Member Info for Surfit

Hey Pre2rcd,
Interesting look at FIL Investment Advisors who have 7.07mil shares quite a few directors in this "company" one being Andrew MCCAFFERY with 23 Appointments!
Where do you find Mizrahi Tefahot, what is their and when was it taken?
I did in the past locate a site where is actually detailed the % position that Interactive Investor help (as nominated), can't find it again!
Rgds Sft

Rgds Sft

I am afraid I can't see your logic HG, the amount of trades do not reflect your aspersions. Especially if your colleague Nigoil is still buying?
As before many here are fully aware of the potential, just VERY VERY remain cautious.
I have no wish for people NOT to invest, but both you and Nig's positivity is never supported with anything other that what we do not all know already, but the numbers remain hoped for but unsubstantiated.
My questions remain based on hazard assessment and then a continued look for mitigations. Something you both continue to either just not understand or which I belive more likely just ignore and have to undermine due to having ropped in "reportedly" veteran investors.
ALL of us on here hope to have regret that we did not buy more if a FID leads to sanction.
True we do need some positivity, but your attempts to undermine debate continues to reveal your real ramper status and not those of concerned investors.
What are your thoughts on my questions with regards HBR financial consideration for the project HG?
Come on join in rather than just undermine.
Rgds Sft

With that being the case, it works, potentially as a big positive.
Where do you think we stand with regards HBR putting in the full project costs. They have been quoted as wanting to give a dividend and keeping in line with their fiscal prudence, debt reduction plans, additional tie-in drilling campaigns (potentially) and remaining cash?
I still feel FEED review to FID may still sit +1yr away...which if some predictions regarding PoO and the lack of additional worldwide development may be a good thing. Just more concern, uncertainty and general "disapointment" for longer. Like a death by a thousand cuts BUT the hugh potential remains there, thus keeping us in.
Rgds Sft

I think what we should remember and consider is: who is Harbour Energy main partner/ owner is EIG Global Energy Partners at 37% they are Washington DC based but ... "A niche investor, EIG has partnered with over 360 energy companies in 36 countries....."
https://eigpartners.com/about-us/
We could then suppose that the Argentinians know this and it would be interesting to understand how much exposure does EIG have in that country, if its too much then the probability of SL gaining sanction
and development will be subject to financial stress testing and risk assessment not only against the actual project BUT also against EIG additional exposure.
We can absolutely sure that Linda Cook has a history of communication and alignment with EIG and therefore SL sanction has 3 potential factors: Project viability (stand alone), HM Gov (diplomatic/trade/regional effects) and EIG (investment portfolio/ contractors in directly effected/sanction).
I remain unclear to Navitas's role. But as others have mentioned they are due an potential answer soon.
Will their SP reflect that potential earlier than the news is broken, or will they also be subjected to the can getting kicked?
Just thoughts for consideration.
Rgds Sft

Thanks for that Rookie, any further detailed analysis on the Twin towers, Area 59, who shot Kennedy, and where the heck is Elvis would also be just as appreciated.
Rgds Sft

Pearls/Delacey,
Generally found LSE to be quite good at founding out the multi accounts, and removing the crazies. Please report each other and who ever is left will be....
Rgds Sft

Good to see you back to your old self and back to really what you were doing before (you got sucked into a share jump over the PMO debauchery).
I need to sit tight for a while to get back in profit, not much average 23.5 old money.
But oil is going to continue to swing enough for 5, 8 or 10% profits (imo).
Just please do not go down the DBNO way of slatting it when you want out, it does not effect anything accept looks silly.
Rgds sft

Oil is looking too good SK. IMO HBR will go for SL...despite that Argi issue...its safe, not that deep, good quality and expandable.
Not quite sure if your in or out these days though?
Rgds Sft

Hey LTT, it's that big Elephant, roller skating in a mini skirt with no knickers on in the room, comment I would stick with as the ONLY concern.
Buying RKH out: just can't see it happening, but I agree, it seems crazy not too.... IF ......the buyer intends to develop...oh that skating Elephant is back.
Rgds Sft

Hey Fuddstone, I belive the word your looking for is undescribedable.

