RE: Holidays6 Sep 2023 15:46
Boyasaka, what is the thing with the extra shares. It's been touched on by others here since the 3rd RI. We've had lots of discussion about the TERP (around 800p from memory) and then there was at least one person arguing that the increase in the number of shares might be important with respect to the fact that the SP has nto come anywhere near the TERP.
Before the 3rd RI, TUI shares were in demand and buying had pushed the price quite high, there was a drift down into the RI date from which the TERP was calculated and that gave us the money to pay back the German governments bailout and for those who had enough cash on hand could have resulted in no financial loss had the SP maintained the TERP. Which it clearly didn't. So, if the shares were in demand prior to the RI with a lot more debt, why are they not in demand now when there's a reasonable argument that travel firms are doing well post-covid? Is there a link to the increased number of shares? Obviously I get your point about MCap as, as long as the SP is below the TERP, then the MCap has fallen after the RI and the pay down of debt. It just isn't making any sense to me. I'm personally treating it (as stated throughout the mechanics of the process) as an opportunity and assuming the market is wrong in marking the SP down to this level (459 as I type). Has anyone come up with a reason for the discrepancy? Am I being naive (that's very possible) in my belief that the company is now undervalued and will recover (I think to 760 or above)?