see.
Just imagine having to see Glen's resolution being included in the next AGM for ALL to decide on.
All possible, just need more some PI to make it possible.
In Harbour Energy we must trust.
Great project, great potential, submit as Glen has proposed. If you do, you do not have to vote Sam out just sharpen his focus by reducing the free ride.
GLA
Rgds Sft

Oh and one other thing: If £156,000 is good enough for Boris being PM of the whole country.
100k is more than enough for what Sam and Stu do!
I would have given them less, but Glen's very very being generous, for what those pair get up to.
Rgds Sft

Still if you do make the effort and support the raising of Glen resolutions, you do not have to vote for it/them.
What it does do is make very public some /many shares holders dissatisfaction. Once it is put out there they can not ignore the dissenters.
They will if you do nothing.
I differ on the 100k, personnel have taken cuts in the OnG business as a result of the recession.
Sam and Stu can claim their cash rewards only when they have got it across the line.
Using your shares to support Glen's is proposals will at least embarrass the pair....well maybe.
Rgds Sft

Hey Godders
Godders are you serious when you said you are not going to contribute your shares to Glen's proposed resolutions?
By supporting this even if you do not vote it makes us private investors significant concern very public.
Glen really has done the leg work on this and the least a dissatisfied private investor like your self would be supporting this?
The process is very simple and requires the statement from your broker and then emailing as per, with the copied/pasted wording. Why would that be too much?
If you supported the board or disagree with what is being proposed fair enough, but to not support what I think you agree on I find VERY strange indeed.
Your thoughts and reasoning would be appreciated.
Rgds Sft

Are you trying to tell you did not before Godders?
Your 1116 posts would suggest otherwise.
Godders are you serious when you said you are not going to contribute your shares to Glen's proposed resolutions?
By supporting this even if you do not vote it makes us private investors significant concern very public.
Glen really has done the leg work on this and the least a dissatisfied private investor like your self would be supporting this?
The process is very simple and requires the statement from your broker and then emailing as per, with the copied/pasted wording. Why would that be too much?
If you supported the board or disagree with what is being proposed fair enough, but to not support what I think you agree on I find VERY strange indeed.
Your thoughts and reasoning would be appreciated.
Rgds Sft

They had to sell Pre2 to keep us a float, the plan to generate income was a good one but: Fail again.
Financial miss management by management is a reoccurring theme.
As I have said before am a big fan of Andrew Austin who invest heavily into his companies and relies on share growth and not a very large salary to make his and share holder a good return.
Pity he is busy again with his new company.
Rgds Sft

Received my document from ii and resent all required documents and wording as Glen has stipulated.
Received message from Keith, that seems to be a standard reply. There was no point in replying or explaining why. The only way a change can be implemented is in the way we are doing it. The BOD have no intention of affecting change.
I did also write to the Telegraph, Times and Sunday Times.

Welldone Glen. Let's see.
GLA
Rgds Sft

For info: I copied as Glen put down, waited a couple of days and the followed up with a phone call to back it up.
interactive were already on it though. There (ii's) "corporate actions department".
Norepinephrine fro. RKH not that I am expecting anything.
If we do not make the numbers I guess they just ignore. Quite good keeping a tally but I am really hoping that other private investors are reading this, as before there must be a lot out there.....somewhere?????
Rgds Sft