Rgds Sft

I think your right, other wise we would have seen a bit of a sp lift (leak of positive information).
Rgds Sft

All one can do Mogger is try: best endeavours.
Rgds Sft

Sorry LacticR, thought you were joking.
Never heard of that, phone him/her up and tell them to stop being ridiculous and get the supervisor on.
Who is your broker, just out of interest?
Rgds Sft

Hahahahaha it's not April 1st you know LacticR
Rgds Sft

I see RKH have just issued standard Resolutions to vote on:
2 to 6 Re-elect firectors
8. AUTHORISE ISSUE OF EQUITY
9. AUTHORISE ISSUE OF EQUITY WITHOUT PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHTS
10. AUTHORISE MARKET PURCHASE OF ORDINARY SHARES

Rgds Sft

They are not going to make it easy to lose a significant % of their salary and share grabs by handing over any information they do not need too.
Remember it's "their" company, the cash raised and where it came from is incidental.
They have no intention of stopping, where would the get another income as good as RKH. NOT in the OnG industry that's for sure.
Rgds Sft

Thanks for your interest covgaz and the 10mins it took to write that. Any professional advice most welcome.

I too recieved my email from Jan, signed off by Keith
To the MANY personnel that did submit, if every one did so that put their number down on the list: Yes it appears we were short, but I belive Overts has raised the correct point: how do we know.
It is entirely in their interests to say and indicate that it was "well short" in an attempt to discourage any further actions.
They are recognising the submission, but if they were unscrupulous only a few would have to go astray. Damn them "illegal postal" votes.

Bit like not revealing the voting for and against percentages in last years AGM.

Hi Glen, to move forward. My take is if we do not have either the valiant 100 or the required number of shares than we can not proceed to actual co-file?
Or do we just now resubmit, now we have the dates?
Again thank you for leading the charge.
Rgds Sft

Hey Rockylee, After all of the experiences of PMO, I think seeing the SP acting so at PoO rising, you could feel a bit jumpy.
I took some (only 5k) profit and moved it into TLW, as I thought they will be more succeptable to PoO fluctuations.
I felt that HPR could be a slower burn,and not knowing when the overhang (the consolidation was a suprise, but now seems logical and should have considered it, but just not so soon) will be cleared.
Would management have invested so, knowing bad news was around the corner.
IMO The $58 hedge does give very surety for a year, in a year that alot of new assets, tax carry, Mexico, Fklands, Indo) needed assessing and personnel settling in and all still in a world /covid / uncertain. Steady first year of business required.
A year ago BP were at £5.00-5.30
Still just my opinions, I do not drive a voltswaggon and bet on black (RKH). So that shows my skill level.
Very best Sft

Hey Rockylee, where do you see the weakness or bad news arising from?
Debt covered, good producing assets, a good ( may be too much) of production covered.
So all I can see is still the unsettling of clearing the overhang on share: ii maybe not wanting jump in until its cleared? and also the share consolidation. My assumption is that ii would want both closed out, markets (unlike traders) do not like uncertainties (so I keep reading). Traders are not making much recently either I.e. not much of fluctuations .
I also do not see any shorts, which was a touch different with PMO of course.
It was not that long ago (Jan) that GS were only saying PoO in 21 at $65
https://www.spglobal.com/platts/en/market-insights/latest-news/oil/011121-goldman-sees-brent-hitting-65b-by-mid-2021-on-sharp-demand-rebound
So that could indicate about tie-ing in some weighty contracts at $58.
Just my considerations, of course.
Rgds Sft

No surprises there:
"For safety reasons, a bare minimum of Directors will be in attendance at the AGM to form a quorum and to conduct the business of the meeting. There will be no presentations on the Company's business and no refreshments will be available. Instead, the Board will arrange for a presentation to be made available on the Company's website at www.rockhopperexploration.co.uk on the morning of the AGM"
Due to furthering the the directors cost reduction drive the presentation was put together by the children and therefore Mr Bumpy and Mr Tickle feature quite heavily. On completion of the presentation, maps, pirate hats and parrots will be made available and a treasure hunt will then be held in two parts
A) Try to find the spent 200 milion
B) Try to find where we will bury the remaining 10 million
Ps Next year we will have a bigger map, as we do expect to win something from our little raid into Italy.
Good luck with that.
All the best Sam, Stu and Keith
Note: the characters are real but some of the detail may have been changed for your entertainment again.
Rgds Sft